8 books
—
1 voter
Qualitative Research Books
Showing 1-50 of 257

by (shelved 12 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.02 — 1,310 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 7 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.96 — 312 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 7 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.00 — 358 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 6 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.10 — 349 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 6 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.81 — 2,786 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 6 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.88 — 135 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 5 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.10 — 499 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 5 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.96 — 745 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 5 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.91 — 155 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 5 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.82 — 314 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 5 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.07 — 175 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 4 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.23 — 125 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 4 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.65 — 224 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 4 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.72 — 144 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 4 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.21 — 747 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.44 — 103 ratings — published

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.13 — 180 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.90 — 534 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.90 — 21 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.96 — 49 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.62 — 8 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.01 — 200 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 3 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.68 — 259 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.75 — 59 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.24 — 63 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.50 — 414 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.01 — 75 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.41 — 63 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.06 — 47 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.60 — 106 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.76 — 304 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.48 — 29 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.08 — 59 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.91 — 188 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.25 — 217,594 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.00 — 46 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.35 — 72 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.99 — 94 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.95 — 145 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.92 — 337 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.86 — 29 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.00 — 44 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.90 — 235 ratings — published 1967

by (shelved 2 times as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.66 — 32 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.12 — 8 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.45 — 4,486 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as qualitative-research)
avg rating 4.37 — 13,137 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.83 — 12 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as qualitative-research)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as qualitative-research)
avg rating 3.86 — 7 ratings — published
“Fragmenting and colliding both hegemonic and oppositional codes, my goal is to reinscribe validity as a way that uses the antifoundational problematic to loosen the master code of positivism that continues to shape even postpositivism”
―
―
“[…] a student in our class asked disdainfully why quantitative methodologists do not openly criticize qualitative methods. He scoffed, 'They don't even mention it. But in courses in qualitative methods, quantitative methods always come up.'
[…]
I pointed out that the lack of critical remarks and the absence of any mention of qualitative research in 'methods' courses indicate the hegemony of the quantitative approach. Were not his statistics professors making a strong statement about the place of qualitative methods by omitting them entirely? Qualitative researchers, then, have to legitimate their perspective to students in order to break the methodological silence coming from the other side.”
― Emotions and Fieldwork
[…]
I pointed out that the lack of critical remarks and the absence of any mention of qualitative research in 'methods' courses indicate the hegemony of the quantitative approach. Were not his statistics professors making a strong statement about the place of qualitative methods by omitting them entirely? Qualitative researchers, then, have to legitimate their perspective to students in order to break the methodological silence coming from the other side.”
― Emotions and Fieldwork