Tassie Dave’s
Comments
(group member since Mar 27, 2011)
Tassie Dave’s
comments
from the The Sword and Laser group.
Showing 1,661-1,680 of 4,076

or the Buffalo Bills v Peter O'Toole
Susan Lucci eventually won ;-)

The 3 time loser against the 4 time loser
I think we should read both at some stage. They are both great books. In very different ways.

Also odd, though V&T could have done it on purpose, each bracket was a male authored book against a female authored book. 2 men and 2 women won in both Laser and Sword sections.
In the next round each bracket will also be a male authored book versus a female authored book.

I was actually joking. I thought it would be the other way around.
and it was :-(
208 to 91
Go Theft of Swords :-)

or Dangerous To Know over Theft of Swords
;-)
:-P

To the Millennials and younger he will always be Snape.
But to us old farts he will always be Hans Gruber.

You forgot the link ;-)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1yqVD...
Though who pronounces chasm with a 'ch' sound? :-?

I was more annoyed that the female character died because she acted stupidly and didn't wait for backup (preferably from real officers)

But isn't TV full of tropes and plot devices. Why give the writers a hard time over using this one.
I agree with the Effects fail. Both practical and CGI. But I will give them a pass for a TV show with a limited budget.
Come on Season 2.

"What we've got here is failure to communicate"
A bit of knowledge at the right time could have save the kids from a lot of grief.
Melanie wrote: "... That guy that mentions Frodo could have just flown an eagle to Mordor. Suspend your disbelief. Your supposed to be too caught up in the world to think of an alternative solution."
and why did Frodo need to go.
As soon as Gandalf realises it is the ONE RING then tie it to a stick. Give it to an eagle and drop it in the fiery pit at Mordor.
Much more efficient, but you miss one hell of a good story ;-)

This is a sickeningly saccharine and cynical cash-in on nostalgia. It is not funny or cute or clever.
0/5 counterfeit feels
PADDINGTON 2
Everything Pooh isn’t: cute, clever, fun and warm-hearted. A couple of the scenes are downright brilliant, and you’ll know them when you see them.
4/5 fuzzy bears 🐻🐻🐻🐻"
In short:
Paddington 2 is all grizzly
Christopher Robin is just Pooh

I think she got to the bottom of page 1 and didn't realise there were another 85 pages after it ;-)

But imagine if it had a few more years of buildup! Support Theft of Swords by voting for Dangerous to Know"
I endorse this strategy. Rob expects to lose eventually this month. So why not Round 1 ;-)

Not even the parents. By then they've had enough of school sports. You'd be lucky to get a crowd of 50 people.
Like Iain said maybe your mates who are only there to drink and take the piss out of you when you f*** up, your girlfriend if your lucky and only if she can get her friends to come along so she has someone to talk to.
Usually the teams outnumber the crowd.
No-one in Australia cars about Uni sport, which is usually Aussie Rules, cricket, Union or League played at an amateur level.
It definitely isn't televised or talked about. If you're lucky the local paper might put the scores in small type among 50,000 other sports.

March Madness means nothing to us foreigners. I had to ask what March Madness was the first year.
Apparently it has something to do with some silly sport I don't like ;-)

(1) Theft of Swords by Michael J. Sullivan
vs.
(16) Dangerous To Know by K.T. Davies."
Battle of the moderator nominations.
Is it too early for me to concede defeat.
Uncle ;-)

Knowing now that no-one outside the two people involved in that story ever knew about what they did, does colour the story differently than if the world ever knew.
I'd say read the 2 novels first, then read the other short stories in whatever order you like.

The Relentless Moon and The Derivative Base
The Relentless Moon (expected in 2020) won't be an Elma story but (view spoiler)
The Derivative Base (expected in 2022) is an Elma and Nathaniel story (view spoiler)