Stefani - SpelingExpirt’s
Comments
(group member since Aug 29, 2012)
Stefani - SpelingExpirt’s
comments
from the She-Geeks group.
Showing 101-120 of 305

I wish there was a like button. Thank you, I think you're spot on.





Every single woman in this group is different, we may read things a little differently than you because of our experience as women, what I mean by this is that we experience sexism on a daily basis and are statistically higher at risk of things like rape so we are more likely to critique sexism and rape in books whereas a reader who has nod had these experiences may not pick up on it as easily.
You've come into a space for women who might like SciFi (it is just one aspect of the many we cover here) to suggest that our reasons for liking it must be different because we are women. It is very 'me Tarzan, you Jane' thinking and extremely sexist.

I do not like specific things just because I am a woman. When it comes to SciFi I do however like characters, plots and technology.

Michelle - I watched that five doctors thing after the show and although it was funny at first it was far too long and felt like were being hit over the head with one joke the whole time. It could have been better for me.

I have to nitpick some things, I still don't like Moffat but he is a much better writer than he is show runner, I'm sad that Rose wasn't Rose and 10 didn't get to see her. I'm worried about the numbering and the fact that unless Moffat screws with Who lore again Capaldi will be the last one.
I loved UNITs science girl, she was such a fangirl and the scarf rocked.
I really want to know what is up with Baker being the curator, I did like that moment though.
I may come back with more thoughts once I've had time to get over the insane emotions of this episode!

I do hope to get to it eventually, when I do I'll jump into this old thread to discuss it with you, great to hear that you're enjoying it!


Your description of your strong female leads as sexy objectifies them within a predominately male gaze and therefore prevents them from representing this strong independence that you supposedly seek. These women may fight well on the battlefields but if they are as objectifies as your description makes out then you are yet another male author promoting female dominance in the sexual space rather than promoting strong women across all fields. I find your description offensive and somewhat misogynistic.
May I remind you that she-geeks is a group made of predominately women to celebrate the books, graphic novels and manga that promote women in a positive light that is neither weak nor sexually objectified nor in strong positions only in relation to men. I'd appreciate it if your future posts and indeed your future publications respect the members of this group.
You're obviously reading the wrong YA and fantasy books if you see the women in them as weak and if your only examples are Twilight and the Hunger Games.
I also hope that you started this to generate an actual discussion and not promote your book as promoting your book is frowned upon here.

Thanksgiving Day (Nov 28),
Christmas Eve (Dec 24),
Christmas Day (Dec 25),
New Year's Eve (Dec 31) and
New Year's Day (Jan 1)

