Young Writers discussion

262 views
Essentials > Questions and Suggestions

Comments Showing 1-50 of 353 (353 new)    post a comment »
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8

message 1: by Acacia (new)

Acacia (acaciaa) Please don't post here until you've read the new layout guide.

Any concerns regarding the new layout and related topics should be directed here.


message 2: by Annemarie, hi (new)

Annemarie Carlson (annielawlz) | 3393 comments Mod
They're still there.

Like, as in the specific book discussions?


message 3: by Annemarie, hi (new)

Annemarie Carlson (annielawlz) | 3393 comments Mod
OH I get what you're saying.


Um, yeah. I can make a new topic right now for suggestions.


Belladonna (~Miriam Daisy Rose~) (miriamdaisyrose) | 11 comments Hey, odd question: Do you know of any groups like this for adults? One was asking me today, and I really can't say that I know much about that whole 'grown-up' realm of the Goodreads world.


message 5: by Anastasia (new)

Anastasia (booksteainsanity) | 955 comments Annie, all of the topics where we're supposed to post our writing have been "frozen by the moderator." Is that the way it's supposed to be, or is it a glitch?


message 6: by Elliott (new)

Elliott | 22634 comments Mod
There are tons of groups on GR; I'm sure there are several for adults who write.


message 7: by Anastasia (new)

Anastasia (booksteainsanity) | 955 comments But aren't we supposed to be able to add comments to the genre threads? For example, I wanted to post a link in the "poetry" thread, but I'm not able to. Is that supposed to be the case?


message 8: by Acacia (new)

Acacia (acaciaa) Oh, I see the confusion. No, you're meant to create a new thread for your poetry, and place it inside the Poetry folder. The "poetry" thread is just there as an explanation for people.


message 9: by Taylor (new)

Taylor  | 0 comments To clarify -- with the genre folders, we create a thread for ALL our pieces, right? Or one thread for each piece?


message 10: by Acacia (last edited Feb 09, 2013 06:30PM) (new)

Acacia (acaciaa) We had intended it to be one thread for each piece, especially considering a lot of people's work spans more than one genre. But if you have a lot of pieces in the same genre and want to just create one thread for all of them, I guess that's okay. Strongly encourage individual thread for each piece, though.

Essentially, they're meant to work like the different sections of a bookstore - grouped into similar categories, but each individual work stands alone.


message 11: by Anastasia (new)

Anastasia (booksteainsanity) | 955 comments Acacia wrote: "Oh, I see the confusion. No, you're meant to create a new thread for your poetry, and place it inside the Poetry folder. The "poetry" thread is just there as an explanation for people."

Holden wrote: "Ah, you have to start your own thread for your particular work."

Aha! Thanks for the clarification, guys!


message 12: by Taylor (new)

Taylor  | 0 comments @Acacia

I'm liking this...except that we might have a bajillion topics and only a few comments in each. Does that make sense?

Also, I have a suggestion. A folder that almost works like the want ads in a newspaper -- people inform the group of what kinds of pieces they're interested in critiquing. Then the group members come to them and say, "I want you to look at this." Because people like me really enjoy critiquing, but I often have a hard time connecting with those who want the help.


message 13: by Elliott (new)

Elliott | 22634 comments Mod
I'm going to assume that anyone who posts a folder in the new topics is going to want critiquing help... and with the different genre folders you can find stories in genres that you enjoy and you can help people with them. I personally think that the system they've designed could work well and it's not complicated or confusing.


message 14: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments Speaking of the folders, I have another question:

1. Does romance fall under realistic fiction if it takes place in the real world or science fiction if it takes place in like Star Trek or something and so forth? Does the same apply to crime fiction?


message 15: by Acacia (new)

Acacia (acaciaa) Taylor: We had planned on the bajillions of topics. There were a lot of unused, unread topics in the old system as well, and at least this way there'll be more exposure that doesn't depend on name recognition. Does that make sense?

