Religious Persecution Quotes

Quotes tagged as "religious-persecution" Showing 1-30 of 37
Philip Pullman
“It comes from history. It comes from the record of the Inquisition, persecuting heretics and torturing Jews and all that sort of stuff; and it comes from the other side, too, from the Protestants burning the Catholics. It comes from the insensate pursuit of innocent and crazy old women, and from the Puritans in America burning and hanging the witches — and it comes not only from the Christian church but also from the Taliban. Every single religion that has a monotheistic god ends up by persecuting other people and killing them because they don't accept him. Wherever you look in history, you find that. It’s still going on.”
Philip Pullman

Benjamin Franklin
“If we look back into history for the character of present sects in Christianity, we shall find few that have not in their turns been persecutors, and complainers of persecution. The primitive Christians thought persecution extremely wrong in the Pagans, but practised it on one another. The first Protestants of the Church of England, blamed persecution in the Roman church, but practised it against the Puritans: these found it wrong in the Bishops, but fell into the same practice themselves both here and in New England.

[Letter to the London Packet, 3 June 1772]”
ben franklin, The Life and Letters of Benjamin Franklin

Alexis de Tocqueville
“The chief care of the legislators [in the colonies of New England] was the maintenance of orderly conduct and good morals in the community: thus they constantly invaded the domain of conscience, and there was scarcely a sin which was no subject to magisterial censure. The reader is aware of the rigor with which these laws punished rape and adultery; intercourse between unmarried persons was likewise severely repressed. The judge was empowered to inflict either a pecuniary penalty, a whipping, or marriage, on the misdemeanants; and if the records of the old courts of New Haven may be believed, prosecutions of this kind were not unfrequent. We find a sentence, bearing date the 1st of May, 1660, inflicting a fine and reprimand on a young woman who was accused of using improper language, and of allowing herself to be kissed. The Code of 1650 abounds in preventive measures. It punishes idleness and drunkenness with severity. Innkeepers were forbidden to furnish more than certain quantities of liquor to each customer; and simple lying, whenever it may be injurious, is checked by a fine or a flogging. In other places, the legislator, entirely forgetting the great principles of religious toleration which he had himself demanded in Europe, makes attendance on divine service compulsory, and goes so far as to visit with severe punishment, and even with death, Christians who choose to worship God according to a ritual differing from his own. Sometimes, indeed, the zeal for regulation induces him to descend to the most frivolous particulars: thus a law is to be found in the same code which prohibits the use of tobacco. It must not be forgotten that these fantastical and vexatious laws were not imposed by authority, but that they were freely voted by all the persons interested in them, and that the manners of the community were even more austere and puritanical than the laws....

These errors are no doubt discreditable to human reason; they attest the inferiority of our nature, which is incapable of laying firm hold upon what is true and just, and is often reduced to the alternative of two excesses. In strict connection with this penal legislation, which bears such striking marks of a narrow, sectarian spirit, and of those religious passions which had been warmed by persecution and were still fermenting among the people, a body of political laws is to be found, which, though written two hundred years ago, is still in advance of the liberties of our own age.”
Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America

Margaret  Rogerson
“Humans simply love inventing superstitions and then getting killed because of them. Or better yet, using them as an excuse to kill other humans.”
Margaret Rogerson, Vespertine

“They were a luckless lot too. What harm did they do anyone by praying to God? Every man Jack of 'em given twenty-five years.”
Alexander Solzhenitsyn, One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich

Bart D. Ehrman
“But the punishments!

Imperial bureaucrats who accepted bribes were to have their hands cut off (Theodosian Code 1.16.7);

ineffective guardians of girls who had been seduced were to have molten lead poured down their throats (Theodosian Code 9.24.1);

tax collectors who treated women tax delinquents rudely were to “be done to death with exquisite tortures”;

anyone who served as an informer was to be strangled and “the tongue of envy cut off from its roots and plucked out” (Theodosian Code 10.10.2);

slaves who informed on their masters were to be crucified (Theodosian Code 9.5.1.1);

How is one to account for such judicial cruelty from a Christian emperor?

MacMullen suggests that by the fourth century Christianity was revealing an increasingly cruel streak. He notes in particular the heightened popularity of the Christian literature... in recounting in graphic detail the torments of hell for those who refuse to do God’s will.

Possibly what applied to heaven applied to earth: If this is how God handles sin, then who are we to act differently?

Religious beliefs may have made judicial punishment specially aggressive, harsh, and ruthless.”
Bart D. Ehrman, The Triumph of Christianity: How a Forbidden Religion Swept the World

Bart D. Ehrman
“Constantius II ordered pagan temples closed and sacrificial practices stopped.

