Centering Books
Showing 1-37 of 37

by (shelved 2 times as centering)
avg rating 4.05 — 2,842 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.02 — 45 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.11 — 1,797 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.26 — 58 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.09 — 765 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.52 — 7,168 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.76 — 12,735 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 5.00 — 1 rating — published

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.46 — 3,860 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.95 — 117,668 ratings — published 2002

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.93 — 1,710 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.24 — 200 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.77 — 16,526 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.51 — 162,124 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.11 — 91,946 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.92 — 52 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.00 — 3 ratings — published 1977

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.94 — 957 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.44 — 87 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.32 — 59 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.08 — 248 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.78 — 9 ratings — published 2000

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.06 — 2,270 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.27 — 89 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.98 — 178 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.00 — 2 ratings — published 2003

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.11 — 151 ratings — published 1962

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.19 — 16 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.21 — 147 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.17 — 36 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.35 — 23 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.13 — 155 ratings — published 1978

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.98 — 1,231 ratings — published 1992

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 3.91 — 64 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.14 — 128 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 1 time as centering)
avg rating 4.25 — 49,997 ratings — published 1997

“The sensuality of her grief, thawing. Her power coming into focus, still so chaotic inside her. I love the way she splurged on this hedonistic indulgence: a public cascade of tears. Not sobbing, not beaten, just allowing the ocean inside to surge and be visible, palpable, wet.”
― The Look of Amie Martine
― The Look of Amie Martine

“The omega point of a system is the point of a pure circulation of energies destined, by the very fact of that circulation, to indifference and death. In such a system exchange becomes impossible owing to an immanent equivalence - every particle is in suspense before the only possible event: the meeting with the antiparticle which will cancel it out. It is at this point that the entire system nears the alpha point of another mechanism. Beyond a certain phase the whole system tends towards this fatal point.
Radical objectivity is the exact opposite of the objectivity of science. The one addresses the rationality of partial processes, the other the irony of the overall process.
Women constitute a secret society. They are all involved together in secret discussions. Those I have known - none of whom have known the others except by accident - nonetheless weave amongst themselves a collusive web of seduc tion. They signal to each other, as the events in a lifetime signal to each other in their apparently indifferent spiral. Moreover, each one, with an unacknowledged fervour, envelops all her rivals, past and future, in the same field of jealousy, fascination and complicity - and in turn she is all the others together, those whom you have kept apart in life, finally united in the only real secret society - the dream society, the society of women.”
―
Radical objectivity is the exact opposite of the objectivity of science. The one addresses the rationality of partial processes, the other the irony of the overall process.
Women constitute a secret society. They are all involved together in secret discussions. Those I have known - none of whom have known the others except by accident - nonetheless weave amongst themselves a collusive web of seduc tion. They signal to each other, as the events in a lifetime signal to each other in their apparently indifferent spiral. Moreover, each one, with an unacknowledged fervour, envelops all her rivals, past and future, in the same field of jealousy, fascination and complicity - and in turn she is all the others together, those whom you have kept apart in life, finally united in the only real secret society - the dream society, the society of women.”
―