C.J. Stone's Blog
October 22, 2024
Judaism is a religion, not a race
Judaism is a religion, not a race. Jews have no more exclusive right to the Holy Land than Christians, say, or Rastafarians. There are black Jews, middle eastern Jews, white western Jews, mixed-race Jews, even Palestinian Jews. You can convert. People have converted, many times. Whole tribes who were previously not Jews elected to become Jews. For the women it’s easy. For the men, slightly less so, but still doable. You have to be willing to put up with a certain amount of discomfort for a while. (I’m wincing slightly as I think of this.)
Likewise, the Bible is symbolic, not literal. It is myth, not history. There probably never was a King David or a King Solomon. There probably never was a Moses, or an Abraham. If any of these characters ever existed, they have been mythologised: like Hercules, or Jason and the Argonauts. Biblical stories are not based on facts, but they do tell us certain truths. They carry hidden messages. They are parables, allegories, metaphors. The promises contained in them have to be understood spiritually. God was not offering his people a piece of real estate, but a state of mind. The promised land should be understood figuratively, as something that is yearned for, hoped for, wished for, longed for, in the deepest recesses of the soul, but never fought for, never killed for.
To be a Jew you have to follow the Torah. The Torah specifically prohibits a number of actions. You shall not kill. You shall not steal. You shall not covet. You shall not bear false witness. God’s promises are conditional. If you do any of these things you are not a Jew. The promises are made null and void by the breaking of the Law. Therefore the people of Israel (most of them) are not Jews. They break the Law every day.
They are Zionists. Zionism is a political ideology. It takes the politics of domination and conquest and dresses it up in religious clothing. Most of the early Zionists were atheists. They did not believe in God, and yet they laid claim to the land of Israel as promised to them by God.
Zionism is a settler colonial project aimed at stealing the land from the indigenous population, many of whom have deep historical roots going back centuries, if not millennia. The Palestinians are the descendants of Canaanites, Philistines, Israelites, Jews, Greeks, Romans, Arabs, Crusaders: all the people who have criss-crossed this strip of land, at the crossroads of the world between Egypt and the Fertile Crescent, and left their DNA behind. Zionism aims at removing those original peoples, and replacing them with settlers. It is a supremacist ideology. Zionists believe they are superior to other people. They see other people – specifically Palestinians – as inferior, less than human. “Human animals,” as Yoav Gallant, the Israeli Defence Minister called them.
Most settlers have dual nationality: that is, they already have homelands of their own. They are from all over the world – North America, South America, Western Europe, Eastern Europe, Asia, everywhere but Israel – but the Israeli “Law of Return” allows them to settle in Israel, while Palestinians, born in Palestine, but driven from the land in one of the many pogroms, have no such right.
BDS
People say that the Israel-Palestine conflict is complex and intractable, and it is, but the solution lies within the world’s grasp. Israel only exists because of the military backing of the West. Once the West removes its backing, Israel will fall. This is why we should do our best to undermine Western support for Israel, to question governmental and institutional investment in Israel, to enact BDS: Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions. BDS brought down apartheid South Africa. It will bring down apartheid Israel too.
States do not have a right to exist. People have a right to exist. Afrikaner rule in South Africa is no more. The Soviet Union is no more. Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, South Vietnam, East Germany: many states have fallen in the last half century. They have been nullified by history. The people are still there, but their identity has changed. The same will happen to Israel. Israel is the illegitimate bastard child of American Imperialism, inserted into the Middle East to control the world’s supply of oil, and to keep the nearby states in check. It’s days are numbered. It has proved itself to be violently anti-social in its nature. We should no more allow a psychopathic state to exist than we would allow a society of paedophiles to start recruiting members.
All terrorist groups need to be disbanded. That includes the IDF, one of the greatest terrorist armies in the world. An international force with the full authorisation of the United Nations should be brought in to take their place. There can only be a one-state solution. Israelis with dual nationality can elect to return to their homes, or remain in Palestine as law abiding citizens, subject to the democratic rule of the majority. The Law of Return should be revoked and Palestinians granted the right of return. There should be freedom of religion and all peoples who lay claim to the various covenants of the region should be allowed to worship: Jew, Samaritan, Druze, Gnostic, Mandaean, Yazidi, Christian, Alawite, Sufi, Ismaili, Sunni, Shia. No religion should be allowed to dominate another. Everyone should be free to worship, whomsoever and howsoever they choose.
