Dickensians! discussion
Novellas and Collaborative Works
>
A Christmas Carol - Staves 1 - 2 (hosted by Connie and Sara)
message 101:
by
Robin P
(new)
Dec 03, 2020 07:59AM

reply
|
flag

Definitely! No smog now, & I live in the suburbs with a bit more space between buildings - but I had to switch the lights on around 3pm today as it’s rained all day & is very gloomy. I’m so glad we no longer have to rely on candles ;-))

While the overall plot line has stayed clear in my memory over the years, I am struck during this reading by a number of details that I had forgotten that really add to the story and often weren't included in the movies.
The bit about understanding that Marley was dead and comparing it to Hamlet's father's ghost is wonderfully funny.
Dickens' tale is from the 19th century but is relevant today. He does an incredible job of showing Scrooge as a man who has no identity outside of his trade. He doesn't care whether he is called Scrooge or Marley. He has no pastimes or amusements, and his means of killing time between closing the counting house and going to bed is really pitiful. And as strong as this warning is, so many of us get sucked into our work to the point where it defines us. Scrooge's character and will are so strongly pronounced that he is his own force of nature within. Dickens tells us, "External heat and cold had little influence on Scrooge. . . .Foul weather didn't know where to have him." Man vs. Nature, and man wins--if being such a hard person can be a win. Scrooge is not only impervious to the plight of human kind, even Mother Nature can't hold his attention. Nothing can be said of him other than he is a ruthless man of business, or rather, he is the ruthless business. He seems to have been absorbed into the trade itself given that there is no Scrooge, the human. The three ghosts have their work cut out for them.


Both Dickens and Shakespeare made it obvious that you can't have a ghost if someone isn't dead. That was a humorous part of the story.
Scrooge is cold and seems to be holding everyone emotionally at a distance. "He carried his own low temperature always about him; he iced his office in the dogdays; and didn't thaw it one degree at Christmas."
Cold is used to describe Scrooge's personality, and also a way to show his greed. He kept the counting house cold, with no regard for his employee, so he wouldn't have to spend money on coal.
Thanks for your observation that Scrooge is only a man of business, rather than Scrooge, the human. Dickens leaves us wondering why Scrooge turned that way and we'll find out later in the story.

Don’t worry, Connie - once you’re sightseeing you don’t even notice the weather much! A gloomy day this time of year is perfect when you want to see the Christmas lights, but a nuisance when stuck at home & trying to read. One of my favourite things is to walk beside the Thames late afternoon & see the Christmas lights reflecting in the river. Last year I went too early on a sunny day & got very cold waiting for it to start to get dark. It’s one of the things I’ll miss this time.

Don’t worry, Connie - once you’re sightseeing you don’t even notice the weather much! ..."
I think many of the Christmas light displays will be smaller everywhere this year due to the pandemic. The public health officials don't want people gathering together. Seeing the lights reflecting off the water sounds beautiful!

Reading Fury, I also enjoy the subtle humor, Dickens trademark for keeping a tale from become just too morose. Good observation about even nature being unable to touch Scrooge, but then Scrooge is an unnatural man, for man is meant to live and communicate with others, and Scrooge has isolated himself from mankind. I think this COVID trial has given us all a taste of what that feels like. One of the hardest parts is not being able to sit and chat with someone and then share a hug.
Connie, love the quotations.

I actually haven’t looked up economical theories in a while and it was much more fun than I expected it to be. Studying economics was more of a necessity than a passion. I tried to explain it the best I could – please bear with me as English is only my second language.
Apparently, Malthus wrote 'An Essay on the Principle of Population' which describes a phenomenon also known as Malthusian catastrophe. He had three premises: food production is limited by many factors (for example land) which is why it increases in a slower ratio than population numbers. He states that as soon as people have more food, instead of cherishing this situation they have more children and the population grows even more. An increase in the number of children affected the lower class the most according to Malthus. Unfortunately, as a whole, society suffered under the new situation because there are more people to be fed and there is not enough food (even with the initial increase). A positive thing (having more food) leads to a negative effect (suffering, hunger).
To escape this cycle Malthus welcomed severe ‘population control methods’ such as war, plague, and famine to decrease population but also less coarse ones like a marriage later in life. Think about the one-child-policy in China for example.
In regards to A Christmas Carol, it would be horrible according to Malthus to collect money for the poor because they would just go on having more children and thus making society suffer. Decreasing numbers of the population – especially in the lower class – as Scrooge suggested would actually be cruel but ultimately, whoever is left on earth would benefit from it.
This is some tricky theory Dickens threw at us.

