All About Books discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
General Archive
>
What have you just read? Opinions, recommendations & reviews



There were for me 2 stand out vignettes Thailand and Super frog saves Tokyo :) However I definitely prefer Murakami in the long version.

There were for me 2 stand out vignettes Thailand and Super frog saves Tokyo :) However I definitely pre..."
Murakami is perfect! I also prefer him in the long version, his prose is so calming. He writes the kind of book perfect to read by the window on a winter day :D

Actually did my essay on Voices in the Park so been reading that which is amazing! Think Anthony Browne's illustrations are fab - so much in them you don't notice first time reading.

My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

What a wonderful book! Which did you read of his so far?


I love that book! Especially the pictures :)

I love Voices in the Park, in fact pretty much all of Anthony Browne's books are great!

We agree again :)


My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

I've only read one from him as well--it was fabulous! The Boy in the Striped Pajamas

Completely agree with your assessment. I gave it 3.5 stars.


Now on to Three Cups of Tea: One Man's Mission to Promote Peace ... One School at a Time.

The book deals with the story of a Jewish family, the Carnovskys: from the beginning of the 20th century to WWII; from Poland to the United States.
My bilingual review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


Had to look twice, Sandy...very nice "new" Avatar. Looking through reviews, I did notice that several people commented on the unusual flow of the book, which didn't bother me. I trust an author to lead me through the story to a satisfying conclusion. This time, it worked.

You should probably be aware of this one as well: Three Cups of Deceit: How Greg Mortenson, Humanitarian Hero, Lost His Way.

Lol! I was kinda hoping you hadn't read it. It was very good.


https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...

Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

I want to read more of his books now - Gorilla and Zoo both look good.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Chuck, I know. Ive owned it forever and finally put it on a challenge list for this year to get it done and over with. It's pretty interesting but I know it should all be taken with a grain of salt. Which is too bad. Sounds like I should also read Deceit.
I also have his Stones Into Schools: Promoting Peace With Books, Not Bombs, in Afghanistan and Pakistan.....derrrr.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show..."
Thanks for this, Gill. It sounds like something I'd enjoy reading. Just placed a hold at my library.

I've known about it for a while--Krakauer is one of my very favorites-but I actually read it last night. It's only like 70 pages. Mortenson's books are fiction essentially. He duped a lot of people to the tune of millions.

My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I wanted to like it more than I did. The second half is much better than the first.

Finished A Little Life and absolutely loved it.
Here's my review:https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Here's my review:https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


I enjoyed it but found it a bit passive. I only had to listen, not think or consider. It took me awhile to figure out why, although I enjoyed every word, I wasn't that involved and didn't anticipate my next car ride more.
Here's my review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Last week, I finished reading Peace Like a River. I was blown away it. I really enjoyed the story and the characters.
Although I can see what some 1-star reviewers said, these things didn't impact the story for me at all and I found the points insignificant. I loved this book.
Here's my review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I can't remember whether I posted this or not, so excuse me if it's a repeat.
I (finally) finished reading The Diaries of Sofia Tolstoy. She's a fascinating woman! But she only writes in her diary when she's bemoaning something. The book is filled with paranoia, tears, wailings, fears, insecurities, etc. I had to take it slow and read only a small section at a time. Because of this book, I'm interested in reading a "real" biography of Sofia, written by someone other than herself and with some historical & life context (outside of the moaning).
Here's my review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

In the last year I've been reading Dickens novels in order. Of the first nine, I have given six 5stars and three 4stars. But Hard Times is awful - thin in plot and thin in characters. This deserves a2star - it should have been a short Dickens Christmas story at best.. Luckily, I've now started the great Bleak House - what a relief. Can't do better than copy what the great socialist novelist J B Priestly wrote:
Why Hard Times is a bad novel
J. B. Priestley [GPL]
Hard Times . . . . has had its special admirers, particularly among those who see Dickens as a propagandist for their own political-economic ideology. We are told that one Cambridge pundit [F. R. Leavis?], a few years ago, declared that the only Dickens novel worth reading was Hard Times — surely one of the most foolish statements of this age. It would be far more sensible to reverse this judgment, to say that of all the novels of Dickens's maturity Hard Times is the least worth reading. It is muddled in its direct political-social criticism. As a novel it falls far below the standard set by Dickens himself from Dombey and Son onwards. Here for once it is almost as if we are seeing Dickens through the eyes of his hostile critics, for in Hard Times there really are reckless and theatrical over-statements, there really are characters that are nothing but caricatures, there really is melodramatic muddled emotion- alism. On the other hand, only in a few odd places is there any evidence of Dickens's unique grotesque-poetic genius, so obvious in Bleak House. We may join him in condemning an industrialized commercial society, its values, its economics, its education, its withering relationships, but this does not mean we have to pretend an unsatisfactory novel is a masterpiece, just because it favours our side. . . .
The truth is, Dickens did not know enough about industrial England. He had given a public reading in Birmingham, which provided him with some horrifying glimpses of the grim Midlands. Because there was a big strike in Preston, he paid it a visit, but he found no drama there. He came away deeply sympathizing with the men but feeling doubtful about trade union organizers. He was not on any ground familiar to him. So his Coketown is merely a horrible appearance, and in order to offer us a sharp contrast to Gradgrind and Bounderby, their outlook and style of life, he sketches a travelling circus to represent arts, skills, warm personal relationships. But he could have found all these, together with many odd attractive characters, in Coketown, if he had really known it and not simply looked at it from a railway train. As it is, Coketown belongs to propaganda and not to creative imagination. [167-68]
References
Priestley, J. B. Victoria's Heyday. New York: Harper & Rowe, 1972.
Victorian Web Overview Charles Dickens Hard Times
Last modified 4 January 2006

I think it was Diana who suggested this: Sophia Tolstoy: A Biography. She said it was excellent. I would like to read it too.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Red Shoes for Rachel: Three Novellas (other topics)Kindred (other topics)
Kindred (other topics)
Kindred (other topics)
The Promise Girls (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Marie Bostwick (other topics)
Deon Meyer (other topics)
More...
I enjoyed it but wouldn't say it was a great read! ;) The atmosphere and sense of male-dominated, strict Calvinist culture was very well created and I found the story read easily. However I would agree with Evelyn's comment that the miniaturist as a character is not central and is never fully explained.