Did You Notice Something a Little Different?
UPDATE: Thanks for all the feedback! For those of you who were having issues with blurriness, we have good news: we pushed out an update this afternoon that improves the sharpness of the font for users who were affected. We’re monitoring all the comments and will keep you posted on any further updates.
If you’re a frequent visitor to Goodreads, you've probably noticed a few tweaks we’ve made to the fonts and colors on the desktop site today. Our goal with these small-but-important changes was to consolidate and refresh our visual styles and lay the groundwork for some design improvements that we’re planning in the future.
What’s different?
To enhance the readability of text on Goodreads, we’ve adopted two new open-source fonts. Lato, our sans-serif font, was designed by Warsaw-based designer Łukasz Dziedzic (“Lato” means “Summer” in Polish). Merriweather, our serif font, was created by Eben Sorkin and was designed to be pleasant to read on screens.
To make it easier to scan the page for information you need, we’ve touched up and modernized the design of common page layout elements like section headers, tabs and links.
To simplify and modernize our visual design, we’ve reduced the number of link colors we use, removed gradients from buttons and the site navigation, and applied a more harmonious color palette to interactive elements such as buttons, stars, and links.
Before:
Comments Showing 1,651-1,700 of 3,113 (3113 new)

We all have different screens, different machines (PC, phone, tablet etc) and different levels of eyesight ability. The new font may work for some, but doesn't seem to work for everyone.

Same problem here: Русские буквы выделяются на фоне английских, и это выглядит аляписто.
It would be nice if a user could decide which version of fonts to use.
HATE HATE HATE
Now really, can you throw away this "modern" shit? It's just awful. Or an option for a "classic" L&F?
(Or perhaps it's good you did it now, I'll start recording my books in the next year on LT)
Now really, can you throw away this "modern" shit? It's just awful. Or an option for a "classic" L&F?
(Or perhaps it's good you did it now, I'll start recording my books in the next year on LT)


I like the new font size, but I preferred the old font...this one on Chrome under Ubuntu looks too "spiky"...
Good choice with the links, there were too many colours!

The books title font looks blurry to me. The fonts are too small and are hard to read.
In my opinion, just ditch the fonts and keep the layout.

Also, the site looks way to bright. It is really hard to look at. Please give us a choice!



Text looks bigger than the old one to me, but I would still like to see it even bigger.


Overall the font brings forward the site's brightness to an uncomfortable level.


I have a major complaint (I'm browsing with a pc and a 14" screen), however, and it's about the serif font (but the sans-serif one is slightly better). It feels blurry, it's not easy to read. Actually, the whole page feels a little out of focus (but I think it's due to the font) and it's headache-ish. I'm having problems even writing this post.
Secondly, the green color. There is little contrast with the black, links are less easily identifiable.
A minor thing, I liked that there was a background with the smaller headers inside the page (Readers also enjoyed, About Lauren Groff, Friends reviews in the example). Upper-casing the headers and leaving out the background doesn't help in identifying them at a glance, and all this mix in font sizes and styles is confusing. Can't you simply leave those in lower case, and add a background with no gradient?
Also, the "notify me when people reply" is too big! Bigger than the font-size I'm currently write this post in. Could you normalize that?
However, I've tried the new desktop site with my smartphone (5") and the results are better. The font is still a pain for the eyes, but the links are more identifiable. Please do not sacrifice desktop navigation for mobile's sake. I really really hope you'll reconsider about the font, I think everything else can be digested over time, but the font is indeed problematic.



I don't really get the passionate against-comments, although they might refer to the pre-update blurriness? The fonts are easy to read, especially the sans serif. The kerning in the serif font is a bit off, it looks really wide and the s's seem to be shifted slightly to the right.


and the navlinks at least 15px.
13px is just too small


That's precisely my problem...




As for the the fonts - and I dislike being a buzzkill - I find everything harder to read.


Also really, really hate that your can not longer expand out (wider) the forum comments. This box I am typing in is not the width of the comments above. You've made it so you cannot increase the width of the comment box. This sucks!!!
Fix the sizing of the commenting boxes so that either they are automatically the width of the comments above or that the user can make it wider, not just longer. I want to be able to put more on my page not a lot less, 1/3 less to be precise.