Quinn
Quinn asked:

This question contains spoilers… (view spoiler)

To answer questions about Little Women, please sign up.
Trix Wilkins Definitely not the only one - but Laurie should've either waited a bit longer before asking Jo to marry him (eg: worked out what he was doing with his life first, what he was doing after college. All we know is that he doesn't want to take up his grandfather's), or after she rejected him the first time, really courted her and asked her again (eg: Fitzwilliam Darcy). I think there was a lot of potential for them to have grown as people together, to have matured and to have spurred each other in their respective passions - she loves writing, he loves music - and it was a shame that wasn't explored in the book.
Christi No way! I agree with Marmee when she says that Jo and Laurie are too alike and while that works for their friendship it would not make a successful, happy marriage. Laurie keeps offering to change for Jo. That's no way to start a relationship.

Amy is perfect for Laurie. Just as Professor Bhaer is perfect for Jo. He comes from humble surroundings, he is a hard worker and he is Jo's intellectual equal. Who better to help Jo run her school?

If Jo married Laurie, she would have spent every day back at her parents' house in her same old life. Laurie would resent that. And Jo would resent having to wear nice gloves and throw parties and be the lady of the manor.
Book lover The author said that she wouldn't do it just to please others which is fine and she also said that she didn't want Jo to marry anyone. BUT SHE GOT MARRIED. I swear that what makes it so wrong that Jo would have been happy with Laurie but she didn't want Jo to get married then she off and marries Jo to that other guy. That guy, I really don't care about. it broke my heart that she did this and I was really mad and also that she married Laurie to Amy of all people. Like give me a break. I was so mad I almost didn't finish the book. Glad I did though.
Karina As a child reading the story....I agreed that up until the point where Jo points out that her needing to write irritates Laurie and her need to be independent where he wants to feel needed and loved and admired and she's not that type of person. I know enough of that time period that any wife of someone of Laurie's class would need to host parties, look pretty and generally make him look good, something that Jo was not cut out for.
Gina
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Bryn
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Karen Miller It is a little heartbreaking, but only because we've come to like Laurie so much! I love the fun Jo and Laurie have together and I grieved the loss of it, but Laurie did not contain the depth to touch the innermost part of Jo's soul. Professor Bhaer did. He drew Jo out with appreciation, and their transcendentalist backgrounds brought each other together. Jo would have never been able to fulfill her greater destiny with Laurie.
Hyo Jung Hong In an idyllic world, they would have but Jo was already adamantly opposed to the idea of falling in love as well as leaving her delightful sisters and mother. To her, the thought of marriage was too distant, something that would not have crossed her mind had it not been for her older sister. Being a tomboy and quite independent herself, she could not see Laurie as more than a dear friend. I do believe that Louisa May Alcott did try to keep this suspense alive throughout the book, something that just makes Little Women all the more delightful to read.
Sabrien Abdelrahman Me too. I just think she did but didn't know it- Laurie didn't try hard enough.
Jennifer
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Louis Arroyo I am very late to the party but I just finished reading Little Women.

Regarding Jo and Laure not living happily ever after...

It made perfect sense that they would not be together at the end, they were to much alike, and therefore, would have made each other miserable. As a hopeless romantic, I prefer the classic happy ending, where the boy gets the girl, but Jo and Laurie just didn't fit. IMHO, the ending that we got made much more sense, even if most fans of the book hate it.
Sagar B I initially did, but eventually realized that Professor Bhaer was more suitable for Jo. She is an independent person from the beginning, and Professor Bhaer allows her to be independent, she also wants guidance which Professor Bhaer can give due to his age and experience.

The most important thing is: Jo did not love Laurie, and she should NOT have to marry someone whom she did not love! Even if he loved her, even if he was rich, etc etc. She should not succumb to societal pressures, and she did not, which is great. Female empowerment - something that was very relevant at that time.

