Science and Inquiry discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
General
>
What science book is your most recent read? What do you think about it? Pt. 2

My review is here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Outstanding book, my brief review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


Outstanding book, my brief review here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/sho..."
Thank you, I enjoyed your review. I absolutely loved this book. It surprised me ... and probably shouldn't have .... that researchers have based their summaries of animal intelligence on experiments which have put them in totally unnatural and often stressful environments. Unlike kids, who are often on their mothers' lap when experiments are done and are treated with consideration, animal researchers often avoid any kind of subjective or emotional attachment to their subjects. Frightened, in strange and sterile envirnoments often lacking in stimuli, we should not be surprised that they underperform relative to their potentials.



Couldn't put it down. Author John McWhorter thinks outside the box about the evolution of languages, and his writing is clever and humorous. Thank you, Joel, for the recommendation. Here's my review:

My rating: 5 of 5 stars
My new favorite author. John McWhorter looks at language from a whole new angle. Languages are never static; by the time the rules are established by the "authorities," the language has changed. The Old English of Beowulf is pretty much incomprehensible to us now; English speakers typically think it is more like German. Since those days English has interbred with Latin, Viking tongues, and French (Normans) ... which results in a colorful language with confounding rules and spellings pulled out of various hats.... makes me a little less critical of the ridiculous way some words are spelled and why the plural of mouse is "mice" but the plural of house is not "hice."
Turns out the French are even lazier speakers than the English, dropping the final sounds off words (and even whole words out of phases) right and left, while retaining the original spellings and, in the written language, the entire phrase.
McWhorter, in a fun way, not only excuses but welcomes the evolution of languages, and explains the logic in some common rule-breaking. ("I didn't see nothing" reeks of ignorance in English, while double negatives are the rule in more languages than not.). And why do we say "He isn't" and "he's not," "you aren't" and "you're not" but can't say "I amn't" for "I'm not?" (I generally get around that one by defiantly saying "I ain't," not sure what McWhorter would say about that one.).
McWhorter also follows the interesting evolution of pidgin languages which just express basic and necessary ideas, to creoles which are languages in their own right, with their own grammars, etc. Amazingly, this only takes about a generation to occur.
Lots of information, easy to digest because the writing is straightforward and sparkles with wit. Delightful!
View all my reviews



Couldn't put it down... Thank you, Joel, for the recommendation..."
You're very welcome Nancy! It was a great book, and I still think about it from time to time. I read it very shortly after reading









I thought so too. I knew almost nothing about Humbolt. Why is he not as famous as Darwin and Galileo and Dawson? His work was revolutionary in its time and its lasting importance is as much as anyone's.

Also, Simon Bolivar will forever be known as "Iron Ass" over there.
Nancy wrote: "The Power of Babel: A Natural History of Language

Couldn't put it down. Author John McWhorter thinks outside the b..."
Thanks for the recommendation, Nancy. It sounds fascinating. I have put the book on hold at the library.

Couldn't put it down. Author John McWhorter thinks outside the b..."
Thanks for the recommendation, Nancy. It sounds fascinating. I have put the book on hold at the library.



This book is very similar to many others in the genre, such as John McWhorter’s The Tower of Babel, Guy Deutcher’s The Unfolding of Language, and Bill Bryson’s The Mother Tongue, all of which I’ve rated very high. But Pinker gets more credit for being one of the earliest in the genre, and he goes into more depth about the neuroscience behind language. In fact, this book covers an exhaustive range of topics, from Chomskyan linguistics, language processing, artificial intelligence, neurobiology, psychology, evolution, and philosophy, politics, and prescriptive grammar. His expertise in all these topics is impressive, and he makes a very persuasive overall argument – that the human mind has built-in modules for specific language-related functions, rather than being born with general purpose hardware that is programmed by its environment.
However, this book just didn’t hook me the same way John McWhorter did. He covers so many topics so quickly that it’s hard to get into it. He does give entertaining examples, and style is swift and humorous, but he fell just short of satisfying me. I guess it’s like having a cup of coffee with one cube of sugar, after getting used to coffee with two cubes. It feels like a tease. Some of the topics he covers deserve a whole book, and in fact, he does have books about those topics – How the Mind Works, The Blank Slate, The Stuff of Thought, Words and Rules, and others. I will definitely be reading them.


