UK Amazon Kindle Forum discussion

405 views
General Chat - anything Goes > The 'Take it Outside' thread This thread will no longer be moderated ***

Comments Showing 3,101-3,150 of 5,982 (5982 new)    post a comment »

message 3101: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21811 comments Because if the money is handed out immediately it'll go to the people who need it
But if they wait a little while all the quangos and local authorities and lobby groups and consultancies have got their plans in as to how it should be used.
And of course a fair bit of it then goes in administration


message 3102: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments The bureaucracy is expanding to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.


message 3103: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21811 comments Absolutely.
The worrying thing is that the only time I've ever come across a bureaucracy significantly cut back was with the fall of the Roman Empire in the west


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments Well, did Obama's lecture make anyone change their minds, I'll admit it put my back up but if he's talking about a trade deal still being negotiated either with the EU or the UK surely there is no change to the situation at present. If it's a future deal and we will be at the ' back of the queue' we won't be worse off than we are now. It sounded like an English speaking speech writer had input as Americans get in line, we queue. I smell help from Downing Street,


message 3105: by Jim (new)

Jim | 21811 comments Radio four pretty well said the same thing Lynne


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments It's not hindsight but I've never been convinced by him on anything. I do think Cameron's judgment is bad on the subject.
Changing the subject, Will, on the Pointless quiz show there were 2 ladies from Haverfordwest, I recognised one and paid attention. They had to name a cabinet minister since 2015 and one named Priti Patel which was a very good answer. However her partner named Haig which was totally wrong. However one of the pointless politicians which would have won them through to the next round was Crabb. How ironic he was their own MP as well. They did appreciate the irony.


Geoff (G. Robbins) (merda constat variat altitudo) (snibborg) | 8204 comments The thing is that we won't be at the back of the queue when signing trade deals. The US is desperate to sign the TTIP treaty, something I'm opposed to by the way, because the US corporations want the control of our markets. This is especially true of the MPAA and the RIAA who produce English language media. And they have huge influence on the US government.


message 3108: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments I heard Obama's speech. and it really convinced me to vote leave. Basically he said that the 'Special Relationship' only existed as long as we toed their line, and did what they wanted. How special is that?

And from all that I've heard about TTIP, which even the EU is beginning to realise has a lot of issues with it, I'd vote for anything that meant we didn't sign it!

The US gov. cannot stop one of their own companies, based in the US, from hosting the IS web stuff. They will not be able to do anything about the existing level of trade.


message 3109: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Lynn, love that!


Geoff (G. Robbins) (merda constat variat altitudo) (snibborg) | 8204 comments Unusually, Nigel Farage made a telling comment on Any Questions this week. He said that Obama said that if we left the EU we would be at the back of the queue to get a trade agreement.

His comment was that no American would say that, they would say "the back of the line" and he's absolutely right. That speech was written in Downing Street just for propaganda purposes.

Did they really think that no one would notice? The more I listen to this garbage the more determined I am to vote Out.


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments This famous trade agreement is years down the line too. So we'd be in the same situation as we are now.


message 3112: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Exactly Lynn. This trade agreement is 10 years in the negotiating now, and it seems to be unravelling daily! The prospect of completion is, thankfully, a long way away.


message 3113: by Michael (new)

Michael Cargill (michaelcargill) | 2992 comments Or maybe the speech was written for the audience.

The Yanks aren't usually in the business of doing favours like that, they're very much in the business of doing what benefits them the most.


Geoff (G. Robbins) (merda constat variat altitudo) (snibborg) | 8204 comments Michael Cargill wrote: "Or maybe the speech was written for the audience.

The Yanks aren't usually in the business of doing favours like that, they're very much in the business of doing what benefits them the most."


You're probably right, Michael, the speech was probably written for the audience, however, it was also using British vernacular. Americans rarely consider that, they tend to think you should understand American English.

Mind you, we tend to do that too.


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments The interviews I saw today suggest he's back-pedalling somewhat. Too late, he said it and it can't be unheard.


message 3117: by Marc (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments course he can be unheard, as is consistent with the full 8 years of his lame duck tenure as President.

What i don't understand about the Americans is they seem to vote for a president simply as a figurehead and rallying call to inspire them to pull themselves up by their bootstraps to fulfil their personal version of the American Dream (which probably doesn't exist if it ever did). I say this because Trump seems to be doing exactly the same, he has no solid policies but people can rally to him as a figurehead. Obama's was "yes we can", of which he himself contributed not one whit of anything tangible.


Lynne (Tigger's Mum) | 4643 comments I'm sure you're right there Marc I think a lot of black people voted for him thinking he would change their lives just by being a black president.


message 3119: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Cameron: I'm very keen to conclude TTIP before the end of Barak's Presidency....

Whilst thousands demonstrate against it in Europe, and the negotiations are to be sealed for 30 years, and even the national governments are not allowed to know what''s in the treaty until it is signed!

More reasons to vote leave


message 3120: by Geoff (G. Robbins) (merda constat variat altitudo) (last edited Apr 25, 2016 02:52AM) (new)

Geoff (G. Robbins) (merda constat variat altitudo) (snibborg) | 8204 comments One of the things in the leak of TTIP was that if governments change things for health reasons, for example the blanking of cigarette packaging, the cancer pushing bastards manufacturers can sue the government for loss of earnings.

And that's just for openers.


message 3121: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments I think the referendum result will be pretty close. The remain argument is "the EU is crap, but change is risky," and I can't see the remain side muster the troops with that ringing endorsement.

