What's the Name of That Book??? discussion

872 views
Just to chat > Let's play a game...

Comments Showing 151-200 of 393 (393 new)    post a comment »

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments You should spoiler your guess for #18

I feel like I should know #21, but I'm drawing a blank, how about (view spoiler)?


Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments Cumbling Michael wrote: "22 sounds a lot like (view spoiler)
"


You are correct. *le sigh* I'd hoped it would be less transparent.


message 153: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Justanotherbiblophile wrote: "You should spoiler your guess for #18

Done

I feel like I should know #21, but I'm drawing a blank, how about [spoilers removed]?"

As before, think outside the box. Think crosswords. Not all words mean what you think they mean.

Michael



message 154: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments OK, the 21 clue is perhaps a bit too obscure. So, the crucial word is "lineman". Outside of current American telephone / power culture, what might that mean?


Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments Obvs, stick figure. But I know no robot birds :P


message 156: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Cumbling Michael wrote: "OK, the 21 clue is perhaps a bit too obscure. So, the crucial word is "lineman". Outside of current American telephone / power culture, what might that mean?"

All right, change perspective. Think of men and a line.


message 158: by Cynthia (new)

Cynthia | 186 comments Also all the above guesses for #18 are incorrect, but very good guesses.


message 159: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Cynthia wrote: "Just a shot in the dark but is 21 [spoilers removed]?"

No, sorry. Sort of on the right track, though. Think of an earlier period, and more scientific.

Michael


message 160: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments 22. Wealthy capitalist discovers benefits of seasonal redistribution to proletariat


message 161: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments 23. I gave you my heart. You gave me Napoleon's chicken. Trust me...


message 162: by Justanotherbiblophile (last edited Apr 26, 2015 08:31AM) (new)

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments You need to renumber those, you correctly guessed 22 already :D


message 163: by Justanotherbiblophile (last edited Apr 26, 2015 01:15PM) (new)

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments [no longer current]


Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments So, 23 is a (view spoiler), but I don't know which one I should pick... :P


message 165: by Sophie (new)

Sophie (notemily) | 477 comments "Linemen" just brings football to mind, but I can't think of any football players harassed by robot birds. :P


message 166: by Sophie (new)

Sophie (notemily) | 477 comments I don't know if anyone here has read this, but it was a favorite of mine as a child:

25) Single mom gets job in male-dominated field, is chosen for a special assignment.


message 167: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Justanotherbiblophile wrote: "So, 23 is a [spoilers removed], but I don't know which one I should pick... :P"

Sort of. Getting close.


message 168: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Sophie wrote: ""Linemen" just brings football to mind, but I can't think of any football players harassed by robot birds. :P"

Way off. "Linemen" is deliberately obscure. Think of men and lines.


message 169: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Sophie wrote: "I don't know if anyone here has read this, but it was a favorite of mine as a child:

25) Single mom gets job in male-dominated field, is chosen for a special assignment."


(view spoiler)


Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments Man, I think we should house-rule out the Bible as something you can use as a stumper, and as an answer. There are so many stories in the Bible, most descriptions can be made to fit *something* in it.


message 171: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Justanotherbiblophile wrote: "Man, I think we should house-rule out the Bible as something you can use as a stumper, and as an answer. There are so many stories in the Bible, most descriptions can be made to fit *something* in..."

I know. My reply was more humorous than serious. But it -does- fit.


message 172: by Bargle (last edited Apr 26, 2015 09:38AM) (new)

Bargle | 1755 comments 23. (view spoiler)?


message 173: by Gerd (new)

Gerd | 221 comments Not sure if she's a single mother, but is 25. (view spoiler)?


message 174: by Juels (new)

Juels | 3312 comments #18 (view spoiler) ??


message 175: by Juels (new)

Juels | 3312 comments #23 (view spoiler) ??


message 176: by Cynthia (new)

Cynthia | 186 comments Juels wrote: "#18 [spoilers removed] ??"

No, that is incorrect.


message 177: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Bargle wrote: "23. [spoilers removed]?"

You are correct. 5 stars awarded *****


message 178: by Cumbling Michael (last edited Apr 26, 2015 12:51PM) (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Juels wrote: "#23 [spoilers removed] ??"

Nope. Sorry. Bargle got it right. The clincher was "seasonal"


message 179: by Justanotherbiblophile (last edited Apr 28, 2015 01:04AM) (new)

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments [no longer current]


message 180: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments OK, further clue time.

For 21, 'Way down South in Dixie.

For 24, Not Oranges.


message 181: by Sophie (last edited Apr 26, 2015 02:49PM) (new)

Sophie (notemily) | 477 comments No, 25 is not the Bible, ha. Nor is it Gerd's suggestion.

I don't think any of the Bible ones are going to top Lobstergirl's "Powerful dad unable to stop beloved son's execution."


message 182: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Sophie wrote: "No, 25 is not the Bible, ha. Nor is it Gerd's suggestion.

I don't think any of the Bible ones are going to top Michele's "Powerful dad unable to stop beloved son's execution.""


But I prefer Justanotherbiblophile's "unwilling".

