Jacob Morgan's Blog, page 36

September 30, 2013

Get This Blog Delivered to Your Kindle; Read it on Any Device

By now you’ve certainly noticed that this site doesn’t look the same way it used to and has in fact been completely changed to do away with anything related to social business and is now 100% focused on the future of work and collaboration.  You can read more about the change in a post introducing the future workplace.  However, I wanted to point out  a new and very useful feature of this new site and that is the ability to get the content delivered directly to your Kindle device.  In other words, you can read the articles just like you would an ebook that you open up from your Kindle app (regardless of what device it’s on).


At the bottom of each post you will see a “send to Kindle” button, click on it.


kindle subscribe to blog


From there you simply need to log into your Amazon account (assuming you have one, if not you need to make one)


sign into amazon


Then when the content opens up you simply hit the “send” button on the bottom right hand of the page.


send to kindle


And you’re done, now when you open up your Kindle app (regardless of what device it’s on) you will see it there along with all of your other ebooks and content.  In the example below I am using an iphone, just click on the article when it appears, and…


read kindle


Enjoy!


photo (1)


One of the goals I had with the new site was to make it much easier for people to consume and interact with the content and I believe the ability to read it via your Kindle app, does just that.  You can send the content to read right away or to read later when you don’t have internet access, such as on a train, or in a cab.  Either way I hope this new feature is something you find to be both valuable and useful.


As always, thanks for reading!


 


 


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 30, 2013 00:08

September 27, 2013

Friday Vendor Roundup: 15Five, Clarizen, & Bitrix24

Every Friday I’m going to attempt to summarize any relevant news in the future of work/collaboration space. I’ll provide the name of the vendor, a short summary of what the announcement or piece of news is with a link to the original, and finally a short POV. I can’t cover every single thing that comes out but I will do my best to provide as much relevant content as I can. If you have something you think I should include then please send it over and I will decide if it’s something I can add.  Ideally I’d also like to see the product which means we can schedule a demo or just me access so that I can take a look at it.


15Five-Logo


15Five launches version 2.0


15Five recently launched the newest version of their product which includes a new user interface, the ability to “like” content, private messaging, reporting into specific groups, and a host of other things.


Link to announcement


My POV


15Five isn’t your traditional collaboration platform.  In fact the whole premise of the platform is that employees spend 15 minutes a week writing up a short report and managers spend less than five minutes reading it and providing feedback.  It’s basically designed to give you a “pulse” for your company.  Each week employees are asked a handful of questions (around 5) such as “how are you feeling?” or “have you had any wins this week?” Managers then respond.  The new design and features look great the platform is very easy to use but again it’s not a product that helps facilitate collaboration or getting work done.  It’s still in the early stages so we’ll see what happens!


clarizen logoClarizen (client) adds JIRA integration


Clarizen is a platform for project management and JIRA is a platform for bug tracking and now the two are integrated together.  This means that anything on the development side can now be more effectively planned and managed through Clarizen.


Link to announcement


My POV


The integration makes complete sense in my opinion.  However, Atlassian also offers a product called Confluence which also allows for collaboration and management of any R&D issues.  Clarizen is a more robust project management platform though.  The integration should make it much easier for any technical teams to go through the whole cycle of finding bugs, fixing bugs, and rolling out the changes (as well as any general development projects).


bitrix24-logoBitrix24 releases the latest version of their collaboration platform


Bitrix24 announced new features such as real time updates in activity feeds, document collaboration, video conferencing, email connectors, more customization’s for how you use and interact with Bitrix24, and a host of other things.


Link to announcement


My POV


You know, I really like the Bitrix24 product.  I’ve kept an eye on them for a little while now and they have come a really long way.  The product looks great and offers a lot of functionality.  The UI isn’t that much different from what you might expect to find in another collaboration platform but there are some minor details that give it that little bit of differentiation.  I think the sweet spot for Bitrix is either smaller or mid-size businesses but for that particular market it has a great offering with a very reasonable price point.  The link above talks about all the new additions but I think this is one of their most significant releases as far as functionality goes.


Until next week!


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 27, 2013 00:08

September 23, 2013

Meeting Requirements vs Meeting Needs

seo-checklistA while ago I was meeting with a prospective client who told me about how much trouble they were having with their collaboration efforts at his company.  We talked for a while and I was shown a list of requirements for what the platform should have.  I took that list and then went to go speak with a few employees in the organization to find out why they weren’t using the tools if the requirements were met.


