Stuart Jeanne Bramhall's Blog: The Most Revolutionary Act , page 553

FDA Hide Bad Data on Moderna Shots for Kids

By Toby Rogers, Ph.D.

Editor’s Note: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s vaccine advisory council will meet June 14 to consider granting Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) of the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines for children under 5 years old, even though the White House last week announced it is already filling orders for the vaccines placed by states and healthcare providers. Click here to tell your members of Congress to oppose EUA of these vaccines for young children.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s risk-benefit document in connection with the Moderna mRNA shot in kids is dishonest, and evidence that the public health establishment has abandoned science, logic, reason, rationality, empathy, health and medicine.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) last week released its risk-benefit assessment of Moderna’s Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application to inject mRNA into kids 0 to 17 years old.

I’ve been reading it for the past two days and here are the things that stood out to me.

Introduction, a shell game to hide the bad data

The risk-benefit document for Moderna is 190 pages single-spaced. It was released two business days before the June 14-15 Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, or VRBAC meeting.

A similar risk-benefit assessment for Pfizer’s EUA application for kids under 5 will be released today (just 24 hours before the meeting).

This guarantees that NONE of the members of the VRBPAC will have read either of these documents before the meeting — which is exactly what the cartel wants.

One of the ways Moderna and the FDA rig the game is by adding endless layers of complexity to hide how bad the data really is.

This should have been four separate documents — Moderna in adolescents 12 to 17, Moderna in kids 6 to 11, Moderna in kids 2 to 5, and Moderna in kids 6 months to 23 months.

Looked at individually, the shot fails in each of these four age groups. But lumping them together creates noise that makes it difficult to understand what’s going on.

Another really pernicious thing that Moderna does is to further subdivide these populations into eight different subpopulations (Randomization Set, Full Analysis Set, Immunogenicity Subset, Per-protocol Immunogenicity Subset, Per-protocol Set for Efficacy, Modified Intent-to-treat Set, MITT1 Set, Safety Set, Solicited Safety Set).

See what they did there? The public just wants to know — does the product work and what are the side effects?

By dividing the data into eight subcategories involving four different age groups now you have to wade through 32 different tables to try to make sense of what happened in the clinical trial.

They do something similar with the adverse events by dividing it across five tables x four age groups = 20 adverse event tables in all.

Subdividing the data in this way also allows Moderna to eliminate or hide data that it does not like.

This is what people call “massaging the data” and it is unethical and a violation of scientific norms. We’ll return to this topic below.

No actual health benefits so Moderna/FDA use the immunobridging trick

The risks of COVID-19 are so low in the childhood population that there were ZERO severe cases of COVID-19 in either the treatment or the control group.

Therefore, the number needed to vaccinate, to prevent a single severe case of COVID-19 in the childhood population, is infinity. (Technically it’s undefined because you cannot divide by zero, but you take my point.)

The FDA and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or CDC guidance documents for how to write a risk-benefit assessment state that one must provide a number needed to treat, the absolute risk reduction, and the relative risk reduction.

Moderna just skipped all that because the cartel makes its own rules.

 Moderna is in a race against natural immunity. But natural immunity has already won because 74.2% of kids had natural immunity by February — so by now, the number is probably closer to 100%.

The God-given immune system in kids has already done its part to stop the pandemic and now the FDA wants to mess that up to enrich the cartel and keep the pandemic going forever.

So how does Moderna/FDA claim that this shot was “effective”? They use an unethical statistical trick called “immunobridging.”

It makes me mad that I even have to explain it because it’s such junk science. But we all need to know exactly how the FDA rigged the process so that we can explain to the jury at Nuremberg 2 why these monsters should be convicted so here goes.

Remember, the Moderna shots produced NO reductions in severe outcomes because the risk of COVID-19 in this age group is infinitesimally small (see studies: here, here, here, and here).

So Moderna ignored the actual health outcomes and switched to looking at antibodies in the blood. In the process, they engaged in two egregious sleights of hand.

First, Moderna claims that the sample size for each of the four subgroups of children is about 3,000. But when it came to looking at antibodies in the blood, Moderna threw out about 90% of the sample and only looked at the bloodwork of about 300 kids in each age group.

No explanation was given for the criteria they used to exclude 90% of the sample from their analysis. We know that up to 30% of kids have no antibody response at all to COVID-19 shots so perhaps they actually started with a much larger sample and then threw out the data that showed no effect from the shot?