Emily: Yes, if you have a romance story you can just put it in the genre that best fits the world it exists in. We had actually considered a romance section before but decided most stories could be put into one of the other categories easily. If there's high demand for it we may add one later.

As for crime fiction, what do you guys think about expanding Mystery to be Mystery and Crime?


message 16: by Taylor (new)

Taylor  | 0 comments Well, the theory is more exposure. But I predict that this system will end up like the old one -- the games and such being the most used, then writing advice, then the actual writing topics. This isn't a bad thing at all, and I'm not complaining. I'm simply pointing out something that I notice.


message 17: by Acacia (last edited Feb 10, 2013 07:40AM) (new)

Acacia (acaciaa) Right, and I think that's sort of the direction the group has gone naturally. Some of our intent in moving the other topics up to the top of the group rather than the bottom was to try to shift that around. But if that's not the most important thing to people we're not gonna force it.


message 18: by Annemarie, hi (last edited Feb 10, 2013 08:01AM) (new)

Annemarie Carlson (annielawlz) | 3393 comments Mod
Also if anyone wants old writing contests they're buried in the archive. Just search like, "contest" on the topic search tool.

Idk, I was worried they were deleted but they're not alright.


message 19: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments Acacia wrote: "Taylor: We had planned on the bajillions of topics. There were a lot of unused, unread topics in the old system as well, and at least this way there'll be more exposure that doesn't depend on name ..."

Okay, thank you!

And for the crime thing, yeah, you might want too.

Annie wrote: "Also if anyone wants old writing contests they're buried in the archive. Just search like, "contest" on the topic search tool.

Idk, I was worried they were deleted but they're not alright."


Ahhh, thank you! I was worried they were deleted to and I tried looking for them but I wasn't finding them.


message 20: by Annemarie, hi (new)

Annemarie Carlson (annielawlz) | 3393 comments Mod
Yeah I think this is all of them:
http://www.goodreads.com/group/commen...


message 21: by Elliott (new)

Elliott | 22634 comments Mod
Can we start posting topics for our stories in the folders right now or should we wait until... whenever?


message 22: by Acacia (new)

Acacia (acaciaa) Oh yeah go ahead! Be a pioneer.


message 23: by Elliott (new)

Elliott | 22634 comments Mod
Sweet!


message 24: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments I'll be a pioneer with you, Lav.


message 25: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments Question:

So, if I have a short story, do I make a short stories topic or a different topic for different stories?


message 26: by Annemarie, hi (new)

Annemarie Carlson (annielawlz) | 3393 comments Mod
Just make individual topics for your short stories in the correct genre.


message 27: by Sum (new)

Sum | 846 comments Has anyone heard of the letter game, aka epistolary novels? Two authors write letters to make up a novel, like Patricia C. Wrede and Caroline Stevermer in Sorcery and Cecelia. I think it's a really interesting idea, and a great writing exercise, so maybe we could have a topic devoted to letter game proposals.


message 28: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments Annie wrote: "Just make individual topics for your short stories in the correct genre."

Thank you!


message 29: by Jayda (new)

Jayda | 2761 comments Where do we post our writing?


message 30: by Taylor (new)

Taylor  | 0 comments You create a new topic for it under the genre folder it best fits under.


message 31: by Dana (new)

Dana (danachewy) | 735 comments Why does it say "No complimenting the movie Chicago" under Posting Rules?

((Not trying to compliment it as I've never seen it, but I'm still confused.))


message 32: by Elliott (new)

Elliott | 22634 comments Mod
Baxter.


message 33: by Jayda (new)

Jayda | 2761 comments But, but, but... I kind of like that movie


message 34: by Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. (new)

Brigid ✩ | 11973 comments Mod
Baxter hates it with an undying passion.


message 35: by Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. (new)

Brigid ✩ | 11973 comments Mod
Jayda wrote: "But, but, but... I kind of like that movie"

I do too. :P


message 36: by Annemarie, hi (new)

Annemarie Carlson (annielawlz) | 3393 comments Mod
Yeah it's not a bad movie. Also don't compliment We Are Young because words can't describe how much he hates that song.


message 37: by Baxter, butts butts butts (new)

Baxter (julietrocksmysocks) | 2455 comments Mod
What are you people talking about? It's an INCREDIBLY bad movie. The absolute worst I've ever seen! I swear, there has to be some horrible mass hypnosis going on to convince people that there is anything even remotely good about that movie. It's just a complete piece of offensively awful garbage. Bleeech.

