K.C. Cave's Blog, page 7
December 24, 2014
How to jerk-off your girl
Thanks to fellow blogger sashayley for her inspirational words about oral sex, “Sucking off and eating out” (http://undercoversblog.com/2014/12/08...) in her Under Covers blog (http://undercoversblog.com/blog). Like most of us, her views on eating pussy and sucking cock have evolved over the years–and now she loves mouth-on-genitals sex.
On blow jobs: “I like watching his face, hearing his breath quicken, feeling his cock throb, and tasting his pre-cum.” And being eaten: “I’ll admit, I used to hate getting eaten out, back in the days when I was insecure about my vagina and all the weird smells and sounds it emits. Now, I could lie back and enjoy it for hours.”
Sashayley also provides a link to this incredible Nina Hartley video, “Nina Hartley teaches how to eat pussy” (http://www.xvideos.com/video531677/mi...). Think you know everything about how to make a woman orgasm using your hands and mouth? Check out this 22-minute video and you might be pleasantly surprised. While the video ostensibly is about cunnilingus, famous porn star and sex educator Hartley spends most of the time demonstrating (on a most willing and beautiful subject) how use your hands and fingers to induce mind-blowing female orgasms. Watch this video, find a partner, and make this holiday season a little brighter!
On blow jobs: “I like watching his face, hearing his breath quicken, feeling his cock throb, and tasting his pre-cum.” And being eaten: “I’ll admit, I used to hate getting eaten out, back in the days when I was insecure about my vagina and all the weird smells and sounds it emits. Now, I could lie back and enjoy it for hours.”
Sashayley also provides a link to this incredible Nina Hartley video, “Nina Hartley teaches how to eat pussy” (http://www.xvideos.com/video531677/mi...). Think you know everything about how to make a woman orgasm using your hands and mouth? Check out this 22-minute video and you might be pleasantly surprised. While the video ostensibly is about cunnilingus, famous porn star and sex educator Hartley spends most of the time demonstrating (on a most willing and beautiful subject) how use your hands and fingers to induce mind-blowing female orgasms. Watch this video, find a partner, and make this holiday season a little brighter!
Published on December 24, 2014 12:54
•
Tags:
cunnilingus, female-masturbation, female-orgasm, nina-hartley, oral-sex, sashayley
December 16, 2014
No squirting, please, we're British
An article in Salon made me feel like I had time-traveled back to the grim 50s, when books were banned and films were censored for boobs, and, well, just about anything overtly sexual: England just banned female ejaculation in porn movies.
WTF?
From the Salon article, The orgasm police: Why female ejaculation is one of the last porn taboos (http://www.salon.com/2014/12/16/the_o... "As has been widely reported in recent weeks, the U.K. has instituted broad restrictions against certain acts in online streaming pornography, including female ejaculation. 'This isn’t actually all that new,' says Good Vibrations staff sexologist Carol Queen. 'The UK and some other countries used to give lesbian movies with ejaculation an especially hard time at the import office.'"
The problem--which, I think you'll agree isn't a problem at all--is that some misguided souls think that squirting is actually urination. To which I say, so fucking what? Who cares whether it's piss or girl cum? Don't like porn with water play? Don't watch it.
Turns out, the Brits have been in squirting-denial for years: "In 2001, a porn film by the name of 'Squirt Queens' was approved only after the name was changed to 'British Cum Queens' and more than six minutes of female ejaculation was scrapped. The squirting was thought to look like urolagnia, the eroticism of urination, which is banned in the U.K. Never mind that the filmmakers said it was female ejaculate, not urination. All that mattered was that it looked kinda like pee to the censors — and after consulting with experts, the British Board of Film Classification expressed skepticism that female ejaculation even existed at all."
