Horror Aficionados discussion
Authors
>
Robert R McCammon

"Anyway…I am not only travelling by night, I feel I am babbling by night."
Although I'm more interested in his contemporary fiction/horror than I am in his historical novels, I'm buying them all anyway to read later. I'm sure they will be very well written.
I'm happy to trust him. :)


I've been reading Mr McCammon's books for as long as he's been writing them, and I will continue to do so.
How many of us just read Boy's Life - some of us for the 2nd or 3rd time - and still say it's one of the best books we've ever read.
How many people do you think will be saying that about the Grey books?

Unfortunately, probably a lot :( cuz they are book dumb! .. 80% of the fans will be people who read 1 or 2 books a year and wouldn't know talent from a hole in the wall. Makes me sick too, to see great authors slide under the radar to make room for crap books.
About McCammon, I've read Swan's Song and loved it! He is such a great author, great character development, and had me "cringing" or "making disgusted faces" as I was reading (hard to get me to do that). I am looking forward to reading some more by McCammon.

Those Grey books will sink like a stone into obscurity in a few years.

Swan Song is also one of my favorite books but if you have not yet read Boy's Life Buddy you MUST move it to the top of your list. and I've probably said this a number of times but I also have a warm spot for Wolf's Hour ..... and Gone South .... and I could probably do this all day .....

My re-read of Wolf's Hour went well and I wanted to spend some more time with Michael Gallatin. : )




They were started as Twilight fan fiction. She changed the names and published it. Yes, it is good for her.
But when someone like McCammon who has the chops to string words together like noone else is denied space in a bookstore because he chose to go with a small publisher, something is wrong with that.
Don't you agree?


They were started as Twilight fan fiction. She changed the names and published it. Yes, it is good for her.
But when someone like McCammon who has the chops to..."
Charlene, I think McCammon deserves to be read by more readers but he himself even admitted the risk he took...and as far as the other goes, it is simply a case of supply and demand...and one hell of a demand...


I see your point, but I guess it just makes me angry that someone with little to no skill is more financially successful than someone like McCammon.

But I'm not backing down on my opinion that it's a goddamn shame and a sad statement on society that some poorly written erotica books has a readership bigger than Robert McCammon and J.K. Rowling.




Agreed...but many have criticized JK Rowling for not being a particularly good writer but her stories are entertaining...


I'm slowly re-reading all the McCammon books that I read as a teen.



Just write more stories, Mr. McCammon! :)
McCammon is an excellent writer but, respectfully, he hasn't been as prolific as he could have been, if he hadn't gotten so wrapped up in the politics of the publishing business (he's had 19 books since 1978 -- that's roughly a book every other year, when I bet he could have had almost twice that output). In another article/blog post on his website he wrote that his agent told him more or less, "just write {the stories}!"
Solid advice I wish he would have taken. Think how many more more books we could have read by him if he hadn't allowed himself to be infected by business people who didn't properly recognize and trust his creative genius.
I'm a huge McCammon fan and glad to see him back writing, period. Admittedly I'm in the New York camp being more interested in his contemporary work, but anything by him is better than what we got when he was retired. The sci-fi horror book sounds great. I might wait for him to finish the ten Corbett books before diving in there.
Label me a selfish fan, but I just want to see my favorite authors keep writing and publishing, whether self-published, small press, or through New York.


http://www.robertmccammon.com/article...
http://www.robertmccammon.com/article...
http://www.robertmccammon.com/article...
http://jpierceportfolio.wordpress.com...
There's more to it than "allow[ing] himself to be infected by business people."
Thanks.
Hunter

I also really enjoyed reading about The Village. I didn't realise there was an unpublished story out there. I'm not sure if it's something that's possible, but I would snap that up in a heartbeat if it were released by McCammon independently.
I have only a few authors in my life for whom every piece of work is a mandatory purchase and McCammon is one of them. It all started when I kept going on and on about how much I loved his books (borrowed from my sister) and how disappointed I was that his books were hard to find in Australia. Then one Christmas before The Queen of Bedlam was published, I received a box of all his book up to Speaks the Nightbird.
I've been slowly savouring his books in the midst of other reading commitments over the last few years. I'm hoping that he continues to write enough that I never catch up to him. :)

The more I read about McCammon the more respect I have for him, both as a writer and as a man.
Caleb, I'm very jealous that you have all those McCammon works ahead of you. : )

