The Sword and Laser discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
What Else Are You Reading?
>
What Else Are You Reading - January 2018
message 101:
by
Brendan
(new)
Jan 17, 2018 08:21AM

reply
|
flag

Brendan wrote: "Reading Barbary Station currently. Not thrilled with it and spending more time playing Breath of the Wild than reading."
Why are you not thrilled with it? I have been eyeing that book for sometime.
David wrote: "Wylding Hall by Elizabeth Hand. Fantasy/horror. This is a very short novel, and told in the style of a documentary. I will also say that while it was spooky (especially at 2am when ..."
Well this is in my TBR and your description makes me want to move it forward.


Taking a short break from Swords and Lasers to read The Midnight Line (which could be considered a laser as Jack Reacher is clearly a genetically engineered killing machine).
Also reading A Wrinkle in Time to my son which seems appropriate as it is clearly a YA book.
My to read list is
Acceptance
La Belle Sauvage

YA? Interesting. I read this for the first time last year and ended up classifying it (or dismissing it!) as a children's book. But maybe that's a discussion for next month ...
I'd also be interested to find out what you think the target audience for Belle Sauvage is once you get round to that one, because that wasn't at all clear to me once I'd finished it.

Just started Altered Carbon ahead of Netflix drop

It's Firefly fan fiction similar to Becky Chambers's books, but the pace is glacial, the author never uses one sentence when five will do. We're given no reason to care about these characters. Interesting premise, poor execution, unfortunately.
That being said, if you're someone who loved Chambers style (i did not), this might be a decent, if lesser, read.

YA? Interesting. I read this for the first time last year and ended up classifying it (or..."
YA spans middle-grade students as well as high school. Although recently publishers have begun using Middle Grades as its own category. There was no such distinction when A Wrinkle in Time was originally published.

YA? Interesting. I read this for the first time last year and ended up clas..."
Also, middle school doesn't happen elsewhere...
The writing is simple and straight forward., The themes, not so much. A pretty good handle on the maths to.
I tend to equate YA = teen. Back when I was a teen there were no YA books and I just read from the adult sections of the library (that and Asterix and Tintin).
I am reading the Binti trilogy by Nnedi Okorafor, after seeing it as a VF pick. They are quite good, though very short.
Iain wrote: "Also, middle school doesn't happen elsewhere... "
Yeah that's high school for us Aussies. I was 11 when I started high school. Middle school is a Nth American thing.
I think of YA as being aimed at teenagers.
I won't hold that against A Wrinkle in Time. I have enjoyed a few YA books.
Iain wrote: "Also, middle school doesn't happen elsewhere... "
Yeah that's high school for us Aussies. I was 11 when I started high school. Middle school is a Nth American thing.
I think of YA as being aimed at teenagers.
I won't hold that against A Wrinkle in Time. I have enjoyed a few YA books.

Middle school isn’t universal in America, either. I never went to middle school, for instance, but some of my friends did. I think it’s probably district by district, and then probably based on population size.
My mom, for instance, went to a one-room schoolhouse which taught kids from kindergarten through freshman year, then the last 3 years was done in the high school that drew from all the small towns in the entire area of the state. Even then, her graduating class was only 13 people or something. Contrasted with my friend from Chicago, whose graduating class was well over 3,000.

And Under the Pendulum Sun which is deliciously weird and creepy. It's about fairies (not the cuddly ones) and theology and forbidden desires.


I felt the same about Neuromancer. It was interesting, but I didn't love it. I see why it is important, but I just didn't find it that interesting. I think Cyberpunk just might not be my jam.

It's been about 20 years since I read it, when it was over 10 years old at the time. I do remember it being a bit of an acquired taste even then. I could see where it may not have aged well, with all the advances in both tech and society since then. I've enjoyed Gibson's near future work since then, but I have a feeling that may not age well either. I do remember Leming at least one of his books, I don't remember if it was The Difference Engine, or Mona Lisa Overdrive, or possibly both.