One of the requirements was to have the ability to collaboratively edit and create documents so I go to the first employee to ask her about it.  She says, “sure you can do that in the platform but it requires some knowledge of HTML and wiki markup language to know how to actually work on a document with someone.”


Another requirement was to have the ability to create private groups for teams.  Again, I go to another employee to ask him about it. He say, “oh ya, you can create groups if you want but then you need to wait at least a week before that group will get approved, by that time we no longer need the group.”


Finally, another requirement was to allow employees to motivate and encourage each other by giving each other badges or “kudos.” Again I go to another employee and ask them about this and the response I got back was, “Yes, you can assign badges and give “kudos” to coworkers but the problem is that you need upload your own badge and then tinker with it so that it looks decent when it’s uploaded not only that, there is no context around what the badge is for or what the “kudos” is for.”


This is a problem of focusing on requirements instead of needs.


Oftentimes those who develop requirements for collaboration platforms aren’t the same people who are going to be using them. Requirements are usually put together in the form a big list which someone can go down and check off.  Then if any issues arise in the future such as employees not using the tools, those who developed the requirements can say, “we checked off everything you asked for, it’s not our problem.”


This is a situation I have seen many times and the problem is that many of those responsible for these initiatives aren’t looking at the big picture, they are purely focused on the technology requirements instead of actually understanding the problems that these technologies need to solve and how employees are going to use them.


This is a very costly mistake to learn but you can avoid this very expensive lesson by doing the following:



Develop your use cases by speaking with employees at your company in various departments to get their feedback and perspective.  This is research.
Make sure the team leading this effort is cross-functional, meaning it’s not just a bunch of technologists working on a product.
Communicate the updates and developments to employees, don’t wait for everything to be done.  Communication is key.

That’s all you need to do, three things which are mainly focused on communication.  This is a classic example of bringing together both the needs of the business with the requirements of the technology.


 


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 23, 2013 07:30

September 20, 2013

Friday Vendor Roundup: Mindjet, Spigit, AtTask, Harmon.ie, Box, & Tomfoolery

Every Friday I’m going to attempt to summarize any relevant news in the future of work/collaboration space. I’ll provide the name of the vendor, a short summary of what the announcement or piece of news is with a link to the original, and finally a short POV. I can’t cover every single thing that comes out but I will do my best to provide as much relevant content as I can. If you have something you think I should include then please send it over and I will decide if it’s something I can add.  Ideally I’d also like to see the product which means we can schedule a demo or just me access so that I can take a look at it.


See the rest of my Friday Vendor Roundups


mindjet logoMindjet and Spigit merge


Mindjet and Spigit are merging to become a single company.  The Mindjet name will stay the same as the 100 Spigit employees fold into the new entity.


Link to announcement


My POV


This is one of those acquisitions that makes complete sense but also one that I didn’t see coming.  Spigit does a great job of helping organizations manage the ideation and innovation process and Mindjet does a good job of giving employees a platform where they can brainstorm and map out their ideas before they enter that development.  As far as I know both companies were doing relatively well but they saw an opportunity to combine their products to build a complete innovation and ideation management platform.  Both companies have great teams and I’m looking forward to seeing how they integrate their products and build them out.


attask logo AtTask releases new “Documents”


The new documents update allows employees to manage what AtTask calls the end-to-end documentlife cycle.  This includes organizing and visualizing, collaborating and sharing, proofing and reviewing, approving and distributing, and storing and reusing.


Link to announcement


My POV


While most vendors offer somewhat similar features when it comes to document management, I don’t believe that others are as thorough in addressing all of these features around documents.  AtTask is a relatively new vendor on my radar but they are putting together quite a good project and content management product.  I’m looking forward to getting more familiar with the product and the the team in near future.


Ha rmon.ie releases Office 365 and Sharepoint for Android devices


harmon.ie logo


Harmon.ie established partnerships with Good Technology, Airwatch, Citrix Ready, Samsung KNOX, and MobileIron to provide employees a full featured app to access Office 365 and Sharepoint from their mobile devices (Android and IOS but IOS has already been out).


