All About Books discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
General Archive
>
What have you just read? Opinions, recommendations & reviews



I agree about the movie.

My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

I found this book uneven. The writing isn't great, some parts of the story are unrealistic in ways beyond the mystical new preachings (I'm usually okay with the mystical elements of this time as they probably were in the minds of the people) but the author seemed to stick with the actual known history as a backbone to his story and there were elements about faith and what it means to believe & be faithful that were interesting. All in all, an uneven read but I may pick up the sequel when it comes out one day....maybe.
Here's my review (it's as lukewarm as the above comment): https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...



My comment on the novel is here: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


You can read my review by clicking on one of the linkes below.
Goodreads Account
My Blog, Don't Judge, Read
-Emily
Gemma wrote: "Just finished Gone Girl Gone Girl It has really disappointed me. Took ages to get into, then got quite good and felt it was going somewhere. But then a terrible ending. I would not ..."
That is such a shame. I really liked the ending, I thought it was very clever and fitted with the rest of the story. I read an article about the ending where Gillian Flynn questions what alternative would have been better. Any thoughts (in spoilers)?
That is such a shame. I really liked the ending, I thought it was very clever and fitted with the rest of the story. I read an article about the ending where Gillian Flynn questions what alternative would have been better. Any thoughts (in spoilers)?

Diane S. wrote: "I didn't like the ending when I first read it but the more I thought about it, I did. Like that it wasn't a tidy ending and I agree Alice, it did fit the tone of the book. I know she changes the en..."
I haven't seen it but from what I have read the main twist of the ending is still there
I haven't seen it but from what I have read the main twist of the ending is still there

It was overhyped, in my opinion. That happens!


I was the opposite, I quite liked it to start with, but then it just got more and more ridiculous and by the end I didn't like it at all! I'm not sure what would have made a better ending, I will have to have a think about it. Good question, though. In a way, I would quite like to see the film - just to see how they tackle it.
I don't think you are in the minority, Angela. In this group I think I am the majority in enjoying it! I think Bette agreed with me in enjoying it so I'm not completely alone.
I don't mind not liking characters in books and I didn't like Nick or Amy. In fact, I think the fact I didn't like either of them actually improved the book for me.
I don't mind not liking characters in books and I didn't like Nick or Amy. In fact, I think the fact I didn't like either of them actually improved the book for me.

I thought I was the only one Gemma. I had a similar experience with The Pillars of the Earth by Ken Follett.
I do think certain new authors or even older unknown ones have great PR campaigns and many good books are never heard about.


I was not at all surprised to hear that the author was changing the ending for the film. It just confirmed my suspicions that it was a money-spinner. It did not read at all like a novel the author cared about, more a piece sold for shock and thrill value. It would be OK if it worked on that level. I too like my silly comfort reads. But for me, chicklit doesn't fit that bill, and neither does this equally formulaic stuff.
With this one, I'm right at one end of the marmite spectrum! :D
You just inspired me to look up "marmite" Jean. :) Ahh!
I suspect I would be on your side of the marmite spectrum with Gone Girl Jean, but I can't really say for sure because I haven't read it.
I suspect I would be on your side of the marmite spectrum with Gone Girl Jean, but I can't really say for sure because I haven't read it.


I don't mind not lik..."
Oh yes, I did enjoy it! But also felt the two characters totally deserved each other by the novel's close. The ending blew me away actually, I was so surprised. I don't think I'd read it again though (because I know the ending). Not sure I would bother seeing the film; I'd be scared they'd ruin it. (Although I could put up with looking at Ben Affleck for a couple of hours!)


With this one, I'm right at one end of the marmite spectrum!"
No idea what the marmite spectrum means??


Gemma who started the conversation on Gone Girl is a very young woman so I'm not sure I agree that age is a deciding factor . I don't believe I would have liked it any better if I were 40 years younger .





Same here!
I have just finished a book of short stories, In a German Pension by Katherine Mansfield. I found it different in feel to the other 2 short story books of hers I have read (The Garden Party and Other Stories & Bliss & Other Stories). This collection almost felt like a "slice of life" novel - the stories were more connected.
@dely -- I agree that I think Maupassant's short stories are his best writing (but I have only read a little of his work).

I started it and knew soon after I would never read it. Why read about such unliikable characters? I won't see the movie either. If that makes me an old fogey I don't care.


But then I think many people of all ages have insight, not that it is exclusively a younger generation's prerogative. And interestingly - here's a thought for our more youthful readers to mull over - it has been thought in many cultures throughout history that age brings wisdom. See here.
Personally, I think it's down to the individual. Some people will like this book, some won't. I'm not sure I like the logical conclusion of such a book not being intended for an older generation. The idea of having to read "age-appropriate" material is something I very much resist. I read a children's picture book yesterday. There's not a child in sight anywhere. But I enjoyed it immensely, and gave it 5*. I will be as attentive to my review of that as to any other. Ya boo sucks! ;)


I ditto Diane S. I enjoyed the book and took it for what it is, a fiction novel with twisted characters. I actually liked all of Gillian Flynn's novels, probably Dark Places is my favourite of the three.
I have to agree with Jean it is a "marmite" type novel (love the definition BTW :)

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


I do think they're meant to be "recognizably representative characters from their generation." I wouldn't be too sad about it, though. I mean they're not supposed to be pillars of society or anything. They're representative of a disturbed couple in a dysfunctional relationship. Amy is a sociopath tailor-made for the younger generation, surely.
Angela M wrote: "Chuck,
Gemma who started the conversation on Gone Girl is a very young woman so I'm not sure I agree that age is a deciding factor .
I don't mean to say that age is the one deciding factor. It's just more geared towards the younger generation, IMO. And I would add it's probably more of American thing also.

I'm about as American as you can get and I don't think that or my age impacted what I thought of the book . I'm not sure that cheating husbands and psychotic wives are indigenous to any one nationality.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Red Shoes for Rachel: Three Novellas (other topics)Kindred (other topics)
Kindred (other topics)
Kindred (other topics)
The Promise Girls (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Marie Bostwick (other topics)
Deon Meyer (other topics)
More...
We keep the books together, but we have ..."
My bedroom as a child had all my parents books. My mum had a few Jackie Collins novels in there and when I was about 8/9 I used to try and read them to be grown up (I didn't know what they were about, just it was grown up to read my mums books!). I'm not sure I understood very much which is probably a good thing!