Creationist Books
Showing 1-39 of 39

by (shelved 3 times as creationist)
avg rating 3.79 — 4,028 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 2 times as creationist)
avg rating 3.93 — 1,784 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.83 — 24,643 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.13 — 459 ratings — published 2019

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.08 — 142 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.23 — 31 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.76 — 104 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.71 — 7 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.06 — 266 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.11 — 175 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.25 — 130 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.05 — 85 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.88 — 721 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.44 — 16 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.09 — 67 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.51 — 105 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.21 — 43 ratings — published 1982

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 1.89 — 9 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 1.33 — 9 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.10 — 84 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.05 — 238 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.80 — 5 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.44 — 535 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.24 — 21 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.06 — 33 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.00 — 4 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.12 — 13,530 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.94 — 16 ratings — published 1990

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.39 — 2,042 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.97 — 96 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.43 — 7 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.82 — 163 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.90 — 10 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.10 — 126 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 2.92 — 13 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.38 — 1,709 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 4.21 — 127 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.82 — 88 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as creationist)
avg rating 3.74 — 250 ratings — published 1994

“A second point that caught my attention was that the very persons who insist upon keeping religion and science separate are eager to use their science as a basis for pronouncements about religion. The literature of Darwinism is full of anti-theistic conclusions, such as that the universe was not designed and has no purpose, and that we humans are the product of blind natural processes that care nothing about us. What is more, these statements are not presented as personal opinions but as the logical implications of evolutionary science.
Another factor that makes evolutionary science seem a lot like religion is the evident zeal of Darwinists to evangelize the world, by insisting that even non-scientists accept the truth of their theory as a matter of moral obligation. Richard Dawkins, an Oxford Zoologist who is one of the most influential figures in evolutionary science, is unabashedly explicit about the religious side of Darwinism. his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker is at one level about biology, but at a more fundamental level it is a sustained argument for atheism. According to Dawkins, "Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist."
When he contemplates the perfidy of those who refuse to believe, Dawkins can scarcely restrain his fury. "It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)." Dawkins went to explain, by the way, that what he dislikes particularly about creationists is that they are intolerant.”
― Darwin on Trial
Another factor that makes evolutionary science seem a lot like religion is the evident zeal of Darwinists to evangelize the world, by insisting that even non-scientists accept the truth of their theory as a matter of moral obligation. Richard Dawkins, an Oxford Zoologist who is one of the most influential figures in evolutionary science, is unabashedly explicit about the religious side of Darwinism. his 1986 book The Blind Watchmaker is at one level about biology, but at a more fundamental level it is a sustained argument for atheism. According to Dawkins, "Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist."
When he contemplates the perfidy of those who refuse to believe, Dawkins can scarcely restrain his fury. "It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that)." Dawkins went to explain, by the way, that what he dislikes particularly about creationists is that they are intolerant.”
― Darwin on Trial

“Don't creationists ever wonder about the fact that the paleontologists found ape-like skulls with the 'human leg and foot bones,' rather than the other way around, i.e., human skulls with 'ape leg and foot bones?' . . . Come on, creationists, think about it! Did God hide the human skulls, only leaving behind leg and foot bones belonging to human midgets with misshapen feet, and mix such bones only with the skulls of ape-like creatures with larger cranial capacities than living apes? What a 'kidder' the creationists' God must be.”
―
―