5 books
—
2 voters
First Amendment Books
Showing 1-50 of 53

by (shelved 3 times as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.86 — 703 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.22 — 398 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.10 — 40 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.81 — 315 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 2.67 — 3 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.56 — 39 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.33 — 6 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.52 — 215 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 0.0 — 0 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.48 — 65 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.07 — 54 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.84 — 182 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.12 — 64 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.25 — 4 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.67 — 3 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.86 — 334 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.23 — 137 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.67 — 12 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.67 — 12 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.90 — 69 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.27 — 48 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.11 — 2,823 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.64 — 1,821 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.22 — 63 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.48 — 25 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.20 — 518 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.92 — 50 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.30 — 10 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.99 — 3,493 ratings — published 1965

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.85 — 227 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.11 — 1,225 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.89 — 70 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.44 — 899 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.02 — 520 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.47 — 2,976,308 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.94 — 1,320 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.14 — 32,637 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 4.13 — 11,542 ratings — published 1968

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.67 — 383 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.91 — 32 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.90 — 360 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.80 — 5 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.98 — 54 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.96 — 28 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.91 — 32 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.89 — 222 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.74 — 23 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as first-amendment)
avg rating 3.68 — 37 ratings — published 1993

“From time to time our national history has been marred by forgetfulness of the Jeffersonian principle that restraint is at the heart of liberty. In 1789 the Federalists adopted Alien and Sedition Acts in a shabby political effort to isolate the Republic from the world and to punish political criticism as seditious libel. In 1865 the Radical Republicans sought to snare private conscience in a web of oaths and affirmations of loyalty. Spokesmen for the South did service for the Nation in resisting the petty tyranny of distrustful vengeance. In the 1920's the Attorney General of the United States degraded his office by hunting political radicals as if they were Salem witches. The Nation's only gain from his efforts were the classic dissents of Holmes and Brandeis.
In our own times, the old blunt instruments have again been put to work. The States have followed in the footsteps of the Federalists and have put Alien and Sedition Acts upon their statute books. An epidemic of loyalty oaths has spread across the Nation until no town or village seems to feel secure until its servants have purged themselves of all suspicion of non-conformity by swearing to their political cleanliness.
Those who love the twilight speak as if public education must be training in conformity, and government support of science be public aid of caution.
We have also seen a sharpening and refinement of abusive power. The legislative investigation, designed and often exercised for the achievement of high ends, has too frequently been used by the Nation and the States as a means for effecting the disgrace and degradation of private persons. Unscrupulous demagogues have used the power to investigate as tyrants of an earlier day used the bill of attainder.
The architects of fear have converted a wholesome law against conspiracy into an instrument for making association a crime. Pretending to fear government they have asked government to outlaw private protest. They glorify "togetherness" when it is theirs, and call it conspiracy when it is that of others.
In listing these abuses I do not mean to condemn our central effort to protect the Nation's security. The dangers that surround us have been very great, and many of our measures of vigilance have ample justification. Yet there are few among us who do not share a portion of the blame for not recognizing soon enough the dark tendency towards excess of caution.”
―
In our own times, the old blunt instruments have again been put to work. The States have followed in the footsteps of the Federalists and have put Alien and Sedition Acts upon their statute books. An epidemic of loyalty oaths has spread across the Nation until no town or village seems to feel secure until its servants have purged themselves of all suspicion of non-conformity by swearing to their political cleanliness.
Those who love the twilight speak as if public education must be training in conformity, and government support of science be public aid of caution.
We have also seen a sharpening and refinement of abusive power. The legislative investigation, designed and often exercised for the achievement of high ends, has too frequently been used by the Nation and the States as a means for effecting the disgrace and degradation of private persons. Unscrupulous demagogues have used the power to investigate as tyrants of an earlier day used the bill of attainder.
The architects of fear have converted a wholesome law against conspiracy into an instrument for making association a crime. Pretending to fear government they have asked government to outlaw private protest. They glorify "togetherness" when it is theirs, and call it conspiracy when it is that of others.
In listing these abuses I do not mean to condemn our central effort to protect the Nation's security. The dangers that surround us have been very great, and many of our measures of vigilance have ample justification. Yet there are few among us who do not share a portion of the blame for not recognizing soon enough the dark tendency towards excess of caution.”
―

“The ages of individual Supreme Court Justices were of significant concern to Zack, as were the nominations President John would make if these elderly Supreme Court Justices retired or passed away. Zack smiled to himself and wished the justices good health and long life.”
― Betrayal of Justice
― Betrayal of Justice