We have already seen a law issued in 341 CE: “Superstition shall cease; the madness of sacrifices shall be abolished... [anyone]... who performs sacrifices . . . shall suffer the infliction of a suitable punishment and the effect of an immediate sentence” (Theodosian Code 16.10.2).

In a law of 346 CE, the penalties are specified: Temples “in all places and in all cities” are to be “immediately closed” and “access to them forbidden.” No one may perform a sacrifice. Anyone who does “shall be struck down with the avenging sword” and his “property shall be confiscated.” Any governor who fails to avenge such crimes “shall be similarly punished” (Theodosian Code 16.10.4);

And perhaps more drastically, later in Constantius’s reign, in 356: “Anyone who sacrifices or worships images shall be executed” (Theodosian Code 16.10.6).”
Bart D. Ehrman, The Triumph of Christianity: How a Forbidden Religion Swept the World

Michelle Rutler
“Faith is not lost all at once; it is forgotten
piece by piece. God allows his children to walk away, but he waits for our return, and our way back begins with remembering. If we forget our past, ignore the present, and do not protect the future we forget the truth.”
Michelle Rutler, Mortality Devoid of Morality: Book One: Absconding Tyranny

John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton
“If the Catholic Church was naturally inclined to persecute, she would persecute in all cases alike, when there was no interest to serve but her own. Instead of adapting her conduct to circumstances, and accepting theories according to the character of the time, she would have developed a consistent theory out of her own system, and would have been most severe when she was most free from external influences, from political objects, or from temporary or national prejudices. She would have imposed acommon rule of conduct in different countries in different ages, instead of submitting to the exigencies of each time and place. Her own rule of conduct never changed. She treats it as a crime to abandon her, not to be outside her. An apostate who returns to her has a penance for his apostasy; a heretic who is converted has no penance for his heresy. Severity against those who are outside her fold is against her principles. Persecution is contrary to the nature of a universal Church; it is peculiar to the national Churches.

While the Catholic Church by her progress in freedom naturally tends to push the development of States beyond the sphere where they are still obliged to preserve the unity of religion, and whilst she extends over States in all degrees of advancement, Protestantism, which belongs to a particular age and state of society, which makes no claim to universality, and which is dependent on political connection, regards persecution, not as an accident, but as a duty.

Wherever Protestantism prevailed, intolerance became a principle of State, and was proclaimed in theory even where the Protestants were in a minority, and where the theory supplied a weapon against themselves. The Reformation made it a general law, not only against Catholics by way of self-defence or retaliation, but against all who dissented from the reformed doctrines, whom it treated, not as enemies, but as criminals,—against the Protestant sects, against Socinians, and against atheists. It was not a right, but a duty; its object was to avenge God, not to preserve order. There is no analogy between the persecution which preserves and the persecution which attacks; or between intolerance as a religious duty, and intolerance as a necessity of State. The Reformers unanimously declared persecution to be incumbent on the civil power; and the Protestant Governments universally acted upon their injunctions, until scepticism escaped the infliction of penal laws and condemned their spirit.”
John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, The History of Freedom and Other Essays

John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton
“But Protestant establishments, according to our author’s definition, which applies to them, and to them alone, rest on the opposite theory, that the will of the State is independent of the condition of the community; and that it may, or indeed must, impose on the nation a faith which may be that of a minority, and which in some cases has been that of the sovereign alone. According to the Catholic view, government may preserve in its laws, and by its authority, the religion of the community; according to the Protestant view it may be bound to change it. A government which has power to change the faith of its subjects must be absolute in other things; so that one theory is as favourable to tyranny as the other is opposed to it. The safeguard of the Catholic system of Church and State, as contrasted with the Protestant, was that very authority which the Holy See used to prevent the sovereign from changing the religion of the people, by deposing him if he departed from it himself. In most Catholic countries the Church preceded the State; some she assisted to form; all she contributed to sustain. Throughout Western Europe Catholicism was the religion of the inhabitants before the new monarchies were founded. The invaders, who became the dominant race and the architects of a new system of States, were sooner or later compelled, in order to preserve their dominion, to abandon their pagan or their Arian religion, and to adopt the common faith of the immense majority of the people. The connection between Church and State was therefore a natural, not an arbitrary, institution; the result of the submission of the Government to popular influence, and the means by which that influence was perpetuated. No Catholic Government ever imposed a Catholic establishment on a Protestant community, or destroyed a Protestant establishment. Even the revocation of the Edict of Nantes, the greatest wrong ever inflicted on the Protestant subjects of a Catholic State, will bear no comparison with the establishment of the religion of a minority. It is a far greater wrong than the most severe persecution, because persecution may be necessary for the preservation of an existing society, as in the case of the early Christians and of the Albigenses; but a State Church can only be justified by the acquiescence of the nation. In every other case it is a great social danger, and is inseparable from political oppression.”
John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, The History of Freedom and Other Essays

