Discover new books on Goodreads
Meet your next favorite book
to-read
(6)
currently-reading (3)
read (1611)
did-not-finish (1)
audiobooks-audio-dramas (561)
comics-manga (552)
big-finish (189)
books-of-2022 (189)
books-of-2023 (164)
currently-reading (3)
read (1611)
did-not-finish (1)
audiobooks-audio-dramas (561)
comics-manga (552)
big-finish (189)
books-of-2022 (189)
books-of-2023 (164)
books-of-2021
(161)
classics (122)
books-of-2020 (103)
books-of-2024 (103)
lgbtq (96)
books-of-2025 (90)
required-reading (65)
books-of-2019 (64)
books-of-2026 (64)
classics (122)
books-of-2020 (103)
books-of-2024 (103)
lgbtq (96)
books-of-2025 (90)
required-reading (65)
books-of-2019 (64)
books-of-2026 (64)
“The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
“There's no doubt about it, being a policeman warps a man's mind and ruins that sunny faith in his fellow human beings which is the foundation of a lovable character. There seems to be no way of avoiding this.”
― Very Good, Jeeves!
― Very Good, Jeeves!
“He never went out without a book under his arm, and he often came back with two.”
― Les Misérables
― Les Misérables
“He was fond of books, for they are cool and sure friends”
― Les Misérables
― Les Misérables
Required Reading With Tom and Stella
— 5 members
— last activity Mar 15, 2019 09:57AM
This is a reading group to read along with the podcast Required Reading With Tom and Stella. This is a show where two teachers talk literature. In eac ...more
Robert’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Robert’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Robert
Lists liked by Robert



