The second sleight of hand is that “no placebo recipients were included in the Immunogenicity Subset” (p. 26). Do you realize how huge this is? This is no longer an RCT at all — they did not include the bloodwork from anyone in the placebo group.

So the study cannot rule out the possibility that the increase in antibody levels was not from the vaccine at all but could have been from natural immunity. Just astonishing.

After these sleights of hand, Moderna then compares the antibody levels in the blood of about 10% of the children against the antibody levels in a sample of about 300 adults ages 18 to 25 enrolled in a previous clinical trial. If the antibody levels are similar (which they are), Moderna claims, ‘And therefore it will prevent disease in the future in kids!’

A few problems with that claim:

The Moderna study only measured antibody levels two months after the second dose — the time period when the antibody levels are at their peak (what Berenson calls “the happy valley”). But real-world experience with these vaccines shows that any efficacy quickly wanes to zero by six months and then goes NEGATIVE after that.

The second problem — and this is unresolvable and instantly disqualifying for Moderna — is that at the April 6 meeting of the FDA’s “expert advisory committee” one member after another acknowledged that there are no “correlates of protection” for these vaccines.

What that means in plain English is that you cannot use antibodies (or B-cells, T-cells, or any other proxy) to predict whether someone is immune or not.

Eric Rubin, who serves on that committee and is also the editor of the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) stated it bluntly:

“We know what kind of antibody response can be generated, we just don’t know if it works.”

You can watch it yourself in the video below.

The third problem is that the Moderna study was completed back in mid-2021 — when the original Wuhan and Alpha strains were prevalent. Since then, the Omicron variant has entirely replaced the original strains and real-world data show that both Moderna and Pfizer shots are not effective against the Omicron variant.

So in spite of all of the chicanery (discarding 90% of the sample, immunobridging, claiming correlates of protection that are not valid) Moderna cannot show any evidence that this shot will be effective against SARS-CoV-2 as it exists now.

Via https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/fda-eua-moderna-covid-vaccine-young-kids/

The vaccines are being brought back to damage our smallest kids and those who believe the FDA that Novovax is an “old-fashioned” shot

Dr Meryl Nass

I wrote an extremely popular article in April.  It got over 50,000 views on Substack, and was republished by Dr. Mercola, Technocracy News and the Epoch Times.

In it, I marshalled a great deal of evidence to support the supposition that the COVID vaccines were on their way out, although I anticipated that the cabal would continue its attempt at world domination using other methods.

I believe they are seriously pulling lots of levers now, and that money pox, artificial shortages of oil, fertilizer, railway cars and baby formula are part of their plan to create economic havoc worldwide, and probably famine in the poorer regions of the world.

However, despite many indications that they would stop pushing the COVID vaccines, including CDC’s admission that 95% of Americans have partial or complete immunity–I think that FDA and CDC were subsequently given new marching orders.

Instead of letting the worthless, dangerous and unnecessary vaccines die a natural death, FDA has turned around and gone whole hog in pushing more shots.

Both Moderna and Pfizer will get a day with the VRBPAC vaccine advisory committee this week, on Tuesday and Wednesday June 14-15, and I will be live-blogging both meetings.  Two days ago, Novavax finally got its day before the VRBPAC and got the usual approbation from the carefully vetted committee, who voted 21-0 with one abstention in favor of an EUA for the new Novavax kid on the block.  The new kid also causes myocarditis, by the way.  It seems that is simply a side effect of spike vaccines, found in all 3 different COVID vaccine platforms in the US.

The Novavax shot contains a novel adjuvant, by the way, so it is not really an old fashioned shot.  This adjuvant (Matrix-M, derived from Quillaja saponaria) is not found in any other vaccines in the US. While touted as a replacement for the PEG (polyethylene glycol) lipid found in the mRNA vaccines, it is less likely to cause anaphylaxis but more likely to cause autoimmune diseases.

The protein is made from a genetically engineered virus that infects moth cells.  Using insect cells is a way to grow proteins rapidly.  There is one flu vaccine made the same way:  Flublok.  The flu shot was used to try out the insect cell platform (using fall army worms), and Voila–it was ready for showtime when COVID appeared.  How many insect and viral proteins or other molecules are being injected into you (a function of how purified the vaccine is) is unknown.

The University of Nebraska (a major site for biodefense work) spun the Novavax vaccine delicately:  moths and tree bark.  How natural.  Genetically engineered virus produces a spike protein mixed with an adjuvant (well known but never used before in an approved or authorized vaccine) that happened to be developed from a South American tree bark.  Not exactly like nature, I’d say.  Some of the most potent poisons come from South American tree frogs, which are natural but deadly.

