Our Homes, Our Wealth: A Tale of Two Property Paths
I'm booking flights at the moment. Suzie and I are heading to the South of England to visit my brother-in-law and family in a couple of weeks' time. They've just recently hit a major life milestone by purchasing their first home together, and we're looking forward to getting a tour by the proud owners. I'm very happy for them; I'm also very happy for myself because I'm getting free accommodation by staying with them.
My brother-in-law is in his mid-forties with a wife ten years younger and has expressed nervousness at taking on such a large debt at his age, although he accepts it's in the long-term best interest for his family.
This got me thinking about property prices and the random nature of where we happen to rest our hat and set down roots to raise our families, and how it interacts with portfolio size and retirement outcomes.
In my brother-in-law's case, the property is on the south coast of England, which is a very high-cost property area to purchase. Contrast this with my neck of the woods, where property prices are generally considerably lower, and you have an interesting financial interplay between property wealth and portfolio size and retirement planning.
My situation, living in an area with lower property prices, translated into a smaller mortgage and lower housing costs. This, in turn, freed up extra cash to invest into my portfolio and participate in market growth. It also offered the extra benefit of lowering my wealth concentration in more illiquid asset classes like property, ultimately enhancing my financial flexibility and retirement planning.
For my brother-in-law in a high-cost area, acquiring a home involved a larger mortgage and higher debt, meaning a significant portion of his income is committed to housing for many years. This financial commitment will reduce available cash for other investments, potentially slowing the growth of their portfolio. Consequently, a large percentage of their total wealth may become concentrated in a single, illiquid asset—their home—offering less portfolio diversification compared to a more varied financial investment strategy
Often, career opportunities, family ties, or personal preferences dictate where we live, and these decisions have profound financial consequences. It's like many areas of life, a bit messy and a trade-off between lifestyle, community, and financial strategy. This shows that our decisions are more often than not driven by personal human factors over the cold face of finance, and I personally believe that's just how it should be. Particularly when it gets me free accommodation!
My brother-in-law is in his mid-forties with a wife ten years younger and has expressed nervousness at taking on such a large debt at his age, although he accepts it's in the long-term best interest for his family.
This got me thinking about property prices and the random nature of where we happen to rest our hat and set down roots to raise our families, and how it interacts with portfolio size and retirement outcomes.
In my brother-in-law's case, the property is on the south coast of England, which is a very high-cost property area to purchase. Contrast this with my neck of the woods, where property prices are generally considerably lower, and you have an interesting financial interplay between property wealth and portfolio size and retirement planning.
My situation, living in an area with lower property prices, translated into a smaller mortgage and lower housing costs. This, in turn, freed up extra cash to invest into my portfolio and participate in market growth. It also offered the extra benefit of lowering my wealth concentration in more illiquid asset classes like property, ultimately enhancing my financial flexibility and retirement planning.
For my brother-in-law in a high-cost area, acquiring a home involved a larger mortgage and higher debt, meaning a significant portion of his income is committed to housing for many years. This financial commitment will reduce available cash for other investments, potentially slowing the growth of their portfolio. Consequently, a large percentage of their total wealth may become concentrated in a single, illiquid asset—their home—offering less portfolio diversification compared to a more varied financial investment strategy
Often, career opportunities, family ties, or personal preferences dictate where we live, and these decisions have profound financial consequences. It's like many areas of life, a bit messy and a trade-off between lifestyle, community, and financial strategy. This shows that our decisions are more often than not driven by personal human factors over the cold face of finance, and I personally believe that's just how it should be. Particularly when it gets me free accommodation!
The post Our Homes, Our Wealth: A Tale of Two Property Paths appeared first on HumbleDollar.
No comments have been added yet.