Quite how any of this can happen is another thing. The confusion between the idea of the promised land as a piece of real estate, and the Holy Land as a state of mind, is one that bedevils us all. You cannot, ultimately, own anything. We are all passing strangers upon this earth, free to drink in its delights while we are here, but then gone and forgotten, blown away like dust in the wind. We should savour every moment, every passing beauty – every shaft of sunlight through the trees, every bird’s call, every breath of air that stirs the leaves – but know that we cannot hold on to any of it. Its secret is in the moment, a wealth deeper and more enriching than all the gold in Fort Knox, and yet as insubstantial as the breeze. This where the Holy Land truly lies, not in substance, but in feeling: not in property but in what we give away, freely, from the generosity of our hearts.
https://www.eldaddruks.studio/Also on Israel/Palestine: https://www.splicetoday.com/politics-and-media/where-s-daddy
October 17, 2024
Rockets Over Blueberry Hill
by
I’ve witnessed four youth music rebellions in my life: rock ’n’ roll, psychedelia, punk and rave. There may be more but, if so, I wasn’t a party to them.
Rock ’n’ roll is coterminous with my birth. The first rock ’n’ roll record to chart in the USA – Crazy Man, Crazy by Bill Haley and the Comets – did so in the week of the 20 June 1953, the week I was born. Bill Haley had been a Western Swing artist, but, after recording a rockabilly version of Ike Turner’s Rocket 88 (considered by many to be the first rock’n’roll record) he changed his style. You can see this as healthy opportunism. Rock ’n’ roll was a development of Rhythm and blues, a black music form. Haley saw the potential in the music and repackaged it for a white audience.
There’s a crucial difference between the two versions. Bill Haley sings, “going round the corner and havin’ some fun, takin’ my Rocket on a long, long run,” while Jackie Brenston in Ike Turner’s version sings, “goin’ round the corner and get a beer, everybody in my car’s gonna take a little pill.” What’s odd here is that none of the lyric sites give the actual words. It’s always some version of the Haley lyric, or the Brenston lyric with the word “nip” substituting for pill. It’s about time someone corrected that.
Rock ’n’ roll was the background music to my life growing up in the 50s. My favourite record as a child was Blueberry Hill by Fats Domino. I had it on 78. I guess it was my mum’s. It sounded so ancient, like something that had been created in the primeval swamp at the beginning of time. I had no idea that, actually, it was a recent release, having come out in 1956, only two or three years before I was listening to it. I played it every morning before I went to school. There was something in the quality of the voice, and in the jaunty melancholy of the melody, that drew me in and overwhelmed me with a kind of gentle, sweet sadness.
Blueberry Hill seemed like a place I would like to go. I associated it with a girl I was in love with and who I had a dream about. We were soaring high on the back of a white swan, me and the girl, high, high in the endless sky, with the little toy town world spread out below us, all the tiny cars moving along the roads, and the miniscule houses with people in them. My heart was soaring too, exultant, expansive, reaching out into the far distance, till it flew on ahead and came to a mountain and just under the summit there were all these jewel encrusted pillars with many colours glinting in the sunlight. It was a place of pure beauty that wrenched my heart with the ache of love.
I used to play Blueberry Hill on a little Dansette record player with a lid. The 78 was bigger than the deck, and one day the lid fell down, breaking the record in two. It was one of the great losses of my childhood.
Another memorable record was Elvis Presley’s Wooden Heart. Not strictly rock ’n’ roll, it dates from Presley’s time in the American army, and is based upon a German folk song, Muss i denn. What makes it meaningful for me is that it was through this song that I discovered irony. I associated it with the film, Pinocchio, which I must have seen around this time. Pinocchio, of course, was a puppet. He was made of wood and he did have a wooden heart. There were strings upon that love of his, because he was a puppet. So I imagined Elvis as Pinocchio, singing in that melancholy voice that he didn’t have a wooden heart, when actually he did. That was the irony. He was wishing he didn’t while saying he did: a strangely sophisticated thought for a 7 year old boy.
What this says about me I can’t say. There was always a kind of melancholy to my fantasies, a sense of loss. In my cowboys and Indian fights, when I was shot and fell down, I would often construct a back story that involved someone grieving over me.
Rock’n’roll in 50s Britain was accompanied by the first recognisable post war youth movement, the Teddy Boys, or Teds. Their name was based upon the Edwardian suit jackets they wore, which the Daily Express shortened to “Teddy”. They were generally working class kids rebelling against post war austerity. Their suits, with velvet collars, were meant to signal style and affluence. They adopted rock ‘n’ roll as their musical form, and were known for carrying flick-knives and for rioting during showings of the American film Blackboard Jungle, which featured Bill Haley and the Comets playing Rock Around the Clock. It was the first time rock ’n’ roll was heard in Britain. My uncle Rob, my mum’s youngest brother – only 7 years older than me – was a bit of a Ted in his time. I remember him working on his quiff in front of the mirror in our living room, combing back his hair repeatedly on the sides and then pulling it forward in the front to make the quiff. One day he made a home made bomb out of sugar and fertiliser packed into a metal pipe which he used to blow up a tree in our local woods.
Another of the crazes of the 50s was skiffle. This was a British version of American blues and folk. The foremost skiffle group of the time was Lonnie Donegan‘s, whose first record was a copy of Lead Belly’s Rock Island Line, sung in a very pronounced American accent.Skiffle groups were characterised by acoustic guitars and improvised instruments such as the washboards and the washtub bass. Most of the 60s British rock acts began as skiffle groups. Donegan changed his style in the end and began singing in his native Essex accent, as witnessed by his 1960 hit My Old Man’s A Dustman.