I believe the globalists reversed course again.  They apparently had another plan; was it moneypox? but now they are back, wanting to push on with these damn COVID vaccines.  Apparently monkey pox is not going to send everyone out looking for yet another shot… no matter how many masks CDC asks you to wear to protect yourself from monkey pox, and then tells you to unwear, because according to the experts, monkey pox is not airborne.  Oops, the cabal is moving so fast they are getting sloppy. Or perhaps all the parts of the cabal are not working collaboratively?

[…]

So I must continue to ask:  since the [Covid Vaccines] don’t prevent COVID, what is their purpose?  Why does the government want to inject us so badly?

Via https://merylnass.substack.com/p/i-have-to-eat-my-words-sorta-the?s=r

Criminal responsibility: Whistleblower’s case against Pfizer marches on

TCW

Last week Serena Wylde reported for TCW on the lawsuit that the whistleblower Brook Jackson has filed against Pfizer which she feared would be thrown out. Today she updates us on the case.

IT TAKES a special type of person to stay the course as a whistleblower. Dismissal from employment, vilification and isolation are just a few of the prices to pay. But Brook Jackson, the clinical trial regional director who has been battling against Pfizer since 2020 to bring facts to light, is not bowing to intimidation.

Having brought a case against the corporate Goliath in January 2021 under the False Claims Act, Jackson was under a gagging order, and her lawyers warned her not to break it as ‘the government would come after her’. But break it she did when in September of 2021 she sent copious amounts of evidence to the British Medical Journal. At this point her attorneys from Berg and Androphy withdrew from the case, leaving her without counsel.

In February of this year the case was finally unsealed and, as reported here last week, Pfizer has filed a motion to have it thrown out. Its argument is essentially that the purchasing party – the US government – of its contract to supply 100million doses of injections in exchange for $1.9billion of US taxpayers’ money, tacitly agreed to the use of fraudulent data. Under this tortuous reasoning, it would appear to be relying on an interpretation that, as both contracting parties were complicit in the sham clinical trials, no breach of contract has occurred.

Some time back we learnt that the Covid-19 injection manufacturers had been granted immunity by governments against civil damages for injury and deaths caused by their products.

But what about criminal responsibility?

An important question must surely be how the law defines intent when it comes to inflicting harm? If a medical practitioner administers an inappropriate and toxic drug to a patient knowing it has the potential to cause harm, including death, is not a resulting fatality classed as a homicide?

As one physician-scientist explained during Republican Senator Ron Johnson’s Expert Panel Discussion on Covid-19 vaccine injuries, held on November 2, 2021, ‘Pfizer don’t do science. They do business. And the Food and Drug Administration know and enable this.’

All eyes are now on the judge, who has granted discovery about any issue related to Pfizer’s motion to dismiss the case. Jackson’s lawyer, Robert Barnes of Barnes Law LLP, says: ‘This is probably the biggest whistleblower False Claims Act case in the history of the United States.’

[…]

Via https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/whistleblowers-case-against-pfizer-marches-on/

‘Made-for-TV’ Jan 6 Hearings a Ratings Disaster

Zero Hedge

After throwing two impeachments and a Russia hoax at Donald Trump, Congressional Democrats’ latest political theater against the former president – produced by a former TV exec for prime time – is a ratings disaster.

Their unifying theory seems to be that Trump masterminded a rag-tag mob of (fed infiltrated) groups, which ‘stormed’ the capital (through doors that were opened for them), then sauntered into various parts of the Capital – some even engaging in mayhem, in an ‘attempt to subvert Democracy’ and, we suppose, topple the US government?

Congress was back to work two hours after the interruption (aka the darkest moment in American history).

In any event, ratings for the Democrats’ latest Trump takedown attempt aren’t exactly a success, relatively speaking, as just 20 million viewers tuned in for Thursday night’s ‘prime-time’ event, according to The Hill.

At CBS alone, last week’s episode of “Young Sheldon” got more views (3.86 million vs. 3.24 million), according to the Washington Free Beacon.

By contrast, an estimated 38 million people tuned in to Trump’s inauguration, 20 million watched Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony against Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and 38 million tuned in to Biden’s State of the Union Address in March.

On a typical day, around 9 million people watched former President Trump’s 2020 impeachment trial, and 13 million or so watched the second.

In short – nobody cares.

On Thursday, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) slammed the trial as “a Hollywood paid political advertisement,” adding “they hired a producer to put this thing on.”