Thanks Connie, for telling us all about Thomas Malthus, and Kathrin for your expert economist's analysis :) Also everyone for the great comments, which I've just read through and become engrossed in!
I can confirm that England - or at least the south part - becomes dark very early in Winter, dusk is about mid-afternoon. Of course it means that any Christmas decorations and lights in public areas look even better :) I was travelling across to the West Country yesterday, and it was quite gloomy by the afternoon.
I can confirm that England - or at least the south part - becomes dark very early in Winter, dusk is about mid-afternoon. Of course it means that any Christmas decorations and lights in public areas look even better :) I was travelling across to the West Country yesterday, and it was quite gloomy by the afternoon.
London Particulars:
Connie has moved her excellent commentary (thank you!) on to the fog and murky conditions. These were very familiar to Londoners, and what hasn't been mentioned is the "pea-soupers" in Victorian times. The fog was called this because it was such thick smog, due to air pollution.
In the Sherlock Holmes stories, Arthur Conan Doyle talks of "London Particulars". These were particularly bad episodes of fog where you could literally see nothing. Deaths were common, either because of the effects of pollution on weakened lungs, or through accidents caused by not being able to see dangers because of the dense murk. London stank of coal. The fog was due to the soot drifting down, called “blacks”, and the pea-soupers were due to a foul mixture of soot, smoke and fog.
A Christmas Carol was written in 1843, and a few years earlier, on 8th of February, 1834, three young men who had been out on a drinking spree with friends fell into the River Thames and drowned. On the same night there were a number of accidents also cause by the fog on the river, and several more deaths.
Men with torches had to walk in front of any horse-drawn carriages and steamers on the river only operated in the middle of the day. Here is a report by "The Times" newspaper for Tuesday, 5 December 1837, describing the previous day’s fog:
"Not only was the darkness so great [in the morning] that the shops were all lighted up., but also every object in the streets, however near, was totally obscured from the view of the persons walking along. In Piccadilly the darkness was very great, and the confusion caused by the vehicles running against each other beyond description. About 9 o’clock the Hastings branch coach, which had just left the Old White Horse Cellar, while endeavouring to turn into St. James’s-street, ran into the shop window of Mr Hoby, the celebrated bootmaker, at the western corner, which it demolished with a fearful crash, breaking upwards of 40 squares of glass."
The pea-soupers in London, incredibly enough, continued until 1952! So many lethal accidents occurred that legislation was passed in the "Clean Air Act 1956 and Clean Air Act 1968". The "Clean Air Act 1993" has been most effective in removing sulphur dioxide and coal smoke from London.
Connie has moved her excellent commentary (thank you!) on to the fog and murky conditions. These were very familiar to Londoners, and what hasn't been mentioned is the "pea-soupers" in Victorian times. The fog was called this because it was such thick smog, due to air pollution.
In the Sherlock Holmes stories, Arthur Conan Doyle talks of "London Particulars". These were particularly bad episodes of fog where you could literally see nothing. Deaths were common, either because of the effects of pollution on weakened lungs, or through accidents caused by not being able to see dangers because of the dense murk. London stank of coal. The fog was due to the soot drifting down, called “blacks”, and the pea-soupers were due to a foul mixture of soot, smoke and fog.
A Christmas Carol was written in 1843, and a few years earlier, on 8th of February, 1834, three young men who had been out on a drinking spree with friends fell into the River Thames and drowned. On the same night there were a number of accidents also cause by the fog on the river, and several more deaths.
Men with torches had to walk in front of any horse-drawn carriages and steamers on the river only operated in the middle of the day. Here is a report by "The Times" newspaper for Tuesday, 5 December 1837, describing the previous day’s fog:
"Not only was the darkness so great [in the morning] that the shops were all lighted up., but also every object in the streets, however near, was totally obscured from the view of the persons walking along. In Piccadilly the darkness was very great, and the confusion caused by the vehicles running against each other beyond description. About 9 o’clock the Hastings branch coach, which had just left the Old White Horse Cellar, while endeavouring to turn into St. James’s-street, ran into the shop window of Mr Hoby, the celebrated bootmaker, at the western corner, which it demolished with a fearful crash, breaking upwards of 40 squares of glass."
The pea-soupers in London, incredibly enough, continued until 1952! So many lethal accidents occurred that legislation was passed in the "Clean Air Act 1956 and Clean Air Act 1968". The "Clean Air Act 1993" has been most effective in removing sulphur dioxide and coal smoke from London.