Couldn't put it down. Author John McWhorter thinks..."
Your welcome ... enjoy!
I recently read the book Idiot Brain - What Your Head Is Really Up To, written by neuroscientist Dean Burnett. This is one of the most entertaining science books I have ever read. I highly recommend it! Here is my review.



Read Madame Curie: A Biography by her daughter Ève Curie.

I started grad school in August so any reading I have done has been quite slow. However, I have been reading a plethora of journal articles. I have learned that lead can be stored in bones for years and can effect people later. Primarily in the forms of heart problems and kidney problems.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I just finished reading Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions, by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths. It is a wonderful book--highly informative and entertaining! Here is my review.


Lovely collection of essays. A wide variety of the different types of field notes and good advice for keeping a field notebook. Not nearly as boring as it sounds, but a non science person probably wouldn't care for it. One of the authors has is a science illustrator and shares some of her beautiful illustrations.

In all, I would think that this book is a great place to start for those interested in the brain signatures of consciousness. The book gives good knowledge on experimental paradigms, used in psychology and neuroscience, to investigate biological signatures of consciousness. The chapter on clinical applications of such studies was interesting as well.
That said, the conclusion of the book was disappointing. In the end, it was just another book on 'it wasn't me, it was my brain'. For instance, he suggests that meta-cognition and phenomenal experience will one day be nothing more than the 'sum of my brain doing it'. This has deep implications on the concept of choice and responsibility.
In addition, Dehaene ultimately failed to address the concept of consciousness. What Dehaene did, was merely highlight the biological signatures of consciousness in relation to conscious access. Yet, he doesn't show how these address the problems of consciousness that he brought up in his opening chapters.
In the end, it was just another book that paints a reductionist view of consciousness.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Don't be alarmed by the length of the review. Most of it is notes to myself. The top few paragraphs are for everyone else.

I thought this book was a total waste of time. Watered down to nothing. The author was afraid to get into anything more technical than angular momentum. Most of the books was just talking about herself, and when she finally did sneak in some scientific explanation, it wasn't that clear.
And her transitions were just strange - she'd end each paragraph by introducing some new topic out of the blue that was totally unrelated. Then the next paragraph would introduce something totally unrelated and get all poetic and descriptive, like some experience she had in the park, and you're not sure where she's going with it. It was like watching an overproduced BBC TV documentary, which makes sense because the author is a BBC television host in her other job.
I gave it two stars. Not sure why I didn't give it one. I guess because there was one interesting passage about tuberculosis and another about countercurrent heat exchange in ducks' legs. Also, she makes a good point about the laws of physics being consistent at any scale, but that at different scales, different forces become dominant. So I did learn something interesting. But two-hundred-fifty pages, when one-hundred-seventy-five of them were about how often she had to change her clothes when she was filming in India and other such trivialities, and the other seventy-five totally watered down science is just not worth anyone's time. There is much better science writing out there, even for those who have no scientific inclination.

Nancy, could you move, or copy, your post to the thread for this book? Thanks.
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...
https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...

He failed to mention Ms. Rosalind Franklin several times when regarding the discovery of DNA. He also made assumptions about how people felt and that President Wilson developed Spanish Influenza and thus effected his policy decisions.

It took me about a month to get through it, but it was still enjoyable. Learned quite a bit about dinosaurs.


https://www.livescience.com/61287-new...

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...



Recalling a few teenaged boys visiting a geek friend:
"I still remember that day when I first came across the internet. It was back in 1993. .. He connected the phone cable to his computer and pressed some keys. For a minute all we could hear were squeaks, shrieks and buzzes, and then silence. It didn't succeed. We mumbled and grumbled, but Ido tried again. And again. And again. At last he gave a whoop and announced that he had managed to connect his computer to the central computer at the nearby university. 'And what's there, on the central computer?' we asked. 'Well,' he admitted, 'there's nothing there yet. But you could put all kinds of things there.' 'Like what?' we questioned. 'I don't know,' he said. 'All kinds of things.' It didn't sound very promising.