Link to announcement 


My POV


This is certainly a positive announcement since security is always a top issue for many companies.  This basically means that employee who rely on Office and Sharepoint can now access anything and everything need from their mobile devices.  I’m not 100% clear on the details though because as far as I know, most enterprise collaboration vendors also allow for and provide secure access to Office and Sharepoint through their applications and many of them work with vendors such as Good Technology and Airwatch.  Either way it’s clear that most businesses to use Sharepoint and Office 365 and empowering that mobile workforce by allowing them to use mobile apps to access people and information is always a good thing!


box_logoBox adds new productivity features


Box announced a few things at their recent Boxworks conference including: Notes (designed to be a Google docs killer), a preview experience (a beautiful new way to see your content), new admin tools, and the ability to add meta-data (for developers).


Link to announcement


My POV


The big announcement was the introduction of Notes which is designed to act just like Google docs which means you can collaboratively create and edit documents with other employees.  I’m certainly a big fan of Box and the work they are doing.  Do I think the new features are groundbreaking or earth-shattering?  Absolutely not but I do think they are closing the gap around working and collaborating instead of just managing content and storing information.  I fully expect them to continue in this direction.


tomfoolery anchorTomfoolery launches their Anchor product on Android, Adds Box and Dropbox integration


Well the title says it all!  Tomfoolery originally launched their product on IOS devices and are now unveiling their Android app to connect and engage the mobile workforce.  Box and Dropbox integrations are available across all their supported devices.


Link to announcement


My POV


Most people have never heard of Tomfoolery or their product Anchor, and that’s because the team behind it is small, the product is new, and there isn’t a lot going on in terms of marketing.  However, Anchor is perhaps one of the most beautifully designed mobile apps for collaboration that I have seen on the market today.  Their main target market is definitely not the enterprise but I think they can make a dent in smaller and perhaps (later) some mid-size organizations.  Box and Dropbox are the two most popular document management and collaboration platforms so integrating with them is certainly a good idea, as is adding the Android app.  They have a unique opportunity to enter the market by providing something that really rethinks the way work should be done.  As of now the app is free.


 


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 20, 2013 00:08

September 18, 2013

When it Comes to the Future of Work, Would Your Rather Try or Succeed?

who is white backgroundI’m oftentimes amazed at how many times I speak to people running future of work or collaboration initiatives for their company who are just not prepared to do so, and it’s not their fault.  Organizations are in a tough spot.  Many of them see and feel that the world of work is changing but they aren’t sure what to do about it.  So what inevitably happens is someone gets appointed to be in charge of these projects.  The people who get appointed could be anyone with an interest in the future of work.  While these types of employees are fantastic to have as community managers I wouldn’t hand over all of the responsibilities to them which include everything from vendor selection and strategy development to technology roadmaps and education and training.


In the last year or so I also started to notice an interesting trend.  When I first started helping companies with things related to the future of work I would be be collaborating with people who had job titles such as: CIO, VP of IT, Head of Marketing, Global Knowledge Manager, and others.  Now I see new roles emerging such as: VP of Transformation, Chief Collaboration Officer, Director of Future Solutions, and the like.  I still see my fair share of the other titles as well but new ones are creeping in.


It’s an interesting shift which to me signifies that the future of work is something that is a genuine and growing concern for many business leaders around the world and they are staffing up in order to make this work.  Not only that but they are creating relatively senior level roles around this.


The reality is that everything related to the future of work and collaboration is a process.  This process has a big impact and it’s not something that can just be assigned or handed over to anyone just for the sake of saying “we tried.”  You don’t want to try you want to succeed, and that requires a bit more commitment.


I’ve written about structuring and building enterprise collaboration teams in the past but the key thing here is that they are teams, not individuals.  We also have to remember that these jobs didn’t exist a few short years ago so there is no schooling or formal training in these areas and the level of experience is oftentimes not that great.  This means that there is a lot of learning that needs to happen and this learning should already be going on in all companies today (even though it’s not).


I have found that the most effective ways to help educate employees around the future of work and collaboration is as follows:



Provide budget to attend conferences and network with other practitioners.
Leverage resources such as books on the topics of collaboration and the future of work, I wrote a whole 304 page strategy guide on collaboration.
Look at many free resources online such as Slideshare presentations, Youtube videos, and blog posts.
Find consultants or people who you can bring in to help get you started and steer you in the right direction.
Invite employees from other companies to present and share their insights and ideas at your company.
Bring your senior team together to discuss what the future of work looks like at your company to give context to what this all means.
Experiment with the technologies that are out there, many of them have freemium versions you can take for a test drive.

