Fantasy Aficionados discussion
Authors
>
Which Fantasy Author Did You Find Most Disappointing?
Beth wrote: "...and I liked him the same way I like the droids from Star Wars...as a novelty"
Novelty? Novelty?
Ma'am.
Thems fightin words.
Novelty? Novelty?
Ma'am.
Thems fightin words.

I agree with you. Aside from all the controversy, and regardless of what does or does not happen in the later books (I did, unfortunately, read all three) - I just found them poorly written with meandering plot lines and thinly drawn, unengaging characters.

Novelty? Novelty?
Ma'am.
Thems fightin words."
lol..."Novelty" as in "not a human being," so that you'd not expecting to actually "engage" with them on a human level. You don't expect the same reactions, emotions, etc. You're delighted when you see some similarities to humans, but you're not expecting them.
I'm not a *huge* Star Wars fan...not because they're not good, but because I was forced to go to the movies with my younger brother. Not the fault of the movies...lol. This was a comparison of the droids to an armored bear, only...which is kind of a funny sentence, in itself.

*whispers* Agreed. *flees*"
Colleen...Tracey...is there room in a broom closet for all of us? Kit...no one agrees on everything...there's a reason I was afraid to say it...the books get rave reviews. Just not from me. :)

http://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/5..."
Wow. Lol, thanks for the link, very... enlightening :)
I think I'm still going to read them, after all, I spent good money on 'em. Probably not anytime real soon though.

It would have to be a big closet! *meep*
I'm used to being the outlier on books that everyone raves about. With a few exceptions, it seems to be my general lot in life. Heh.

*sigh* That's not what happens."
Don't ya love it with the rumors? That was all the talk...usually, the rumors are enough to make me read them to see how much truth is in it...but, yeah, nah. I just didn't care enough. I just wanted to make the point that it wasn't the "hubbub" that influenced me. :)


Good to know. Tastes are different. It's the misrepresentation that bothers me.


the movie version of The Golden Compass was okay. i was very frustrated by the happy, hopeful ending that leaves out a stark truth that is learned about the protagonist's father's nature. but now that i know that there will be no more films in the series, i guess i'm not too unhappy with that positive ending.
@Beth - well, alright. I reckon that's a good nuff explanation.

*whew* Thought I was going to have to go into Fantasy Anonymous Relocation program.

This book was on cassette and I had it in my company vehicle, luckily alone. I got the first "graphic scene"...okay, fast forward through that before getting to the job sight. Then another came up...fast forward through that, don't want to shock a customer...wait a second, another one...and another and...okay, I get the picture.
I'm sure she has a big following. :) I haven't tried another of her books since, I'm afraid I might get corrupted or something... LOL
I've been told she started out writing actual UF but found the soft core porn paid better, I don't know. Still, I'm not one of her readers. :)

The torti was one of my long-term fosters...she's now in a permanent home...my fb profile pic has one very similar to the one in your pic. I need to update. :)

My understanding (and it may be flawed) is that she's moved beyond soft-core...she includes "every which way but loose" porn and beastiality...um, ew.


rotfl...I'm not sure which story is funnier!

Ummmm. *gag*
Seriously? Why not just cut the bull and go write erotica then?? Stop confusing people. That's why UF is all starting to look the same. Thank goodness for Patricia Briggs.

Glad she found a home!

I think I've said this somewhere before, but I couldn't even get through the first Anita Blake. It just seemed silly to me. Just my opinion, though! :)

I think I've said this somewhe..."
I have six or seven of her books, all I have read is the first book in graphic novel, and found it all sexed out, not for me.


I recei..."
I'm sorry you feel that way. A lot of people disagree with you. Perhaps you should've read some samples on her website before asking for someone to give it to you?
www.paravia.com
Couldn't agree with you more Elizabeth...though I'm still partial to the Word & the Void series



I'd have to say Card's Alvin Maker series.
The first 3 books are very strong. Very close to on par with the original 4 Ender books, which I regard quite highly.
But after that, it's just a slow slide into boredom.
(I won't even go into my disappointment with some of Card's public statements about non-writing issues. That's a kettle of fish I'm not going near.)

It seemed like the kind of book I would love but I was so disappointed! Anne Bishop even dedicates the book to Charles De Lint who is one of my favourite authors, but I could not make it past the first few chapters!


It seemed like the kind of book I would love but I was so disappointed! Anne Bishop even dedicates the book to Charles De Lint who is one of ..."
Hmmm. I had heard good things about that book, and was actually considering it as a gift for my daughter (who is 22 but enjoys reading YA. What did you find disappointing?

It seemed like the kind of book I would love but I was so disappointed! Anne Bishop even dedicates the book to Charles De Lin..."
The Dark Jewels series is very popular and a lot of people love it, but for me it was too dark. I don’t mind dark if there is light to balance it out. I also have a hard time getting into books where in the first few chapters I have to learn all about a new universe. I prefer the type of fantasy fiction that takes place in our world and the fantasy is hidden, and the magical world slowly unfolds

Another it Robert Jordan in the Wheel of Time. I don't see why he kept widening and expanding the plot to include events that we quite uninteresting, like the capture of Perrin's wife. He would have done better to have kept the story focused on Rand.


I know it's a unique thing for characters to travel through different worlds and all but the endless descriptions of yellow skies and pink clouds then *gasp* funny looking trees just seemed like useless filler. And I wouldnt have minded if it was a couple paragraphs here and there but the 6-7 page acid trips which littered the entire series was just too much. I am hardly ever critical of books but for something as highly rated as this to be so repellant was really a new experience for me. I was actually reading this aloud with my fiance and after the first two books, I began just to skip over the extra words and read the substance of the novel. My fiance had no idea what I was doing because the extra junk had no bearing on the actual story. And it allowed me to finish the thing much faster so that I could get on to more enjoyable reading. After that, we read The Lions of al-Rassan which was a much needed relief.



I tried reading it not long after I got it for him, and wasn't really drawn in. I keep intending to start again, but the other Zelazny books I've read since then have less than impressed me, and now I'm not sure if I want to try again.
I don't think Zelazny is for me. His writing style doesn't do it for me - I don't like to feel like I need to guess at the gaps. I just want to read the story, not investigate it.

I know it's a unique thing for characters to travel through different worlds and all but the endless descriptions of yellow skies and pink clouds then *gasp* funny looking trees just seemed like useless filler. And I wouldnt have minded if it was a couple paragraphs here and there but the 6-7 page acid trips which littered the entire series was just too much. I am hardly ever critical of books but for something as highly rated as this to be so repellant was really a new experience for me."
Thanks for this... I'll definitely be passing on this then. I really dislike that kind of stuff. =\

But, I mean, I really like the ideas behind the stories - the worlds and dimensions, the Courts or Order and Chaos and the paradoxical ways in which they work and, of course, the Trumps.
And I liked Corwin and some of the other characters, too.
But there does seem to be what I could only call filler - in the middle books, especially.
But I did, eventually, read the whole series and while I'd say I enjoyed them well enough I wouldn't, personally, rave about them and would probably only recommend them to certain people.
And then I didn't really like 'Lord of Light' and I thought 'Night in Lonesome October' was cool, but not great.
I think, for me, Zelazny is one of those authors that has really awesome ideas, but I'm not always a fan of the execution.
Books mentioned in this topic
Tantalize (other topics)Tantalize (other topics)
Sword and Sorceress (other topics)
Temple of the Winds (other topics)
Memories of Ice (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Mercedes Lackey (other topics)Terry Goodkind (other topics)
Steven Erikson (other topics)
David Eddings (other topics)
Robert Jordan (other topics)
More...
*sigh* That's not what happens.