Of course, there's got to be a more insidious reason for getting down on squirting--and there is, Salon reports: "There is another explanation — one with more of a cultural angle — for why female ejaculation so rankles censors. As Kristina Lloyd brilliantly wrote ..., 'The BBFC’s ban colludes with the cultural default of viewing female sexuality as intangible and precious, as if the ‘enigma of woman’ was something beyond the reach of science.' The truth is, the science isn’t unclear on the matter: In the 2013 paper “Obscene Squirting: If the Government Thinks it’s Urine, Then They’ve Got Another Thing Coming,” [research shows that] women can ejaculate even when their bladders are empty and that 'the chemical composition of ejaculate differs from that of urine.' It is not, I repeat, it is not urine."
Got that, British Board of Film Classification? (Probably not.)
A footnote: Where was the John Waters quote? Salon should have called him. Maryland film censors in the '60s and '70s gave him the publicity that made him into a film auteur. I'm sure he would have hilarious things to say about the British Board of Film Classification and its war on squirting.
WTF?
From the Salon article, The orgasm police: Why female ejaculation is one of the last porn taboos (http://www.salon.com/2014/12/16/the_o... "As has been widely reported in recent weeks, the U.K. has instituted broad restrictions against certain acts in online streaming pornography, including female ejaculation. 'This isn’t actually all that new,' says Good Vibrations staff sexologist Carol Queen. 'The UK and some other countries used to give lesbian movies with ejaculation an especially hard time at the import office.'"
The problem--which, I think you'll agree isn't a problem at all--is that some misguided souls think that squirting is actually urination. To which I say, so fucking what? Who cares whether it's piss or girl cum? Don't like porn with water play? Don't watch it.
Turns out, the Brits have been in squirting-denial for years: "In 2001, a porn film by the name of 'Squirt Queens' was approved only after the name was changed to 'British Cum Queens' and more than six minutes of female ejaculation was scrapped. The squirting was thought to look like urolagnia, the eroticism of urination, which is banned in the U.K. Never mind that the filmmakers said it was female ejaculate, not urination. All that mattered was that it looked kinda like pee to the censors — and after consulting with experts, the British Board of Film Classification expressed skepticism that female ejaculation even existed at all."
Of course, there's got to be a more insidious reason for getting down on squirting--and there is, Salon reports: "There is another explanation — one with more of a cultural angle — for why female ejaculation so rankles censors. As Kristina Lloyd brilliantly wrote ..., 'The BBFC’s ban colludes with the cultural default of viewing female sexuality as intangible and precious, as if the ‘enigma of woman’ was something beyond the reach of science.' The truth is, the science isn’t unclear on the matter: In the 2013 paper “Obscene Squirting: If the Government Thinks it’s Urine, Then They’ve Got Another Thing Coming,” [research shows that] women can ejaculate even when their bladders are empty and that 'the chemical composition of ejaculate differs from that of urine.' It is not, I repeat, it is not urine."
Got that, British Board of Film Classification? (Probably not.)
A footnote: Where was the John Waters quote? Salon should have called him. Maryland film censors in the '60s and '70s gave him the publicity that made him into a film auteur. I'm sure he would have hilarious things to say about the British Board of Film Classification and its war on squirting.
Published on December 16, 2014 14:03
•
Tags:
female-ejaculation, female-masturbation, john-waters, salon, squirting
December 10, 2014
Feeling OK about masturbation
Yeah, I feel okay about masturbation. It's a rare day that I don't, and I've been doing since I was ten years old, if memory serves. Masturbation is like a best friend that I know I can rely on. I like sex with other people (women, mainly). But it's never a substitute for the pleasure that I can have with myself (although, I must add, masturbating with another person is real turn-on).
I'm always amazed that there are people out there who don't masturbate or put it down. Europeans, I'm told, look down on it, too. You must be a loser who can't make it with another person, they must reason.
What got me on this topic? This blog on the Huffington Post, Why It Took Me to My 50s to Feel OK About Masturbation" (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-j...), by Erika Jagger (no relation to that other Jagger, as far as I can tell). You've got to like a blog post that starts, "I started masturbating when I was five." Damn! Got me beat by five years.
Like most Americans, Jagger had to put up with a lot of negativity about sex and, like most of us, felt some shame about jilling-off. Yet she grew out of it. Finally, in her late twenties, a friend dragged her to a sex shop, and she got her first vibrator.