[…]

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/made-tv-jan-6-hearings-are-ratings-disasterVia

US Naval Air Forces Orders “Safety Pause” For Aircraft After Multiple Deadly Southern California Crashes

Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The U.S. Navy announced this weekend that there would be a “safety pause” for certain aircraft following 3 recent crashes in Southern California where 6 service members died.

The Navy’s aviation community will undergo a “safety pause” Monday in the wake of multiple fatal flight mishaps in less than two weeks.

During the pause, units will review risk-management practices and train “on threat and error-management processes,” according to a Naval Air Forces statement.

“In order to maintain the readiness of our force, we must ensure the safety of our people remains one of our top priorities,” the command statement said.

Deployed units will conduct the pause at the earliest possible time.

The pause comes amid at least three Navy and Marine Corps aircraft crashes in the past 10 days, two of which were fatal. (Source.)

I have read several reports from multiple sources regarding this “safety pause,” and not one of them mentioned the vaccination status of the pilots, and there is no indication that the investigations will consider if any adverse reactions from the COVID-19 vaccines could have been involved.

The Navy currently has 97% of its service members vaccinated with COVID-19 vaccines. (Source.)

American Airlines pilot Captain Robert Snow, a pilot with over 31 years experience, made headlines recently when he went public with his story after going into cardiac arrest in the cockpit of the commercial plane he was flying just moments after landing in Dallas, avoiding what could have been a major catastrophe if he would have suffered his heart attack while landing.

His career is over now, as the FAA will not allow pilots with heart conditions like Mr. Snow now has to continue flying.

Mr. Snow went public to explain how this was most certainly a COVID vaccine adverse reaction, and his testimony was quickly removed from Google’s YouTube.

Mr. Snow was mandated to receive the COVID vaccine as a condition for keeping his job.

Pilot Joshua Yoder, who is the co-founder of the U.S. Freedom Flyers, was interviewed by Steve Kirsch where he revealed that he was receiving many phone calls from other pilots in the commercial airline industry who are also suffering heart problems after receiving a COVID-19 mandatory vaccine, but they fear coming forward because they will lose their jobs.

[…]

Via https://healthimpactnews.com/2022/us-naval-air-forces-orders-safety-pause-for-aircraft-after-multiple-deadly-southern-california-crashes/

 

 

Weird the “I-Believe-The-Science(TM)” crowd has completely given up on science

Toby Rogers

The NY Times announces that henceforth, clinical trials for Covid-19 shots must be abandoned because real world data makes the cartel look bad

I. Pharma is losing the game so they are throwing the chess board across the room

The NY Times published a vile piece of fascist Pharma propaganda today. Berenson flagged the online version of the article yesterday. As you know, I have been yelling about the FDA’s Orwellian “Future Framework” for weeks because it’s literally the worst idea in the history of public health.

It turns out that it’s even worse than I thought.

Pharma has already begun a PR offensive to get it across the line and Sharon LaFraniere of the NY Times was eager to do their bidding.

Here’s what’s happening. The mRNA shots are not working against SARS-CoV-2. Everyone knows this. So Moderna and Pfizer are racing to reformulate these shots. The reformulated shots are not working either. Just last week Moderna was touting a bivalent shot that combined Alpha + Beta, but now, apparently, they’ve abandoned that approach. The NY Times article hypes a Moderna shot targeting earlier Omicron variants (it does not say, but perhaps BA.2 and BA.2.12.1?). However evidence from South Africa shows that BA.4 and BA.5 are outcompeting the earlier Omicron variants and the reformulated Moderna shot probably won’t work against the new strains (the virus evolved for a reason — to evade vaccines).

So what are predatory pharmaceutical companies and their feckless government enablers supposed to do!? Abandon clinical trials altogether!

Here’s how the NY Times describes this scheme:

…many experts worry that the virus is evolving so quickly that it is outpacing the ability to modify vaccines, at least as long as the United States relies on human clinical trials for results.

See, it’s not that coronavirus vaccine have failed over and over again (even though they have). It’s that This Wily Virus(TM) is just evolving so quickly that we could not possibly allow human clinical trials of coronavirus vaccines ever again. The only way to beat This Wily Virus(TM) at this point is to abandon science.

Of course it gets worse. The NY Times elaborates:

The problem is that Moderna and Pfizer — the maker of the other main coronavirus vaccine in the United States — do not have enough time now to run more human clinical trials and still manufacture shots before the fall, when the Biden administration is hoping to be able to offer an updated vaccine to counter what public health experts predict will be a winter surge.