Cynda, those are the best kinds of memories and those days pass by us all to quickly.

Yes they do Sara, don't they. Such challenging and beautiful times.


Even outside of his writing, Dickens had a strong interest in the magical and supernatural. He loved to perform magic tricks at home. He attended seances, but was skeptical about them. In an 1858 "Household Words" article, he questioned why ghosts would "return to make general idiots of themselves by conveying inane messages full of spelling mistakes."
Dickens was involved in Mesmerism (similar to hypnosis), and practiced it himself. According to Roger Luckhurst: "The Mesmerist would throw his subject into a trance, allowing the passage of energy into the weaker body of his patient, as if literally recharging their battery. . . .Associated with trance were spectacular supernatural powers: gifts of cure, visions of the future, heightened senses, and a merging of minds typical of the rapport."
Dickens was first exposed to ghost stories when his childhood nanny told scary bedtime tales. He read "The Terrific Register," a horror magazine as a schoolboy. The Victorians had a strong interest in the supernatural so Dickens incorporated ghosts into his short stories, Christmas stories, and some of his novels.

I'm reading the Wordsworth Classics "Christmas Books" edition which has A Christmas Carol along with other Dickens Christmas stories, The introduction by Cedric Watts was very interesting and had another comment about Scrooge's name:
"..her noun 'screw' (slang then for 'a stingy fellow, an extortioner, a skinflint') explains the surname 'Scrooge': which in turn has entered dictionaries as a synonym for 'miser or curmudgeon'."
I love that there are different theories about the names.
The grave theory is much more entertaining however. Also I live in Edinburgh and used to work on the Royal Mile just up from the Cannongate Kirk - I'll have to go and investigate one day :)


I shall definitely try and make it a mission! :)

Even outside of his writing, Dickens had a strong interest in the magical and supernatural. He loved to perform magic tricks at home. He attended ..."
I love Dickens' comment about seances.



