Goodreads Librarians Group discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
Serieses!
>
Is this a series?

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1680...
advent calender doesn't sound as series at first ...but perhaps it is one with a weird name?

https://www.goodreads.com/series/1680...
advent calender doesn't sound as series at first ...but perhaps it is one with a weird name?"
The covers say Warhammer 4K, which is a valid and well established universe with many different authors.. I would suggest renaming the series to "Call of Chaos" as per the titles.
I think those are all short stories.

All odd works are collected in this omnibus. (Bottom work in series page)
All even works are in this one.
So I'm wondering instead of putting numbers such as 1,3,5,7,9,11...etc how we can make it clear that that is the case?

That made me LOL. So simple! Would have never thought of it :D


and similar https://www.goodreads.com/series/181349 (three parts of Henry VI)"
Yes, but these aren't separate parts of a book. But, instead, 5 different plays by Shakespeare. Are they connected? Yes, see - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henriad. But they are not pieces of one book.
Henry IV, Part 1
Henry IV, Part 2
Henry VI, Part 1
Henry VI, Part 2
Henry VI, Part 3
ETA: oops. I just noticed that I'm at the end of page 6 and there's another page. Um, let's see if someone already said what I said? heh. I should pay more attention to whether or not a thread has more posts before I respond to stuff.

If you look on this series page, the books are also part of War of the roses. As per the explanation on that second series the books seem to be in the same "universe".
However I usually don't touch series like this as I am not familiar with English literature. Hopefully someone will point out if I am wrong and those should be deleted, though I would err on the side of caution and leave them if no one else comments.

Yes, but these weren't originally published in one volume (except in the sense that the first official version of the plays were published at the same time in a kind of 'complete works of Shakespeare' volume). They were all plays by Shakespeare that may or may not have been among the ones that were published without his permission during his life, but were definitely published when his friends published a 'Complete Works' that included all of Shakespeare work after he died (or, at least, 36 of his plays).
Unless new information has come to light, Shakespeare, the playwright, published none of his plays during his life (except as things to hand out to his actors to use to learn their lines - a few copies of which still exist . . . I think).
Henry IV and Henry VI were not published as that at some point, as books, then broken down into separate parts. They were always separate plays that, somewhere along the line, got combined together into one volume . . . at the same time as all of Shakespeare's plays were combined into one collection. Technically - using that 'published as one volume' as a guide to create a series, 36 of Shakespeare's plays could be linked in a series as a part of that 'parts of one volume makes a series' - since technically the only 'official' versions of the plays that got published was that 'complete works' book that his friends published. (the plays had been published during Shakespeare's life, separate from each other (presumably) but were not 'official' plays - the publishers 'stole' them and published them - copyright laws weren't exactly what they are today)
"Many of Shakespeare's plays, which were written to be performed, were not published during his lifetime. The First Folio is the first collected edition of Shakespeare’s plays. It was published in 1623, seven years after Shakespeare’s death. Two of Shakespeare’s fellow actors compiled 36 of his plays, hoping to preserve them for future generations. Without it, we would not have 18 of Shakespeare’s plays, including Macbeth, Julius Caesar, Twelfth Night, The Tempest, Antony and Cleopatra, The Comedy of Errors, and As You Like It."
I would not, personally, create a series that consists of those 36 plays.
--
Now in terms of - is there a series? yes - they tell the story of a period of time in British history, with many of the same 'players' (or relatives), and something like 8 of Shakespeare's plays are considered a series by Shakespeare experts. The War of the Roses series that you link are those 8 plays.
I'm not sure if there is a specific reason to have the Henry IV plays, and separately the Henry VI plays linked in separate series - separate, that is, from War of the Roses. Though they would technically qualify - same universe, same characters (to a certain extent), etc.

edit: ok after reading on the rowohlt page - that's not really like the SZ Bibliothek ... they just seem to call all their monographs just "Rororo Monographien" ... according to the website more than 650 at the moment.

Thought so, but better double check, is my motto. :)

https://www.goodreads.com/series/7540...
The icons one looks like an imprint to me, the other ones can stay because it looks like same topic? or deleted as well? (universe is quite difficult with non fiction)

https://www.goodreads.com/series/7540...
The icons one looks like an imprint to me, the other ones can stay because it looks like same topic? or delet..."
With non-fiction, I would personally use the rule of:
Would this book still be part of the series if
a) Republished by the author?
or
b) Released by a new publisher once out of copyright?
If no, then it's a publisher's imprint. That's my feeling anyway... :)
320: Yes. Don't forget to remove it from the title lines (edition fields are ok) before deleting the series.
Edit: Actually, that one is somewhat different and I'd say just this side of the line and ok to stay.