I was 10 when I heard my first Beatles record, Please, Please Me. It was different to anything else at the time: lively, catchy but also sly and suggestive. Listening back it reveals the relationship that the Beatles had with their girl fans, who would have understood the references. My favourite early Beatles record is Twist and Shout, a cover version of a song originally recorded by the Top Notes, then by the Isley Brothers, who had a US hit with their version. The Beatles’ is still the best: fast-paced, infectious, with Lennon’s rasping vocals, rising to a screaming crescendo at the end, it shows what a great little rock ’n’ roll band they always were. The Beatles had begun as Teds. If you look at the first album cover Ringo still has his Teddy Boy quiff. He’s only just joined the group and hasn’t adopted the Beatles cut yet.
British interest in American music led to a further delving into its history and the discovery of the blues. A number of the best known groups of the 60s started off as blues acts, most notably the Rolling Stones, who had a number one hit with Willie Dixon’s Little Red Rooster in 1964. It remains the only blues song ever to reach the top of the UK charts.
The reference to “a little pill” in Ike Turner’s Rocket 88 reminds us that there has always been a relationship between popular music and drugs. In the 50s and early 60s the main drug was speed, amphetamine, which allowed its users to stay up all night and dance – that’s what Rock Around the Clock is about – but by the mid sixties new drugs had become available which began to alter the character of the music: marijuana and LSD. It was the introduction of these drugs that led to the creation of psychedelia, the next great musical form to take over Britain and the world.
—Follow Chris Stone on X: @ChrisJamesStone
—Story originally appeared here.
About CJ Stone
CJ Stone is an author, columnist and feature writer. He has written seven books, and columns and articles for many newspapers and magazines.
Read more of CJ Stone’s work here, here and here.
Donate
https://www.eldaddruks.studio/
May 30, 2024
Money, Magic and the Imagination
A magical ritual in the City of LondonAccording to Julian Vayne, magic is “the technology of the imagination”. It’s using certain techniques to focus the mind, to make a change in the world. That change may be internal, to do with our own attitudes, our hopes and aspirations, our limitations and anxieties. Or it may be external. We may use magic as a way of influencing or controlling other people.
CJ StoneHow is this possible, you ask? In a secular world, surely magic no longer has any power. Maybe that’s because we no longer call it magic. Maybe magic is still prevalent in our world, but we call it by other names.
Take money for instance. Money is magic. It is one of the most effective, and all-pervading, “technologies of the imagination” of the last few centuries, particularly in its form as fiat money, paper money.
Think about it. Unlike gold or silver, paper money has no intrinsic value. It costs virtually nothing to produce – fractions of a penny – but can represent any exchange, large or small. And where does that representation take place? In the imagination.
Money is a sigil, a magical sign. It signifies value. We measure the value of things by how much we are willing to pay for them. It works as an integral part of a system of control. In our world there is very little you can do without money. Those who have money are made powerful by it. Those who don’t become servile or oppressed. People will do anything for money. They will degrade themselves. They will lie, cheat, steal, even kill. So the power of money controls the world, and those who control that power, control us.
We call the system “Capitalism”. The word “capital” is from the Latin. It means head. And on June 5th a new head will appear on the bank notes produced by the Bank of England: the head of our sovereign, Charles III.
This is a crucial moment in British history, the birth of a new age: the third Carolean era. The first Charles had his head lopped off in 1649. The second oversaw the restoration of the monarchy in 1660. The reign of both monarchs saw significant shifts in the constitutional arrangements in these Isles. It is our purpose to ensure that the third Corolean age is as transformative as the previous two.
Bank of England – Tivoli CornerThe Bank of England was established in 1694, not long after the death of the second Charles. It is the world’s eighth oldest bank, and the model on which most modern central banks have been based. It has been at its present location, on Threadneedle Street, since 1734. The current building was designed and built by John Soane in 1806. This whole period, from 1660 to 1806, saw the rise of Britain, from a parochial off shore Island on the outer margins of Europe, to a global empire. Part of this was done using the resources of the Bank of England.
It is here that the gold reserves of the United Kingdom are held, and it was from here, from this fortress in the middle of London, that the British Empire was created. And on the North West corner of the Bank, at the junction between Princes Street and Lothbury, there is a weird little architectural anomaly: a copy of the Temple of Vesta in Tivoli, Italy. The perfect place for a ritual.
Vesta is a flame. She is the goddess of the hearth. In Rome she was considered the guardian of the Roman people. Unlike most Roman gods, there were no statues of Vesta, only a perpetual fire that was kept burning by her servants, the Vestal Virgins. So it is appropriate then, that on the 6th June 2024, a New Moon, one day after the head of Charles makes its first appearance on our bank notes, that we should put our notes to the flame, as a burnt offering, a ritual sacrifice to the gods.
