The Future is Here: Google’s New Self-Driving Car

google-new-self-driving-car-prototype-640x352Google has just unveiled its very first, built-from-scratch-in-Detroit, self-driving electric robot car. The culmination of years worth of research and development, the Google vehicle is undoubtedly cuter in appearance than other EV cars – like the Tesla Model S or Toyota Prius. In fact, it looks more like a Little Tikes plastic car, right down to smiley face on the front end. This is no doubt the result of clever marketing and an attempt to reduce apprehension towards the safety or long-term effects of autonomous vehicles.


The battery-powered electric vehicle has as a stop-go button, but no steering wheel or pedals. It also comes with some serious expensive hardware – radar, lidar, and 360-degree cameras – that are mounted in a tripod on the roof. This is to ensure good sightlines around the vehicle, and at the moment, Google hasn’t found a way to integrate them seamlessly into the car’s chassis. This is the long term plan, but at the moment, the robotic tripod remains.


google-self-driving-car-prototype-concept-artAs the concept art above shows, the eventual goal appears to be to to build the computer vision and ranging hardware into a slightly less obtrusive rooftop beacon. In terms of production, Google’s short-term plan is to build around 200 of these cars over the next year, with road testing probably restricted to California for the next year or two. These first prototypes are mostly made of plastic with battery/electric propulsion limited to a max speed of 25 mph (40 kph).


Instead of an engine or “frunk,” there’s a foam bulkhead at the front of the car to protect the passengers. There’s just a couple of seats in the interior, and some great big windows so passengers can enjoy the view while they ride in automated comfort. In a blog post on their website, Google expressed that their stated goal is in “improving road safety and transforming mobility for millions of people.” Driverless cars could definitely revolutionize travel for people who can’t currently drive.


google_robotcar_mapImproving road safety is a little more ambiguous, though. It’s generally agreed that if all cars on the road were autonomous, there could be some massive gains in safety and efficiency, both in terms of fuel usage and being able to squeeze more cars onto the roads. In the lead-up to that scenario, though, there are all sorts of questions about how to effectively integrate a range of manual, semi- and fully self-driving vehicles on the same roadways.


Plus, there are the inevitable questions of practicality and exigent circumstances. For starters, having no other controls in the car but a stop-go button may sound simplified and creative, but it creates problems. What’s a driver to do when they need to move the car just a few feet? What happens when a tight parking situation is taking place and the car has to be slowly moved to negotiate it? Will Google’s software allow for temporary double parking, or off-road driving for a concert or party? google_robotca


Can you choose which parking spot the car will use, to leave the better/closer parking spots for someone with special needs (i.e. the elderly or physically disabled)? How will these cars handle the issue of “right of way” when it comes to pedestrians and other drivers? Plus, is it even sensible to promote a system that will eventually make it easier to put more cars onto the road? Mass transit is considered the best option for a cleaner, less cluttered future. Could this be a reason not to develop such ideas as the Hyperloop and other high-speed maglev trains?


All good questions, and ones which will no doubt have to be addressed as time goes on and production becomes more meaningful. In the meantime, there are no shortage of people who are interested in the concept and hoping to see where it will go. Also, there’s plenty of people willing to take a test drive in the new robotic car. You can check out the results of these in the video below. In the meantime, try not to be too creeped out if you see a car with a robotic tripod on top and a very disengaged passenger in the front seat!





Sources:
extremetech.com, scientificamerican.com


2 likes ·   •  26 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 25, 2014 13:56
Comments Showing 1-26 of 26 (26 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Gary (new)

Gary Wish they'd designed something that looked cooler....


message 2: by Matthew (new)

Matthew Williams Give it time, the aesthetics can only get cooler once people stop thinking these are death machines :)


message 3: by Gary (new)

Gary Apparently, we have something like 30-40,000 road fatalities every year in the U.S. alone, not to mention injuries and property damage, so the sooner that happens the better.


message 4: by Matthew (new)

Matthew Williams Yep, and there really is no reason why autodrive can't be a feature the same way cruise control is. There's all kinds of worry associated with whether or not robotic cars can adapt and do ad hoc things. But seriously, all you need is a switch.


message 5: by Leslie (new)

Leslie Matthew wrote: "Yep, and there really is no reason why autodrive can't be a feature the same way cruise control is. There's all kinds of worry associated with whether or not robotic cars can adapt and do ad hoc th..."

The fear is pretty ridiculous. We are such control freaks! And we don't want to give up our "road rage". Something else in control means more defensive and conscientious driving, and we like to drive aggressively (even though it is -less- efficient). The fear of injury is just an (poor) excuse not to give up our control.


message 6: by Gary (new)

Gary At the very least, a robot car will free up both hands for "saluting" other vehicles....

I suspect if most people realized how much of the pilots' job is being done by the airplanes themselves (including take off and landing) then they might be more accepting. On the other hand, that might just be too rational. Something to think about.


message 7: by Leslie (new)

Leslie Gary wrote: "At the very least, a robot car will free up both hands for "saluting" other vehicles....

I suspect if most people realized how much of the pilots' job is being done by the airplanes themselves (in..."


