Fifty Shades of Grey
discussion
dont like it ..dont read it


LOL. I lived and worked in Juarez, Mexico until September of last year. The Plaza is a fictional account of the very real events in Juarez, a territory that has been viciously fought over since 2007 by the Juarez and Sinaloa cartels. It is largely based on the death of a crime reporter that was a true hero and is representative of the many victims of the drug war in Mexico that are in no way directly related to the cartels but have been written off as colateral damage by the government.

;)

Thanks. I truly appreciate that.

Plus I nearly got myself killed in the process of writing it, so that has to account for something. Thanks Kris.

See, most readers have no clue as to what authors go through during the writing/marketing process...best of luck!


Yes I did and yes it was scary. Truman Capote was actually related to me on my mother's side.

Really cool, thanks Jenna!

I too am a published author of two books and working on my third. It's not an easy process. I belong to a writer's asso. and have joined several critiquing groups. Our members were former editors for major newspapers or retired educators in the literary field. We have a retired pathologist, some in law enforcement and various other fields. We read a couple of chapters and get constructive criticism before submitting to an editor. Some editors leave a lot to be desired. I learned my lesson with my first book. I found out errors happen to the best of them. Bill O'Reilly is one with Killing Lincoln. He had them redo it...of course they did because of who he was. We are not all that lucky. I've got great compassion for authors and tend to cut them some slack.

Yes I did and yes it was scary. Truman Capote was actually related to me on my mother's side."
I bet you have some literary talent as well. Have you ever explored it? He was an amazing author.

Exactly...we tend to not think about the grueling process of writing as we are reading. So it's nice to be reminded. Im an artist and much time goes into my work, which I put out there and hope for the best, but expect anything. So I can somewhat relate. Best of luck to you, as well, with your writing!

Yes I did and yes it was scary. Truman Capote was actually related to me on my mother's side."
I bet you have some literary talent as well. Have you eve..."
I have about 15 books in various degrees of completion. ;0)


I write for a living (technical grant writing), so I am always putting words to "paper." My problem is when I am writing, I am not reading and I have a hard time choosing which one I want to do. So...I read a little and write a little. ;0)

Oh interesting point. I actually share the same opinio..."
I hate putting down a book, but I will if I find it truly awful. There are too many good books and too little of my time to waste on something I am not enjoying. And I don't put down books often, I actually enjoy most books that I read, my husband often acuses me of falling in love with every book I read. Obviously this was not the case with this one. LOL
On the rare occassion I do put down a book I generally have atleast slogged it out to halfway. I tend to think that halfway is a fair go on a book. If it hasn't got me by then, it is unlikely that I will enjoy the end, or atleast I am not interested in the end.
In the case of 50 shades I read all of the first book and about half of the second before I had to give it up. It was painful read for me, and I had much rather read something I enjoy.
I don't think there has to be a minimum amount someone reads from a book, but they should be honest about their progress and why they gave it up if they are going to be critical. For example, if someone said to me that I couldn't get past page three because there were two many typos and it drove me crazy, I think that is legitimate. If they said to me I couldn't get past page 3 because the story is boring, I would say that this was an unfair critism because they hadn't really tried. :D


I generally give the author half of the book to hook me too. If I am not hooked by then, I probably will never be. Most of the time I just finish the book though.

i agree with both ur comments and im the same way i finish the book anyways even if i dont like it

I completely agree with you.





"
See...I would view this a book not of a damsel in distress, but a man in distress. Christian does not save Ana. She saves him. Despite all of his wealth and power, he is not happy. He might think of himself as her knight in shining armor, but as weak as she is portrayed, the emotional strength is hers.

Mary,
Brilliant summation :)

Mary,
Brilliant summation :)"
I agree!

Agreed. The set up here is more similar in some ways to "Pretty Woman" - where Julia Roberts character saves the lonely isolated mogul (Richard Gere) than it is to Twilight and various other romances where the wealthy guy saves the lonely isolated girl.
Also Ana doesn't strike me as a damsel. For one thing, he never saves her, she saves him or his family. Or she saves herself. And she holds her own throughout the books, never really capitulating to him.
This is quite different than most of the erotica fiction that I've read and quite a few historicals.
I remember getting excited when Ana kicked her sleazy editor in the balls when he attempted to rape her. (I've been waiting for a heroine to do that forever.
Finally...a romance novelist handles it right! Thank you!) And I rather liked how she handled crazy Leia, not to mention the fact that she shot Jack to protect herself. Ana was tough.
Where's the damsel behavior? Not seeing it.
In the other novels I read, the woman was either raped (often in the past) or the hero saved her at the last minute. Sylvia Day's Bared to You and Nora Roberts Sweet Revenge are examples.
This book felt different because it was erotica, but with a strong female character who was not experienced with sex (usually they are or they aren't strong in many of the contemporary erotica novels that I've read), and it contained no rape. She's never raped. And when someone attempts it or tries to hurt her - she fights back.
*When Christian beats her? She leaves him.
* When Jack tries to rape her? She kicks him the balls.
* When Jack attacks her - she shoots him.
* When her step-father caused her problems in the past, she fought back and left the situation to live with Ray.
When she doesn't like what Christian does? She tells him. She doesn't brood about it forever. Very rare in a romance novel. Often the characters never talk and just continue to misunderstand each other. Here? They talk.

All great points Christine. I also like the Pretty Woman reference (even though they are opposite ends of the spectrum on sexual experience).

I refuse to read it."
It's not encouraging women to go off with jerks actually.. if you actually read the book you might understand, he may be stern about things but he was brought up with anger issues and he finds a way to cope and falls inlove and if you read the book she is the one that wants him to touch her like that. This book is mainly about their love for eachother than the sex. FYI.....

Pretty Woman didn't occur to me...until my mother read it. (She only made it through to book 2). While opposite spectrums on the sexual experience, she said the set-up was similar. Where you have the rich/isolated guy...who falls for this gal, and buys her clothes, tells her that he doesn't want a commitment, doesn't want love - just sex. A sexual contract. And she wins him over and saves him.
It's a definite trope. Not everyone likes it though.
A lot of my friends hate Pretty Woman with a passion.
And really despise that specific trope.
50 Shades like a lot of genre novels hits peoples buttons one way or the other. It either turns them on or really offends them.

I agree



I concur completely!

Or numerous television serials...Dallas comes to mind, as do soap operas, reality shows, comic books, etc.
It's not an uncommon trope or anything..and certainly not limited to the romance genre. I've seen it in sci-fi and noir fiction.

same here good comparison :)





Mary,
Brilliant summation :)"
I agree!"
Thank BOTH of you!

I think that people can say they did not like the writing enough to continue with the book. However, when people start stating that Christian is an abusive jerk who is controlling Ana and that is not a good message to send to young impressionable girls, it is obvious to me they have not read all of the books. If you want to discuss the themes and issues in the books, you need to read them.

THANK YOU!

Why skip over the sex scenes? It describes how intimate they are together and how gentle he is with her, but still gives her what she wants. its one of the most key parts

Barbra, you're so right on your take.
all discussions on this book
|
post a new topic
Darkfever (other topics)
On Dublin Street (other topics)
The Siren (other topics)
Sempre (other topics)
More...
Books mentioned in this topic
On the Island (other topics)Darkfever (other topics)
On Dublin Street (other topics)
The Siren (other topics)
Sempre (other topics)
More...
Haha...that was a very good point, actually. I think, by this point, a lot of people are reading out of curiosity. Whether good or bad reviews, the fact is- it's getting A LOT of attention. That's what a book needs for success. I'll have to look into this "forbidden", no good for ya, Plaza... Lol