Bank of EnglandThe MonumentWe do not do this to do any harm to Charles, the man, who, let’s face it, had no choice in his position. He was born to it. But as well as being a man, a mere mortal—with all the vulnerabilities that this entails—he is also a symbol. As a man he will die. As a symbol he will not. He is the sovereign. He represents sovereign power. It is through this power, called the Royal prerogative, that we are ruled on these Isles.
The Royal prerogative is no longer wielded by the sovereign himself, but by his representative, the Prime Minister. British people are not citizens. We are subjects. We have had our sovereignty taken away from us and invested in the head of state, who in turn has invested it in the institutions of the state, the government and the Bank of England. By burning the note we are letting go the power that is inherent in it.
According to David Graeber, in his book, Debt: The First 5,000 Years: In 1694 a consortium of English bankers made a loan of £1,200,000 to the king. In return they received a royal monopoly on the issuance of banknotes. What this meant in practice was they had the right to advance IOUs for a portion of the money the king now owed them to any inhabitant of the kingdom willing to borrow from them, or willing to deposit their own money in the bank – in effect, to circulate or ‘monetize’ the newly created royal debt. This was a great deal for the bankers (they got to charge the king 8 percent annual interest for the original loan and simultaneously charge interest on the same money to the clients who borrowed it), but it only worked as long as the original loan remained outstanding. To this day, this loan has never been paid back. It cannot be. If it were, the entire monetary system of Great Britain would cease to exist.”
In other words, money is debt. It was created by debt and is maintained by debt. By burning our money, we are forgiving the debt. We are releasing the sovereign power of money into the world. We are changing our relationship to money. We are redeeming ourselves. The word “redemption” means to pay back what we owe, and thus to redeem our property. In the ancient world it referred specifically to debt slavery: enslavement due to debt. To be redeemed was to be bought out of slavery: to become free. Thus to burn money is to set yourself free, both from the enslavement of debt, and from the enchantment of the money sigil.
We will be gathering at the Monument to the Great Fire outside of Monument station, about three minutes walk from the bank, at 12 noon on Thursday 6th June. I will be wearing a top hat with a caduceus on it, and carrying a staff made of English bog oak, with a Celtic cross on top. From the Monument we will process to the bank. Those who wish to burn money can go into the bank to have your old notes exchanged for new. If you wish you can mark your old notes with your own magical sigil. The sigil I will use was designed by Julian Vayne. It consists of a less than sign < crossed by a more than sign >, crossed by an equals sign =. (See above).
Once everyone has their notes, we will process to the Temple of Vesta, where, after a suitable prayer, and a reading from our holy books, we will perform the ritual. We will burn our notes. Don’t worry if you don’t want to burn money yourself, merely being there is enough. I will burn mine and you will be a witness to history.
Facebook Event Page: https://www.facebook.com/events/1496865587898805/
Forgive Us Our DebtsPrevious magical actions in the City of London:(Follow the links at the bottom of each article to read the whole sequence)
Money, Magic and the Imagination – Part I
Donate
August 10, 2023
Let Life Be My Guide
August 4, 2023
The Trials of Arthur Revised Edition
When I first started work on The Trials of Arthur, people thought that I was crazy. If I told them about King Arthur they would say, “so where are you meeting him then, in a mental institution?” It became a hard thing to justify. I’d been moderately successful in my writing career up till then, with columns in the Guardian and the Big Issue amongst others. I’d had two books published. After I started work on what I’ve always referred to as “the Arthur book” my career went into terminal decline. I’m not saying that co-writing a book with a biker who says he’s King Arthur caused that to happen. Maybe it was going to happen anyway. But it was certainly a staging post on my journey to oblivion, a mile-stone on the lonely road to nowhere in my writing career, and very prominent in my memory for that reason.
My first conception of the book was that it would be about protest. I wanted to use the figure of Arthur as the central thread around which I would weave a story about protest and rebellion. There was a lot of it about in the 90s and Arthur had been heavily involved in much of it. But by the time of writing those protests were long gone. Consequently I had to find us some new protests to get involved with.
Thus it was that our first trip was up to Scotland to join in with a protest at the Faslane Naval base on the Clyde, where Britain’s nuclear deterrent is kept.
There were several things about this journey which made it memorable, although none of it went into the book. Firstly that I missed the turnoff for the Motorway, which didn’t bode well. I was losing my way already and we hadn’t even started yet. Then that we picked up Mog Ur Kreb Dragonrider on the way – generally known as Kreb – who was due in court in Scotland on some charges relating to the peace protest. Kreb is as memorable for his personality as he is for his name, being one of Arthur’s staunchest supporters, and a truly unique individual.