See, it’s not that rapacious pharmaceutical companies want to suck all wealth out of the world and put it into their own pockets while setting up a 1,000 year Pharma Reich. No, no, no, silly. It’s just that they “do not have enough time” to do actual science anymore so they are just going to skip all that. Don’t you worry your little head about it.

Furthermore, only a conspiracy theorist would believe that the FDA has abandoned all of its statutory responsibilities to protect public health in order to prostitute themselves to Pharma. The Correct Understanding(TM) is that the FDA is being forced by circumstances outside their control to abandon science. This is not a problem because the cartel is truth, the cartel has always been truth, and since the cartel has decided to abandon science altogether then that’s the new science.

Henceforth, quite literally, the peasants will be forced every six months to inject whatever they are told, with no questions asked, and “they will be [required by law to be] happy about it”.

Instead of human clinical trials the FDA will rely on a few test tube and mouse studies. In the article, Fauci describes this as, “alternative pathways of decision.” That guy just oozes totalitarianism at this point.

So if the “Future Framework” is approved on June 28 the new rules will be: a pharmaceutical company can claim that some new injection creates antibodies in a test tube or mouse (that no one else can see or audit). Done! Ship it and inject it! That’s it. Even though the FDA admits that there are no “correlates of protection.”

In the replies to my earlier articles about the Future Framework some astute readers have pointed out that the FDA has already abandoned human trials when it comes to Covid-19 shots in kids. None of the Moderna or Pfizer clinical trials in kids showed any real world health benefit at all. So they switched to looking at antibodies in the blood and use this tortured mental gymnastics called “immunobridging” to conjure up hypothetical future benefits that never materialize in the real world. Abandoning even the pretense of human trials and moving to test tubes and mice is the obvious next step in this complete abandonment of science.

[…]

Via https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/weird-that-the-i-believe-the-sciencetm

Dear Friends, Sorry to Announce a Genocide: Dr. Naomi Wolf on the Pfizer “Confidential Report”

Dr Naomi Wolf

It’s Really True: They Know they are Killing the Babies

I’ve been silent for some weeks. Forgive me.

The truth is: I’ve been rendered almost speechless — or the literary equivalent of that — because recently I’ve had the unenviable task of trying to announce to the world that indeed, a genocide — or what I’ve called, clumsily but urgently, a “baby die-off” — is underway.

The WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Volunteers, a group of 3000 highly credentialled doctors, RNs, biostatisticians, medical fraud investigators, lab clinicians and research scientists, have been turning out report after report, as you may know, to tell the world what is in the 55,000 internal Pfizer documents which the FDA had asked a court to keep under wraps for 75 years. By court order, these documents were forcibly disclosed. And our experts are serving humanity by reading through these documents and explaining them in lay terms. You can find all of the Volunteers’ reports on DailyClout.io.

The lies revealed are stunning.

The WarRoom/DailyClout Volunteers have confirmed: that Pfizer (and thus the FDA) knew by December 2020 that the MRNA vaccines did not work — that they “waned in efficacy” and presented “vaccine failure.” One side effect of getting vaccinated, as they knew by one month after the mass 2020 rollout, was “COVID.”

Pfizer knew in May of 2021 that 35 minors’ hearts had been damaged a week after MRNA injection — but the FDA rolled out the EUA for teens a month later anyway, and parents did not get a press release from the US government about heart harms til August of 2021, after thousands of teens were vaccinated. [https://dailyclout.io/pfizer-vaccine-...]

Pfizer (and thus the FDA; many of the documents say “FDA: CONFIDENTIAL” at the lower boundary) knew that, contrary to what the highly paid spokesmodels and bought-off physicians were assuring people, the MRNA, spike protein and lipid nanoparticles did not stay in the injection site in the deltoid, but rather went, within 48 hours, into the bloodstream, from there to lodge in the liver, spleen, adrenals, lymph nodes, and, if you are a woman, in the ovaries. [https://dailyclout.io/internal-pfizer...]

[…]

Pfizer skewed the trial subjects so that almost three quarters were female — a gender that is less prone to cardiac damage. Pfizer lost the records of what became of hundreds of their trial subjects.

In the internal trials, there were over 42,000 adverse events and more than 1200 people died. Four of the people who died, died on the day they were injected.

