Intertextuality Books
Showing 1-50 of 725

by (shelved 7 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.82 — 286 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 7 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.59 — 104,418 ratings — published 1966

by (shelved 6 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.23 — 18,626 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 5 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.80 — 1,174 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 5 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.50 — 12,631 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 5 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.32 — 194,938 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 4 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.93 — 1,414 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 4 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.19 — 4,638 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 4 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.51 — 673,208 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 3 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.14 — 7,388 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 3 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.88 — 136,452 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.64 — 220 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.11 — 384,243 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.98 — 50 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.04 — 156 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.87 — 187 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.56 — 1,451 ratings — published

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.75 — 287 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.37 — 571 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.68 — 362 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.87 — 6,925 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.23 — 603 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.31 — 270,195 ratings — published 1922

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.03 — 1,531 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.26 — 3,646 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.82 — 496 ratings — published 1970

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.87 — 53,770 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.37 — 14,215 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.07 — 198,774 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.31 — 1,924,846 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,725,484 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.81 — 108 ratings — published 1974

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.43 — 612,892 ratings — published 1952

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.56 — 606,780 ratings — published 1851

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.07 — 96,584 ratings — published 1966

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.00 — 1 rating — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.23 — 26 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.91 — 74,077 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.98 — 86,423 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.54 — 176,169 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.52 — 257,223 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.70 — 1,472,496 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.51 — 69,328 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.12 — 534,849 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 2 times as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.14 — 36 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 1 time as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.74 — 34,314 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.01 — 191,104 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as intertextuality)
avg rating 4.01 — 82 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as intertextuality)
avg rating 3.80 — 167,040 ratings — published 2020

“A special kind of relationship happened between an artist and a piece of art, on account of the investment. Sometimes it was an emotional investment. The subject matter meant something to the artist, making every stroke of the brush weightier than it looked. It might be a technical investment. It was a new method, a hard angle, an artistic challenge that meant no success on the canvas could be taken for granted. And sometimes it was simply the sheer investment of time. Art took hours, days, weeks, years, of single-minded focus. This investment meant that everything that touched the art-making experience got absorbed. Music, conversations, or television shows experienced during the making became part of the piece, too. Hours, days, weeks, years later, the memory of one could instantly invoke the memory of the other, because they had been inextricably joined.”
― Mister Impossible
― Mister Impossible

“They’re dead words—a human chain reaching back ten thousand years,” said the corpse. “How did they feel?”
“Genuinely sad, bordering on very funny,” said God.”
― Harrow the Ninth
“Genuinely sad, bordering on very funny,” said God.”
― Harrow the Ninth