Leave, however, will probably have their voters queuing outside the polling stations at 6am.

And judging by the aftermath of the Scottish independence referendum, if Remain don't get at least 60% of the vote, and it turns out to be close, say, 52/48, this issue will rumble on for years.


message 3122: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Even with an OUT vote, the issue will rumble on for years with the 'negotiations' to leave.


message 3123: by Michael (last edited Apr 27, 2016 12:23PM) (new)

Michael Cargill (michaelcargill) | 2992 comments Hillsborough.

Only took 30 years and a Jimmy McGovern drama for the truth to eventually come out.

Rupert Murdoch is doing his best to get in the way though.


message 3124: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Times had to change it's front page, didn't it?


message 3125: by Michael (new)

Michael Cargill (michaelcargill) | 2992 comments Yeah, they made a 'mistake' and said mistake had nothing to do with the visitation of Mr Murdoch himself that day.

*cough* bullshit *cough*


message 3126: by Marc (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments I blame Jerry Hall


message 3127: by R.M.F. (new)

R.M.F. Brown | 2124 comments Will wrote: "Even with an OUT vote, the issue will rumble on for years with the 'negotiations' to leave."

Given how incompetent this government is at the best of times, I'd have to agree.


message 3128: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments So, any thoughts on the elections in the UK yesterday?


Geoff (G. Robbins) (merda constat variat altitudo) (snibborg) | 8204 comments The shock is that, apart from conservative gains in Scotland, nothing as changed.

Interestingly, Labour are static even with a new leader. First time ever. Even Michael Foot did better.


Rosemary (grooving with the Picts) (nosemanny) | 8590 comments As few as possible!

No surprises here other than the increase in the Tory vote. I don't think many would have expected that.


message 3131: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Considering the vitriol poured over Corbyn by the UK media, I think static is a good result!

And, ladies and gentlemen, for those who support the outsourcing of public services to private industry, I present the triumph that was Barnet ...


message 3132: by Jim (last edited May 06, 2016 12:29AM) (new)

Jim | 21811 comments From the BBC the only outsourcing was the printing. Round here local authorities have never done printing
I assume that there has to be something that hasn't been mentioned?

Interesting article from the Guardianhttp://www.theguardian.com/politics/2...
Written before the vote

Just pondering the results, I wonder whether we're going to start seeing Labour as the party of the South East 'metropolitan intelligentsia' They have been pushed into third place in Scotland because working class voters prefer the SNP. In Wales I was surprised at the success of UKIP. Especially since that party has always been regarded as the dark face of English nationalism.


message 3133: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Isn't UKIP the preferred party of slack-jawed yokels?


Rosemary (grooving with the Picts) (nosemanny) | 8590 comments UKIP got 0 votes in Scotland. Zero. Along with RISE, Solidarity and Women's Equality parties. Which presumably means that these numpties didn't even manage to vote for themselves??


message 3135: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments I think you are barking up the wrong tree there, Jim. In the council elections, the vote hasn't really changed from a high water labour vote 4 years ago, despite the best efforts of the media.

In Wales, UKIP scored 18%. They haven't any directly elected members, just a share on the regional PR vote that has got their Leader and others into the Assembly. I was pleased to see Leanne Wood, the Plaid Leader, directly elected in Rhondda. Plaid are actually closer to the Labour Party in policies than Welsh labour are, these days.


message 3136: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Hehe


message 3137: by Jay-me (Janet) (new)

Jay-me (Janet)  | 3784 comments Our local radio station made me laugh this morning

what I heard was
"Coming in the news headlines - Life gets tougher for the Labour leader and thousands are expected to line the streets in celebration"

It wasn't until the actual news came on that it was clear that I had heard headlines from two separate news items.


message 3138: by Will (new)

Will Macmillan Jones (willmacmillanjones) | 11324 comments Finally, I see that some Police forces have commenced criminal enquiries into the hidden election expenses of some Conservative MP s. Only the Independent seems to have carried the story though


message 3139: by Will (new)


message 3140: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments So how are we feeling about the new mayor of London?

Personally, I think it's rather cool that a real person has won, not the other one.

How many of us in the group actually live in London?


message 3141: by Marc (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments moi


message 3142: by Marc (last edited May 07, 2016 06:38AM) (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments London gets a lot of stick from the rest of the country and it's true we're pretty much a city-state with the property prices here.

But we are a wealthy city who still possesses a social conscience unlike many parts of Middle England. We are also an incredibly diverse city that doesn't fear otherness. UKIP have no traction here. The pro-cannabis mayoral candidate polled more than the Far Right BNP (and incidently the One-Love candidate who i presume was pro-Ecstasy, so hash beat E).


message 3143: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments So that's Marc's pharmacological theory.


message 3144: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Oh and which part of the country is Middle England, please?


message 3145: by Marc (new)

Marc Nash (sulci) | 4313 comments market towns, new towns & county towns


message 3146: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Nope, I don't get it.


Rosemary (grooving with the Picts) (nosemanny) | 8590 comments It's between Top England and Bottom England.


message 3148: by Michael (new)

Michael Cargill (michaelcargill) | 2992 comments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_...

It's not a region, it's a term that refers to middle class types.


message 3149: by David (new)

David Manuel | 1112 comments Patti (baconater) wrote: "Oh and which part of the country is Middle England, please?"

That's the little villages where the hobbits live, isn't it?


message 3150: by Patti (baconater) (new)

Patti (baconater) (goldengreene) | 56525 comments Ah. The belly button. I get it.


back to top