Jonathan’s
Comments
(group member since Oct 24, 2013)
Jonathan’s
comments
from the Reading Proust's In Search of Lost Time in 2014 group.
Showing 681-700 of 751

I was quite shocked that Odette ended up being the much talked about Mme. Swann with the poor reputation. I really have a hard time understanding after all he went through with her th..."
I was surprised as well, because in the last part of 'Swann in Love' it looked like Swann was beginning to accept that Odette no longer loved him.
I was a bit confused with this at the time because I thought that Proust wrote that Swann would never she her again...except once in a dream. So I thought the break was final.
Going back, I managed to find the sentence that made me think this:
And just as, before kissing Odette for the first time, he had sought to imprint upon his memory the face that for so long had been familiar before it was altered by the additional memory of their kiss, so he could have wished - in thought at least - to have been able to bid farewell, while she still existed, to the Odette who had aroused his love and jealousy, to the Odette who had caused him to suffer, and whom now he would never see again.
So, am I correct that he is saying that Swann will never see the 'Odette that he loved' ever again, though he will see Odette?

"
I often wish that top hats would come back into fashion. I'm not so keen on monocles though: :-)
I quite liked the General de Froberville as he's a bit of a dirty old man.

I assumed that it was a fictional piece by a fictional composer. I'm not sure if Proust had any particular piece in mind though?

Marcelita: Have you decided who you're going as?
The group looks like hard-core Proustians! Have you read ISOLT several times or do you read 'around' it these days?
I'm intrigued by the 're-write' of the party. I keep thinking it would be amusing to re-write some of ISOLT in the style of Hemingway or Bukowski....I haven't the skill to do it though: :-(

Swann decides to venture out alone to a grand party held by the Marquise de Saint-Euverte. I feel Proust's prose really comes alive when he concentrates on characters and we get it in abundance in this section as he describes the servants and guests.
I really liked the bit where Swann had arrived and was taking note of the servants, something he'd never really done before, when one servant, of a 'ferocious aspect', approaches him the narrator mentions that he was 'exhibiting at once an utter contempt for his person and the most tender regard for his hat.' Ha Ha!

Work was for the lower orders my dear. :-)
I guess if they owned land and/or property then they would have collected rent or income from that. They may have had shares (Swann mentions giving Odette advice on buying shares at some point), they may have dabbled in the arts, though I doubt if that brought in any money. On top of just inheriting money they may have been politicians, army officers, been directors of companies etc...in short all the lucrative jobs that didn't require doing much...unless they chose to.

No, it's not a dumb question and yes, he does appear to be omniscient.
In the penultimate paragraph of Part One which starts with 'Thus would I often lie....' the narrator explains that the story was told to him by someone (by whom? Swann? Odette?) and admits that there is an extraordinary 'precision of detail'.
I wonder if this is explained in further volumes or if it is just one of those things that we just have to accept. :-)

I realised at an early stage that I wasn't going to be able to read Proust on my morning commute. I have to read a section through reasonably quickly but a give it a re-read a few days later. If it still doesn't sink in at that point I just move on....
It might be interesting to see how others have changed their reading patterns (or not) to cope with Proust?

I quite like books and authors that are stylistically different, e.g. Beckett & Céline are two of my favourite authors. They don't have to be difficult, just inventive and playful. I still remember reading Joseph Heller's book Something Happened years ago and suddenly came across a closing parenthesis, when I checked back I realised that the opening parenthesis was several pages earlier! Maybe he was trying to outdo Proust.


Yes, I wondered as well what the sign was. I wonder if there are any experts on early twentieth century French hand gestures out there that can enlighten us?

I liked the quote (p.88 Vintage UK, possibly p.104 in ML) when the narrator is commenting on his Uncle's 'relations' and just before the 'lady in pink' episode:
Now my uncle knew many of them [actresses] personally, and also ladies of another class, not clearly distinguished from actresses in my mind.

I was starting to think that events had been engineered by Odette, but as I've just been re-reading this section I think that she's just playing the game of mistress with Swann, which she does quite naturally. And Swann is happy initially to play along by keeping his allotted times and venues with her. Surely though, given that Swann is unmarried and rich, she must have considered the possibility of marriage, especially when it's apparent that he's actually in love with her. I think this is where I miss not seeing things also from her p.o.v. I can, however, see the benefits from Proust's view; we become just as unsure as to Odette's true feelings and we become almost as paranoid as Swann.
I enjoyed the first half of this section as it was quite humorous, almost a farce; what with Swann spying (very badly) on Odette and trailing around behind her, the final expulsion from the Verdurins etc. I even get the feeling that Proust was enjoying himself with this part of the book, especially when he claims that Swann 'would plunge into the most intoxicating romance in the lover's library, the railway time-table...' or when Swann is hoping that Odette will decline an offer to go on a trip, he says to himself 'Think of listening to Wagner for a whole fortnight with a woman who takes about as much interest in music as a tone-deaf newt - that would be fun!'
Although this is my first read of ISOLT, I find that I'm re-reading each section after a few days and I'm finding that my opinion of it has generally changed on the second read. I don't know if I'll keep up this read/re-read schedule throughout though.


Maybe do a re-read? :-) What's the ISBN of yours?

What is the last page of the book? i.e. the last page of the story.

Susan: I've got 'Swann in Love' going from page 225 to 460. The total number of pages is 513. Does that match with your version?

The Verdurins are uneasy that Swann is not one of 'them', the 'faithful' and he is in fact a 'heretic' who won't openly denounce the 'bores'. I can identify with Swann in this position, who is actually unaware of the repositioning of the group against him, as I have found myself in such positions socially before. He's unwilling to join in in the denunciations of the 'bores' and is therefore considered dangerous by the Verdurins though he is really just politically naive. He's unaware that Mme Verdurin is a tyrant and that the others are sycophants that would attack him on a single word from her.
With the introduction of Forcheville are we witnessing Odette's affections switching? She also is willing to criticise Swann openly within the group.
