The Sword and Laser discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
What Else Are You Reading?
>
What Else Are You Reading - October 2023


Man, can Heinlein tell a story. I was hooked in the first few pages. Released in 1949 so over 70 years old but still good. Familiar characters but well-defined strange environment on Mars. Appealing "pet" as the focus. Was almost halfway through when I realized very little had actually happened. The action got back-loaded. It's pretty much "going to school on Mars" followed by events leading to a revolution. A boy's adventure story at the start, then kids treated as adults towards the end.
Maybe part of it is nostalgia. This is the "future of the past" where planets in our solar system easily held life. Mars almost inhabitable and terraforming in progress. The local intelligent life gives permission to humans to settle.
And part of it is the acknowledged debt Stranger in a Strange Land owes to this book. The Martians of Red Planet led directly to the same race in that book. The doctor is an early version of Jubal Harshaw.
We don't have a writer of Heinlein's stature now, more's the pity. (Nor Bradbury, but his was a unique voice. Heinlein's skill could plausibly be replicated.) Libraries seem to have passed him by, an oddity for someone previously so well represented in them. There are exactly three of his books available at the LAPL Overdrive. A look on Amazon shows odd gaps; "Job: A Comedy of Justice" is not available in ebook, but forgettable-at-best works like Sixth Column or Farnham's Freehold are there. Most of the juveniles are there and are cheap. Perhaps a binge is in order...



I’m reading it too for at least the fifth time in my case, this time via the Re: Dracula podcast, which is a full-cast audiobook version released in chunks on the dates given in the book’s internal chronology of letters and journal entries. It’s a great read for spooky season, enjoy!

There are both hardware and software reasons for this. He was getting quite ill as he was writing this and by the time he finished the rough draft he was both physically and mentally out of commission and stayed that way for the next 2 years. His wife, Virginia, is said to have done the revisions since he wasn't up to it.
The software part is the combination of Robert and Virginia as self insertion as the main character. Heinlein had been married 3 times in open marriages and was also a nudist and this really comes through in this book. Beyond the setup in the first few chapters their is really no plot here except sex. Talking about sex, thinking about sex, how, when, where, and with who and how many can we have sex. The sex is all offscreen but it's all this book is about and it get boring to read about.
The setup is Johann Smith is a 95 year old billionaire who through a series of coincidences has his brain transplanted in the body of his beautiful 27 year old secretary, Eunice. Her consciousness is somehow still active in his/her mind and most of the rest of the story is the two of them having an internal dialogue on how to be a woman and get laid a lot. This includes by Jake, his former friend/lawyer (in his 70's) whom she was having an affair with, her bodyguards, her nurse/maid and doctor, and Eunice's widowed husband and his new wife.
I'll mention a few scenes behind a spoiler tag because they will upset some people. (view spoiler)
Now that all being said, there are a couple good points. Heinlein's writing style is always a pleasure for me to read. He purposefully left Eunice's race ambiguous so people could picture whatever they thought of as beautiful (he stated this in a letter to his agent).
And he treated the sex change as just accepted as no big deal by society and all expressions of sexuality were equal. I find this pretty progressive for 1970.
Oh well. It's been over 30 years since I last read this and I probably never will again. It only gets better from here.

My first thought is, "Nah, it could at most be third worst." I mean, I also love the guy but he's had some stinkers. Reading your description tho, yeah, this one has to join the "What in God's name were you thinking" list for Heinlein.
We've also got:
Farnham's Freehold: Don't have a nuclear apocalypse, because then the relatively-untouched people of Africa will take over and eat white kids as food animals! But it's okay, because the MC throws over his wife in favor of his daughter's black friend and they create a Libertarian stronghold. I've had people tell me this is satire. God, I hope so.
Sixth Column: The yellow menace invades America! But not any named country, "Pan-Asian." But it's okay, our own Patriotic Asian-Americans (tm) also fight them.

It's OK but I wish I'd done a bit of background checking first as it seems to be the first part of a quartet (or did we settle on tetralogy?)
I'm about a third of the way through and it's as schlocky and splattery as you might expect but oddly a few instances of the Z-word have snuck through.