Thanks. Will do :)

Lachgas wrote: "that's an imprint isn't it? https://www.goodreads.com/series/1063..."
I'd say that one barely is on the "keep" side of the line. All the editions of each work are part of this same series, and they have customized content that has considerably more in common from work to work than a theme.
I'd say that one barely is on the "keep" side of the line. All the editions of each work are part of this same series, and they have customized content that has considerably more in common from work to work than a theme.
Lachgas wrote: "and if that would be fictional I wouldn't see a series part in it https://www.goodreads.com/series/188844"
The same as the above, although this one is even closer to the line.
The same as the above, although this one is even closer to the line.



EDIT: This series is the one I was thinking of.
Two points to consider with them:
- If the "books" are OK as anthologies (they often seem to be decreed as toeing the line but just about OK), then we need a Listopia for them, and will need to make that a project given the quantity of issues is more than one librarian or user can vote for. (If not, that bit is moot!)
- Having the issues is beneficial for when we find yet another 300 adds for a short story not published in any other anthology! I admit that's one of my personal whack-a-mole areas though, so I might have a different outlook on it... :)


https://www.goodreads.com/series/9887...

https://www.goodreads.com/series/4931...
Publisher describes it as series:
Insinuations: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, Literature, Charles Shepherdson, ed.
This series focuses on the overlap between contemporary continental philosophy and the adjacent fields of rhetoric, literary theory, and psychoanalysis, with an emphasis on how these intersections contribute to cultural theory.



Added the missing books but got a bit confused by the description in some of the books "Welcome to the VIGILANTE Series, a growing collection of suspense best sellers best described as thrillers and mysteries which will have you cheering for the assassin as justice is delivered in a clandestine fashion... "
That sounded more like an imprint to me I must admit, so I looked for same characteres in description and the first books mentioned McCall (and the last one) so I added the few missing ones.
While I looked for the one missing book I came across https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1... where it says "Barry/McCall" series - which are the characters mentioned in the descriptions of the first Vigilante books.
Now I'm doubting ... if this "Vigilante" is not just only an imprint (there are books were McCall isn't mentioned in description, only other police guys).
Tried to look it up on authors homepage but that doesn't work.
So does anyone know this series and if "Vigilante" has characters in common or is just a collection of changing serial killers/killer hunters?

https://www.goodreads.com/series/163765
The series hasn't been properly formed, doesn't appear to have characters in common & the Bollywood link is tenuous at best. Can I delete the (Bollywood)?

I wouldn't consider that as a series I think but I wouldn't see a Kathryn Dance& Lincoln Rhyme series on my favourite author Jeffery Deaver - and GR does so ... *chuckle* (there are Lincoln Rhyme/Amelia Sachs and a Kathryn Dance series - but a series for books in which both appear? never would define that as an extra one (and in fact since Dance appeared first they mention/appear each other in every book))
So I'm obviously not the best reference in case of guest appearances ;)


"Dark Iceland: English Publication Order series"
https://www.goodreads.com/series/170745
"The ordering for the English publication differs from the original."

I'm curious why do you think it doesn't qualify as series?

Is it? Because it's the same in every other language. I don't see why the English publication order (it doesn't say anything about the reading order) is more important than the publication order in other languages and it would be stupid to make series of publication orders in every language.

Nowhere is it stated the English order is more important. Original pub. order series exists as well.
As per the manual It is allowed to create series for different reading orders. You say reading order is not mentioned, but it is implied. You cannot read books that are not yet translated and published, so the reading order in this case would be the same as the publishing order for the translation.
I do agree that creating a series for each language would be too much. Also, I guess it would not be against the rules to delete the English series page and note the order in the description of the original series page, but I personally am I against this until there are more series pages to deal with.
Let's see what other librarians have to say as well.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Planet of Slums (other topics)Love & Other Detours: Love & Gelato / Love & Luck (other topics)
The Blind Geometer (other topics)
Tequila (other topics)
Fastest Girl in Town (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Jane Aiken Hodge (other topics)Jane Aiken Hodge (other topics)
Илья Франк (other topics)
"series" deleted