Hunter - you seem a bit (unnecessarily) defensive. Also, my comment would be more in context, and seem less like a cheap shot at a writer I deeply admire and respect, if you had included my entire quote:
"Think how many more more books we could have read by him if he hadn't allowed himself to be infected by business people who didn't properly recognize and trust his creative genius."
Respectfully, you know Robert McCammon better than most (all?) of us in this group. He's a personal friend of yours, yes/no? So, if there's more than what's in these articles and interviews (which I've read before and you'll see below seem to indicate there isn't "more to it"), that he has said somewhere publicly perhaps you can set the record straight?
Yes, Mr. McCammon also took time out to raise his daughter, but in the links referenced above the man in his own words is talking about being infected by the business side of publishing and going into a "depression."
Again, I'm not stating this to disparage Mr. McCammon in any way, I'm simply stating factual information that has come from his own words. Please correct the record if this is not the case.
http://www.robertmccammon.com/article... - December 1998
"To make this long story shorter: I ran into (collided with, actually) an editor who wanted me to change the book to make it into (my opinion here, of course) an historical romance. I will be kind to the memory of this person. We did not see eye-to-eye on anything. I simply could not make the changes I was asked to make." - Robert McCammon
and:
"The truth is that I was afraid to work, for fear of another rejection. I did keep at the new book, called The Village, but only a few pages at the time. I got very depressed during this time period, and I wondered if I ought to just quit. I was wondering what else I could do, and realized I couldn't do very much else." - Robert McCammon
http://www.robertmccammon.com/article...
"But I started running into resistance. I was told repeatedly that my fans expected a certain type of book from me, and that was the bottom line. I suggested that I might try writing under a pseudonym, but I was told that wouldn't work because then my fans "couldn't find me."
The point being, I was beginning to understand that I had a particular place in the publishing world—that place was "horror" and I ought to be satisfied with where I was." - Robert McCammon
http://jpierceportfolio.wordpress.com...
"I left my publishing house at that time, with “Speaks the Nightbird” in hand, because I just wanted to start over somewhere. I didn’t want to be thought of as the imitator anymore, and I thought I needed a new publishing house to be taken more seriously." - Robert McCammon
and:
"So, anyway, I couldn’t do the editing and I pulled the book." - Robert McCammon
and:
"That book didn’t get one offer ... I took my manuscripts, went home, and figured my career was over." - Robert McCammon

"In another article/blog post on his website he wrote that his agent told him more or less, "just write {the stories}!"
Solid advice I wish he would have taken.
And that's really where the "there's more to it" came from. You're right, of course, as your excerpts indicate. One prominent editor at the time publicly chastised him for not having thicker skin. But when he'd had to fight to get BOY'S LIFE published as he wrote it and then everything that followed that, I completely understand why he felt the way he did.
However, even his agent at the time was telling him, "Just give the publishers what they want." In other words, "Don't write what makes you happy, just give the publishers what they want." Instead of going to bat for him, his agent(s) let him down, too.
I took your comment, "solid advice", in the same manner, albeit perhaps unfairly. I couldn't agree with you more: I wish none of that had happened and that we'd had lots more McCammon novels to enjoy. But to say that he ignored solid advice is wrong. It wasn't solid advice, it was laziness from an agent who wasn't willing to work for and on behalf of his client. And that's why I posted all the links.
None of this, of course, is unique to Robert McCammon. Unless your name is King or Koontz, everybody has run into this, and we'll continue to see it more and more....
And yes, Rick McCammon is a personal friend of mine, and yes, I probably am too defensive. In this case, I took umbrage with one small part of your post, when I should have just let it go. My apologies.
Hunter

Let me explain in greater detail what I meant by his agent giving him "solid advice." I did not mean that he should have ever agreed to radically change his stories. Heck, I had an editor back in 1992 ask me to gut one of my horror novels and rewrite it as a woman-in-distress book instead.
So, I think we agree on this point, too :)
What I am saying was solid advice was "keep writing." Keep going. If something you write and finish doesn't work now, it might work later with somebody else (as the Corbett series eventually did with his current publisher). I wish Mr. McCammon had done the same thing rather than retiring. It's like the characters in his book The Five. They kept going, kept working on that last song, kept pushing despite their obstacles. They did something Mr. McCammon did not do and I find a fascinating parallel there.
Today, which was not the case 20 years ago, I readily admit, we can see almost everything a writer deems publishable published -- assuming they are willing to self-publish.
Robert McCammon could self-publish The Village right now, if his current publishing contract allowed and he wanted to. He could pay for an editor or put up a post and have a bunch of editors begging to do his bidding pro bono, I'm guessing, just to be able to add to their reference list.
So the only good reason today why any publishable work like The Village goes unpublished is if an author's current publishing contract does not legally allow him to self-publish under a pen name and/or the author him/herself doesn't want the story published.
Frankly, I think if he can he should self-publish that book. This way he'll get 70% at Amazon and other publishers direct instead of the much smaller percentage he's getting from his current publishing arrangement. I know he likes having hardcover versions of his books as collectibles for readers. There are places he could have excellent hardbound copies made of his books, if he wanted to do so and his current contract allowed. He could do almost everything New York publishers do except get his books in grocery stores and the like.
I know there used to be a major stigma with self-publishing (vanity, yadda, yadda), and to some extent there still is with some, but it's fading as more and more trad pub authors break ranks and do it themselves (with the help of professional editors, of course) and make a lot more money.
Writers as good as Robert McCammon no longer must have unpublished manuscripts that they deem publishable sitting on shelves gathering dust.
The "solid advice" his agent gave is that we missed out on the great stories he should have kept writing. We missed out on something he could have given us that now is forever lost in the combines of time.
I wish every writer with fans would realize that we're out here and we crave more good stories. All that you can write. Please fellow writers remember this when you get discouraged with business garbage. It's the stories that matter more than anything else to both you and readers.
As much as possible, please, please leave the suits out of the art.