I agree though, so far its a total dorkmobile. If HD can come up with a decent looking electric motorcycle, there's no excuse for this looking like a dweebuggy. But, I don't drive at all, so I'm not part of this technology's demographic. My bicycle isn't gonna ride itself :)


message 8: by Matthew (new)

Matthew Williams I am just about to do an article about that very thing, Leslie. Psychic! :)


message 9: by Leslie (new)

Leslie Matthew wrote: "I am just about to do an article about that very thing, Leslie. Psychic! :)"

They don't call me Leslie Professor X Lynch for nuthin! ;)


message 10: by Bryan (new)

Bryan The only thing I'd be worried about with a Google car is the data-related ramifications. I'm actually looking forward to having fewer idiot drivers on the road.


message 11: by Leslie (new)

Leslie Bryan wrote: "The only thing I'd be worried about with a Google car is the data-related ramifications. I'm actually looking forward to having fewer idiot drivers on the road."

data-related ramifications? like you say "take me to cincinnati" and you end up in detroit? or you're reading and the car breaks and you spill your coffee on your magazine?


message 12: by Matthew (new)

Matthew Williams Yeah, I'm going to need some clarification on that point too. I'm assuming it means that so much data in the system could result in a total clusterf**k when it comes to directions.


message 13: by Bryan (new)

Bryan No, I mean the fact that Google is a corporation that makes its money from data, and you'd essentially be giving them data on all of your day-to-day travel, which they would then sell to whatever company is best situated to advertise to you. That sort of thing.


message 14: by Leslie (new)

Leslie Bryan wrote: "No, I mean the fact that Google is a corporation that makes its money from data, and you'd essentially be giving them data on all of your day-to-day travel, which they would then sell to whatever c..."

So no latte? ;)


message 15: by Bryan (new)

Bryan If it could drive me around AND make me coffee then I'd buy one, privacy concerns be damned (assuming I could afford it, which is unlikely).


message 16: by Leslie (new)

Leslie Bryan wrote: "If it could drive me around AND make me coffee then I'd buy one, privacy concerns be damned (assuming I could afford it, which is unlikely)."

Count me in on some of that fine action!


message 17: by Matthew (new)

Matthew Williams Bryan wrote: "No, I mean the fact that Google is a corporation that makes its money from data, and you'd essentially be giving them data on all of your day-to-day travel, which they would then sell to whatever c..."

I knew it! Or at least, I suspected that. Yes, they are a data-driven group and every move they make into the field of AI, robotics, self-driving cars, space travel, mass transit, electronic and flying cars is seen as a possible move to secure more of our personal data for their purposes. One thing I will say... Elon Musk is a true believer in making things happen. So whatever else he's got going on and however he made his bones, he's willing to spend the big bucks to make innovation happen no matter what.


message 18: by Bryan (last edited Jun 27, 2014 08:19AM) (new)

Bryan Uhh...I think we're talking about different things. I thought Elon Musk was the dude from Tesla Motors.


message 19: by Gary (last edited Jun 27, 2014 06:14AM) (new)

Gary I suspect the collection of our travel data is going to be just as pervasive as our Internet behavior. Consider that it's already pretty much transparent given the way cell phones are tracked. Monitoring by the vehicle we travel in is most likely little more than support for that existing data. Those who want to track us are going to have that ability unless we take particular steps to avoid or defeat their systems.

So, your job will be able to monitor your location, your family will know where you've been, and should some government peon with a fetish for spying get into a position of relatively minor authority, he'll be able to find out how often you go to Denny's for a Superbird.

The closest we can really get to anonymity these days is what I like to call "the veil of obscurity." It's not that our data isn't out there, it's that we are not significant enough for it to be plucked out of the cloud and examined individually. Of course, if one does something that draws the attention of anyone with access to the data stream then that veil can be lifted as easily as a bride's on her wedding day... but data protection does exist as a herd phenomenon.

Cold comfort, I know, but that looks to be where we're at.


message 20: by Matthew (new)

Matthew Williams Bryan wrote: "Uhh...I think we're talking about different things. I thought Elon Musk was the dude from Tesla Motors."

He is, as well as SpaceX and a slew of other start ups that Google owns. The man is all over the map when it comes to innovation and is extremely dedicated to making things happen.


message 21: by Matthew (last edited Jun 27, 2014 11:22AM) (new)

Matthew Williams Gary wrote: "I suspect the collection of our travel data is going to be just as pervasive as our Internet behavior. Consider that it's already pretty much transparent given the way cell phones are tracked. Mo..."

Speaking of which, Gary, the Supreme Court just made a ruling that makes its illegal to use cell phone data to track movements. Not for private companies, mind you, but certainly for law enforcement and government. It was one of two landmark rulings lately that's putting the nails in the coffin of warrantless surveillance, and I did post about them somewhere here...


message 22: by Leslie (new)

Leslie I don't even have a cell phone. Catch me if you can! :D


message 23: by Matthew (new)

Matthew Williams But you're sending emails! (Knock at the door) Uh-oh, who could that be? ;)


message 24: by Gary (last edited Jun 27, 2014 11:25AM) (new)

Gary Matthew wrote: "Speaking of which, Gary, the Supreme Court just made a ruling that makes its illegal to use cell phone data to track movements. Not for private companies, mind you, but certainly for law enforcement and government. It was one of two landmark rulings lately that's outing the nails in the coffin of warrant less surveillance, and I did post about them somewhere here..."

Thanks, I'll poke around for it.

Leslie wrote: "I don't even have a cell phone. Catch me if you can! :D"

Me neither, truthfully. I've seen folks do some crazy stuff with those things, effectively turning them into listening devices.

So, now that the NSA is alerted to this conversation (my fault... I shouldn't have mentioned The Veil) we should all toss out our burners.


message 25: by Leslie (new)

Leslie *waving to the NSA* Hi fellas!! (that was kinda sexist) My ex used to do the listening device thing. Creepy. It was the second thing to go (after the ex).


message 26: by Leslie (new)

Leslie Matthew wrote: "But you're sending emails! (Knock at the door) Uh-oh, who could that be? ;)"

Ha ha! The old fashioned way - typing pigeon.


back to top