"I used it immediately when I got home and was amazed by the intensity of my orgasm," Jagger wrote. "It was almost like losing my virginity. I discovered a new position (on my back) for masturbating, and a new way of touching myself. I discovered what it was like to penetrate myself, as a lover would do."
Now in her early fifties, Jagger's sexuality has matured even more. She's really into it. In fact, it sounds like she's having the best sex of her life--and lot of it is masturbating.
"My sexuality has evolved through masturbation," she continued. "I no longer feel shame when I lie back on my pillows for an electronic interlude. I no longer feel that I'm betraying my mother when I touch myself. I know now, at 52, that masturbation shouldn't be a guilty pleasure, but rather a regular part of self-care.
"My journey through masturbation has taught me to take care of my own needs. It's allowed me to celebrate my exodus from repression. And it's enabled me to understand and claim my sexuality, in all its fierce, raw, and sensual wonder."
Good words to read. Let's all go celebrate. I have an idea....
I'm always amazed that there are people out there who don't masturbate or put it down. Europeans, I'm told, look down on it, too. You must be a loser who can't make it with another person, they must reason.
What got me on this topic? This blog on the Huffington Post, Why It Took Me to My 50s to Feel OK About Masturbation" (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/erica-j...), by Erika Jagger (no relation to that other Jagger, as far as I can tell). You've got to like a blog post that starts, "I started masturbating when I was five." Damn! Got me beat by five years.
Like most Americans, Jagger had to put up with a lot of negativity about sex and, like most of us, felt some shame about jilling-off. Yet she grew out of it. Finally, in her late twenties, a friend dragged her to a sex shop, and she got her first vibrator.
"I used it immediately when I got home and was amazed by the intensity of my orgasm," Jagger wrote. "It was almost like losing my virginity. I discovered a new position (on my back) for masturbating, and a new way of touching myself. I discovered what it was like to penetrate myself, as a lover would do."
Now in her early fifties, Jagger's sexuality has matured even more. She's really into it. In fact, it sounds like she's having the best sex of her life--and lot of it is masturbating.
"My sexuality has evolved through masturbation," she continued. "I no longer feel shame when I lie back on my pillows for an electronic interlude. I no longer feel that I'm betraying my mother when I touch myself. I know now, at 52, that masturbation shouldn't be a guilty pleasure, but rather a regular part of self-care.
"My journey through masturbation has taught me to take care of my own needs. It's allowed me to celebrate my exodus from repression. And it's enabled me to understand and claim my sexuality, in all its fierce, raw, and sensual wonder."
Good words to read. Let's all go celebrate. I have an idea....
Published on December 10, 2014 14:35
•
Tags:
masturbation, sex, sexual-shame, vibrator
November 3, 2014
Your wildass sex fantasy ain't so wildass
Let's hear it for science.
Researchers at a university in Canada have established that sex fantasies cover a wide range in the general adult population--and fantasies that may have been thought of as abnormal or atypical are fairly common.
And, get this, shared by both sexes.
The takeaway? "Care should be taken before labeling an SF as unusual, let alone deviant. It suggested that the focus should be on the effect of a sexual fantasy rather than its content," the academics said.
For a list of the fantasies (and the percentage of men vs. women who fantasized them), go to http://www.businessinsider.com/which-....
Did I see any of my fantasies? Uh, sure. But not all, by any means. Remember, I'm a professional. My fantasies are my livelihood. Here's one that wasn't on the list:
The driver of the crew who picks up my trash is a black man, mid-thirties, about 280 pounds. Nice guy. Shitty job. Glad it's unionized. In my dream, I'm on my hands and knees on my front lawn, he's fisting my long blonde hair in one of his huge, calloused paws, and his 8-inch slab of black man meat is deep in my rectum. After he takes his pleasure, I feel a warm, full sensation in my belly. He's released his bladder. He pulls out and his hot piss spills out of my asshole. He flips me over and finishes his piss on my face, hair, breasts and belly.
Is there a word for that? Piss enema? By the way, this is a recurring fantasy. Not one, I'll add, that I plan to act on.