[…]

I was able to process all of this and keep simply reporting. But in the last few weeks the horror overcame me. Because now, the Volunteers, under the excellent leadership of Program Manager Amy Kelly, have confirmed that there is a genocide underway, intentionally driven or not. And Israeli journalist Etana Hecht has added her own superb analysis. Here is Ms Hecht’s summary of the Volunteers’ findings . . . Read more

[…]

The WarRoom/DailyClout volunteers have confirmed that lipid nanoparticles, the tiny hard fatty casings that contain the MRNA, traverse the amniotic membrane. That means that they enter the fetal environment, of course

[…]

The Volunteers have drilled deep into the Pfizer documents’ reports about pregnancy and found that the assurance that the vaccine is “safe and effective” for pregnant women, was based on a study of 44 French rats, followed for 42 days (the scientists who ran the study are shareholders or employees of BioNTech). [https://dailyclout.io/covid-19-vaccin...]

The Volunteers found that while pregnant women were excluded from the internal studies, and thus from the EUA on which basis all pregnant women were assured the vaccine was “safe and effective”, nonetheless about 270 women got pregnant during the study. More than 230 of them were lost somehow to history. But of the 36 pregnant women whose outcomes were followed – 28 lost their babies.

The Volunteers found that a baby died after nursing from a vaccinated lactating mother, and was found to have had an inflamed liver. Many babies nursing from vaccinated mothers showed agitation, gastrointestinal distress, and failure to thrive (to grow), and were inconsolable.

I am hearing anecdotal reports of these symptoms in babies nursing from vaccinated mothers, now, from across the country.

The Pfizer documents also show that some vaccinated mothers had suppressed lactation, or could produce no milk at all.

Doctors, of course, are stumped by all this. Stumped.

[…]

Via https://naomiwolf.substack.com/p/dear-friends-sorry-to-announce-a?s=r

WHO and Gates Foundation: Clandestine Infertility Campaigns Disguised as Tetanus Vaccines

Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda

Directed by Dr Andy Wakefield (2022)

Film Review

This short documentary reviews strong documentary evidence that the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Gates Foundation conducted a clandestine campaign in Kenya from 2014-16 to sterilize by giving them tetanus vaccine adulterated with beta-HCG (human chorionic gonadatropin).[1] The apparent goal was to promote the production of anti-HCG antibodies. After taking the vaccine, numerous women suffered repeated miscarriages and found they were infertile.

The film begins by reporting on research WHO commenced in 1987 to develop an anti-fertility vaccine, in which women would be injected with beta-HCG to stimulate the production of anti-HCG antibodies.

In the 1990s a Philippine court ordered the discontinuance of WHO’s tetanus vaccination program there, after vials of tetanus vaccine were found to contain beta-HCG.[2]

When WHO tried to launch a similar campaign in Kenya in 1994, the government demanded the vaccine be tested for HCG. The Kenyan government became suspicious owing to WHO’s proposal to give all women of reproductive age five tetanus vaccines at six month intervals.[3] Prior campaigns (against neonatal tetanus only gave a single shot (conferring 10 years of immunity) and only to pregnant women.[4] Instead of agreeing to the testing, WHO abandoned the campaign.

In 2014, after a new government aggressively supported the WHO campaign, Kenya’s Catholic bishops and two Catholic doctors obtained vials of the tetanus vaccine and sent them to six independent labs for testing. Most contained beta-HCG. Under pressure, the government also ordered testing from a new lab. This time the vials from government stores (which turned out to have fake labels disguising their source) tested negative for beta-HCG. However, once again, the original vials tested positive for beta-HCG. Despite death threats and repeated break-ins the new lab refused to alter their results as ordered by the Kenyan minister of health.

Although he government accused the Catholic bishops and doctors of tampering with the tetanus vaccine vials, this would have been impossible. Lab results showed the beta-HCG was present in the form of a Tetanus Toxoid Conjugate. This means the vaccine was deliberately manufactured that way – that the HCG couldn’t have been added through vial tampering.

The government also retaliated against the doctors, by threatening to suspend their medical registration and issuing a gag order forbidden them to talk about vaccines publicly or with their patients.

[1] The placenta produces HCG to stimulate the mother’s ovaries to produce progesterone to prepare the uterine lining. Without adequate HCG and progesterone, it’s impossible for the uterus to support a full term pregnancy.

[2] Nicaragua and Mexico also targeted all women of reproductive age with this unusual 5-dose tetanus vaccine regimen. See Baby Killing Vaccine: Is It Being Stealth Tested?

