ReemK10 (Paper Pills)’s
Comments
(group member since Dec 26, 2012)
ReemK10 (Paper Pills)’s
comments
from the The Year of Reading Proust group.
Showing 821-840 of 1,025

This was the quote that I chose to post on my profile page. And what I meant by it is that as a reader I felt that I had a hard time finding my place in this world, feeling as if a part of a different breed of people, one that suffers hypersensitivity from the effect of words, easily choosing to spend time alone reading a book than being around other people. When I came across this passage in Franzen's How to Be Alone essay, I felt validated for who I was. When I became a part of this group, I felt I was around like-minded people and it was a great feeling to be a part of this group!
When I quoted Pearl S. Buck, it was because I love this quote. I'm not creative, but I adore it in others, and I feel that I understand what it is that makes them so passionate about their art in whatever form it takes. It is something that I have a lot of respect for.
That being said, I would never use it to insult anyone, not that I would ever insult anyone anyway.
Being a reader makes one become terribly empathetic, because we live in other character's heads so much that they become a part of our lives.I even attribute reading for changing me from being INFJ to INFP.
I thank all of you who reached out to me and for wanting me to remain. I think this is what defines us as a group that we continue to want to make our way through Proust together, despite any obstacles we face along the way.
Kalliope's interpretation was what I intended to say.
I hope Aloha and her daughter get well soon. Cheryl, I hope we can all take your advice and put this behind us.
And to Proustitute and the two others who messaged him, it is my hope that we can get beyond this. There was never an iota of harm intended.


I am hardly judging you: I am judging your words. As a gay man myself, I can tell you that I take offense. As mod..."
Again I say I'm sorry I offended, and to those members I would like you to know that there is no way I would ever have intended to do so. And Proustitute, I have been enjoying your tumblr, clicking on it every time I have had a free moment, and it is because I have been doing so that I have delighted in all your selections. They are exceptional. I don't know. I am not articulate enough to explain to you what I mean to say, but please do understand that I was being complementary.


Is your reasoning for this, using Buck's quote, that gay..."
It was not my intention to offend in any way or form, and for me this quote captures for me the beauty of being exceptionally creative. The words abnormally, inhumanly to me, mean beyond the norm of what is normal and what is human in the most complimentary terms just as I would see a noncomformist as being gloriously abnormal. In no way, do I see this as a negative.
"You ask we not take offense at what is a huge stereotype and in the same turn ask us to forgive what you believe is not a stereotype."
Is this a huge stereoptype? I don't think it is, in the same manner that I think introverted idealistic types make for the very best authors. You can not judge me when you really don't know me.
I'm sorry if I offended.

"The truly creative mind in any field is no more than this: A human creature born abnormally, inhumanly sensitive. To him... a touch is a blow, a sound is a noise, a misfortune is a tragedy, a joy is an ecstasy, a friend is a lover, a lover is a god, and failure is death. Add to this cruelly delicate organism the overpowering necessity to create, create, create -- so that without the creating of music or poetry or books or buildings or something of meaning, his very breath is cut off from him. He must create, must pour out creation. By some strange, unknown, inward urgency he is not really alive unless he is creating.”
which I think captures Proust perfectly, as the creative artist but even more so because being also gay, he is exceptionally more artistic and his touching upon subjects extraordinarily more sensitive.
I really hope that no one is thinking I'm being stereotypical in my thinking by saying so.

"Agree. I flew to Texas several weeks ago and saw...pajama bottoms!
When I returned home, I needed to spend an afternoon in Bergdorf's to recover. "
LOL. That is just priceless!

I think Proust just wants to shows us love from all angles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bot...
"Once only she allowed her husband to order her a dress covered all over with daisies, cornflowers, forget-me-nots,and bluebells like that of the Primavera." (265)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bot...

http://www.eliteauction.com/catalogue......"
lovely, thanks Marcelita.

I agree with you Eugene. I think Proust is testing how much as readers we are willing to accept of such boorish human behavior, which really applies just as much now as it did then.

For those who can't go: http://www.musee-orsay.fr/en/collecti...

I assumed that the live webchat was something that you could watch or listen to. Apparently, it was only the thread on this link that Proustitute gave us:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2013/...

Thanks Kalliope, I thought it might already be available for viewing.
Proustitute, no I did not log in, but I do have an account there. Now to only remember my password. I would have thought this chat would be available for general viewing, maybe not. No worries. I'll try again.


This sort of reminds me of philosophy and religion, where philosophy needs to rely only on arguable facts and religion that relies on blind faith. If you can think it, see it, dream it, you can write it having never experienced it. As if you are in jail and writing about freedom.


“The gourmet’s tongue and palate,” she says, “were precision instruments, capable of generating the connaissances, or experiential knowledge, on which sçavoir, or true knowledge, was founded.
http://lareviewofbooks.org/article.ph...