I’m sure you can think of other things here but don’t just throw employees at the problem and expect a solution.  That’s what companies do who “try”; but we already agreed that it’s better succeed than to try, right?


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 18, 2013 00:08

September 16, 2013

The Vendor Opportunity Gap in The Future of Work

robot thinking technologyThe bulk of what I do entails working with large (and some mid size) organizations on helping them understand and then adapt to the changes we are seeing around the future of work and collaboration.  Part of this means understanding what’s happening on the technology side of things which is one of the reasons why I started doing my Friday Vendor Roundup.


An innovation problem or a marketing obstacle?


For the better part of a year now I’ve noticed a bit of stagnation on the innovation side for many of these vendors.  Granted they are still adding features, improving their products, and making other enhancements; but they are not innovating.  Most of the things I’m seeing are around new pricing structures, redesigned UIs, some new minor features, and perhaps some added integrations and capabilities. Of course this is still important but I don’t see anyone really pushing the envelope so to speak.


There’s been this long running joke where if you go to the exhibit call of a conference and cover up the logos and branding of the various products, that you won’t be able to tell them apart.  They all look the same, do the same thing, and integrate with the same applications.


Many of these technologies have been around for a while now and instead of completely rethinking how work is and should be done they are instead continuing to pile onto their existing platforms which are now not as innovative as they used to be half a decade ago. There is a big opportunity for some disruption to happen here (and I know of a few companies looking to break into this area in the next few months).


The current market challenge


Now having said that I also understand that vendors are also in a bit of a catch-22.  Vendors have switched from innovating and product development mode to marketing and selling mode while just doing enough on the product side to keep pace with the market.  While these technologies have been around for a few years now, many companies have yet to begin investing in deploying them and developing strategies around them.  I get the sense that perhaps some vendors want to move forward at a more rapid speed but then they realize that it might not make sense to do so unless they have more companies purchasing at least the very basic versions of their product.  In other words what’s the incentive to innovate unless more organizations start to get on board?  (of course I’m not their target market since I’m in the industry).


There are essentially five stages for building a collaborative organization but from a broader perspective I’m seeing a bifurcation in the market.  There are those companies who are heavily investing in the future of work and want more innovative technologies and then there are those companies who are at the very bottom of the totem pole who are just getting started (or who started a while ago but haven’t moved anywhere).


The challenge for vendors is how to address the needs of both.  How can they provide something for the advanced companies and also something for the companies just getting started?  Keep in mind that the market for companies that are just getting started is far bigger which is why most vendors are focusing on sales and marketing instead of on innovation, unfortunately this frustrates the advanced companies.  Many vendors are offering the same products and services to companies regardless of what their needs are or how advanced they might be, this is one of the reasons why I advocate the feature adoption framework for collaboration.


An opportunity gap


As mentioned above I see a big opportunity for new vendors entering the collaboration/future of work space that are going to challenge and disrupt the current state of things.  Many existing vendors have their hands tied so to speak.  They can’t innovate faster than the market is ready to adopt since so many customers are used to their existing platforms which means that they have to keep pace with things, at least until adoption of the technologies increases.  However, this doesn’t mean that new vendors can’t come in and start to shake things up a bit, and there are a few which are just on the horizon.


So now the question is what are existing vendors going to do to innovate and what are new vendors going to do to shake things up?


 


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 16, 2013 00:08

The Vendor Opportunity Gap in The Future of Wok

robot thinking technologyThe bulk of what I do entails working with large (and some mid size) organizations on helping them understand and then adapt to the changes we are seeing around the future of work and collaboration.  Part of this means understanding what’s happening on the technology side of things which is one of the reasons why I started doing my Friday Vendor Roundup.


An innovation problem or a marketing obstacle?


For the better part of a year now I’ve noticed a bit of stagnation on the innovation side for many of these vendors.  Granted they are still adding features, improving their products, and making other enhancements; but they are not innovating.  Most of the things I’m seeing are around new pricing structures, redesigned UIs, some new minor features, and perhaps some added integrations and capabilities. Of course this is still important but I don’t see anyone really pushing the envelope so to speak.