Laura - I seem to remember that the gravestone is no longer there, (upheaval in the kirkyard some time ago :( ) but it would be great if you could visit the Cannongate Kirk and find out more for us. It seems to be well known about locally.
Yes, "screw" is used in English even now, colloquially to mean getting money out of someone. Perhaps not in the USA? I've often thought that the surname Oliver Twist was one of Charles Dickens's little jokes, as Oliver asked for more, and in a card game when you say "twist" you ask for another card! Often there is more than one happy derivation or association which had led to Charles Dickens's choice. Here it was poor Mr. Scroggie, allied with the slang term "screw" (meaning tight-fisted).
However what Cedric Watts meant, was that the name/word "Scrooge" to mean a skinflint came about as a result of Charles Dickens's invention of the character Ebenezer Scrooge. He coined the word himself, as has done many others, such as "Pickwickian" or "Pecksniffian". which are both originally taken from characters in his novels.
So not different theories as such - just a combination of happy circumstances. Charles Dickens loved to play with language :)
Yes, "screw" is used in English even now, colloquially to mean getting money out of someone. Perhaps not in the USA? I've often thought that the surname Oliver Twist was one of Charles Dickens's little jokes, as Oliver asked for more, and in a card game when you say "twist" you ask for another card! Often there is more than one happy derivation or association which had led to Charles Dickens's choice. Here it was poor Mr. Scroggie, allied with the slang term "screw" (meaning tight-fisted).
However what Cedric Watts meant, was that the name/word "Scrooge" to mean a skinflint came about as a result of Charles Dickens's invention of the character Ebenezer Scrooge. He coined the word himself, as has done many others, such as "Pickwickian" or "Pecksniffian". which are both originally taken from characters in his novels.
So not different theories as such - just a combination of happy circumstances. Charles Dickens loved to play with language :)
A little more on Mesmerism:
Charles Dickens was also fascinated by anything supernatural and remained so all his life. But as Connie pointed out, he was not easily taken in by fraudsters. Charles Dickens loved to investigate the idea of ghosts and ghouls, sprites and fairies, and they pepper all his works. He was not the only author to feel this way: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle believed in fairies almost to the point of obsession (and was famously fooled along with thousands of others by the Cottingley fairies) and remained a Spiritualist all his life.
Charles Dickens was a little more circumspect - at least in public - but as Connie mentioned, he was a keen exponent of Mesmerism. In 1838 he had attended several lectures on the subject by a professor of clinical medicine (who had introduced the stethoscope to England) John Elliotson and others. Charles Dickens became adept at it, most notably in 1844 with a Madame Augusta de la Rue, who suffered from extreme anxiety, spasms, hallucinations and strange thoughts in which she spoke of being pursued by a “phantom”. She improved greatly after a month.
Charles Dickens mesmerised his wife, Catherine, his friend John Forster and firmly believed this procedure would help pain, and to relax someone.
Interestingly, six years after the first publication of A Christmas Carol he treated his illustrator of it, John Leech! In 1849 John Leech was injured. The accident left the artist with concussion-like symptoms which would not disappear, despite all the best efforts of his doctors. He was in a great deal of pain and unable to rest. Charles Dickens rushed to help his friend, and within a few days John Leech’s condition had improved.
There is a book on Dickens and Mesmerism: The Hidden Springs of Fiction by the scholar Fred Kaplan. Mesmerism was developed by Franz Anton Mesmer. It used hypnotic trances to heal people.
Thank you for introducing this aspect, Connie! It's central to the story :)
Charles Dickens was also fascinated by anything supernatural and remained so all his life. But as Connie pointed out, he was not easily taken in by fraudsters. Charles Dickens loved to investigate the idea of ghosts and ghouls, sprites and fairies, and they pepper all his works. He was not the only author to feel this way: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle believed in fairies almost to the point of obsession (and was famously fooled along with thousands of others by the Cottingley fairies) and remained a Spiritualist all his life.
Charles Dickens was a little more circumspect - at least in public - but as Connie mentioned, he was a keen exponent of Mesmerism. In 1838 he had attended several lectures on the subject by a professor of clinical medicine (who had introduced the stethoscope to England) John Elliotson and others. Charles Dickens became adept at it, most notably in 1844 with a Madame Augusta de la Rue, who suffered from extreme anxiety, spasms, hallucinations and strange thoughts in which she spoke of being pursued by a “phantom”. She improved greatly after a month.
Charles Dickens mesmerised his wife, Catherine, his friend John Forster and firmly believed this procedure would help pain, and to relax someone.
Interestingly, six years after the first publication of A Christmas Carol he treated his illustrator of it, John Leech! In 1849 John Leech was injured. The accident left the artist with concussion-like symptoms which would not disappear, despite all the best efforts of his doctors. He was in a great deal of pain and unable to rest. Charles Dickens rushed to help his friend, and within a few days John Leech’s condition had improved.
There is a book on Dickens and Mesmerism: The Hidden Springs of Fiction by the scholar Fred Kaplan. Mesmerism was developed by Franz Anton Mesmer. It used hypnotic trances to heal people.
Thank you for introducing this aspect, Connie! It's central to the story :)

On the other hand, the conversational parts transfer perfectly to stage or screen, so that almost everyone knows "Bah! Humbug", "Let them die and decrease the surplus population", "A poor excuse for picking a man's pocket every 25th of December", etc.
The question about why Marley haunts Scrooge is legitimate. He wants to warn his partner because he knows Scrooge is making the same mistake. But I thought it might also have to do with the simple fact that Scrooge is living in what used to be Marley's rooms.
There is an odd thing about the promised visits. My version says "Expect the first to-morrow, when the bell tolls One. Expect the second on the next night at the same hour. The third upon the next night when the last stroke of Twelve has ceased to vibrate." In all the films I know of, it is at one, two & three o'clock the same night that the ghosts visit, since the time in between isn't "real". We do now that somehow it all ends before Christmas Day. So what does Scrooge do during those extra days? Does he somehow sleep through them? We know those days don't exist in the outside world. Very weird and something I never noticed before. Is my copy incorrect?