I could not even finish Neuromancer. It was just not engaging.
Brendan wrote: "Silvana wrote: "Why are you not thrilled with it? I have been eyeing that book for sometime."
It's Firefly fan fiction similar to Becky Chambers's books, but the pace is glacial, the author never ..."
Oh! Good to know, thanks. I am not a fan of the long way to some angry planet book. *deleting from my TBR

I loved it and have re-read it several times over the years. I do think it helps a lot if you're into computers, hacking and the like and it resonates, perhaps, with those of us who saw computers emerge and remember how foreign and new that world was at the time. If you're 20 or even 30 something, you grew up in a different world and had different formative experiences.
It's like, in a minor way, viewing the Mona Lisa. That painting was revolutionary for its time. It broke the mold, using perspective etc in ways that simply had not been done for centuries. But we can't look at it with the eyes of the people who first saw it. We're all products, in part at least, of our time.

Same here, and I read it when it came out. I found his short stories superior, especially “Burning Chrome”, which is essentially Neuromancer v1.0.
It is very much of its time, as much as the synth sounds of British New Wave were.

I lemmed that book 3 times, haha. Won't try it again.


You’re killin’ me, Smalls.


(gasps)
if you didn't care for those 2 you likely wouldn't like the other authors in the movement (Sterling, Shirley etc). The seminal novel in the movement (some feel, including me) is Vernor Vinge's True Names: and the Opening of the Cyberspace Frontier which is eerily prescient.
I'm curious about the overlap, if any, between post-apoc fandom and cyberpunk fandom. While they're superficially similar (both being flavors of dystopias) they are radically different in that cyberpunk looks at a high tech future gone wrong, usually because of centralized power and control, with rebel/alternative cultures living in the cracks whereas most post-apocalyptic stuff seems to be about civilization having been wiped out somehow and tech being a very low level.

Have you read The Shockwave Rider? It’s one of those seminal proto-cyberpunk novels that paved the way for the movement.
The James Tiptree Jr. story (novella?) The Girl Who Was Plugged In/Screwtop is also a good example of pre-cyberpunk.
I remember enjoying Pat Cadigan’s book Synners and the fix-up novel Mindplayers, but I’m guessing they’ll feel a bit clunky today. But then few if any SF writers anticipated smart phones.

Perhaps "ok" was a bit harsh. I did think it was pretty fun at times. A solid 3.5 stars. I've only read a few Neal Stephensen books and he seems very creative and inventive with his ideas and world building, but not as solid with his storytelling and especially his endings.
As far as the overlap, if any, between post-apocalyptic fandom and cyberpunk fandom I can't really say with authority. The parallels are interesting though. One thing that comes to mind as a fusion between the two is The Matrix where society is wiped out but there is plenty of tech still.
Neither of those genres are really my main fandoms though. Give me an epic space opera or high fantasy novel any day. =)

Thanks! I'll have to give some of those a try. I want to like cyberpunk, but nothing has really grabbed me yet. Perhaps one of those will.

Walter Jon Williams’ novel Hardwired straddles both. It takes cyberpunk ideas to their natural conclusion, resulting in the Balkanization of the US that spawns perpetual war. It’s definitely a dystopia that feels decidedly post-apocalyptic.
Now that I ponder it, it’s actually prescient about places like Iraq and Syria in the 21st century, minus the brainjacking aspects.

Taking a short ..."
What a coincidence! I read Authority a couple of weeks ago, am currently reading La Belle Sauvage, and have Acceptance waiting for me at the library as we speak.
Otherwise, so far this year I've also read This Savage Song, Binti, The Zookeeper’s Dilemma, and The Guild. Graphic novels are not usually my thing, but a friend lent me that one and I was willing to make an exception for The Guild :)

Second in a growing series which started with Space Captain Smith



Also finished up listening to For We Are Many with my wife and started in on All These Worlds.




