Goodreads Librarians Group discussion

note: This topic has been closed to new comments.
969 views
Questions (not edit requests) > Goodreads Listopia

Comments Showing 51-100 of 334 (334 new)    post a comment »

message 51: by Mē-chan (new)

Mē-chan | 124 comments Anybody?


message 53: by Lobstergirl (new)

Lobstergirl Mē-chan wrote: "Thank you very much. Could you remove the first book as well? This is more of a science fiction then a fantasy book. Not to mention this smell of self promotion since that book has only 18 ratings,..."

Gone. No one had shelved it as fantasy, which is suspicious.


message 54: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Lobstergirl wrote: "Too personal."

Edited.


message 56: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Got 59.


message 57: by Mē-chan (new)

Mē-chan | 124 comments https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/8...

Can you replace book #7 edition with this edition and delete the previous one.
Current: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3...

Correct edition: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4...

Replace the book #43
Current edition: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7...

Correct edition: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8...


Delete book #45
Correct edition is book #58
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

Delete book #49
Correct edition is book #57
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

Delete book #50
Correct edition is book #56
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

Delete books #47, #48. These are upcoming editions but not yet published
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Phoenix-Mirro...

http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Falling-W...


Thank you very much!


message 58: by Mē-chan (new)

Mē-chan | 124 comments Anybody can help with this?


message 59: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Mē-chan wrote: "Anybody can help with this?"

Have you noticed that the list has 2 each of 45,47,49,51?

Replacing an edition will lose all the votes for the old edition. Books can be added or deleted but not, as far as I know, replaced.

For your deletes, do you mean to remove the current book 45 and add the new edition as book 58, etc? Obviously the numbering needs to be changed because of the duplication mentioned above.


message 60: by Mē-chan (last edited Nov 16, 2013 03:12AM) (new)

Mē-chan | 124 comments Banjomike wrote: Replacing an edition will lose all the votes for the old edition. Books can be added or del..."I know.
This is a specific situation. Fantasy Masterworks is a special series by Gollanz. I know that editions will lose votes when deleted, but, those editions do not belong on that list in the first place.

Click here for more info on this specific series:
https://www.worldswithoutend.com/list...

I have added editions 47,49,51 because these are the correct editions. And book WAS by Geoff Ryman was missing from the original list in the first place so I added it. I don't see duplicate for it as you say. Which book number is that?

Editions 43,
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7...
45,
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...

47,
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8...

and 51
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/9...

are not part of Fantasy Masterworks published by Orion Publishing Group and were added there by mistake, or because there were no correct editions on Goodreads.

Book 49 "The Falling Woman" is not even out yet.

As far as the votes go they will normalize after a while. It's better to have correct editions, because this list is called Fantasy Masterworks, and that means specific editions, not just any old book.
Here is more on wiki as well
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantasy_...
This list is not updated though.

Thanks.


message 61: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Mē-chan wrote: "I don't see duplicate for it as you say. Which book number is that?"

Never mind. It is just the voting positions. They change all the time.

Looks like Viriconium is wrong as well, or at least has a different cover. The Falling Woman removed. I'll finish it later.


message 62: by Mē-chan (new)

Mē-chan | 124 comments Banjomike wrote: "Mē-chan wrote: "I don't see duplicate for it as you say. Which book number is that?"

Never mind. It is just the voting positions. They change all the time.

Looks like Viriconium is wrong as wel..."


Ok thanks.
Lyonesse (book 7) is wrong as well. It should be this: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4...

Virconium is not wrong. Fantasy Masterworks edition has ISBN13: 9781857989953 which is the one on the list.

Also, I don't understand why you deleted correct editions of Last Call, Aegypt, and The Dragon Griaule
and you left the wrong ones.
Correct editions are
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1...

The Well of the Unicorn by Fletcher Pratt should be this edition:
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/8...

and The Phoenix and the Mirror (book 49) is not even out yet.

Hope that makes things clear.


message 63: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Mē-chan wrote: "Also, I don't understand why you deleted correct editions of Last Call, Aegypt, and The Dragon Griaule and you left the wrong ones."

