Around the Year in 52 Books discussion
Archives
>
[2020] Voting for 14th Mini Poll

Yes, I can understand that. In the last poll I was afraid the book about a diaspora would win. I have friends who are refugees and they are full of horror stories about terrible things that happened to them in real life. I have no desire at all to read a book about that subject.


Perhaps I missed it in all of these posts, but I have not seen anyone tell you to stop complaining or to be quiet. I have seen a lot of people who disagree with your point of view, and who have shared their disagreement, but I have not seen a single person tell you that you need to stop talking or that you are flat out wrong.
I have seen many discussions in other posts where people have argued back and forth about the wording of a prompt or people who do, like you mention, say they're down-voting a prompt because they hate such-and-such topic or they don't like "personal" prompts or they can't vote for something because they take it too literally to make it work for them. I disagree with many of those, as well, but there's nothing to be gained from a dialogue about someone's quirks about personal prompts or how literally someone takes something.
I think you got so much to feedback because people people are honestly wanting to have a dialogue about the topic, and express why they disagree with your point of view. That doesn't meant they're wrong, and it also doesn't mean they think you are wrong. Again, I never saw anyone being ugly or hateful towards you, just people expressing differing opinions. I think people just want to be able to express and maybe even work out their feelings about this prompt.
I'm sorry if you have felt attacked or have felt policed, as you say, but from where I'm standing, I did not see anyone trying to attack or belittle or police you or your opinions. Again, this has been a long discussion thread and I have been keeping up with it while I was at work, so I apologize if I have missed something that you are referring to specifically. Just speaking for myself, I have not felt animosity towards you, or felt like you are wrong. I just feel like the prompt doesn't mean to mean what it means to you.

It is just *so* frustrating to see people bending over backwards to make the bargain priced prompt doable (which is good, I want it to be doable!) but pointing out a prompt trends to xenophobia is stonewalled. It signals the culture here is very much about only allowing “safe” debate and not considering any real issues.

I definitely upvoted the pronunciation prompt.
I voted for the ATY prompt after I saw how many options there are. I like the idea f carrying on the tradition of having a prompt with those letters.
I voted for the prompt that has a character in two points of their life.
I voted for the social media/technology prompt.
I voted for the sky prompt. It will be fun to narrow down my options.
I also voted for the book that brings my joy. On one hand it feels like a bit of a freebie. But I thought it would be a fun prompt to use for a nostalgia read--like a book of Peanuts cartoons or a reread of a favorite.
My downvotes for for the non-fiction book about something I see every day. It just doesn't appeal. And I downvoted the birthday prompt because the planner in me can't handle the randomness. I tried it with a few books and wound up with "of," "and," and "its" for three of my attempts.

Aside from that one, I voted for the sky prompt since I've noticed a lot of sky themed covers, a title without AT or Y because it's surprisingly tricky!, NASA, and a book about twins.
I downvoted the birthday prompt, the title based on an idiom because I had trouble finding many options, and the nonfiction book, although I could live with that one if it did get in.
The difference I see here is that many people voice opinions about prompts but they don’t also expect others to have that same view.
That would be equivalent to saying “I don’t like non-fiction and it’s wrong if you do too”. You’re even going a step further and saying “I don’t agree with that prompt and you’re xenophobic if you do” (I.e. making judgments that could be seen as offensive).
There’s a distinct difference there. Opinions are all well and good (we welcome them). Safe, polite discussion, even debate, is fine too. But it seems like you want others to agree with your opinion, you’re not just voicing it.
That would be equivalent to saying “I don’t like non-fiction and it’s wrong if you do too”. You’re even going a step further and saying “I don’t agree with that prompt and you’re xenophobic if you do” (I.e. making judgments that could be seen as offensive).
There’s a distinct difference there. Opinions are all well and good (we welcome them). Safe, polite discussion, even debate, is fine too. But it seems like you want others to agree with your opinion, you’re not just voicing it.


