Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well
Rate it:
Open Preview
16%
Flag icon
the difference between the giver’s “data”
16%
Flag icon
(what they observe) and their interpretation (the meaning they make from what they observe).
16%
Flag icon
Feedback givers arrive at their labels in two steps: (1) they observe data, and (2) they interpret that data—they tell a story about what it means.
16%
Flag icon
They Confuse Data and Interpretation (We All Do)
16%
Flag icon
The process of moving from data to interpretation happens in the blink of an eye and is largely unconscious.
16%
Flag icon
human intelligence is organized around stories.
16%
Flag icon
Bad parenting is not the data; it’s our auto-story about the encounter.
17%
Flag icon
ASK WHERE THE FEEDBACK IS GOING
17%
Flag icon
Often, though, feedback will have a forward-looking component.
17%
Flag icon
As we’ll see below, with coaching, that piece is about advice; with evaluation, it’s about consequences and expectations.
17%
Flag icon
When Receiving Evaluation: Clarify Consequences and Expectations
17%
Flag icon
What does this mean for me? What will happen next, what is expected of me? Given where I stand, what should I do now?
18%
Flag icon
Working to first understand their views doesn’t mean we pretend we don’t have life experiences or opinions.
18%
Flag icon
And that’s almost impossible to do unless we make a key shift—away from that’s wrong and toward tell me more: Let’s figure out why we see this differently.
18%
Flag icon
Biases Drive Data Collection
19%
Flag icon
Others seek data that confirm their preexisting view of us, whether that view is good or bad. It’s human nature.3
19%
Flag icon
Even when you are both looking at the same data, each of you can interpret them differently.
19%
Flag icon
Differences in how we interpret what we see are so fundamental to understanding the feedback we get that it’s worth taking a closer look at a couple of key factors that are often embedded in our interpretations.
19%
Flag icon
One of the primary reasons we interpret data
19%
Flag icon
differently is that we have different rules in our heads about h...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
19%
Flag icon
Feedback that isn’t making sense can suddenly fall into place when we understand the implicit rule underlying the interpretations.
20%
Flag icon
“WHY CAN’T FEEDBACK JUST BE OBJECTIVE?”
22%
Flag icon
Annabelle knows how she intends to come across. But she is blind to her actual impact on others.
22%
Flag icon
How can these folks be so oblivious? Is it possible we are this oblivious, too? It is.
24%
Flag icon
We know what they said; we want to know what they meant.
25%
Flag icon
The difference here is not just a matter of cutting ourselves a break. It’s really an alternate way of telling the story.
25%
Flag icon
We judge ourselves by our intentions (arrow 2), while others judge us by our impacts (arrow 4).
25%
Flag icon
But for those around us, our impact drives their story.
25%
Flag icon
But she doesn’t actually realize what impacts she’s having.
25%
Flag icon
“I’ve been working hard to be more patient [arrow 2, my intentions]. And yet it sounds like that’s not the impact I’m having [arrow 4]. That’s upsetting. Let’s figure out why.”
25%
Flag icon
Feedback givers also confuse impacts a...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
25%
Flag icon
Their feedback is packed with assume...
This highlight has been truncated due to consecutive passage length restrictions.
25%
Flag icon
they should share the impact the behavior had on them: “I was upset and confused when you said it was your idea.
25%
Flag icon
unaware of their impact.
25%
Flag icon
They judge themselves by their intentions
26%
Flag icon
Instead, discussing the impact of specific behaviors (and prohibiting them when appropriate) helps the offending party see themselves in the moment and begins to illuminate their blind spot.
26%
Flag icon
we often withhold critical feedback because we don’t want to hurt others’ feelings or start a fight.
26%
Flag icon
We figure they must already know,
26%
Flag icon
The result of this withholding is that it’s easy for the receiver to take misplaced comfort in the absence of corroborating views: If what you’re saying were true, other people would have told me.
26%
Flag icon
USE YOUR REACTION AS A BLIND-SPOT ALERT
26%
Flag icon
When you notice yourself wondering What was their agenda? and What’s wrong with them?, make sure your next thought is I wonder if this feedback is sitting in my blind spot.
26%
Flag icon
“What do you see me doing, or failing to do, that is getting in my own way?”
26%
Flag icon
First, consider to what extent you are each describing the same behavior
26%
Flag icon
you may be unaware of your impacts
27%
Flag icon
What impact do you see it having?”
27%
Flag icon
Honest Mirrors Versus Supportive Mirrors
27%
Flag icon
When it comes to feedback, there are two kinds of mirrors—Supportive Mirrors and Honest Mirrors.
27%
Flag icon
We go to a supportive mirror for reassurance.
27%
Flag icon
An honest mirror shows us what we look like right now,
27%
Flag icon
we often ask the people closest to us to be supportive mirrors.