Like I said, I'm a professional. Everyone in my fantasy is 18 or older.
Researchers at a university in Canada have established that sex fantasies cover a wide range in the general adult population--and fantasies that may have been thought of as abnormal or atypical are fairly common.
And, get this, shared by both sexes.
The takeaway? "Care should be taken before labeling an SF as unusual, let alone deviant. It suggested that the focus should be on the effect of a sexual fantasy rather than its content," the academics said.
For a list of the fantasies (and the percentage of men vs. women who fantasized them), go to http://www.businessinsider.com/which-....
Did I see any of my fantasies? Uh, sure. But not all, by any means. Remember, I'm a professional. My fantasies are my livelihood. Here's one that wasn't on the list:
The driver of the crew who picks up my trash is a black man, mid-thirties, about 280 pounds. Nice guy. Shitty job. Glad it's unionized. In my dream, I'm on my hands and knees on my front lawn, he's fisting my long blonde hair in one of his huge, calloused paws, and his 8-inch slab of black man meat is deep in my rectum. After he takes his pleasure, I feel a warm, full sensation in my belly. He's released his bladder. He pulls out and his hot piss spills out of my asshole. He flips me over and finishes his piss on my face, hair, breasts and belly.
Is there a word for that? Piss enema? By the way, this is a recurring fantasy. Not one, I'll add, that I plan to act on.
Like I said, I'm a professional. Everyone in my fantasy is 18 or older.
Published on November 03, 2014 14:44
•
Tags:
sex, sex-fantasy
September 29, 2014
Vagcam
For those of you who (like me) have seen a lifetime's worth of spurting penises, here's your chance to see a female orgasm really, really, really close-up.
Hat's off to Penny, who writes the Penny for Your (Dirty) Thoughts sex blog (http://pennysdirtythoughts.com/vagcam...), for taking the time and effort to move into Masters and Johnson territory and record her vaginal canal during orgasm. What a sacrifice for science! Check out the link to see her orgasm (and the equipment she used to achieve this technological feat). Impressive.
Her secret to success: A clear speculum (link provided), which, uh, opened things up. She reports it didn't take long for her to come using an electric dildo/g-spot stimulator. (The spasms start at about 20 seconds.) I'm not surprised. The first time I rigged up a webcam and watched myself jill-off in HD on a 27-inch screen, I came in under two minutes!
Hat's off to Penny, who writes the Penny for Your (Dirty) Thoughts sex blog (http://pennysdirtythoughts.com/vagcam...), for taking the time and effort to move into Masters and Johnson territory and record her vaginal canal during orgasm. What a sacrifice for science! Check out the link to see her orgasm (and the equipment she used to achieve this technological feat). Impressive.
Her secret to success: A clear speculum (link provided), which, uh, opened things up. She reports it didn't take long for her to come using an electric dildo/g-spot stimulator. (The spasms start at about 20 seconds.) I'm not surprised. The first time I rigged up a webcam and watched myself jill-off in HD on a 27-inch screen, I came in under two minutes!
Published on September 29, 2014 04:51
•
Tags:
dildo, female-masturbation, orgasm, speculum, vaginal-canal
September 19, 2014
The Best Furniture to Have Sex On
Check out this fun infographic from True Interiors, a British manufacturer of home and office furniture: The Best Furniture to Have Sex On (http://www.trueinterior.com/pages/inf...). It’s not only a fun read (with drawings of the positions and ratings for difficulty), but think about it: This company talks to its customers like adults.
A sample (about the rocking chair): “No longer an item just for old folks! Get into the Caboose position, and you’ll certainly love that rocking motion which allows you to really feel each other….He sits on the chair with her backed up into his lap. As the chair begins rocking the thrusting begins naturally. This position is also ideal for wondering hands which can also add extra satisfaction.”
Other suggestions include the breakfast bar, the chaise lounge, the garden bench (yes, outdoor and public sex!), the glass coffee table (“Just make sure the coffee table is strong enough!”) and the executive desk.
What if, say, Ikea, started marketing their furniture like this? Hmm, just had a thought. Maybe Ikea does this in other countries that aren’t as puritanical as the U.S.