Glass Town by Steven Savile - 3 stars.
Stiletto by Daniel O'Malley - 4 stars (audio)
Persepolis Rising - 4 stars
The Dragon's Path by Daniel Abraham - 4 stars (audio)
Now I'm slogging through the 1818 version of Frankenstein. I think I have about a third left. In audio I will follow-up The Dragon's Path with The King's Blood. I had considered going back to finish The Demon Cycle next, but those books are longer and I kind of like the 15-16 hour length the The Dagger and the Coin books all come in at.

My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
Binti was disappointing due to its unconvincing characters and poor storytelling. I don’t know why this won so many awards.
My review:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


Last night I started Beyond Apollo, has anyone read it? I bought it for less than a dollar years ago at a great second hand book shop. All I can say is whoa. I almost lemmed it several times already because of *wonderful* '70s sexism and (in my opinion) unnecessary and absurd sexual descriptions. However, it's style has somehow hooked me and it's a quick read so I'm eager to finish it. It reminds me of Slaughterhouse-Five because Beyond Apollo also has an unreliable narrator who jumps between time and blurs the line between reality and fiction.
Finally, I'm still listening to The Wise Man's Fear after finally upgrading to Audio. Is it just me and how long I've been reading this for, or did this feel like three different books in one to anyone else?

Wise Man’s Fear is more episodic then “The Name of the Wind”, but I think that is a bit inherent in the narrative style Pat chose to write this in. That being said, he could have easily broken up the series ( at least based on the first two books) into a longer series with shorter books. But A, there is a market for big book epic fantasy, and both do qualify for that. And B, from interviews I’ve heard Pat was reluctant to even break this story into 3 books, since he had conceived of, and written the first draft as a single book. So I think the idea of breaking it up even more would have been inconceivable to him at the time.

Wise Man’s Fear is more episodic then “The Name of the Wind”, but I think that is a bit inherent in the narrative sty..."
John, your first comment made me literally laugh out loud. My dear husband listened to me rant about the cover for quite a while last night haha.
As for Patrick Rothfuss, hopefully this means the third book will be published soon?

Even though the original draft may have been as a single book, it's far, far bigger now (for example, Auri wasn't in the original draft and he's had to rewrite large portions as things have progressed in the trilogy). Also, Rothfuss himself is an insane reviser (this blog post is my favorite example: https://blog.patrickrothfuss.com/2013... ) so it takes him forever to do anything, especially with as much as he puts into his books (see Jo Walton's wonderful reread series on Tor.com--you really get to see all that Rothfuss is putting together: https://www.tor.com/series/patrick-ro...
Finished The Last Man by Mary Shelley. I'd read Frankenstein 2 years ago. So read this instead.
Wow, what a depressing book.
If Mary was alive today, she'd have one word to say to George R.R.Martin & Robert Kirkman (Re: Killing off main characters)
"Amateurs" ;-)
Wow, what a depressing book.
If Mary was alive today, she'd have one word to say to George R.R.Martin & Robert Kirkman (Re: Killing off main characters)
"Amateurs" ;-)


The Christopher Paolini of the 19th century.
Joseph wrote: "The Christopher Paolini of the 19th century."
Mary wrote Frankenstein as a teenager, while raising a baby and pregnant with her 2nd child.
Chris was probably playing video games in his parents basement while writing his book. ;-)
Mary wrote Frankenstein as a teenager, while raising a baby and pregnant with her 2nd child.
Chris was probably playing video games in his parents basement while writing his book. ;-)

Mary wrote Frankenstein as a teenager, while raising a baby and pregnant with her 2nd child.
Chris was probably playing video games i..."
Frankenstein also shows an infinitely higher level of craft. Although, to be fair, wasn't Paolini more in his early teens when he wrote Eragon?
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Authority (other topics)Acceptance (other topics)
The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (other topics)
Witchcraft, the Devil, and Emotions in Early Modern England (other topics)
Hild (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Robert Rankin (other topics)Claudia Gray (other topics)
Claudia Gray (other topics)
Timothy Zahn (other topics)
Victor LaValle (other topics)
More...