We stopped at a Motorway service station on the way to get some breakfast. Arthur and I both had full English breakfasts with bacon and sausages and all the trimmings. Kreb is a vegetarian but opted for the full English too. I can’t remember his exact words now, nor his reasoning. What I remember was his tone, a kind of careful, weighed out deliberateness in the way he spoke, a measured seriousness, accepting the food with a kind of bow, because it was a gift, because he honoured it, and because he wanted to partake fully of the experience as a member of the clan.
A glossy beard
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/druid-reunited-with-excalibur-1292317.htmlAfter a while Arthur took over the driving and our speed increased. We were doing up to 120 mph, tagged on behind another vehicle which Arthur was using as a marker, hanging on to its tail, swerving in and out of the traffic with furious precision, weaving a fine line between destiny and danger. Arthur was driving casually with one hand holding the steering wheel, a look of calm concentration on his face. I was most impressed with his driving and always felt like he was in complete control. Until we got to the other end, that is, after we’d dropped Kreb off in Glasgow and were making our way to my friend’s house in the fading light of evening, and he almost drove directly into a roundabout, missing the turning completely, and I suddenly realised that he couldn’t see anything, that he needed glasses, and I took over the driving.
My friend, Alan, had moved in with a woman with a couple of kids. The kids were most impressed with Arthur, especially his sword. Later on we were starting to get very drunk. Arthur wanted food. He was looking for something to eat and came across some dog biscuits in the kitchen, which he began to eat with relish, to everyone’s amusement. He ate at least eight of them. My friend said, “that’s why he has such a cold nose and a glossy beard.”
The following day we drove over to the Faslane protest site and Arthur almost immediately got himself arrested. He was wearing his robes. I overheard someone talking about the arrest. “What’s that for,” he said, “bad dress sense?” He was arrested along with a Labour MP, a Member of the Scottish Parliament, Catholic Priests, Church of Scotland Ministers and members of the Scottish Nationalist Party. I spent the rest of the day waiting for the phone call to say that he needed picking up. It didn’t arrive till late in the evening by which time I had already started to drink.
The following day we went to pick him up from the Friend’s Meeting House in Glasgow, which is where he’d been dumped after his arrest. He was standing on the step outside smoking a cigarette. It looked like he had been standing there all night. Later on we went to find Kreb at the peace camp and then went for a walk. There was an old empty Manor House nearby, which looked like a Pre-Raphaelite castle, and Arthur was talking about squatting it. It seemed like a great place for an Arthurian squat. We were in the garden and there was this old tree with a bough that stooped down low to the ground. Me and Alan both tried climbing it, but neither of us could manage. Alan found this stick and was practicing his swordplay, holding it over his head, making out like he was a Samurai warrior. And then we turned around and there was Arthur perched in the tree, lying on his side like a reclining Buddha, looking like some kind of a tree elf with a look of impish mischief on his face. It was so quick and unexpected it felt like he must have levitated himself to get there.
After that we bought some cider and Arthur was immediately drunk. He only had to open the bottle and smell the contents. We got back to Alan’s place and one of the locals called in, a very broad and muscular lesbian. “Nice tits,” Arthur commented while sucking on his cider bottle. That’s one of his chat-up lines.
“Arthur!” Alan shouted in amused outrage, “she’s a lesbian.”
“I don’t care,” Arthur said, “she’s still got nice tits.”
And that was the end of our first attempt to get material for our book.
A binThe plan was that I was going to follow him around for a year, and work that into a narrative with his past life as a series of flashbacks, but it became quickly apparent that driving him about in hired cars and paying for everything would soon eat up the advance money. I decided to use the story of my original search to find him instead, but we had a new difficulty now. It was joint authorship. Who’s voice was I going to use?
A month or so later we met again in Amesbury for one of the round-table meetings about access to Stonehenge. I had a return ticket on the train. After the meeting we went to the pub to discuss the book, and that’s where we decided on the ploy of writing in the plural: “we” instead of “I”, “our” instead of “my”.
We were soon quite drunk. I said, “I’ll have to get back Arthur, I’m going to miss the train.” I got out my tickets to show him.
“Trust me,” he said, “I’ll get you home,” and he snatched the tickets from me and ripped them up.
So, several hours and many pints later, after a bag of chips and a battered sausage from the chip-shop, we made our way up to the Countess roundabout on the A303 in order to hitch home. After about five minutes Arthur slumped to the floor under his cloak and promptly fell asleep. It was early in the year, February, and very cold. I was marching up and down with the cold. No one was driving past. Those that did saw a crazed middle aged man alongside the body of a dead King. They probably thought it was regicide.
I was jumping up and down with the cold. I was walking about exploring, beating myself with my arms to stay warm. The service station was closed but the entrance lobby was open. I went in there and tried to sleep but couldn’t. The floor was rough and hard. Outside again I found what I supposed was the outlet for the refrigerator units inside. It was blowing out warm air. I stood under the air flow and tried not to die of exposure. This went on for several hours, but I was so tired, I really needed to lie down. The lobby was locked by now. Someone must have crept up without me seeing and turned the lock. Or maybe the lock was automatic, in which case it was a good job I wasn’t inside. There were some dumpster style bins nearby full of cardboard. So I climbed into one of these, pulled the cardboard around me and over me, and, though I didn’t sleep, was at least lying down and moderately warm.