Currently reading it, and enjoying it.


To give you an overview, I will introduce some of the topics.
Pollution of the oceans
Some of the points that come to my mind are
1. feminization or infertility of the fish. Thus danger for the stocks up to the extinction. 2. The death zones in the deltas of rivers. The vast amounts of waste, toxins, pesticides, etc that carry the rivers.
3. The melting of the polar caps. The associated mixing of salt water with fresh water can in the worst case, for example, bring the Gulf Stream to a standstill. The shift of the climatic zones and the change of the water temperature endangers the spawning grounds.
4. Legal and illegal capping of various toxins
5. The long-term consequences of various atomic bomb tests, the sinking of nuclear submarines and toxic waste.
6. The relative legal freedom in international waters.
7. The microplastic and the toxins that accumulate in the marine animals. As the crown of the food chain, we also consume that too.
8. The noise of international shipping. This massively affects dolphins and whales.
9. Trash in the oceans. The effects on all depths from the sea surface to the deep sea. 10. Algal blooms and similar monocultures. Thereby
11 coral death.
12. Overfishing and general formation of ever larger, deserts of similar zones. In combination with monocultures of a dominant species that could adapt to the circumstances. It all comes together in the sea.
Disappearing of insects
1. The role of neonicotinoids.
2. The entire industrial agriculture. Over-fertilization and leaching of the soil.
3. Sprays such as fungicides, pesticides, herbicides, etc.
4. Use of genetic engineering for hybrid seeds.
5. Contamination of the natural varieties with the stronger hybrid seeds.
6. NRA sprays
7. The effects on animals that are not as popular as bees. But equally important for the ecosystem. Like ants and termites, supposed insect pests, beetles.
8. The ever-increasing resistance of pests and weeds to spray.
9. The dead soils where nothing can grow properly.
The dangers of plastic
The problem with plastic is so complex and multi-layered that one could argue for days at a time. A few of the key issues are:
1. Phthalates and other chemicals contained in plastics. Both the enrichment in the environment and in humans are massive. Whether animal or human, the masculine and the unborn baby are already massively impaired. The influence of the hormone balance and the control processes of the body are unclear.
2. Smaller and smaller particles: As the microplastic continues to degrade, it eventually comes in orders of magnitude that act at the cellular level. Plastic builds up in body cells and influences processes. Theoretically, the degradation could go on and on until you reach the genetic level. Especially with the advent of nanotechnologies, this option seems more and more likely. If the raw materials are already so small, there is no fair way to degrade to the right size to fit inside the DNA.
3. Pollution of the environment: On the one hand the garbage strudel. Furthermore, fouling one level of the food chain could destroy everything. When microplankton, plankton, algae, plants or certain small fish are extirpated, everything collapses.
4. The massive industrial interests of almost all lobbies.
5. Peak Oil. Not as a panic scenario, but rather in terms of the really irreplaceable raw materials. Such as essential components for many machines and infrastructure. Which one can produce in the right condition with no sustainable methods? The same problem arises with medicines and in other areas. With special fuels and liquids that you cannot or only very expensive products in other ways.
6. The conversion of the infrastructure to decentralized energy production, which must go hand in hand with a reduction of the dependence on plastic and fossil energy sources.
I hope one or the other useful new fact was included in this condensed summaries.
I have posted long reviews about some nonfiction topics and I will continue with the most popular and controversial nonfiction books. Yes, that´s some kind of shameless self-promotion, but at least for a good propose.
Best regards


Very good overview. Thank you. I would look into this on the basis of your review.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


I agree, a very good read.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
The Basics of Genetics (other topics)Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space (other topics)
Pale Blue Dot: A Vision of the Human Future in Space (other topics)
Why We Sleep: Unlocking the Power of Sleep and Dreams (other topics)
Internal Time: Chronotypes, Social Jet Lag, and Why You're So Tired (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Betsey Dexter Dyer (other topics)Carl Sagan (other topics)
Carl Sagan (other topics)
Yuval Noah Harari (other topics)
Carlo Rovelli (other topics)
More...
I pretty much skipped that part. I got what he was talking about, but I didn't care to read about the dangers of living in a city in regards to a bomb.