The key to everything, I think, is this: Depression robs people of the ability to think and act logically....
McCammon actually did keep writing until 1998. Though it took a long time, as he describes, he wrote Speaks the Nightbird from 1993 to 1996, then wrote the The Village from 1996 to 1998. His actual "retirement" really only lasted five years, from late 1999 to 2004, when he started working on The Queen of Bedlam. At the time, it seemed to him like the right thing to do.
There are any number of small press publishers who would love to publish The Village. McCammon addressed this in a January 2010 post: "But...I might at some point clean it up and put it out there, so The Village is certainly not dead. It's just that right now I have so many other things going on."
He has considered self-publishing (at one time, we were going to publish The Village for free on his website---this predates the ebook boom---but that plan was scrapped for various reasons), and may still. But as he said in his "I Travel By Night" essay a few days ago, "One might say the era of the brick-and-mortar bookstore is coming to an end, but my work must be on the shelves of as many bookstores as possible, or I will find myself laboring at a “hobby” instead of having a “career”." For all of the talk about self-publishing, I know of very few authors who are actually able to make a living with their self-published ebooks, at least for now.
You mentioned the characters in The Five: that view is something that McCammon shares now. In the midst of his depression, he wasn't able to keep going. Once he found his way out of that, he started writing again and, as he's said, has plans for numerous more books.
Hunter

What I'm suggesting is that--if he can within the parameters of his contract--he should strongly consider doing both: publish traditionally, self-publish and/or use small/indie publishers for work that doesn't fit in the New York box. Consider the self-published stuff supplemental income. That's what a number of authors are doing these days.
(and yes, many are not hobbyists)
The business is changing. I'm glad to read that he has been thinking of exploring other publishing models and only took five years off from writing. Still, in those five years (ironic considering the title of his most recent contemporary novel), we lost at least two more novels we could have read . . . someday.
I appreciate the dialogue and additional insight. Have a nice day, sir :)

he should strongly consider doing both: publish traditionally, self-publish and/or use small/indie publishers for work that doesn't fit in the New York box.
That's essentially what's happening now. Subterranean Press is publishing the Matthew Corbett books. The intention was for The Five to be published by a NY publisher. Unfortunately, for whatever reason, no NY publisher picked it up. That will change next year, though, when TOR publishes The Five in paperback.
Subterranean does beautiful books, and their trade editions are priced comparably to, if not cheaper than, NY-published books. Unfortunately, B&N, as a general rule, won't stock small press books, so even though the Subterranean books are available via the same distributors the NY houses use, B&N ignores them because Subterranean is a small press (and because Subterranean can't afford to pay for placement, which the NY houses do). But hopefully that'll change to....
Thanks. You have a nice day, too!
Hunter

Depression is an illness, though not one that many take seriously, even today. I've seen a number of people who suffer from it (my Mom for one) and it robs people of all of their motivation and reason for living. It's a dangerous disease.
Lastly, Hunter...everyone needs to have a friend like you. : )

Aside from the one comment that Todd made that prompted my reply, I don't disagree with anything Todd has said. Rick and I have discussed self-publishing, POD, etc. Two years ago, nobody had much interest in ebooks. Now they're catching on big time. We'll see what happens.
And Caleb, how cool that you received the box of books. Was that from your sister?
Hunter

people speak lightly of being 'depressed' at times but unless you've experienced a true depression you have no idea how much it takes over and changes your life - I am unfortunately experiencing this first hand and some days it's an effort just to get out of bed. I'm just glad to see that Mr McCammon was able to get himself out of it and back to writing - and his life.

At the end of day, I think his fans respect him MORE for following his muse, and his heart. I only hope--for HIM--that it truly pays off someday soon. He's one of the best...



That's why I encourage you all to recommend the books to your friends, post on Facebook, other Goodreads groups, etc. Maybe a grassroots effort can help repair the damage. 8-)
Thanks for all the kind words.
Hunter

Books mentioned in this topic
The River of Souls (other topics)Blue World (other topics)
Gone South (other topics)
They Thirst (other topics)
Swan Song (other topics)
More...
It's a rarity for a writer to consistently produce great works of literature. That's what I call them, and how I think of them, no matter the genre.
The man is a wordsmith and deserves better than this.