I'll check it out when I'm in Italy next month.
A sample (about the rocking chair): “No longer an item just for old folks! Get into the Caboose position, and you’ll certainly love that rocking motion which allows you to really feel each other….He sits on the chair with her backed up into his lap. As the chair begins rocking the thrusting begins naturally. This position is also ideal for wondering hands which can also add extra satisfaction.”
Other suggestions include the breakfast bar, the chaise lounge, the garden bench (yes, outdoor and public sex!), the glass coffee table (“Just make sure the coffee table is strong enough!”) and the executive desk.
What if, say, Ikea, started marketing their furniture like this? Hmm, just had a thought. Maybe Ikea does this in other countries that aren’t as puritanical as the U.S.
I'll check it out when I'm in Italy next month.
Published on September 19, 2014 14:27
•
Tags:
sex, sex-on-furniture
July 28, 2014
Sexual tension and writing erotica
I’m not a big fan of writing about writing. Specifically, I don’t enjoy reading blog posts by other erotica writers about their daily travails of grinding out paragraphs of graphic sex.
Who cares? I don’t.
That said, let me run an experiment by you. It’s an experiment I’m conducting about how sexual tension relates, or doesn’t relate, to writing erotica.
Last night and this morning, my sexual energy was running high, particularly high, even for this highly sexed woman (it’s no surprise that I’m highly sexed, right?). For reasons that don’t matter, I didn’t masturbate last night. This morning, I woke up so horny that, in the immortal words of Tom Waits, the crack of dawn wasn’t safe (the analogy doesn’t directly apply, but you get the idea). But, damn it, I had to get up early for an appointment. No leisurely, early morning jill for me. Not even a quickie. (For a graphic description of my ideal masturbation session, go to http://kccaveerotica.wordpress.com/20....)
On top of that, a new erotica short story has taken hold over the last day or so. I’ve got two key scenes figured out, a lot of snappy dialog written in my head, and, best of all, I actually lubricated while dreaming up some of this stuff. Plus, I’ve even got a title (no point in spilling the beans yet; I need to Google it and check Amazon titles to make sure it hasn’t been used 27 times before). All very good signs that a hot short story is about to unfold, once I sit down at the computer.
Here’s the experiment: I got back from the appointment this morning around 10:30, horny as fuck and wanting to take myself. Question: Do I indulge my hornyness now? Because I have an option–the option a mature, professional writer would take: I can forgo jilling, sit down at the computer and start writing the story that wants to get out. My question: If I do that instead of masturbating, will some of that sexual energy feed into the story? Will the sacrifice of my personal satisfaction benefit my art?
I decided to go with my art. After playing with the new cat ten minutes (she’s so needy), I sat down and wrote. I got one of those scenes written. And I like it. It’s not finished (nothing’s ever finished, actually, you just give up, to quote Faulkner). Am I still horny? I had to put a towel under my ass as I wrote. After lunch, I’m going to masturbate myself into orbit.
Then, part deux of my experiment: This afternoon, I’ll write that second scene, but with my libido in check, my hornyness sated, my mind off my clit (or not as intently focused).
Will the diminution of my sexual energy affect my writing? Will it be less fun to write that scene after I’ve diddled myself and released a boatload of sexual tension? Will I find out it’s better to write erotica while I’m horny as fuck? Or that it doesn’t matter? Or, God forbid, it’s worse?
I dunno. Should find out this afternoon. I’ll keep you posted.
Who cares? I don’t.
That said, let me run an experiment by you. It’s an experiment I’m conducting about how sexual tension relates, or doesn’t relate, to writing erotica.
Last night and this morning, my sexual energy was running high, particularly high, even for this highly sexed woman (it’s no surprise that I’m highly sexed, right?). For reasons that don’t matter, I didn’t masturbate last night. This morning, I woke up so horny that, in the immortal words of Tom Waits, the crack of dawn wasn’t safe (the analogy doesn’t directly apply, but you get the idea). But, damn it, I had to get up early for an appointment. No leisurely, early morning jill for me. Not even a quickie. (For a graphic description of my ideal masturbation session, go to http://kccaveerotica.wordpress.com/20....)