There’s been this long running joke where if you go to the exhibit call of a conference and cover up the logos and branding of the various products, that you won’t be able to tell them apart.  They all look the same, do the same thing, and integrate with the same applications.


Many of these technologies have been around for a while now and instead of completely rethinking how work is and should be done they are instead continuing to pile onto their existing platforms which are now not as innovative as they used to be half a decade ago. There is a big opportunity for some disruption to happen here (and I know of a few companies looking to break into this area in the next few months).


The current market challenge


Now having said that I also understand that vendors are also in a bit of a catch-22.  Vendors have switched from innovating and product development mode to marketing and selling mode while just doing enough on the product side to keep pace with the market.  While these technologies have been around for a few years now, many companies have yet to begin investing in deploying them and developing strategies around them.  I get the sense that perhaps some vendors want to move forward at a more rapid speed but then they realize that it might not make sense to do so unless they have more companies purchasing at least the very basic versions of their product.  In other words what’s the incentive to innovate unless more organizations start to get on board?  (of course I’m not their target market since I’m in the industry).


There are essentially five stages for building a collaborative organization but from a broader perspective I’m seeing a bifurcation in the market.  There are those companies who are heavily investing in the future of work and want more innovative technologies and then there are those companies who are at the very bottom of the totem pole who are just getting started (or who started a while ago but haven’t moved anywhere).


The challenge for vendors is how to address the needs of both.  How can they provide something for the advanced companies and also something for the companies just getting started?  Keep in mind that the market for companies that are just getting started is far bigger which is why most vendors are focusing on sales and marketing instead of on innovation, unfortunately this frustrates the advanced companies.  Many vendors are offering the same products and services to companies regardless of what their needs are or how advanced they might be, this is one of the reasons why I advocate the feature adoption framework for collaboration.


An opportunity gap


As mentioned above I see a big opportunity for new vendors entering the collaboration/future of work space that are going to challenge and disrupt the current state of things.  Many existing vendors have their hands tied so to speak.  They can’t innovate faster than the market is ready to adopt since so many customers are used to their existing platforms which means that they have to keep pace with things, at least until adoption of the technologies increases.  However, this doesn’t mean that new vendors can’t come in and start to shake things up a bit, and there are a few which are just on the horizon.


So now the question is what are existing vendors going to do to innovate and what are new vendors going to do to shake things up?


 


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 16, 2013 00:08

September 13, 2013

Friday Vendor Roundup: Huddle, HiqhQ, Mango Apps, & Mindjet

Every Friday I’m going to attempt to summarize any relevant news in the future of work/collaboration space. I’ll provide the name of the vendor, a short summary of what the announcement or piece of news is with a link to the original, and finally a short POV. I can’t cover every single thing that comes out but I will do my best to provide as much relevant content as I can. If you have something you think I should include then please send it over and I will decide if it’s something I can add.


Huddle launched Connected Desktop


huddle-logo


Connected Desktop is essentially a major update comprised of four main areas:



Cloud storage and access- files no longer need to be saved locally, the cloud is now your hard drive and you can edit, open, lock, store, and collaborate on files.
Outlook integration- basically everything that happens in Outlook is transposed into Huddle and moved into a collaborative threaded environment instead of email chains.
Huddle Viewer- images and videos can be previewed directly from the cloud as if you were accessing them directly on your computer or an external hard drive.
Huddle Dashboard- an activity stream that allows you to see content and activity happening within your organization.

Link to announcement


My POV


This is a huge upgrade for Huddle with a heavy bet on the cloud (which I think is the right bet to make).  The main challenge with Huddle is that while it might be a good platform for content management or project management, it still lacks in many of the collaborative capabilities that other vendors offer.  However, Huddle’s main competition is Box and Sharepoint and not necessarily Jive or Chatter.  I really like the new updates but still, it would be great to see features that allow employees to share what they are working, ask and answer questions, submit ideas, etc that don’t specifically revolve around a specific piece of content. 


HighQ release Collaborate 3


high q logo


This newest release includes some big new additions such as: responsive design for mobile (all devices), tablet, and desktops; secure file sharing, rich profiles, private messaging, activity streams (including microblogging, image sharing, commenting, and “liking”), and task management.


