From the Bookshelf of Science and Inquiry…
Find A Copy At
Group Discussions About This Book
March 2014 - Epigenetics Revolution
By Betsy , co-mod · 13 posts · 147 views
By Betsy , co-mod · 13 posts · 147 views
last updated Nov 06, 2019 03:45AM
September 2014 - Sixth Extinction
By Betsy , co-mod · 62 posts · 168 views
By Betsy , co-mod · 62 posts · 168 views
last updated Jan 06, 2016 01:48AM
showing 10 of 13 topics
view all »
Other topics mentioning this book

By William · 774 posts · 1270 views
last updated Aug 23, 2014 02:59PM

By deleted member · 749 posts · 781 views
last updated May 14, 2013 01:49AM

By David · 11 posts · 119 views
last updated Aug 27, 2012 04:00PM
need help with my next month books plz :)
By Shaaban · 3 posts · 16 views
By Shaaban · 3 posts · 16 views
last updated Aug 25, 2012 10:56PM

By David · 11 posts · 94 views
last updated Sep 27, 2012 02:05AM

By Betsy , co-mod · 633 posts · 1017 views
last updated Mar 22, 2019 03:22PM
September, 2011: The Blind Watchmaker
By David · 47 posts · 151 views
By David · 47 posts · 151 views
last updated Jun 21, 2018 05:08AM

By Betsy , co-mod · 18 posts · 114 views
last updated Dec 19, 2018 06:45PM
What Members Thought

If you are bored look up the Community Reviews, sort by 1-star. They are very entertaining. One of them as a uni professor advising a student to burn down the book store where they bought this book. Then we have the creationists, then the person who thinks it is all a capitalist manifesto. There are those who think he is arrogant, depraved, uses philistine language (!) ...
How can anyone be a creationist and not believe in dinosaurs and such? Do they believe that the earth is flat? Are they the ...more
How can anyone be a creationist and not believe in dinosaurs and such? Do they believe that the earth is flat? Are they the ...more

This book is probably really about three and a half stars - I am glad I read it, and it was interesting, but I'm not necessarily planning on a re-read. It is, however, probably an important book to have read.
And I disagree with Dawkins in his most recent introduction - this is indeed a "young man's book," as evidenced by the fact that he is still hotly defending it over thirty years after having written it. Not that this makes The Selfish Gene a lesser book in any way - although possibly a more ...more
And I disagree with Dawkins in his most recent introduction - this is indeed a "young man's book," as evidenced by the fact that he is still hotly defending it over thirty years after having written it. Not that this makes The Selfish Gene a lesser book in any way - although possibly a more ...more

I read the 30th anniversary edition of the book, from what I can tell the anniversary edition only contains a new short introduction and some review extracts. I kind of wish that Dawkins would have added some new additional footnotes, because the notes from the second edition were great, Dawkins better explained some things and even admitted in a few places where he was wrong. With this being 20 years after the second edition, surely even more has changed.
This book so far is my favorite from Da ...more
This book so far is my favorite from Da ...more

“The Selfish Gene” is an extremely well researched and written book on evolution. Dawkins looks at the genes as the most basic unit of replication. He argues that it is the survival of genes that is the reason that life exists and that “a predominant quality to be expected in a successful gene is ruthless selfishness”.
It is a very thought provoking read. He not only looks at the how a gene propagates from generation to generation but also how a gene might express certain behaviour in an organis ...more
It is a very thought provoking read. He not only looks at the how a gene propagates from generation to generation but also how a gene might express certain behaviour in an organis ...more

I admit a certain prejudice against Richard Dawkins, whom I originally had my hero list. But when he started his evangelism of atheism, he lost my respect. I do not object in any way to atheists; what I resent is an atheist's (or anyone else's) scorn of my own beliefs.
Anyway, that prejudice may have influenced me. Dawkins has an intriguing premise and sets it forth reasonably, but in places I found myself annoyed with his intellectual superiority. Perhaps it's my fault rather than his - but not ...more
Anyway, that prejudice may have influenced me. Dawkins has an intriguing premise and sets it forth reasonably, but in places I found myself annoyed with his intellectual superiority. Perhaps it's my fault rather than his - but not ...more

Sep 20, 2008
Jill
marked it as to-read

Dec 09, 2008
Thomas
added it

Mar 20, 2009
Gabrielle
marked it as to-read

May 16, 2009
Ryan
marked it as to-read

Aug 18, 2009
Waldtochter
marked it as to-read

Aug 04, 2010
John J.
marked it as to-read


Aug 09, 2012
David Cerruti
marked it as to-read

Oct 23, 2012
Amanda
marked it as to-read

Jul 30, 2014
Robert
marked it as waiting-on-the-bookshelf