On top of that, a new erotica short story has taken hold over the last day or so. I’ve got two key scenes figured out, a lot of snappy dialog written in my head, and, best of all, I actually lubricated while dreaming up some of this stuff. Plus, I’ve even got a title (no point in spilling the beans yet; I need to Google it and check Amazon titles to make sure it hasn’t been used 27 times before). All very good signs that a hot short story is about to unfold, once I sit down at the computer.
Here’s the experiment: I got back from the appointment this morning around 10:30, horny as fuck and wanting to take myself. Question: Do I indulge my hornyness now? Because I have an option–the option a mature, professional writer would take: I can forgo jilling, sit down at the computer and start writing the story that wants to get out. My question: If I do that instead of masturbating, will some of that sexual energy feed into the story? Will the sacrifice of my personal satisfaction benefit my art?
I decided to go with my art. After playing with the new cat ten minutes (she’s so needy), I sat down and wrote. I got one of those scenes written. And I like it. It’s not finished (nothing’s ever finished, actually, you just give up, to quote Faulkner). Am I still horny? I had to put a towel under my ass as I wrote. After lunch, I’m going to masturbate myself into orbit.
Then, part deux of my experiment: This afternoon, I’ll write that second scene, but with my libido in check, my hornyness sated, my mind off my clit (or not as intently focused).
Will the diminution of my sexual energy affect my writing? Will it be less fun to write that scene after I’ve diddled myself and released a boatload of sexual tension? Will I find out it’s better to write erotica while I’m horny as fuck? Or that it doesn’t matter? Or, God forbid, it’s worse?
I dunno. Should find out this afternoon. I’ll keep you posted.
Published on July 28, 2014 11:03
July 9, 2014
Spritz me!
Marijuana legalization is leading to more than just a legal way to get ammo for your bong. A new product, Foria, is a cannibis sex spray. How's it work? How would you think it works? You spray it on your clit and pussy lips and start fucking! Or jilling.
From the article on AlterNet (http://www.alternet.org/drugs/cannabi...) where I found out about this amazing new product:
Unlike a traditional lube, Foria is sprayed on the sensitive skin of the vulva, and clitoris prior to any sexual stimulation. On the product website, it’s described as a “pre-lube” to be applied “at least 30 minutes before engaging in sexual activity.” Waiting, apparently, allows the skin to absorb the compounds in the spray, which consists of 100 percent liquid coconut oil and THC oil (THC is responsible for the plant's psychoactive effects as well as several purported health benefits). Bottles each contain 360 mg of THC and other cannabinoids.
Gee, just when I thought technology was an endless downward spiral to oblivion, something new comes along to change my mind.
From the article on AlterNet (http://www.alternet.org/drugs/cannabi...) where I found out about this amazing new product:
Unlike a traditional lube, Foria is sprayed on the sensitive skin of the vulva, and clitoris prior to any sexual stimulation. On the product website, it’s described as a “pre-lube” to be applied “at least 30 minutes before engaging in sexual activity.” Waiting, apparently, allows the skin to absorb the compounds in the spray, which consists of 100 percent liquid coconut oil and THC oil (THC is responsible for the plant's psychoactive effects as well as several purported health benefits). Bottles each contain 360 mg of THC and other cannabinoids.
Gee, just when I thought technology was an endless downward spiral to oblivion, something new comes along to change my mind.
Published on July 09, 2014 15:26
July 5, 2014
A better way to buy erotica
The folks over at E-Read Erotica Reviews (http://ereaderotica.com/) have expanded their website to include a store (http://ereaderotica.com/?page_id=2962) selling erotica--specifically, all the erotic books sold by Amazon (a lot of books). In fact, the sales and shipping are still handled by Amazon. So what's different? At ERE, the books are much, much better organized. Instead of the broad genre categories offered when you go to Amazon, ERE assembles shelves of erotica by keyword. Let them explain:
On Amazon, erotica is only loosely organized by genre, and you are forced to browse the entire genre to find what you want. The ERE-Store ignores Amazon’s genre category, and uses the author-supplied keywords for each book. Each author can input several keywords for each book telling customers what it’s about, cheating wives, spring break, housewives, BBWs, or any other words they can imagine. The ERE-Store uses this information to create “shelves” based around specific interests based on the author-supplied keywords.