The following day we caught a bus from Amesbury to London. So Arthur had kept his promise. He’d got me home all right…. by allowing me to pay for our tickets on the bus.
Glastonbury
Arthur Pendragon in 2009Later that year Arthur came to visit me in my hometown, in Kent. The historical Arthur is a Celtic hero, of course, while Kent is the seat of the Saxons, the traditional enemy. While Arthur was staying with me I had this dream, about a small white dragon emerging from the waters of a river. It was a very vivid dream. The dragon was palpably real, snorting with a cold breath, about the size of a small horse, but stockier. Pure, albino white, the water running off its back shining in the sunlight. Afterwards I realised that this was the symbol of Kent, normally depicted as a white rampant horse, rather than a dragon.
This was in 2001. Everyone knows what happened in September of that year. I was getting seriously blocked with the book by now and could no longer see the point of it. Bigger things were happening. Who cared about some crazy biker and his pretensions to legendary status? The whole world was falling to bits.
I’d started to grow very depressed. I was drinking on my own and not writing. The book began to feel like a terrible burden I was carrying, a millstone around my neck. For once that’s a cliché that almost exactly describes the feeling: like a dead weight dragging me down. I couldn’t get any other work. No one was taking me seriously any more. I was telling everyone that I never, ever wanted to write another book. It was a vicious cycle. Whenever I thought about it a kind of stultifying heaviness descended on my mind and I couldn’t lift myself enough to write, but the failure to write was just increasing the weight.
I think now that I was approaching something near to a clinical depression. This wasn’t made any easier by the fact that people were scoffing very noisily at my project. I thought I was looking at the end of my writing career. But here’s a measure of all of that superfluous noise: one of the people who was snorting the loudest at the time later died of alcohol poisoning in the Philippines having sired a child with a teenage prostitute. So who, now, seems the craziest?
Meanwhile Arthur was growing increasingly restive about the lack of progress with the book and had asked a mutual friend to help. So I was invited to Glastonbury with the idea that I would be fed and watered while I got on with the writing. This was in the beginning of 2002.
I have to say this helped: not only having food cooked for me, and people to sit with in the evening, but someone to read the book to after I had finished my days’ writing. The book began to move again. In fact it started to get good. I was writing about the protest scene by now, and suddenly it all began to have relevance again. Yes, the world was turning apocalyptic before our very eyes. Yes, an almost literal hell was being unleashed upon the Earth by the forces of war and insanity. But memories of people’s defiance in the road-protest scene of the 90s seemed like an antidote to that. Something real. Something hopeful, with Arthur’s particular blend of egotism and heroism at the heart of it. People putting themselves on the line for beauty and nature and living up to an ideal.
The deadline had been put back several times by now, and, with most of the book finished, I quickly tossed out an introductory chapter and a conclusion knowing that I would be asked to rewrite them both once the editing got under way. They asked me to rewrite the conclusion but they never asked me to rewrite the introduction.
The Wheel of the Year
The book came out in 2003 to no great acclaim. My depression got worse, and I gave up writing altogether to become a postman. My one regret was that I hadn’t made a better job on what would probably turn out to be my last book. It had some good bits, but I always hated the introduction. It was slow and turgid, badly written and clumsy. So when Arthur asked me if I could get the book republished in 2009 I decided that I wanted to rewrite it first.
The Trials of Arthur Revised Edition is the fruits of my labour.
It is the book I always wanted to write.
Not only have I rewritten the first chapter, but I’ve added a number of other chapters too. The original book had seventeen chapters, while the new book has twenty four. It is around 20,000 words longer. Two of the chapters were written by Arthur, the rest by me. We’ve extended the quest element of the first part of the book, while adding a new theme. “The Turning of the Year” represents the pagan calendar as a cycle running through the book. It extends the idea of the quest but specifically attached to the time of year. Thus the first chapter is called “The Turning of the Year: Samhain” and is set on the Prescelly Mountains in Pembrokeshire,West Wales, on Halloween night in 1994.
I won’t tell you about all the new chapters. Suffice it to say that they do what the original first chapter entirely failed to do: they take you right into the action, and then keep you there.
Unlike the original, this is a book I am immensely proud of.
It is also, very definitely, not my last book.
BlurbThis is an updated version of an earlier book “The Trials of Arthur: The Life and Times of a Modern Day King.”
It is more than 20,000 words longer and has nine brand new chapters.
The Central character is a Druid, who is also a Biker.
He claims to be King Arthur, but is actually sane.
It is set in the UK in the mid nineties but it is still relevant today.
It is about someone who may never have existed, and about someone who definitely does exist. About Myth and about meaning. About history and how to make it.. About the world and how to change it. About standing up for what you believe.
It is the Matter of Britain brought up to date.
