The Sword and Laser discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
POLL: What should we read in July?


It was the only one I knew nothing about before the vote, but it does look really good. It's added to my list, and would have been picked, but others had the priority of having been known about and interested in for longer. :)
I like seeing the results. What's odd is that, reading this thread it seemed like the Doctor Who book was a lot more popular. Personally, I'm glad it's doing less well because it seems to be the most expensive, but otherwise, I do like the sound of that too. Redshirts wasn't my pick only because I'm almost certainly going to get it soon anyway. :D

I agree with this.

That book sneaks up on you and is so good, one of the only books to make me sob. I still can't bring myself o read the sequel (because I don't want it to be over).
Tom, feel free to dictate this title in the future since nothing can seem to beat Scalzi.



Doesn't seem that bad to me. I had read Old Man's War years before, and I have purchased, but have yet to read, Redshirts; so, this is the first Scalzi book I've read in two years. Not counting essays, short stories and the like.

1.) It's a classic
2.) Chance to compare the movie to the original
3.) A meaty book, full of ideas (as all of Dick's are)
4.) Just did a Scalzi

2.5!! :)
I'd just like to spread the love around (so to speak). I voted for the PK Dick which, though I love the movie, I've never read and since the two are supposed to be quite different, really want to read.

2.) Chance to compare the movie to the original
"
Please don't do that. Both are great by their own rights, but have very little to do with each other.


Not that it matters since Redshirts seems to be in the lead, but I think book/film comparisons are a valid thing for any book or film group.

The problem is, there is very little to compare. The movie is more "inspired by" than based on the book.
It is like comparing Romeo and Juliet and Twilight (which the author publicly stated was inspired by the former).

It's also not available for Kindle in the US, just changed my vote too. I'm up for anything that I can get on my kindle. And I don't think I'd read the Dr. Who book since I haven't entered the Dr. Who universe yet and I've planned on starting with the TV show for a while.


Ringword is great. The sequels are crappy, at best.

I tried to read this and couldn't. The dialogue is so terrible."
That's propositional, and you understand it later on in the book.

Ah, good to know!

It shows it becoming available July 1st 2014, that's not too helpful.

Yeah, I got really excited for a minute, maybe we can read it next year.
I have nothing against paper books, I just know that I never get around to them because they don't fit into my commute well now that I've gone kindle. It requires more advanced planning.


Reading it now, so I'm a bit ahead--but it'd still be fun to discuss if you do a renegade read. A couple of the books in the vote are on my to read but I voted for Snow Crash.

http://tuebl.ca/book/show/id/138

Will now go convert, hope it's okay!
ETA: Looks good so far...
ETA2: Ringworld's currently just one behind Redshirts. Hmm...


Not when it came out. I think it has some non-explicit free love.

I am curious why you ask that Tina. I find a lot of older books now get refered to as YA but they weren't when they were first published. Dragonflight and Ender's Game spring to mind. If explicit sex is the only criteria then most science fiction written before the 80's could probably be classesd that way.


The concept of YA as a distinct publishing market didn't really exist until the 1970s. Consequently, a lot of titles from around or before that time are sometimes retroactively classified as such. It seems to be applied mainly to books that have teen protagonists or older genre titles that are less than 300 or so pages long.
The sexual content factor is a more recent consideration from publishers, and hardly universal. Many of the earliest examples of YA were actually rather frank in their depictions of sex, drug use, violence, abuse (Go Ask Alice, The Outsiders, Forever). It's still not unheard of (ttfn, Gossip Girl, etc.).

From what I remember it contains actual science and engineering, so I wouldn't classify it as YA:)

Further stuff about the kind of book it is, for people who want to know before reading:
(view spoiler)

http://terribleminds.com/ramble/2013/...

From what I remember it contains actual science and engineering, so I wouldn't classify it as YA:)"
So YA can't be educational? I sure hope we're marketing more to young people than just fluff. :p

This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Cryptonomicon (other topics)Quicksilver (other topics)
The Sparrow (other topics)
The Sparrow (other topics)
Snow Crash (other topics)
More...
I'm intrigued by the DOCTOR WHO book. I've been watching all the great Doctor Who Revisited specials on BBC America, so it'd be cool to read an adventure featuring Pertwee's Doctor, after just recently becoming familiar with his time as the 3rd Doctor. His Doctor was basically stranded on Earth, worked for a government agency, and was almost James Bond-ian.
I know I'll read REDSHIRTS at some point which is the main reason I didn't vote for it. I weirdly enjoy it when the book club forces me to pick up a book I likely wouldn't have considered otherwise (BRIDGE OF BIRDS being the first to come to mind). Plus we read Scalzi's OLD MAN'S WAR not too long ago.