185 books
—
63 voters
Religious Criticism Books
Showing 1-50 of 183

by (shelved 6 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.96 — 111,778 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 3 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.89 — 43,218 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 3 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.99 — 42,182 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 3 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.90 — 281,087 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 3 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.88 — 12,909 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.23 — 137 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.61 — 1,319 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.56 — 16 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.29 — 179,642 ratings — published -350

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.90 — 24,167 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.77 — 755 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.78 — 480 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.10 — 7,546 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.04 — 3,007 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.02 — 3,736 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.95 — 5,934 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.94 — 7,978 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.08 — 1,140 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.99 — 867 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.12 — 6,343 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.89 — 262 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.13 — 140 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.62 — 21 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.22 — 9 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.84 — 25 ratings — published 1986

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.44 — 27 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.05 — 75 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.16 — 219 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.18 — 773 ratings — published 1424

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.09 — 22 ratings — published 1959

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.61 — 1,937 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.23 — 2,945 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.28 — 5,213 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.97 — 1,265 ratings — published 1947

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.00 — 1 rating — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.86 — 250 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.00 — 2 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.78 — 824 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.66 — 461 ratings — published 1970

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.00 — 2 ratings — published 1973

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.21 — 42 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.06 — 346 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.48 — 367 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.19 — 377 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.21 — 963 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.94 — 6,541 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.85 — 2,926 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.89 — 1,075 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 4.02 — 3,805 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as religious-criticism)
avg rating 3.99 — 7,684 ratings — published 2008
“Trial began on Friday, July 23, 1875... the jury which was finally selected consisted of eight Mormons, three Gentiles, and one Jack Mormon... When finally the case was closed and the case given to the jury, they could not agree upon a verdict, the eight Mormons all being for acquittal and the other four, all for conviction. The court was obliged to begin all over again and try the case before another jury. Even the most cursory examinations of the court records will show that between the first and second trials of Lee, something happened. When court opened again on September 14, 1876, the whole tone was changed... R.N. Baskin and other non-Mormons insisted that the leaders of the Mormon church had entered into an agreement with District Attorney Howard that Lee might be convicted and pay the death penalty, if the charges against all other suspected persons would be withdrawn. This was to be done by a jury composed only of Mormons, who would bring a verdict of "guilty", if names of other participants were left out of the discussion... This time the trial proceeded with dispatch. Men who had participated, and for almost twenty years had sealed their lips, now came forward to testify... On September 20, the case was given to the all-Mormon jury, who deliberated three and one-half hours and brought in a verdict of "guilty." [Lee was] convicted of murder in the first degree...”
― The Mountain Meadows Massacre
― The Mountain Meadows Massacre

“The foundation of irreligious criticism is: Man makes religion, religion does not make man. Religion is, indeed, the self-consciousness and self-esteem of man who has either not yet won through to himself, or has already lost himself again. But man is no abstract being squatting outside the world. Man is the world of man – state, society. This state and this society produce religion, which is an inverted consciousness of the world, because they are an inverted world...
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.
Criticism has plucked the imaginary flowers on the chain not in order that man shall continue to bear that chain without fantasy or consolation, but so that he shall throw off the chain and pluck the living flower. The criticism of religion disillusions man, so that he will think, act, and fashion his reality like a man who has discarded his illusions and regained his senses, so that he will move around himself as his own true Sun. Religion is only the illusory Sun which revolves around man as long as he does not revolve around himself.”
― Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right
Religious suffering is, at one and the same time, the expression of real suffering and a protest against real suffering. Religion is the sigh of the oppressed creature, the heart of a heartless world, and the soul of soulless conditions. It is the opium of the people.
The abolition of religion as the illusory happiness of the people is the demand for their real happiness. To call on them to give up their illusions about their condition is to call on them to give up a condition that requires illusions. The criticism of religion is, therefore, in embryo, the criticism of that vale of tears of which religion is the halo.
Criticism has plucked the imaginary flowers on the chain not in order that man shall continue to bear that chain without fantasy or consolation, but so that he shall throw off the chain and pluck the living flower. The criticism of religion disillusions man, so that he will think, act, and fashion his reality like a man who has discarded his illusions and regained his senses, so that he will move around himself as his own true Sun. Religion is only the illusory Sun which revolves around man as long as he does not revolve around himself.”
― Critique of Hegel's Philosophy of Right