The prompt is literally... any individual group member picks any author with a name they aren't sure of the correct pronunciation.
Proper pronunciation has nothing to do with race/ethnicity/language/nationality/gender or any other factor. There are names from every language, backround and nationality that are difficult to pronounce. There is absolutely nothing indicating, requiring or even suggesting the author be from any specific demographic. Proper pronunciation will differ for each individual group member based on their own background, their experiences with other cultures and languages, normal reading habits along with many other factors.
The fact that a member can *choose* to pick an author from a minority group with a name that they don't know how to pronounce has nothing to do with the prompt itself. That is an individual choice completely beyond the parameters of the prompt. Just because one member chooses an author because they don't know how to pronounce the name doesn't mean that is the case for every other member.
I don't believe people disagreeing with you is indicative of a culture of "safe" debate, or one that disregards issues as not relevant or present as you seem to be suggesting.


If it wasnt for that book, I probably would’ve up-voted something else.

The prompt is literall..."
Well said, Peter. I value hearing the opinions of the other ATY participants. Sometimes their opinions coincide with mine, sometimes they don't. On occasion their thoughts make me reconsider a prompt that I had overlooked. That said, we each bring our own reading preferences to the voting so we should expect different opinions. However, disagreement, on my part, is not meant as judgement and I don't expect my opinions to change anyone else's.

Oh I hadn't thought of it that way! That's an interesting perspective, Peter... thanks for mentioning that.




We are all just here for fun to discuss a shared leisure activity, but it's always important to be aware of how our words and actions can be taken and recognize opportunities for improvement. I also think it's especially important when we're having dialogue electronically and are subject to the limitations of this media that we seek to give each other the benefit of the doubt in our discussions.

I did not vote either way for the name pronunciation task. I felt there were too many strings attached to it and the discussion feels too push for it. Even though I think I have a fairly straight forward first name, it is frequently mispronounced. Names are personal. Some people are bothered by them being mispronounced others are not.


But I want to draw particular attention to this section:
Fear of Open Conflict
-people in power are scared of conflict and try to ignore it or run from it
-when someone raises an issue that causes discomfort, the response is to blame the person for raising the issue rather than to look at the issue which is actually causing the problem
-emphasis on being polite
-equating the raising of difficult issues with being impolite, rude, or out of line
Antidotes: role play ways to handle conflict before conflict happens; distinguish between being polite and raising hard issues; don't require those who raise hard issues to raise them in acceptable ways, especially if you are using the ways in which issues are raised as an excuse not to address the issues being raised


I voted yesterday so haven't tried it recently but the link was working fine for me then.
Have you tried opening the link in a different browser?
Have you tried clearing your browsers cache?
Maybe (& hopefully!) one of those two things will resolve your issue? :)
It looks like it might be a problem with surveymoz, the website we use to create the surveys. Bryony will have to look into it, as she's the mod that created the survey.

Not working for me either.
Rebecca wrote: "I think this would be a helpful read for many people. It specifically say white supremacy, but I think it is relevant to any imbalance of power and privilege. https://www.showingupforracialjustice...."
This is slightly specific but I have a close friend who is from Puerto Rico. She is extremely sensitive about people mispronouncing her name, especially when she feels like they aren’t putting effort into correctly pronouncing it. I thought of her when people were talking about sensitivity regarding names.
But at the same time, I think she would be happy if people admitted they didn’t know how to pronounce her name and asked her how to say it. That’s way better than moving forward in ignorance.
I give that example to hopefully exemplify that I’ve been thinking about the issue that you raised. But genuinely thinking about it doesn’t mean that I have to agree in the end. I do think there’s plenty of ways that the prompt could be xenophobic. But I just don’t think it is in the way it’s currently written. Especially since it doesn’t require that people pick certain ethnicities.
This is slightly specific but I have a close friend who is from Puerto Rico. She is extremely sensitive about people mispronouncing her name, especially when she feels like they aren’t putting effort into correctly pronouncing it. I thought of her when people were talking about sensitivity regarding names.
But at the same time, I think she would be happy if people admitted they didn’t know how to pronounce her name and asked her how to say it. That’s way better than moving forward in ignorance.
I give that example to hopefully exemplify that I’ve been thinking about the issue that you raised. But genuinely thinking about it doesn’t mean that I have to agree in the end. I do think there’s plenty of ways that the prompt could be xenophobic. But I just don’t think it is in the way it’s currently written. Especially since it doesn’t require that people pick certain ethnicities.