“So unbelievable it might just be true” Awen Clement, Kindred Spirit
“A haunting elegy to all those people who refuse to accept that they can not make a difference in a world they know must change ” Deborah Orr
Reviews on Goodreads: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2004656#CommunityReviews
Available here:
DonateLike what you read? Please consider donating. As little as £1 would help. Details on my donations page here: https://whitstableviews.com/donate/
July 19, 2023
Why I (re)wrote The Trials Of Arthur
Front coverI wrote the original version of The Trials of Arthur between 2000 and 2003.
It was a book I’d always wanted to write.
I’d originally come across Arthur Pendragon in the mid-nineties, through my good friend Steve Andrews, while I was working on my first book, Fierce Dancing.
There was something about the story which caught my imagination.
Just to give you a brief outline: Arthur Pendragon is this ex-soldier, ex-builder, ex-biker who had some sort of a brain storm back in 1986 and decided he was King Arthur. When I heard about him he was already moderately famous, not only as a media figure – he had been on the Clive Anderson show and had had a number of radio and TV documentaries made about him – but he was also central to the campaign for open access to Stonehenge and heavily involved in the road protest scene of the time. By the time I met him, late in 1996, he was living on-site at the Newbury bypass, then the most prominent and fiercely contested of the road building schemes.
Fierce Dancing had featured a road protest and I had already acquired the status of a sort of spokesman for the movement through my columns in the Guardian and the Big Issue.
It was more than just a protest scene. There was something profound and archaic at its heart. It seemed to evoke feelings and ideas that came from a very deep place. It was tribal. It was animistic. It was archetypal. Arthur’s story seemed to fit in well with the general ethos. I spent the better part of 1996 chasing all over the UK looking for him.
I finally met him in August of that year, at Avebury stone circle in Wiltshire, where we both got very drunk, after which, still drunk, I drove him and another bunch of drunken people over to Bath, where we got even drunker.
That was something Arthur and I did a lot of in our early days.
Tongue-in-cheek
Back coverAt the time my writing style was very tongue-in-cheek, and Arthur seemed a very tongue-in-cheek kind of hero. He often referred to himself as “the nutter who thinks he’s King Arthur”, which tells you a lot about Arthur’s approach to his identity. Had I written the book then it would almost certainly have been a comedy. I would have played it for laughs. It still is a comedy to a large extent, meaning that there are a lot of funny bits in the book. But it also has a serious point, something I’m not sure I would have been so clear about back in 1996.
So, then, the book didn’t get written in 1996. Other things got in the way. And by 2000, when I finally got round to starting work on it, my life had taken an uncomfortable turn. I was no longer a Guardian writer, and I was no longer writing for Faber & Faber either. The book was commissioned by Thorsons/Element, a New Age imprint of Harper Collins. I felt I was going down in the world. And it wasn’t me who got the commission, it was Arthur. So I was going to have to accept joint authorship, and I no longer had complete control over the end product. This was difficult. I was writing to please Arthur, not writing to please myself, which had a detrimental effect upon my style. I was never anywhere near as confident writing this book as I had been with the others.
Arthur’s view of himself is conditioned by his own self-mythologizing, of course. This is something we all do, but it is greatly compounded when you are not only self-mythologizing in the normal way but also identifying yourself with a mythological hero who is attempting to bring the mythology up to date. This is like mythologizing cubed. Mythology times mythology times mythology.
Arthur thinks he’s Arthur because he always has been Arthur. But clearly there had been a life before this which I insisted on exploring. As I said at the time, it will make the book all the more believable if we know where Arthur comes from. This tends to give the book a kind of hagiographical quality at first as in Arthur’s mind he was always destined to be Arthur. This is one of the prime weaknesses of the original book. Arthur emerges as a hero because of some sort of inherent quality he was born with, rather than as someone who stepped up to the mark and took on the role, which I now think is much nearer the truth. It’s not that Arthur is Arthur because he always was Arthur. It’s that he’s Arthur because he’s made himself Arthur. He’s worked at the role and made it come true. He’s evoked the name and taken the consequences. He adopted the name without necessarily knowing what it would involve. But then the name turned round and bit him and he’s never really been the same since.
So I was never very happy with the first part of the book. It was too much “Arthur did this” and “Arthur did that” and “good old Arthur”, without looking into the context or paying very much attention to anyone else.
Protest
CJ StoneLater I started writing about the protest movement, and this is when the original book starts to get really good. In that version of the book, it takes off around the half-way mark, and in the rewrite I’ve virtually done nothing to change the second half. It was always very good and it still is very good.
The book came out in 2003 and then quietly died a death. By 2009 it was out of print, and Arthur had managed to get the rights back. That’s when he approached me and asked if I could get the book back into print.
Thus it was that in early 2010 I started rewriting the book.
