Donato
https://www.goodreads.com/donato
“They climbed back into the dish with brooms and scrubbing brushes and carefully swept it clean of what they referred to in a later paper as “white dielectric material,” or what is known more commonly as bird shit.”
― A Short History of Nearly Everything
― A Short History of Nearly Everything
“As was foreshadowed in Paragraphs 1 and 4, Cantor, and Dedekind's near-simultaneous appearance in math is more or less the Newton + Leibniz thing all over again, a sure sign that the Time Was Right for (Infinity)-type sets. Just as striking is the Escherian way the two men's work dovetails. Cantor is able to define and ground the concepts of 'infinite set' and 'transfinite number,' and to establish rigorous techniques for combining and comparing different types of (Infinity)s, which is just where Dedekind's def. of irrationals needs shoring up. Pro quo, the schnitt technique demonstrates that actually-infinite sets can have real utility in analysis. That, in other words, as sensuously and cognitively abstract as they must remain, (Infinity)s can nevertheless function in math as practical abstractions rather than as just weird paradoxical flights of fancy.”
― Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity
― Everything and More: A Compact History of Infinity
“At some point in their education, most smart people usually learn not to credit arguments from authority. If someone says “Believe me about the minimum wage because I seem like a trustworthy guy,” most of them will have at least one neuron in their head that says “I should ask for some evidence”. If they’re really smart, they’ll use the magic words “peer-reviewed experimental studies.” But I worry that most smart people have not learned that a list of dozens of studies, several meta-analyses, hundreds of experts, and expert surveys showing almost all academics support your thesis– can still be bullshit.”
― Slate Star Codex Abridged
― Slate Star Codex Abridged
“Te occidere possunt sed te edere non possunt nefas est." (Roughly, "They can kill you, but the legalities of eating you are quite a bit dicier.")”
― Infinite Jest
― Infinite Jest
“The material in this book is a combination of topics in geometry, topology, and algorithms. Far from getting diluted, we find that the fields benefit from each other. Geometry gives a concrete face to topological structures, and algorithms offer a means to construct them at a level of complexity that passes the threshold necessary for practical applications. As always, algorithms have to be fast because time is the one fundamental resource humankind has not yet learned to manipulate for its selfish purposes. Beyond these obvious relationships, there is a symbiotic affinity between algorithms and the algebra used to capture topological information. It is telling that both fields trace their names back to the writing of the same Persian mathematician, al-Khwarizmi, working in Baghdad during the ninth century after Christ. Besides living in the triangle spanned by geometry, topology, and algorithms, we find it useful to contemplate the place of the material in the tension between extremes such as local vs. global, discrete vs. continuous, abstract vs. concrete, and intrinsic vs. extrinsic. Global insights are often obtained by a meaningful integration of local information. This is how we proceed in many fields, taking on bigger challenges after mastering the small ones. But small things are big from up close, and big things are small from afar. Indeed, the question of scale lurking behind this thought is the driving force for much of the development described in this book. The dichotomy between discrete and continuous structures is driven by opposing goals: machine computation and human understanding. The tension between the abstract and the concrete as well as between the intrinsic and the extrinsic has everything to do with the human approach to knowledge. An example close to home is the step from geometry to topology in which we remove the burdens of size to focus on the phenomenon of connectivity. The more abstract the context the more general the insight. Now, generality is good, but it is not a substitute for the concrete steps that have to be taken to build bridges to applications. Zooming in and out of generality leads to unifying viewpoints and suggests meaningful integrations where they exist.”
― Computational Topology: An Introduction
― Computational Topology: An Introduction
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 310010 members
— last activity 0 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
Ler Devagar, gruppo di lettura (Padova)
— 3 members
— last activity Oct 11, 2022 10:48PM
I libri del male
Reading Classics, Chronologically Through the Ages
— 458 members
— last activity Aug 11, 2025 10:22AM
This group began with a book called The Well-Educated Mind (TWEM) by Susan Wise Bauer, which is a wonderful guide to “The Great Books.” TWEM presents ...more
Books of Some Substance
— 72 members
— last activity Dec 15, 2020 08:26AM
B.O.S.S. is a San Francisco-based book club and podcast with a charter to read books of "substance" (see: boring, too long, out-dated, sighhhh as othe ...more
Donato’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Donato’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Donato
Lists liked by Donato






































