All About Books discussion
note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
General Archive
>
What have you just read? Opinions, recommendations & reviews
message 8401:
by
Pam
(last edited May 29, 2016 05:25AM)
(new)
May 29, 2016 05:25AM

reply
|
flag

Petra wrote: "I just finished Mister Pip by Lloyd Jones. I thoroughly enjoyed this story of Great Expectations, an idyllic island setting and the story of home, family and the power..."
Terrible though, don't you think?
Terrible though, don't you think?

The Bryant and May stories are matchless, hahahahaha:)


Terrible though, don't you think?
..."
Definitely. The author did a good job even on the horrors. He brought them out slowly, as they would become apparent to a child.

The author wrote a non-fiction book as a fictional story in order to put her ideas and slants into it. I think it failed in this manner but still the story was well told and laid out.
I found the book interesting and easy to read but lackluster and not stellar.
Review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

The Bryant and May stories a..."
Oh, Bette too funny. I remember that conversation.

I notice there’s a comment on Goodreads that this is the most true-to-the-original translation.


I don't know about my translation but being it a daily deal by amazon, it had (as usual) several typos and this doesn't help too.
I thought my introduction was good but after have read the book I see that it was too short and also there they talked as if the reader already knew everything about Ukraine.
It's a pity, I really loved The Master and Margarita and thought to enjoy also this one.


Perhaps I should first learn more about Ukraine and then read a different translation though I don't like to reread books.

My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

Probably this has been answered already but here is my take. I think that 'potboiler' is a slightly more derogatory term for what is typically called "genre fiction" here. Lots of mysteries, thrillers, romances, science fiction, fantasy etc. can fall into this category though the best of genre fiction does have artistic/literary merit.
As for why would one read it -- the short answer is for fun! This kind of book is typically 'light' or 'escapist' but it is not necessarily poorly written. I read a lot of mysteries, for example; they are not "great literature" but the better ones do show an insight into human motivations. But that isn't why I read them -- I read them because I enjoy trying to puzzle out who did it & because I find escaping into a fictional world in which justice reliably prevails a relief sometimes from the disappointments in the real world.

https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
I agree Leslie, mysteries are fun and I love reading a variety of things. I get bored easily and they do say variety is the spice of life.

Isn't it more that the ones classified as potboilers are those that do NOT have artistic literary merit? That makes more sense to me than saying that all mysteries, thrillers, romances, science fiction, fantasy and such lack merit.
And then you can ask, "Lacking in merit according to WHOSE definition!?!" Don't we need escapist literature too?

Just finished


He wrote these as separate articles not long before he died, and they've been compiled in a beautiful little book Gratitude.
My review
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

I agree; categorizing ends up causing confusion. Me too, I just read for pleasure. At least that is what I ma looking for when I pick up a book.

From the word, I would picture a book that starts by bringing in the elements of the story (pot of water heating up) and ramping up into a full-blown exciting story that ends with a burst of satisfaction (furiously boiling pot of water).
Whether there's any literary merit is debatable and individual. I can enjoy a book that has no literary merit and I can not enjoy a book that does have literary merit......but who's to say which book has literary merit?


https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
My thinking of pot boiler matches Petra. Simmering and than a big boil or bang. Oh well now know that isn't right.

That’s my understanding too. I think the term was coined to describe a book which “keeps the pot boiling” (ie. keeps the author fed) as opposed to a book which may take years to research and write and hence will have only a long-term payoff for the author.
I think it’s a term one could use interchangeably with “beach read” or “summer read” — but I saw someone in the reviews of the book I was referring to complaining about the term “summer read” saying that a good book can be read at any time of year!




Point taken -- though I still enjoy many mysteries & other genre fiction that fall into the potboiler category. I made my comment because I know that some people on GR think all genre fiction has no merit. There is some indefinite undefinable middle ground between 'literature' and badly written dreck. Potboilers often fall into that middle ground.

I agree. I don’t think anyone would classify novels such as Nineteen Eighty-Four or Fahrenheit 451 (the first examples of genre fiction that came to mind) as "potboilers". Instead, I would use that term to describe the commercially highly successful thrillers, crime novels and romances which are written by household names and which everyone seems to be reading. Such books are usually skillfully plotted and well-written, but you can't imagine they will still be read, let alone studied, in 50 year's time.
I'm sorry to have sparked such a debate; I thought "potboiler" was a common term.

Apologies not needed -- debates are interesting!

This is a complex, quick-moving Sharon Bolton mystery Daisy in Chains. Just loved it. Kept changing my mind about who dunnit - the best sort of story for me.
My review
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...

From the word, I wou..."
I grew up with the term "potboiler" as something written to keep the soup pot full (and boiling) - in other words, something that would guarantee a living. Popular fiction.
I don't remember where I learned that, but I didn't make it up. :)
The Oxford says simply "A book, film, or other creative work produced solely to make the originator a living by catering to popular taste."
I've always heard it used disparagingly but fondly, if you know what I mean. It couldn't be too bad, or obviously it wouldn't sell! For some, it's Mills and Boon, for others, it's 'cheap' westerns.



My review: https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...



I think it's possible to admire the skill with which a book is written while disliking the message. But I guess if I thought a book was promoting and likely to gain support for something I think is wrong, I wouldn't like it no matter how well it was written.
There could be some beautifully written, highly literary anti-somebody propaganda that would be 5star writing but that I'd be reluctant to promote, and I think I'd have to take that into consideration. I might give it a low rating just for "intent", since basically I don't approve of the book.
Not much help, am I? But I sympathise.



I think it's possible to admire the skill with which a book is written while disliking the message. But I guess if I thought a book was promoting and likely to gain support for something I think is wrong, I wouldn't like it no matter how well it was written."
I feel the same, Patty.


5★ for one of the most interesting books I've read, David Eagleman's Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain.
He wrote my favourite fiction book, Sum: Forty Tales from the Afterlives, but this is his 'real' work as a neuroscientist. Fascinating cases and anecdotes. The upshot is, the more we know, the more we don't know, I guess.
My review, which includes some stories:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...


Eligible by Curtis Sittenfeld (4 stars) - Usually not a fan of Austen adaptations but I was pleasantly surprised with this one. The author kept true the original while make the necessary updates for Pride and Prejudice to make sense in the modern era. My review.
A Year in Provence by Peter Mayle (4 stars) - This book was a joy from start to finish, an easy and quick read. The stories within the larger narrative are humorous and sweet. My review.
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.
Books mentioned in this topic
Red Shoes for Rachel: Three Novellas (other topics)Kindred (other topics)
Kindred (other topics)
Kindred (other topics)
The Promise Girls (other topics)
More...
Authors mentioned in this topic
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Octavia E. Butler (other topics)
Marie Bostwick (other topics)
Deon Meyer (other topics)
More...