My first thought is, "Nah, it could at mos..."
I didn't mind Farnham's Freehold so much. It was very pro Libertarian though and Heinlein said that it was meant to show that no matter what group was in power that it would become corrupted if unchecked. I think the wife in the book was a reflection of Heinlein's second wife, Leslyn, who was an alcoholic and who began to object to his acting on their open marriage.
Heinlein himself said later that he didn't like Sixth Column. Heinlein was pushed into writing the novel based on the unpublished story by his editor, John Campbell, which apparently was much more racist. Heinlein afterwards swore he'd never work off someone else's idea like that.
The one book of his that I think was poorly written style-wise was For Us, the Living. It was the first novel he wrote (1938) but never published until 2003, 15 years after his death and after the death of his wife Virginia.


Just started Daisy Jones & The Six by Taylor Jenkins Reid.

I liked the part with Hell under ISO 9000-like efficiency. I've been reading through Discworld in order, too, and thought this was one of the weaker entries. (at least it was short!)
I loved the audio version of Daisy Jones.

Frontier Corps was a by-the-numbers space marines story, basically a beach read.
Currently reading The Ramal Extraction by Steve Perry, which is quite good. I bought it when it came out and I’m just getting to it, but better late than never.



Well that was a f**king understatement.
What is wrong with this guy? Seriously.

I've had Great Classic Ghost Stories: Unabridged Tales downloaded for a while so I'm going to listen to it for spoopy season.
On the Kindle, I'm reading Star Wars: From a Certain Point of View.

I am still plugging along with the Dracula podcast. We are about a month behind but have committed to making a big push. I have a list of Dracula movies to watch as well. Starting with the ones that are least like books

Well that was a f**king understatement.
What is wrong with this guy? Seriously."
I thought it was fun as hell.

Which part? Where the 11-year-old was slitting babies’ throats or the part where they cooked a boy alive? Or was it the more gruesome and sadistic passages?

It's a solid series, a fleet of spaceships fighting its way home through solar systems with connected wormholes. Themes of leadership burden, handling a fractious team and the difficulty of having interpersonal relationships under pressure.
Kinda repetitive and stolid prose keeps this at a 4 star rating. Every book includes "enter system, fight enemy at high speeds, have problems on way out." The books suffer by comparison to Heinlein as I read Red Planet right before. His easy writing style just isn't duplicated by anybody.
It's presented as hard SF but isn't. The fleets regularly approach each other at 10% of lightspeed so computers handle the actual attack - okay fine. Then they turn around, decelerate and attack again at the same speed. Yet the MC is worried about saving fuel cells for getting to the exit wormhole. Yeah, that's only a problem if you have friction. If you're making multiple passes at full speed then each pass is enough energy to handle the trip to the exit wormhole.
Some of it sounds good but on analysis is silly. They analyze attack patterns of a fleet 30 light minutes away. Yeah, that's the distance to the Asteroid belt from the Sun. And they're picking up features of individual ships? Mmmmmkay.
The author is a US Navy vet who went to Annapolis so he clearly has been educated on the leadership issues and probably encountered some of them. So it feels real.
There's a puzzling interpersonal relationship part that seems reminiscent of Babylon 5. He's dating a fair analogue of Delenn, but then has the hots for an Ivanova stand-in. Er. Sorry, can't relate. Maybe because Straczynski did so good a job so playing with the same concepts forces a comparison.
Anyway, there's two left in the main series. This is an obvious "USA vs the Soviet Union" setup so I'm expecting this will conclude with the Syndic government falling. A bit of a wait for the last two but I will gladly move on to them.