Robin - That quotation is my favourite part of the First Stave too :)
Now I'm rereading the text I am reminded how cosy it is, as if someone is sitting next to me telling the story. I love that! No dramatisation can ever capture it for me.
Good point about Scrooge living in Marley's room (sorry Connie - I don't want to step on your toes! But it had never occurred to me before, that Scrooge could have a heightened sensitivity to the "Spirits" in that particular room).
As for the time differences, I just assume time is suspended. We'd accept it in a Sci Fi story. It adds to the disjointed feel, doesn't it?
There are several instances of grave diggers in Charles Dickens's stories; often minor characters, and yes they are usually haunted - and added for comic effect :)
Now I'm rereading the text I am reminded how cosy it is, as if someone is sitting next to me telling the story. I love that! No dramatisation can ever capture it for me.
Good point about Scrooge living in Marley's room (sorry Connie - I don't want to step on your toes! But it had never occurred to me before, that Scrooge could have a heightened sensitivity to the "Spirits" in that particular room).
As for the time differences, I just assume time is suspended. We'd accept it in a Sci Fi story. It adds to the disjointed feel, doesn't it?
There are several instances of grave diggers in Charles Dickens's stories; often minor characters, and yes they are usually haunted - and added for comic effect :)

Robin, for me, the time differences of having three nights in one when the ghosts visit suggests that Scrooge might be dreaming the whole sequence. He's asleep before the bells chime each time announcing the ghosts. I haven't read any explanation about it so I assume it's magic or Sci Fi as Jean suggests. (Your text has the time of the visits by the ghosts correctly. Maybe some children's texts change it so kids don't get confused.)


I actually liked Gonzo‘s remarks the best when it comes to The Muppet version. This breaking down of the fourth wall always amazed me - even when I was little. The movie was in cinema when I was about six years old but I hadn‘t encountered The Muppets before. I was born in the GDR and The Muppets wasn‘t something my family was familiar with. We watched it more for content instead of the puppets.
My copy of the book features the same text which means it‘s probably correct. I also stumbled about this wondering why it‘s not three ghost visiting him in one night. I guess Stave 2 will enlighten us. EDIT: I can really go along with Jean‘s explanation.


It's Chapters XXVIII-XXIX"A Good-Humoured Christmas Chapter" and "The Goblins Who Stole a Sexton" in the Pickwick Papers. The Pickwick Papers is online on Project Gutenberg. I have not read the story, but the British Library has a short article about it.
https://www.bl.uk/collection-items/th...

It's fascinating how a story can be interpreted in so many ways in film and on stage--and even in our imaginations!
Thank you Connie, that is very gracious :)
"Charles was spending a large part of every day with Augusta while the he and Katherine were on vacation" - Yes, you're right, Catherine didn't like it at all!
You know, thinking about it I'm sure Charles Dickens would have much preferred the idea that it was "magic", than us trying to work it out logically :)
You can read The Story of the Goblins Who Stole a Sexton free on Gutenberg LINK HERE.
"Charles was spending a large part of every day with Augusta while the he and Katherine were on vacation" - Yes, you're right, Catherine didn't like it at all!
You know, thinking about it I'm sure Charles Dickens would have much preferred the idea that it was "magic", than us trying to work it out logically :)
You can read The Story of the Goblins Who Stole a Sexton free on Gutenberg LINK HERE.

...when Scrooge, regenerated, finds that the Spirits have, as he had requested, completed their tasks in one night, not three..."
I think it refers to the passage in Stave One where Scrooge asks Marley " 'Couldn't I take 'em all at once, and have it over, Jacob?' hinted Scrooge,"
There's no further explanation in the intro of how/why the time scale differs from that which Marley laid out but I had not remembered Scrooge specifically asking to condense the experience so I thought it interesting.
Found this link also: http://scroogebook.blogspot.com/2011/...


spoiler alert


There have been lots of med students and psychiatrists that have tried to analyze Hamlet. It's interesting that they now have Scrooge as a "patient."

Cynda, what an interesting link! I never would have considered the possibility that Scrooge had a psychotic episode. lol
Books mentioned in this topic
David Copperfield (other topics)Winnie-the-Pooh (other topics)
Charles Dickens Magician: Conjuring in Life, Letters and Literature (other topics)
A Christmas Carol (other topics)
Tales of a Thousand and One Nights: Volume 1 (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Arthur Rackham (other topics)Charles Dickens (other topics)
Globe Fearon (other topics)
Charles Dickens (other topics)
Charles Dickens (other topics)
More...