What's the Name of That Book??? discussion
Just to chat
>
Let's play a game...

"
You are correct. *le sigh* I'd hoped it would be less transparent.

Done
I feel like I should know #21, but I'm drawing a blank, how about [spoilers removed]?"
As before, think outside the box. Think crosswords. Not all words mean what you think they mean.
Michael


All right, change perspective. Think of men and a line.

No, sorry. Sort of on the right track, though. Think of an earlier period, and more scientific.
Michael


25) Single mom gets job in male-dominated field, is chosen for a special assignment.

Sort of. Getting close.

Way off. "Linemen" is deliberately obscure. Think of men and lines.

25) Single mom gets job in male-dominated field, is chosen for a special assignment."
(view spoiler)


I know. My reply was more humorous than serious. But it -does- fit.

Nope. Sorry. Bargle got it right. The clincher was "seasonal"

I don't think any of the Bible ones are going to top Lobstergirl's "Powerful dad unable to stop beloved son's execution."

I don't think any of the Bible ones are going to top Michele's "Powerful dad unable to stop beloved son's execution.""
But I prefer Justanotherbiblophile's "unwilling".
Michael

That would be "Oh Lord, why hast thou forsaken me? You're such a dick".

That would be "Oh Lord, why hast thou forsaken me? You're such a dick"."
Totally OT; but I suspect that the virile representation of manhood didn't have negative connotations back in the day... Making sure the tribe had enough people to continue as a vibrant, not-to-be-overwhelmed-by-hostile-neighbors (or just die/age out) was of particular concern; which is why a lot of non-reproductive sex was frowned upon, as you needed to be doing the reproductive stuff, or your tribe was snuffed out.
So, I suspect insults were along some other lines...

"
On the other hand, I suspect that coarse humour and the puncturing of pompous religiosity are as old as the human race. Have you read Petronius Arbiter?

You are correct. 5 stars awarded *****"
Yay! I'll try to come up with something now. Something that isn't too obscure. ;-)

Nope. But I suspect it was only when times were secular enough that you could get away with it. I doubt Egyptians were doing it (except very, very quietly, in their own heads) when priests of the God-king controlled the writing, the water, tax collection, the army, and food distribution...

Mostly agreed. Whilst there were elaborate water management systems, They didn't -really- control the water - the Nile floods every spring and waters the fields, regardless of what the Gods may think.
But it's precisely because only the temple scribes could write that we have such a one-sided view of Egyptian society. If you want to know what the common people were thinking, you have to look at things like tavern ballads, scurrilous pamphlets, and court cases. And because almost all the written Egyptian sources that survive are either state-related or funerary, we get a very biased picture.
It's a bit like looking at the official output of the Soviet Union. We now know that there was massive dissent - but you wouldn't know that from approved sources.

Blah, blah, blah. Not a novel, nor a stumper. :P

I'd say it should've been "A character (named after/known by the name of) a crossbred quadruped..." to be legit.
And also, it's only in the second book that that character comes into play.
Also, your guess hits just about every other aspect of that stumper.
I was working my way thru Schrodinger's cat variations and the like...

28) Former student takes over school in order to thwart evil-doers.

Ding! Ding! Ding! Valerie is correct! I would also have accepted the 2nd book in the series alone.
Books mentioned in this topic
A Little Princess (other topics)The Honest Truth (other topics)
Paper Towns (other topics)
On the Road (other topics)
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn (other topics)
More...
I feel like I should know #21, but I'm drawing a blank, how about (view spoiler)[The Warrior of World’s End (hide spoiler)]?