Mina Kosec
Mina Kosec asked Susan Wittig Albert:

Are there any discrepancies between historical facts and your book Loving Eleanor?

Susan Wittig Albert Oops--thought I answered this yesterday, Mina. Guess I didn't save it correctly. Trying again!

To my knowledge, there are no discrepancies between the historical record and my novel. However, I have often filled in the gaps in the historical record, expanding and enlarging the story. As I've done this, I've tried to be very sure that my expansions are in line with what history tells us.

Blanche Wiesen Cook has reviewed LOVING ELEANOR. Here's what she has to say on this question: "Susan Wittig Albert’s Loving Eleanor is a vivid 'fictional interpretation,' written from Hick’s perspective as her relationship with ER unfolded and endured. Albert’s novel, which is rooted in the women’s correspondence, is so skillfully told that I found her “enhancements” believable and profoundly moving. For example, there’s the mystery of Earl Miller’s lost papers. Miller was ER’s bodyguard and possibly her lover; we know that ER and Miller wrote to each other regularly, much as Hick and ER did. Lash revealed that the letters mysteriously disappeared. Why and how? Read this book: Albert has a theory."

You can read Cook's review here: https://www.wcwonline.org/Women-s-Rev...

About Goodreads Q&A

Ask and answer questions about books!

You can pose questions to the Goodreads community with Reader Q&A, or ask your favorite author a question with Ask the Author.

See Featured Authors Answering Questions

Learn more