[3] Neonatal tetanus occurs when the umbilical cord is cut with unsterile instruments and the umbilical stump becomes infected. Seems to me it would have been much cheaper and easier to flood Kenya with sterilization equipment rather than mass vaccination.

[4] Coincidentally giving five shots in six months is the same protocol WHO uses with their beta-HCG antifertility vaccine.

Film can be viewed free at the following link:

Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda

Research Confirms Statins Are a Colossal Waste of Money

By Dr. Joseph Mercola | June 9, 2022

Via Aletho News

The lecturer in the featured video, Maryanne Demasi, Ph.D., produced the 2014 Australian Catalyst documentary, “Heart of the Matter: Dietary Villains,” which exposed the cholesterol/saturated fat myths behind the statin fad and the financial links which lurk underneath.

The documentary was so thorough that vested interests actually convinced ABC TV to rescind the two-part series.1 The Australian Heart Foundation, the three largest statin makers (Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme) and Medicines Australia, Australia’s drug lobby group, complained2 and got the documentary expunged from ABC TV.

Cholesterol and saturated fat have been the villains of heart disease for the past four decades, despite the many studies showing neither has an adverse effect on heart health.

The entire food industry shifted away from saturated fat and cholesterol, ostensibly to improve public health, and the medical industry has massively promoted the use of cholesterol-lowering statin drugs for the same reason. Despite all of that, the rate of heart disease deaths continues to be high.3 That really should tell us something.

Statins Are a Colossal Waste of Money

Since the release of Demasi’s documentary, the evidence against the cholesterol theory and statins has only grown. As noted in an August 4, 2020, op-ed by Dr. Malcolm Kendrick, a general practitioner with the British National Health Service:4

“New research shows that the most widely prescribed type of drug in the history of medicine is a waste of money. One major study found that the more ‘bad’ cholesterol was lowered, the greater the risk of heart attacks and strokes.

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, almost every other medical condition has been shoved onto the sidelines. However, in the UK last year, heart attacks and strokes (CVD) killed well over 100,000 people — which is at least twice as many as have died from COVID-19.

CVD will kill just as many this year, which makes it significantly more important than COVID-19, even if no one is paying much attention to it right now.”

According to a scientific review5 published online August 4, 2020, in BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, lowering LDL is not going to lower your risk of heart disease and stroke. “Decades of research has failed to show any consistent benefit for this approach,” the authors note.

Since the commercialization of statin drugs in the late ’80s (lovastatin being the first one, gaining approval in 19876), total sales have reached nearly $1 trillion.7,8 Lipitor — which is just one of several brand name statin drugs — was named the most profitable drug in the history of medicine.9,10 Yet these drugs have done nothing to derail the rising trend of heart disease.

Lowering Cholesterol Does Not Show a Beneficial Impact

According to a press release announcing the BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine review, the analysis found that:11

“… over three quarters of all the trials reported no positive impact on the risk of death and nearly half reported no positive impact on risk of future cardiovascular disease.

And the amount of LDL cholesterol reduction achieved didn’t correspond to the size of the resulting benefits, with even very small changes in LDL cholesterol sometimes associated with larger reductions in risk of death or cardiovascular ‘events,’ and vice versa. Thirteen of the clinical trials met the LDL cholesterol reduction target, but only one reported a positive impact on risk of death …”

In their paper,12 the study authors argue that since dozens of randomized controlled trials looking at LDL-cholesterol reduction “have failed to demonstrate a consistent benefit, we should question the validity of this theory.”

They also cite the Minnesota Coronary Experiment,13 a double-blind randomized controlled trial involving 9,423 subjects that sought to determine whether replacing saturated fat with omega-6 rich vegetable oil (corn oil and margarine) would reduce the death rate from heart disease by lowering cholesterol.

It didn’t. Mortality and cardiovascular events increased even though total cholesterol was lowered by 13.8%. For each 30 mg/dL reduction in serum cholesterol, the death risk rose by 22%. In conclusion, the Evidence-Based Medicine study authors note that:14

“In most fields of science the existence of contradictory evidence usually leads to a paradigm shift or modification of the theory in question, but in this case the contradictory evidence has been largely ignored, simply because it doesn’t fit the prevailing paradigm.”

Deception Through Statistics

If lowering cholesterol doesn’t reduce mortality or cardiovascular events, there’s little reason to use them, considering they come with a long list of adverse side effects. Sure, there are studies claiming to show benefit, but many involve misleading plays on statistics.

