32,511 books
—
123,790 voters
Grips
https://www.goodreads.com/grips
to-read
(602)
currently-reading (2)
read (394)
did-not-finish (1)
reference (22)
postponed (0)
essential-read (23)
novels (166)
fiction (158)
lit-us (152)
history (146)
light-reading (122)
currently-reading (2)
read (394)
did-not-finish (1)
reference (22)
postponed (0)
essential-read (23)
novels (166)
fiction (158)
lit-us (152)
history (146)
light-reading (122)
lit-uk
(95)
politics (78)
classics (74)
author-atheist-satanist (72)
religion (68)
philosophy (62)
ideology (61)
heavy-reading (53)
author-female (44)
social-commentary (41)
author-jewish (38)
science (38)
politics (78)
classics (74)
author-atheist-satanist (72)
religion (68)
philosophy (62)
ideology (61)
heavy-reading (53)
author-female (44)
social-commentary (41)
author-jewish (38)
science (38)
Grips
is currently reading
bookshelves:
currently-reading,
classics,
favorites,
lit-fr,
philosophy,
schmaltz-polemic,
social-commentary
Reading for the 2nd time
“If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers.”
― Gravity’s Rainbow
― Gravity’s Rainbow
“But man is not made for defeat," he said. "A man can be destroyed but not defeated.”
― The Old Man and the Sea
― The Old Man and the Sea
“It may be inferred again that the present movement for women’s rights will certainly prevail from the history of its only opponent, Northern conservatism. This [Northern conservatism] is a party which never conserves anything. Its history has been that it demurs to each aggression of the progressive party, and aims to save its credit by a respectable amount of growling, but always acquiesces at last in the innovation. What was the resisted novelty of yesterday is today one of the accepted principles of conservatism; it is now conservative only in affecting to resist the next innovation, which will tomorrow be forced upon its timidity and will be succeeded by some third revolution; to be denounced and then adopted in its turn. American conservatism is merely the shadow that follows Radicalism as it moves forward towards perdition. It remains behind it, but never retards it, and always advances near its leader. This pretended salt hath utterly lost its savor: wherewith shall it be salted? Its impotency is not hard, indeed, to explain. It is worthless because it is the conservatism of expediency only, and not of sturdy principle. It intends to risk nothing serious for the sake of the truth, and has no idea of being guilty of the folly of martyrdom. It always when about to enter a protest very blandly informs the wild beast whose path it essays to stop, that its “bark is worse than its bite,” and that it only means to save its manners by enacting its decent role of resistance: The only practical purpose which it now subserves in American politics is to give enough exercise to Radicalism to keep it “in wind,” and to prevent its becoming pursy and lazy, from having nothing to whip.”
―
―
“Political correctness is communist propaganda writ small. In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control. I think if you examine political correctness, it has the same effect and is intended to.”
―
―
“For more than a century ideological extremists at either end of the political spectrum have seized upon well-publicized incidents such as my encounter with Castro to attack the Rockefeller family for the inordinate influence they claim we wield over American political and economic institutions. Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure--one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”
― Memoirs
― Memoirs
Grips’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Grips’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Grips
Lists liked by Grips


















