That was the wizzo automatic duplicate checker (and slightly less wizzo automatic duplicate deleter. Sorry.

Viriconium seems to have had several different covers in this series but Goodreads doesn't have them all. I'll add them later.


message 64: by Mē-chan (new)

Mē-chan | 124 comments Banjomike wrote: "Mē-chan wrote: "Also, I don't understand why you deleted correct editions of Last Call, Aegypt, and The Dragon Griaule and you left the wrong ones."

That was the wizzo automatic duplicate checker ..."

Oh I see. Hope you can fix it later. And thank you very much for doing this.


message 65: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Mē-chan wrote: "Hope you can fix it later"

Should be OK. I'll post later and you can check it.


message 66: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Mē-chan wrote: "As far as the votes go they will normalize after a while. "

OK, check that now. The new books have decided to be in the middle of the list. Must be a fantasy list. Back later.


message 67: by Mē-chan (new)

Mē-chan | 124 comments I think that is it! A 1000 thanks for you :) Have a nice day~


message 69: by Renske (new)

Renske | 12222 comments 72 done


message 70: by Lobstergirl (new)

Lobstergirl Is this a permitted use of Listopia?

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/5...


message 71: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
It seems much the same as lists for specific groups.


message 72: by Lobstergirl (last edited Jan 16, 2014 08:51PM) (new)

Lobstergirl rivka wrote: "It seems much the same as lists for specific groups."

But it seems to suggest that only 3 people should vote on it.

And what are lists for specific groups? I don't think I have seen one.

From the List page:

"Lists are public and everyone can vote on them, so don't create "Michael's Favorite Robot Books"—instead create "Best Robot Books" and seed it with your favorite books about robots."


message 74: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Lobstergirl wrote: "GR isn't letting me edit the titles."

You were probably editing them to be identical to existing titles of other Listopias. It won't allow that.

All edited.


message 75: by Lobstergirl (new)

Lobstergirl But there are a billion Listopias...they can't all have unique titles. Perhaps the system lets you create a duplicate title but not alter a title to be a duplicate?


message 76: by rivka, Former Moderator (last edited Feb 03, 2014 07:44PM) (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Lobstergirl wrote: "they can't all have unique titles."

They do. One of our developers looked into this quite a bit when you raised this issue with other "uneditable" lists several months back. It doesn't take much to be unique -- a single additional letter will do it. If you try to create a list with a taken title, you get the error message "There is already a list with that title."

We've had this conversation before.


message 77: by Nick (new)

Nick (nantonakos) | 1 comments The book that is #1 on the below list is only voted for by 6 contributing authors. Is that grounds for removal from the list? In general authors (or friends of authors) going through any applicable list and voting for only their book really annoys me and detracts from lists.


https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/4...


message 78: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Nick wrote: "Is that grounds for removal from the list?"

No.

I suggest you get more people to vote on the list. With only 12 voters, 6 votes for one book count a lot. With 30 voters, they'd count far less.


message 79: by Lobstergirl (new)

Lobstergirl rivka wrote: "Nick wrote: "Is that grounds for removal from the list?"

No."


https://www.goodreads.com/topic/show/...

Msgs 9-10 in that thread. Meghan says contributors rating and reviewing is against the rules. Why is Listopia voting different?


message 80: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
You are misquoting her somewhat; it's only against policy if they are not listed as contributors of the book with author profiles.

Noting that a vote is from a book's author is not a current feature on Listopia, so it's moot.


message 81: by Rainbowheart (last edited Feb 05, 2014 10:03PM) (new)

Rainbowheart | 125 comments Hi, so I have a question about this.

I am very active in maintaining my "2014 YA Books with (Possible) LGBT Themes" list. It's been going strong for several months now.

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/4...

Just now I noticed that someone created a duplicate list a few days ago!

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/6...

I really don't understand why they created the list, but it's an exact duplicate of the one already on Goodreads. I don't see the need for two of them at all. Is it possible for that list to be deleted? I mean, I don't want to mess up anyone else, but it seems really unnecessary and a waste of energy to have people voting on two lists that are for the same topic.