One common statistic used to promote statins is that they lower your risk of heart attack by about 36%.15 This statistic is derived from a 2008 study16 in the European Heart Journal. One of the authors on this study is Rory Collins, who heads up the CTT Collaboration (Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration), a group of doctors and scientists who analyze study data17 and report their findings to regulators and policymakers.

Table 4 in this study shows the rate of heart attack in the placebo group was 3.1% while the statin group’s rate was 2% — a 36% reduction in relative risk. However, the absolute risk reduction — the actual difference between the two groups, i.e., 3.1% minus 2% — is only 1.1%, which really isn’t very impressive.

In other words, in the real world, if you take a statin, your chance of a heart attack is only 1.1% lower than if you’re not taking it. At the end of the day, what really matters is what your risk of death is the absolute risk. The study, however, only stresses the relative risk (36%), not the absolute risk (1.1%).

As noted in the review18 “How Statistical Deception Created the Appearance That Statins Are Safe and Effective in Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease,” it’s very easy to confuse and mislead people with relative risks.

Statins Sabotage Your Health

A stunning review of statin trials published in 2015 found that in primary prevention trials, the median postponement of death in those taking statins was a mere 3.2 days [what Mercola doesn’t mention is that this statistic is believed to result from statins’ anti-inflammatory effects – 20+ years of research suggest that arterial plaques are caused by inflammation, not cholesterol buildup – see https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5986484/%5D. While potentially extending life span by 3.2 days, those taking statins are also at increased risk for:

Diabetes (if taken for more than two years, your risk for diabetes triples)Dementia, neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric problems such as depression, anxiety and aggressionMusculoskeletal disordersOsteoporosisCataractsHeart diseaseLiver damageImmune system suppression

[…]

https://alethonews.com/2022/06/11/research-confirms-statins-are-a-colossal-waste-of-money/

 

 

Why I’m 99% certain Justin Bieber’s facial paralysis was caused by COVID vax

Was it vaccine related? That’s what the math says. Here’s my calculation.

Steve Kirsch

Via BrianPeckford

Executive summary:

The VAERS data shows that Ramsay Hunt Syndrome (RHS) is 160 times more likely after a COVID vaccination than for all the other vaccines combined in any given year. And if you exclude the anthrax vaccine from that comparison, the likelihood is simply too high to calculate (0 cases in 32 years).

So the COVID vaccine should definitely be considered as a possible cause for this rare disease. I show below that the estimated rate of RHS after COVID vaccination is 338 cases per 100,000. The medical literature says it occurs naturally in 5 cases per 100,000. Therefore, it is 99% likely that Justin’s RHS was caused by the vaccine, and only 1% chance that he got “unlucky.”

Sadly, it’s unlikely Bieber’s doctors will ever acknowledge that so it’s unlikely he’ll get the care he needs (treat both the RHS and the vaccine injury). He’ll simply assume he is just unlucky.The mainstream press isn’t doing its job if they don’t report this (which they won’t).

Introduction:

I was just finishing a slide in my Elephant deck scolding Jonathan Jarry for ridiculing my comments about how shingles is exacerbated by the COVID vaccines (search for Jarry in the deck).I take a break and I check my email and it is lit up with messages from my followers about Justin Bieber per this story:Here’s one of the messages:

Seems eerily similar to a vaccine related shingles activation, amongst other things.  All these odd ones are popping up in what seemingly is a more than normal fashion, by a fair bit.  We even have new problems, like “Sudden Adult Death Syndrome” which I am reading about all of the sudden.  Hmmm….This is the bad news for Justin Bieber.

Compared with Bell’s palsy (facial paralysis without rash), patients with Ramsay Hunt syndrome often have more severe paralysis at onset and are less likely to recover completely.

Bieber’s wife was also likely vaccine injured. For example, see this tweet about his 26 year-old wife who had a mini-stroke after she was vaccinated. Lot of young people getting strokes nowadays… the one thing they have in common: they’ve all been vaccinated.

What does VAERS say about this?

First, here’s what the slide I wrote says about shingles. But according to Jonathan Jarry, the “Pseudoscience Buster” at McGill, I am a misinformation spreader for pointing out the high rate of shingles recurrence as acknowledged in the peer-reviewed literature.

In my defense, according to VAERS, there were 54 shingles reports following the COVID vaccines in the US and associated with death. There were 0 cases in 2020 for all vaccines combined.

[…]

Via https://peckford42.wordpress.com/2022/06/11/why-im-99-certain-that-justin-biebers-facial-paralysis-was-caused-by-the-covid-vaccine/