Abhijit Naskar
“If you don't stand up to nationalist extremism now, every single nation that has been secular for a short while, such as America, Turkey, India and so on, will again turn back into the grovel-pit of bigotry, sectarianism, persecution and hate crime.”
Abhijit Naskar, I Vicdansaadet Speaking: No Rest Till The World is Lifted

“Although Pakistan is an ethnically, linguistically and religiously diverse nation, the role of religion in the society is being ignored altogether.”
Qamar Rafiq

“I am a victim of religious persecution, and this tragedy has changed my life forever. Anything I write about freedom of religion is therefore colored by what has happened to me—a nightmare that never ends.”
Qamar Rafiq

“As I look at the upsurge in horrific atrocities against faith and ethnic communities, the pandemic of forced conversion and marriages, and see the widespread persecution continuing to rise, it feels like several storms are on their way to hitting us.”
Qamar Rafiq

“In reality, minorities are chewing over several levels of trauma at the same time: personal, social and national. This also means the burden of social trauma is carried from generation to generation with tears and rage.”
Qamar Rafiq

Priscilla Vogelbacher
“Religious beliefs have been the greatest cause of persecution in all of history.”
Priscilla Vogelbacher, Hallowed Be Thy Name

Abhijit Naskar
“Intolerance is the desecration of sanctity,
Every stream reflects the same aspiring piety.
Every heart is a living church, from river to the sea,
Season of love and peace transcends ethnicity.”
Abhijit Naskar, Little Planet on The Prairie: Dunya Benim, Sorumluluk Benim

Abhijit Naskar
“World is my church, the persecuted are my deity. God faith is interfaith, human welfare is my priority.”
Abhijit Naskar, Little Planet on The Prairie: Dunya Benim, Sorumluluk Benim

Abhijit Naskar
“Practical Theology (Sonnet)

Not sheep, not wolf, be human -
graduate from dogma to divinity.
Take theology out of the sky and
place it in the heart of humanity.

From stars to soil to synapses,
arrangement of atoms dictates reality.
From inanimate to animate to sapient,
humanity is an affair of cosmic serendipity.

All superstitions are practiced as truth,
all entitlement is passed on as enlightenment.
Acts of dogma are perpetrated as divinity,
love-n-reason feels dehumanizing to the intolerant.

Hallucinations are the foundation of perception,
delusions are the foundation of persecution.
Day you grow up to distinguish between the two,
you shall become a pillar of civilization.”
Abhijit Naskar, The God Sonnets: Naskar Art of Theology

Abhijit Naskar
“I have no problem with you shouting, that your religion is the only true religion, at most, I'll ignore you like a raving lunatic - but the moment you start persecuting others, your lunacy becomes a medical emergency.”
Abhijit Naskar, The God Sonnets: Naskar Art of Theology

Abhijit Naskar
“Don't take a hammer to the pulpit, to defy those selling mindless creed, just don't visit, it's that simple - because vandalizing pulpits is just as fanatic as religious fanaticism.”
Abhijit Naskar, The God Sonnets: Naskar Art of Theology

Abhijit Naskar
“Don't take a hammer to the pulpit, to defy those selling mindless creed, just don't visit, it's that simple - because vandalizing pulpits is just as fanatic as religious fanaticism. Mocking faith doesn't end fanaticism, extremism doesn't cure extremism.”
Abhijit Naskar, The God Sonnets: Naskar Art of Theology

Abhijit Naskar
“Right to leave religion is just as fundamental as right to religion.”
Abhijit Naskar, Iftar-e Insaniyat: The First Supper

Abhijit Naskar
“Defending all persecuted is true act of khalsa.”
Abhijit Naskar, Iftar-e Insaniyat: The First Supper

Abhijit Naskar
“Service of humanity is supreme shahada,
to defend the persecuted is cosmic khalsa,
to treat neighbor as god is real dharma,
quiet kindness is the real karma.”
Abhijit Naskar, Kral Fakir: When Calls The Kainat

Abhijit Naskar
“Service of humanity is supreme shahada,
to defend the persecuted is cosmic khalsa,
to treat neighbor as god is real dharma,
quiet kindness is the real karma.

Ana al-haqq, ana al-hub -
aham bindu, aham brahmanda.
I shed dogma like dead skin,
el cosmos es mi casa.”
Abhijit Naskar, Kral Fakir: When Calls The Kainat

Abhijit Naskar
“When ethnic cleansing feels enlightened, Sinai becomes septic, Bethlehem becomes Bedlam.”
Abhijit Naskar, Kral Fakir: When Calls The Kainat

« previous 1