Is Podkayne a juvenile? It opens that way with a breezy travelogue narrated first person by Podkayne. She's 9, in Martian years. Heinlein gives us enough to figure out that's 17 by Earth reckoning.
There's not much of an obvious plot for the first 3/4 of the book. Podkayne takes the trip from the Martian surface to Deimos, then shipboard adventures, then Venus. She interacts with her uncle, a veteran of the Martian independence war referenced in Red Planet, and her brother, a brainy jerk. But it's all done with love.
I reread this despite not particularly liking it the first time because I'd read some things I wanted to follow up on. The mother apparently is supposed to be unsympathetic because she's a hard charging career woman who can't be bothered to raise her kids, leading to the son being antisocial. Yeah, I didn't get that at all. It's the usual Heinlein techno stuff, in this case the Mom and most Martians have kids young and freeze them until they're ready to raise them. The brother is referred to as obnoxious but lovable - kinda like how a sister would perceive any brother.
Heinlein goes on his usual soapbox. Podkayne is outwardly Scandinavian like her mother, but also has Maori and Polynesian influences from her dad. Her uncle is more obviously Maori and darker, which some highly unsympathetic busybodies on the ship remark on. And the usual Heinlein commentary on capitalism in its various forms and how social norms vary across cultures but none of them are wrong in and of themselves.
Well anyhoo. A lighthearted travelogue through the first 3/4 of the book. Then the narrative takes a hard turn into torture, murder and death for political gain. Podkayne wanders into a situation that she makes worse by her presence, showing no agency as MC. The brother causes a major problem that he could easily have averted. In the postlude Heinlein comments that he set it up that way to show how taking care of the young is the primary requirement of a civilization. Nice sentiment Heinlein, but you didn't show it with these plot points.
Anyway, done. I wanted to reread this and have done so. I don't recommend it.



I wonder if you read the version from 1963 that the publisher wanted or the version from 1993 that Heinlein wanted. In the Heinlein version (view spoiler) I wonder if it would have made a difference for you one way or another.
It's funny. I was daydreaming just a few days ago about which Heinlein book I would pick for the group to read if I had the power and I settled on Podkayne. My first choice would have been The Moon is a Harsh Mistress but the group read it many years ago and Veronica lemmed it. A lot of his other books either have no significant female characters or other issues that would make them objectionable to a large segment of the group.
OK, I spend too much time thinking about things like that.


Heinlein was a mixed bag on female characters. He got some props for so much as having them in a day overwhelmingly dominated by male readers and characters. But his women were idealized, often superwomen. But then, so were his men. Both characters in Glory Road were far above average; and when his characters started average, they rose to the occasion. Heinlein seemed to do okay with women as major characters but not narrators. I thought he failed with Podkayne and didn't like Friday either. (I'm a super spy, but what I really want is to be a mommy! Anyone's embryo will do!) Okay, I exaggerate for effect, but there's enough there to make the argument.
FWIW I'm leaning towards the idea that Heinlein was forcibly reined in for his juveniles, to the betterment of the stories. Some of his unfettered "idea exploration" left me cold.

Which part? Where the 11-year-old was slitting babies’ throats or the part where they cooked a boy alive? Or was it the more gruesome a..."
Yes, those were all fun parts. But to be honest I think I liked the lions best. And the guy who wore the tutu. But it's been a while. My memory is a little hazy.




There are some gems in that collection.
The Imperial gunner stressing about giving the order to 'Hold your fire. There are no life forms aboard.' and being walked through a bureaucratic escape route is a joy.


"A Kzin-Tie!"
Thank you, I'll be here all the week!"
What does a Kzin Starfleet Captain drink?
Kzin-Tea!

"
The first few are really good, but the collections have been taken over by lesser writers, some of whom are of the extremist right wing viewpoint, so there are lots of global warming denier and “libtards are bad mmmkay” type stories infecting the things.

Next up is The Light of Other Days by Arthur C. Clarke and Stephen Baxter.

Are you reading discworld in publication order, or taking it mini series by mini series? I’ve been doing the series I like, and Night Watch is one I mean to go back too, because I really enjoyed it as well.


The book was supposedly written by Robert at the age of 13. He's the son of SFF author Sarah Hoyt so I suspect an uncredited co-author.
It's plenty of fun, silliness and commentary along the way. Ending was smashup action, the journey there a little long. At 300 pages it could have lost a good 50-80 with no impact. But then, people expect longer books now. Anyway, it was a fun interlude between more serious works.

I'll be interested to hear what you think. I used to read a lot of Clarke but I never read any of his collaborations with Baxter.


Her Smoke Rose Up Forever by James Tiptree Jr.
Rating: 4 stars
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Terminal World (other topics)Mammoths at the Gates (other topics)
Starter Villain (other topics)
The Elements of Pizza: Unlocking the Secrets to World-Class Pies at Home (other topics)
The Sinister Mystery of the Mesmerizing Girl (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Naomi Klein (other topics)Leigh Bardugo (other topics)
Robert A. Heinlein (other topics)
Freya Marske (other topics)
Anthony Ryan (other topics)
More...
If not, what else are you enjoying this month?