There are middle grade books on my list too, and I will probably go ahead and add a note to say it's ok to add middle grade books in case people were unsure. There are only two MG books with queer characters in 2014 (so far), so not enough for a separate list.


message 82: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Lists are not deleted simply for being similar to existing lists.


message 83: by Rainbowheart (last edited Feb 05, 2014 10:15PM) (new)

Rainbowheart | 125 comments I'm a little confused then, when you make a new list it tells you not to create it if there's one already similar. It's a little warning that pops up.

I don't get what the criteria is for deleting a list if being identical isn't one?


message 84: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
In general, we try to edit lists rather than deleting them when possible. Some are too personalized, too promotional, etc. But many can be edited instead.

The warning is there, but users who feel their list is different enough have the ability to create one.


message 85: by Rainbowheart (new)

Rainbowheart | 125 comments Thanks, so how do you mean edit the lists?

It seems kind of silly if someone can make, for example....

"2014 Vampire Books"

And then a few weeks later someone else can make....

"Vampire Books in 2014"

And the two lists just stay side by side even though they're the same topic.


message 86: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Rainbowheart wrote: "Thanks, so how do you mean edit the lists?"

For example, "Bob's Favorite SciFi Books" might become "Favorite SciFi Books".


message 87: by Rainbowheart (new)

Rainbowheart | 125 comments Oh, I gotcha.

I admit I feel..... kind of usurped. My list was unique for a long time and now there's an identical one. I dunno why someone would totally ignore the warning and create an identical list to one that's already there.


message 88: by Lobstergirl (new)

Lobstergirl Rainbowheart wrote: "Oh, I gotcha.

I admit I feel..... kind of usurped. My list was unique for a long time and now there's an identical one. I dunno why someone would totally ignore the warning and create an identical..."


You're in a better position, though, since your list is older. I'd rather have the older, established list so that (hopefully) I and my friends have gotten our votes up there which dominate the first page.


message 89: by Rainbowheart (new)

Rainbowheart | 125 comments Thanks Lobstergirl. Yeah, at least my list has way more voters and books! Maybe people won't even notice the other list is there, lol.


message 92: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Dealt with 94 & 95.


message 93: by Lobstergirl (new)

Lobstergirl rivka wrote: "Lobstergirl wrote: "they can't all have unique titles."

They do. One of our developers looked into this quite a bit when you raised this issue with other "uneditable" lists several months back. It doesn't take much to be unique -- a single additional letter will do it. If you try to create a list with a taken title, you get the error message "There is already a list with that title."

We've had this conversation before. "


Unique, including case sensitive? So "YA Favorites" and "ya favorites" could both exist?


message 94: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
I think so, but I haven't tested it.


message 95: by Lobstergirl (last edited Feb 20, 2014 01:00AM) (new)


message 97: by rivka, Former Moderator (new)

rivka | 45177 comments Mod
Got 99 and 100.


message 98: by Lobstergirl (last edited Mar 03, 2014 04:51PM) (new)

Lobstergirl https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/7...

Too self-promotional.

GONE.


message 99: by Cat (new)

Cat | 5 comments Hi,

Can someone please remove a book from a list for me?

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/2...

The Changing Sky by Steven Forrest should not be on this list as it is not an Evolutionary Astrology book. He has another book, Yesterday's Sky, that is an Evolutionary Astrology book. After the incorrect book is removed, I will add the correct book.

Thank you!
cat


message 100: by Banjomike (new)

Banjomike | 5166 comments Cat wrote: "Hi,

Can someone please remove a book from a list for me?

https://www.goodreads.com/list/show/2...

The Changing Sky by Steven Forrest should not be on this list as it is not an Evolutionary Astrology book. He has another book, Yesterday's Sky, that is an Evolutionary Astrology book. After the incorrect book is removed, I will add the correct book.

Thank you!
cat "


The book cover claims it is an Evolutionary Astrology work. Is that wrong?
https://www.goodreads.com/book/photo/...


back to top
This topic has been frozen by the moderator. No new comments can be posted.