deleted user
From your shelves, I'm interested in Black Beauty, The perks of being a wallflower (ur 1-star might be my 5-star....just kidding), Speak and especially The Strange Case of Some doctor guy :P
deleted user
Mishty, Narnia is good. Have you seen the movies? But they are very childish. Very very childish. Very Childish.
For me, only book-1 and book-2 made a little sense. You could try book-1 (magician's nephew) and book-2 (the lion, the blah blah blah...)
If you had seen the first movie, i.e. The Lion, the witch...then you read only magician's nephew. It answers many question like "who was white which?" or "How the wardrobe was magical?"..etc.
deleted user
Fantasy? Uhuh...actually I want to try fantasy, but they are always in series. I can't start new series now. I still have to complete the Giver series. Besides if it's a stand-alone fantasy (like Tigana), it will be more than 600 pages. It's difficult, since my exams are going on.
deleted user
Both are good. To Sir, with love is boring at some times. Honestly, the first quarter of the book is very boring but the later part is great.
deleted user
So my options are: Black Beauty The Strange case of... Speak ..... ... And... I think i'll start with the Strange case and if the time remains, I'll also read Black Beauty :)
Jarvis Manasa wrote: "If you read the concised version, then it's really not that good. They used to do that in school. But I think if you read a classic, you should always read the complete version, for actually enjo..."
deleted userGehna wrote: "Arpit wrote: "But if you know any fantasy-standalone book in less than 400 pags, then let me know. Okay duology will alos do."
Arpit, you can try The Last Wish. It is a fantasy book..."
I'm not a fan of short-stories. Skipped. Another reco, please.
Jarvis
Arpit, try The Shadow of The Wind. It is more of Historical Fiction and less of Fantasy but still a really great book.... Otherwise, read The Hobbit. And we can BR it since I want to read it too. ...you still HAVE to read Shadow of the wind though :D
deleted userGehna wrote: "Arpit, try The Shadow of The Wind. It is more of Historical Fiction and less of Fantasy but still a really great book.... Otherwise, read The Hobbit. And we can BR it since I want to read it too. ...."
Yeah, I'll surely read it. Hobbit? Check June Nomination.
deleted userPranjali wrote: "Gehna wrote: "Arpit, try The Shadow of The Wind. It is more of Historical Fiction and less of Fantasy but still a really great book.... ...."
deleted userManasa wrote: "I'm 13% done.....doesn't this book remind you of The nightingale? The only thing is the plot is set in Denmark and that was in France"
Actually, there's a fine difference, you will notice soon.
deleted user
Well, it's like a half-empty glass or a half-full glass. Point of view changes a lot. In this book, the main characters aren't adults, but children. The war wasn't that fierce in this book. It's light, but still it manages to say what it wants to say. That's why I loved it.
The Nightingale, well, I already justified my rating in my review. Let's forget about that like a bad dream :)
deleted userManasa wrote: "Here are my thoughts: 1.This book didn't break my heart like you-know-what did, and i mean it in a good way. 2. It's written from a child's perspective and it made everything more subtle (I mean to..."
Wow. You really got the essence of the book. I agree with all these points. I deducted one star 'cause the story wasn't complex at all. Actually, it's a children book :P Have you read The Giver? It's by the same author. You might like Giver, 'cause it's utopia.
deleted user
I'm liking it. Although it's not as good as Dracula was!! But still till now it's 3.5 star material. Story is fast. I'd love it more if it was a novel instead of a novella. More detailing, I mean.