Laurie ended up marrying Amy, which is good because that way at least he'll still be connected to the Marches for the rest of his life.
Arifa I always wanted laurie to marry beth and not amy. I also firmly agree that marmee is right about jo and laurie being to alike and they could not do anything about it
emily that would be cliche, so no. I like the fact that Jo and Laurie love, care and support each other, as best friends and not as lovers. Romance would just spoil their friendship, if you ask me.
GypsyBookworm Yes! I think she loved him but was just not ready when he originally asked her to marry him. I think if she had been given time she definitely would have accepted.
Lady Willpower No, you're not the only one. The Laurie/Amy pairing never sat well with me. Jo and Laurie could've grown into the perfect mates for each other, given time. If he had waited a little longer, and been more persistent, it could've worked. I could also see them supporting each other's artistic passions.

Incidentally, there's a variation of the story where they do get together (obviously not written by Alcott): https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3.... You might enjoy it. I think I'm going to give it a try.
Jordan
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
MinaG
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Sherry Good thing they didn't get together. With names like Jo and Laurie people might freak out a little lol who's who?!
Megan I believe they should have to actually.
Nora
Wait, what? Theres another book? :0.
Anna I didn't even finish reading this book when I learnt that Jo wasn't meant for Laurie! I hate it! Why should authors lead people on this way to break their hearts! This is why I like romance, you know all will be well at the end. And people wonder why classics are so unpopular!
Elizabeth Dalton I think it would have been interesting but something tells me Alcott wanted Jo to be a different kind of woman. That probably says a lot for the time period. It was such a great book. Loved the TV show too as a kid - made me cry every time.
Keri Steen I agree! I'm so sad that Laurie is getting his heart ripped out right now, as I'm at the big part where she rejects him now. :(
Rachel
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Luisana Rodríguez
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Abbi Davis Nope I also thought they should have
Pat Both Professor Bhaer and Amy read like substitutes. I can't see any great passion of Jo for Bhaer, and nor of Laurie for Amy. LMA obviously had her heart in Jo and Laurie's friendship. Whether she wanted them to marry or not (apparently not) she never could make the publisher required substitutes for that love have 1/100th of the passion Jo and Laurie had for eachother as friends. So that's why the marriages are unsatisfactory to so many readers.
Katie They should have been together. I just wish like many movie, they change the ending and make Jo marry Laurie which would be perfect ending. It just doesn't make any sense how Laurie suddenly propose Amy. I felt they were like brother sister.
Shobana Sankar
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
Elizabeth Dragina I think they should have fallen in love too! It made me really sad when they didn't, because then he went on and found Amy, but he knew he could never love Amy as much as he loved Jo. :( I wonder how Amy felt about that.....
Wendy J.
This answer contains spoilers… (view spoiler)
RunedNephilumGirl I wanted that too!!!
RoyS Yes, Laurie and Jo, they both loved each other. But Jo was unable realize her actual feelings for Laurie... the end actually didn't satisfy me.. I have expected that Jo and Laurie would be together at the end.. but Jo ended up marrying Professor Bhaer . According to me , it would have been better if Jo remained unmarried and had a great life.
Rose I absolutely thought that Jo and Laurie ought to be together, but when I read the ending, I believe that they weren't meant to be together.
Abdullah men idea of this little women story?
twice_baked✌️ I think Laurie was in love with Jo, but Jo wasn't in love with Laurie. At least, at the end she wasn't. She was at the beginning but LMA decided to take an unexpected turn for the worst and married her off to someone old enough to be her dad. I think everyone who reads this book thinks they should have gotten married, too. I've never met someone who's like yay Jo and Mr. Bhaer.
Brenda Feldman No. I thought Jo was dumb for not liking Laurie. He was always there for her when she was crying over Beth being sick. I thought they were perfect for each other since they have a lot in common. I get that they both have a temper, but it was not like they were violent.
Image for Little Women
Rate this book
Clear rating

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more