Nathan "N.R."’s
Comments
(group member since Oct 28, 2012)
Nathan "N.R."’s
comments
from the William T Vollmann Central group.
Showing 181-200 of 734

"The writer we deserve"
http://seattlereviewofbooks.com/revie...

'“They came out like ants!” Some years ago, William T. Vollmann wrote this headline in Harper’s, adding the subtitle “Searching for the Chinese tunnels of Mexicali.” Tomorrow (Saturday, February 20), “they”—the Chinese Americans—might again come out “like ants” in more than 40 cities, this time not from the mysterious tunnels of Mexicali, but from a cellphone-based social media network called WeChat.'
http://atimes.com/2016/02/thoughts-on...

http://www.theguardian.com/books/2016...
"If you like Thomas Pynchon and William Gaddis, this is probably your kind of Arctic novel."

[book porn warning]
http://biblioklept.org/2016/02/19/why...
I'm not certain, but it may be my favorite Dream.

"From a historian’s point of view, the license allowed novelists is something to envy." --that sentence alone ought to be glossed by something from one of WTV's apologia.
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v38/n04/sheila-f...

Like the hd's price reflecting the publisher's lack of confidence, I think the pb's price reflects how poorly it sold. And not due to page=count/difficulty.


https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
In part, he writes ::
"Why, after having read her trilogy, is WTV's Seven Dreams the first thing that leaps to mind as a comparison?
"Because, I think, in both we find Historical events portrayed from the inside out, illuminated from multiple viewpoints, all given equal validity. We find sexual violence, and the justifications for such violence. We find melodrama (WTV's rhapsodic riffs on the female goddess carry echoes of some of the love-struck thoughts of Scott's characters, for example) and, most importantly I think, we find authorial ambition, a desire and a drive to create a text which truly does justice to the rich expanse of the past and which re-writes the national myth.
"There are, of course, significant differences between the two. WTV's project is perhaps the greater in part because of its ranging over a thousand years, while Scott moves only from about 1830 to 1914, and also in part part because I think his stylistic and imaginative range more impressive. Nevertheless, both are very much concerned with the American unconscious, the true Being of the American soul. Neither gives a flying fuck about reader expectation or desire, nor do they care about publisher demands. They are both, I think it is fair to say, a little bit crazy. "

Not definitive, but the first result returned by google on "Amortortak" is The Ice-Shirt wikipedia page.

"Vollmann's works, though they're fairly bad paintings, delve into similar territory, as the straight artist addresses femininity and desire via images of cross-dressing and his female alter ego."
==sounds about right!
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/jew...
“Unorthodox" :: thru March 27, 2016, at the Jewish Museum, New York.

http://www.santafenewmexican.com/pasa...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Y7TS...

My thoughts too ; but unfair for me to have them since I think audiobooks are weird to begin with. But the novel is very oral, so the idea at least makes sense to me.
@Zadignose -- yes, I thought his voice had that wild west timbre to it ; which, my humble opinion, is the wrong way to go with this novel.

"El autor que sólo escribe sobre lo que experimenta: William T. Vollmann"
by Andrés Hax
William Faulkner was a peculiar but excellent criterion to evaluate their fellow writers. He said that the greatness of a novelist was to the size of its failure. The best was the one that had more tried, which aspired to an impossible perfection, one whose ambition was so excessive that the execution of the project would inevitably end in a failed work. This criterion put to Thomas Wolfe (the Look Homeward, Angel, not the Bonfire of the Vanities) on top.
If we took the same approach to a ranking of the best American novelists today, there is no doubt who would correspond to the top. No Jonathan Franzen and Jeffrey Eugenides. Neither Donna Tart or James Ellroy. Not even we could give honorable octogenarians Philip Roth or Cormac McCarthy. According to the "Faulkner-Test" the best living American writer William T. Vollmann is. With 56 years (the same age as Franzen, who has just published his fifth novel) and his work has literally the size of an encyclopedia. It consists of more than 30 volumes which include reports, stories, novels, travel diaries and photo books. Among its themes are war, poverty, drug addiction, immigration, prostitution, violence-how and when justified and the history of the colonization of North America."
http://www.lanacion.com.ar/1840947-bi...