Michael


message 183: by Sophie (new)

Sophie (notemily) | 477 comments "Dad, you're such a dick." - Jesus, probably


message 184: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Sophie wrote: ""Dad, you're such a dick." - Jesus, probably"

That would be "Oh Lord, why hast thou forsaken me? You're such a dick".


Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments Cumbling Michael wrote: "Sophie wrote: ""Dad, you're such a dick." - Jesus, probably"

That would be "Oh Lord, why hast thou forsaken me? You're such a dick"."


Totally OT; but I suspect that the virile representation of manhood didn't have negative connotations back in the day... Making sure the tribe had enough people to continue as a vibrant, not-to-be-overwhelmed-by-hostile-neighbors (or just die/age out) was of particular concern; which is why a lot of non-reproductive sex was frowned upon, as you needed to be doing the reproductive stuff, or your tribe was snuffed out.

So, I suspect insults were along some other lines...


message 186: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Justanotherbiblophile wrote: "...So, I suspect insults were along some other lines...
"


On the other hand, I suspect that coarse humour and the puncturing of pompous religiosity are as old as the human race. Have you read Petronius Arbiter?


message 187: by Bargle (last edited Apr 27, 2015 08:47AM) (new)

Bargle | 1755 comments Cumbling Michael wrote: "Bargle wrote: "23. [spoilers removed]?"

You are correct. 5 stars awarded *****"


Yay! I'll try to come up with something now. Something that isn't too obscure. ;-)


message 188: by Bargle (last edited Apr 27, 2015 09:14AM) (new)

Bargle | 1755 comments 26. A quadruped crossbreed causes problems for very advanced mathematicians.


message 189: by Justanotherbiblophile (last edited Apr 27, 2015 11:32AM) (new)

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments Cumbling Michael wrote: "On the other hand, I suspect that coarse humour and the puncturing of pompous religiosity are as old as the..."

Nope. But I suspect it was only when times were secular enough that you could get away with it. I doubt Egyptians were doing it (except very, very quietly, in their own heads) when priests of the God-king controlled the writing, the water, tax collection, the army, and food distribution...


message 190: by Juels (last edited Apr 27, 2015 12:59PM) (new)

Juels | 3312 comments #26 (view spoiler)


message 191: by Cumbling Michael (new)

Cumbling Michael (CumblingMichael) | 165 comments Justanotherbiblophile wrote: "Nope. But I suspect it was only when times were secular enough that you could get away with it. I doubt Egyptians were doing it (except very, very quietly, in their own heads) when priests of the God-king controlled the writing, the water, tax collection, the army, and food distribution..."

Mostly agreed. Whilst there were elaborate water management systems, They didn't -really- control the water - the Nile floods every spring and waters the fields, regardless of what the Gods may think.

But it's precisely because only the temple scribes could write that we have such a one-sided view of Egyptian society. If you want to know what the common people were thinking, you have to look at things like tavern ballads, scurrilous pamphlets, and court cases. And because almost all the written Egyptian sources that survive are either state-related or funerary, we get a very biased picture.

It's a bit like looking at the official output of the Soviet Union. We now know that there was massive dissent - but you wouldn't know that from approved sources.


message 192: by Bargle (new)

Bargle | 1755 comments Juels wrote: "#26 [spoilers removed]"

Nope, not that one.


Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments But, unlike USSR, there weren't any non-official sources. Writing was sacred, and only taught to the scribes (priests). Nile only floods what it can reach - the irrigation systems (ditches, surveying, topographical calculations) allowed much more land to be reached, along with check dams, etc. Which is why you get more than some limited villages next to a river, and get an Empire. Having the army allows you to control the areas that're naturally done by seasonal flooding, and the rest exist at your whim.

Blah, blah, blah. Not a novel, nor a stumper. :P


message 196: by Justanotherbiblophile (last edited Apr 28, 2015 12:27AM) (new)

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments Man Valerie, that's twisted. The *name* is a quadruped... and I think that would be cheating :P

I'd say it should've been "A character (named after/known by the name of) a crossbred quadruped..." to be legit.

And also, it's only in the second book that that character comes into play.

Also, your guess hits just about every other aspect of that stumper.

I was working my way thru Schrodinger's cat variations and the like...


message 197: by Justanotherbiblophile (last edited Apr 28, 2015 01:00AM) (new)

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments 27) Tripedal monsters destroy the human economy, because of baleful astronomical influences.

28) Former student takes over school in order to thwart evil-doers.



message 198: by Justanotherbiblophile (last edited May 05, 2015 07:31AM) (new)

Justanotherbiblophile | 1814 comments [no longer current]


message 199: by Bargle (last edited Apr 28, 2015 03:53AM) (new)

Bargle | 1755 comments Valerie wrote: "26 [spoilers removed]"

Ding! Ding! Ding! Valerie is correct! I would also have accepted the 2nd book in the series alone.


message 200: by Valerie (last edited Apr 28, 2015 06:18PM) (new)

Valerie (veegood) | 248 comments Yay, yay, I got one! (Is this where I confess that I haven't read the book, but I guessed 'mule' from the clue and then spent some time googling mules and mathematicians?)

It does look interesting, I think I'll have to read it.


back to top