Ah yes it worked! I just voted 8 prompts in the top for the first time ever! There weren't any I really disliked, except for one, so I just decided to use all 8 to upvote because YOLO.
I really like prompts that relate to how I feel about a book, for example the brings you joy prompt, or the prompt based on something you read in 2019. I also like unique prompts I haven't seen before, so I voted for something you see on a regular basis, and the name pronunciation prompts. Then I also voted for the sky cover, bargain price, and character in two different ages prompts because I have a ton of books that would work for those. Finally I voted for the NASA Mission to get more 2020 related prompts on the list :)


This is a great example of how different we all are as readers. I can't imagine having settled on a book I want to read to start the 2020 challenge. If it's something I really want to read, I can't wait 3 1/2 months to read it... and yet the planners of the group have books slotted for many of the prompts. Love the diversity in approaches!
Edie, I'm kind of the opposite of you lol. I already know what books I want to read for certain prompts (not all of them, to be sure), and I'm holding off reading them until next year because of that. Gilead and The Gifted School are two that I purchased this year but I'm waiting until next year to read because they fit well with prompts!

I can only read so many books in a year so some books just have to be pushed back to the next year. Not only do I plan my reading for the entire year, I even go so far as to plan my reading by month! So, yes, I have a good idea what I will be reading in December 2020. (Ridiculous, I know, but I'm a super planner and it works for me.) .

On the other hand, I love the process of looking through possibilities for prompts and matching books that will work, so I do also know my top options for most of the prompts selected so far. (I also know those might change if I decide I really want to read some of those before the end of year... But if I only have one option for a hard prompt, I will TRY to save it.)



Emily ... oof, Gilead. Good luck with that.

This is a great example of how different we all are as readers. I can't imagine having settled on a book I want to read to start the 2020 challenge. If it's something I really want to read, I can't wait 3 1/2 months to read it... and yet the planners of the group have books slotted for many of the prompts. Love the diversity in approaches!
"
The main reason is that I have over extended myself in joining groups and challenges. I’m pushing myself to wrap up some challenges that I’ve been working on for several years. I’m using my book as a reward for finishing and not signing up for so many more challenges. Plus, my book is the only one I own that fit the emotion title prompt.
As Jody, remembered correctly if I put a book down on a list to read is a sure way of not reading it. I only had one book set for this challenge and it was the last prompt I completed even though it was a short book that I wanted to read and already owned. Reading that book first guarantees it will get read.



This is awesome, I had no idea this series existed!
Here's a list I found of microhistories that look neat:
https://bookriot.com/2018/11/14/must-...
I think there's a lot of flexibility with this one, though, if you don't like microhistories. There's anything to do with the weather, city planning, social issues. Even astronomy (though I suppose the Maximilian Hell prompt has astronomy covered!).

This is awesome, I had no idea t..."
Thanks Marin -- I love this list.

Moonshine: A Global History is going on my 'to read ' list. There is even one about eggs, which I hope will answer the question about who first decided that eggs might be good to eat and was willing to try them.

A dollar is .8 British pounds, or .9 euro, or $1.32 for Canadians.
Books mentioned in this topic
Gilead (other topics)The Gifted School (other topics)
Because Internet: Understanding the New Rules of Language (other topics)
An Absolutely Remarkable Thing (other topics)
Skin Deep (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Riley Sager (other topics)Shobha Rao (other topics)
I think this is the heart of the issue, Rebecca. You’ve cited lots of examples of people (predominantly people of colour) who have experienced hurtful, discriminatory or insensitive treatment because of their name. That is something which should not happen and yet it’s a daily experience for many people.
However, that some people experience such treatment does not mean that it is problematic for a person to acknowledge that there are some names which they do not know how to pronounce and to choose a book for a reading challenge on that basis.