Why are keywords better?
When we create the ERE-Store’s shelves, we can combine keywords to create fun, unique, and interesting shelves. If you are looking for a book about an “exhibitionist housewife” we can build a shelf covering those books and present them to you. We also organize books by interesting and novel themes, like relationship, emotion, and even who hooks up with who. Explore the shelves a little bit and get a feel for how the store is organized and you’ll find things you are interested in are places near things you might be interested in. Keywords gives you a unique and fun shopping experience you can’t get anywhere else.
Sound great, right? So the question, how much more does this cost?
The ERE-Store is the only place you can shop Amazon’s erotica section by keywords. The shopping engine is created by Amazon, and they handle all shopping, delivery, and payment transactions. The only thing we do is curate the selection, manage presentation, and organize the shelves. The site is 100% safe and secure, and the back-end is 100% managed by Amazon – we have nothing to do with delivering books, payment, or account info.
In other words, the price is the same from ERE as from Amazon.
It's a no-brainer. When shopping for erotica, go to ERE. For more information, go to ERE's FAQ page (http://ereaderotica.com/?page_id=1772).
On Amazon, erotica is only loosely organized by genre, and you are forced to browse the entire genre to find what you want. The ERE-Store ignores Amazon’s genre category, and uses the author-supplied keywords for each book. Each author can input several keywords for each book telling customers what it’s about, cheating wives, spring break, housewives, BBWs, or any other words they can imagine. The ERE-Store uses this information to create “shelves” based around specific interests based on the author-supplied keywords.
Why are keywords better?
When we create the ERE-Store’s shelves, we can combine keywords to create fun, unique, and interesting shelves. If you are looking for a book about an “exhibitionist housewife” we can build a shelf covering those books and present them to you. We also organize books by interesting and novel themes, like relationship, emotion, and even who hooks up with who. Explore the shelves a little bit and get a feel for how the store is organized and you’ll find things you are interested in are places near things you might be interested in. Keywords gives you a unique and fun shopping experience you can’t get anywhere else.
Sound great, right? So the question, how much more does this cost?
The ERE-Store is the only place you can shop Amazon’s erotica section by keywords. The shopping engine is created by Amazon, and they handle all shopping, delivery, and payment transactions. The only thing we do is curate the selection, manage presentation, and organize the shelves. The site is 100% safe and secure, and the back-end is 100% managed by Amazon – we have nothing to do with delivering books, payment, or account info.
In other words, the price is the same from ERE as from Amazon.
It's a no-brainer. When shopping for erotica, go to ERE. For more information, go to ERE's FAQ page (http://ereaderotica.com/?page_id=1772).
Published on July 05, 2014 14:19
May 22, 2014
Making Michael Obey: 4 stars!

Making Michael Obey, my 5-erotic short story compilation, got a boffo review from E-Read Erotica Reviews (and 4 stars on Amazon).
"KC Cave is quickly becoming my favorite author for WTF kinky sex. This book is a very fun collection of kinky encounters between just two people, but wow, they slam home with intensity and sexual energy. I have reviewed a couple of KC’s books before, and I’m very happy to say this one is the best yet, they style, prose, descriptiveness – it’s all improved and very kinky and sexually charged. In this five-story collection, there’s erotic roleplay, spanking, food sex, and some dom-sub play between two people moving into a new place, and I enjoyed this a lot."
For the complete review: http://ereaderotica.com/?p=3787
Published on May 22, 2014 14:24
•
Tags:
erotica, erotica-compilation, explicit-erotica, m-f
K.C. Cave's Blog
- K.C. Cave's profile
- 15 followers
K.C. Cave isn't a Goodreads Author
(yet),
but they
do have a blog,
so here are some recent posts imported from
their feed.