We Are Young...not quite that bad. But close.


message 38: by Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. (new)

Brigid ✩ | 11973 comments Mod
It's not the best movie ever, but ... I find it entertaining. I like the music, the choreography, the story, etc. I don't like Renée Zellweger but otherwise I don't have many problems with it. So ... to each their own.


message 39: by Jayda (new)

Jayda | 2761 comments I've seen MUCH worse movies than Chicago.


message 40: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments BAXTER I HATE WE ARE YOUNG TOO


message 41: by Baxter, butts butts butts (new)

Baxter (julietrocksmysocks) | 2455 comments Mod
Emily [Bobby Darin is a dork] wrote: "BAXTER I HATE WE ARE YOUNG TOO"

What whaaat! You know what's going down with the world, man. You get it.


message 42: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments Baxter wrote: "Emily [Bobby Darin is a dork] wrote: "BAXTER I HATE WE ARE YOUNG TOO"

What whaaat! You know what's going down with the world, man. You get it."


Ugh I can't stand Fun. in genral.


message 43: by Annemarie, hi (new)

Annemarie Carlson (annielawlz) | 3393 comments Mod
Haha, I love Fun. I think I'm going to their concert in the summertime!

Although I can agree that We Are Young is very overplayed and a waste of potential.


message 44: by Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. (new)

Brigid ✩ | 11973 comments Mod
Annie wrote: "Haha, I love Fun. I think I'm going to their concert in the summertime!

Although I can agree that We Are Young is very overplayed and a waste of potential."


I agree. I like them but that song in particular is not that great and way overplayed ...


message 45: by Taylor (new)

Taylor  | 0 comments We Are Young discussion

I have mixed feelings about the song. I like the notion of setting the world on fire, but other than that it is overplayed and I think some indie bands need to take over radio stations.


message 46: by Elliott (new)

Elliott | 22634 comments Mod
fun. is an indie band! I like it better when my indie bands stay off the radio so I can keep them to myself. Because as much as I try not to be, I'm one of those annoying people who is all like, "I knew about them before they were popular blah blah blah they're too popular now." I try not to be like that because it's a stupid attitude, but it kind of happens even when I try to end it.

But yeah, I don't hate the song We Are Young, but it's definitely not as good as their other music. I love the song Some Nights (even though it was overplayed on the radio) and the album Aim and Ignite has great music.


message 47: by Brigid ✩, No tears in the writer, no tears in the reader. (new)

Brigid ✩ | 11973 comments Mod
But then they wouldn't be indie anymore. :P


message 48: by Baxter, butts butts butts (new)

Baxter (julietrocksmysocks) | 2455 comments Mod
Everything else by fun. is totally dealable. Just not We Are Young, which is one of two songs to ever literally cause pain, like a searing headache, after hearing it the first time (the other being that one Black Eyed Peas song that's all DIRTY BIT DOO WOOOP WOOOP DOO WAH DOO WOO)


message 49: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments Brigid *Flying Kick-a-pow!* wrote: "But then they wouldn't be indie anymore. :P"


message 50: by Isaac (new)

Isaac | 8014 comments Baxter wrote: "Everything else by fun. is totally dealable. Just not We Are Young, which is one of two songs to ever literally cause pain, like a searing headache, after hearing it the first time (the other being..."

I mean, I can't say I hate Fun. I just really hate We Are Young and Some Nights.


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8
back to top