Vintage Tales discussion

97 views
Group Reads/Readalongs > Group Read Nominations

Comments Showing 151-155 of 155 (155 new)    post a comment »
1 2 4 next »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 151: by Rosemarie (new)

Rosemarie | 179 comments Mod
I've checked the shelf and there's only one questionable book-Go Set a Watchman. It was written a long time ago but only recently published.

After reading reviews, it's a book I will not be reading, since To Kill a Mockingbird was so good.


message 152: by Werner (new)

Werner | 864 comments Rosemarie wrote: "After reading reviews, it's a book I will not be reading, since To Kill a Mockingbird was so good."

Rosemarie, I feel the same about that! I won't be reading it either.

Just on the question of how to determine the age of a book, if there's known to be a significant difference between the two, I think the date it was written is more important than when it happened to be published. The former has much more of a determining influence on the book's actual characteristics than the latter does.


message 153: by Rosemarie (new)

Rosemarie | 179 comments Mod
I agree with you, Werner, especially when the book was not published at all during the author's lifetime.


message 154: by Werner (new)

Werner | 864 comments As you all know by now from Rosemarie's broadcast message, Benito Cereno by Herman Melville has won the poll, and will be our annual group read. We'll officially start the read/discussion on Sept. 1, though I'll personally probably have to start late (I'm expecting a review copy of a Goodreads author friend's newest novel in today's mail). But I'm very much looking forward to this one!


message 155: by Vickie (new)

Vickie (bookfan4ever) | 88 comments I just got my ebook copy.👍 Not sure if I'll be able to start right away, either, so we'll see. Looking forward to a group read!


1 2 4 next »
back to top