Link to announcement


My POV


Truth be told I can’t imagine how HighQ existed without having these features in place which many consider to be standard for any collaboration vendor.  This is certainly a huge release for HighQ which has really need to step up in order to be considered a “true” vendor of collaboration software.  Of course the challenge now is that with the current new features HighQ still isn’t better or ahead of anyone else, they simply caught up to where much of the market is and vendors are already taking next steps with 3rd party integrations (and building out their own ecosystems), adding video and voice calling, Office integration, and a host of other things.  Congrats to the team on a major release but they need to keep it coming!


Mango Apps  announces version 8.2 


mango apps logo


Disclosure: Chess Media Group uses a no-cost version of the software which Mango has “given” us.


The new Mango release features things such as a new admin roles interface, ability to set user permissions on folders, smart settings which “remember” how you like to view information, moving folders between projects, and a host of other things.


Link to announcement


My POV


It’s funny, you don’t really notice many of these changes on the surface but you certainly notice them when you are actually working within Mango and realize that you would like to do something such as move a file from one group to the other.  This release mainly focused on specific use case that I’m sure customers were requesting and mainly deals with more functional or tactical changes instead of broader new feature sets.  Still, this new release makes it much easier to use Mango to get work done without worrying about the little tedious things that make you say “darn, I wish I could do XYZ.”  I’m excited to see the future versions of Mango, especially since I was given a little glimpse into their roadmap.  These guys really have a great product that rivals what the other major players have.


Mindjet releases newest version of MindManager


mindjet logo


MindManager was given a big update to help teams improve the


way hey visualize and then act on the mind maps that they create. The full list of new updates is extensive but highlights include: the ability to build formulas directly into your mindmaps, “what if” analysis and visual decision making that allows users to set thresholds and color code information (to help make better decisions), and drag and drop functionality to easily move content around.


Link to annoucement


My POV


In all fairness I haven’t used or seen their product in quite some time.


If you use mindmapping software then MindMapper is certainly one of the leaders in that space. Imagine using a visual mapping tool to get all of your work done (assign tasks, budgeting, roadmaps, etc) and that’s what you have with MindManager.  I’d be curious to see how they fit in with enterprise collaboration platforms such as Chatter, Jive, Yammer, Telligent, and many others. While I can’t say that their product really fits within the enterprise collaboration space, I suspect that they will either release a product in this area or add features to their project management tool.


 


 


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 13, 2013 01:25

September 12, 2013

The Evolution of Work Explained

For those not aware, I recently started a column on Forbes where I cover the future of work and collaboration.  I write there once a week and try to write here 2-3x a week when I can.  I recently shared an infographic that my team created on the evolution of work which became quite popular so I wanted to share it here as well.


I found that I was always explaining the future of work and repeating the same things over and over again and there wasn’t really a good visual which helps summarize what the future of work actually looks like.  So I decided to make something that anyone can use, which you can see below.


The full article on the evolution of work can be found on Forbes where I provide more detail around what these different things actually mean.


Let me know what you think


Evolution of work


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 12, 2013 00:08

September 9, 2013

Case Study: The Future of Work and Collaboration at Electronic Arts

EA-Case-StudyWe just released our new case study on the future of work and collaboration with Electronic Arts (EA).  We had the privilege of speaking with Bert Sandie who is their director of technical excellence and helps drive these efforts.  For those of you not familiar with EA they are one of the top distributors, publishers, and developers of interactive entertainment software.  They have around 10,000 employees globally and some of their flagship games include: Battlefield, SimCity, Command and Conquer, Dead Space, Mass Effect, and many others.


EA games are created by many teams (oftentimes at least 20) that are spread out across various geographical regions so being able to virtually bring together people and information was a huge business driver.  Hundreds of people come together to work on a single game!


In this case study we explore things such as:



How EA was able to leverage social and collaborative technologies to connect their people and information.
Where the push for new technologies and strategies came from and how they were formalized.
What tools EA is actually using and how they are using them to connect their people and information while providing a culture of collaboration.
The operational impact of these new technologies and strategies on EA.
The lessons learned.
Future plans for changes and enhancements.

The case study also features several screenshots from their collaboration portal as well as plenty of insights and tips from Bert.


You can download the EA case study here.


 


 


 


 


 


Send to Kindle

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on September 09, 2013 00:08