The first thing I did was to get rid of the introduction, which I had never liked. It was slow and clumsy and introduced you to characters that later were to play very little part in the book. It rambles all over the place while never locating you anywhere in particular. Later in the book I had made a decision that whenever a place is evoked we would really enter that place. We would step across its threshold and visualise it. If anyone reading this is ever planning to write a book, I would suggest this as good advice. Be there. Make it live. Make the pages come to life. This is very much what I failed to do in the original introduction.
So the new first chapter takes you right into the heart of an adventure: on the Prescelly Mountains in Pembrokeshire, at Halloween in 1994. We are introduced to people as archetypes. It’s not only Arthur as an archetype, but everyone else as an archetype too. This is a much more satisfying way of entering the book. Arthur is seen as one of many, not one on his own, and his story seems all the more profound for that. It is the story of a whole culture.
We also bring in another innovation: the story of the pagan calendar which runs like a thread throughout the book. Each of the pagan festivals is invoked, starting with Samhain, and ending with the Autumn equinox. This is absolutely precise, as Samhain represents the pagan New Year.
Heart
Arthur PendragonThe book still has Arthur at its heart, of course, but it is also much more about the people around him too. It’s about people remaking themselves, just as Arthur remade himself. It is about the making of a culture as much as the making of a man.
The new book has 24 chapters whereas the old book had 17. This makes a difference of seven chapters. But two of the old chapters have been jettisoned, so in fact there are nine brand new chapters in this book. Two of them were written by Arthur, and the rest by myself. You’ll be able to tell the difference. Arthur’s chapters are very much more tongue-in-cheek than mine, meaning that he’s continued the book I might have written in 1996 and proved to me that he still is a tongue-in-cheek hero.
As for its relevance: it is not about contemporary events, but about things which happened back in the 90s. However, it is about protest, and there are even more things to protest about now than there ever were. The book is virtually a handbook for successful protest. We could subtitle it: How To Protest And Stay Sane!
It is also about challenging the mores of the dominant culture. It is about forging a new identity, about seeking something authentic in a world of dross, about finding something real in a world conditioned by advertising slogans. In other words, it is more deeply relevant now than it ever was.
At our first meeting with the publishers back in 2000 I had asked Arthur what he wanted the message of the book to be.
“If I can do it, anyone can!” he said.
Which doesn’t mean you have to wear a dress and a crown to emulate him. It just means you have to be authentically yourself.
—Read more here
—The Trials of Arthur: Second revision 2023 is available here
DonateLike what you read? Please consider donating. As little as £1 would help. Details on my donations page here: https://whitstableviews.com/donate/
April 4, 2023
Spirits in a material world
I had a clear image of this raggle-taggle band of pagan revellers, strutting the hills, and was momentarily drawn into their world-view: “We are the old people, we are the new people, we are the same people, stronger than before…”
First appeared in the Guardian Weekend, June 4th 1994
DOES the Earth have a spirit? That depends upon your point of view of course. Does anything have a spirit? Is there even such a thing? I only pose the question because what follows depends not so much on the answer as on whether you think the question is worth asking in the first place.
The pagan eco-warriors of Little Solsbury Hill, overlooking the watermeadows of Bath, are in no doubt. The Earth has a spirit, as do all things upon it: trees, plants, animals, even rocks and stones. Mother Earth nurtures all creatures, including ourselves. And how do we repay her? We rip her, wound her, tear down those lovely tree-spirit-beings to make way for motorways. I’m speaking for them now. I’m sure they’d agree that this is the essence of their message. So convinced are they by the truth of this philosophy, that they daily perform acts of extreme courage, shinning up the arms of the JCBs, locking themselves to machinery and even – I saw this – throwing themselves behind the reversing wheels of a truck full of hard-core about to disgorge its load.
One of them told me a story which – having observed a number of such things – I feel perfectly inclined to believe. He’d attached himself by a noose to a tree that was about to come down. Had the tree fallen, of course, he would have gone with it. The supervisor came over to him and asked, “are you serious?”
“Look into my eyes and tell me whether you think I’m serious or not.”
I saw that look as he was telling me the story. I’m certain that the supervisor made the right decision in stopping the digger.
Such conviction is both startling and educational. What we are observing here is a new kind of politics: at least in Britain, at least in recent years. Old-style left-wing politics had a tendency to cynicism and behind the scenes wrangling. It appealed to the greed in human beings, not to their idealism. Trade Unionism was inevitably tied to differentials based on collective bargaining power. On the other hand, the crystal gazing self-indulgence of the conventional New Age opted out of politics altogether for personal self-improvement. One philosophy involved sneering reductionism, the other self-righteous self-aggrandisement. Both were peculiarly fitting for the Thatcher years and doomed to failure. The tribal warriors of Little Solsbury Hill, and other places, represent a new New Age: clear on the question of collective action, politically astute and media-wise, spiritually aware without the attendant vanity.
I’d gone there the first time with a BBC Open Space crew to make a film about the Criminal Justice Bill. This is precisely the kind of protest that section 5 of the bill threatens to make illegal depending, as it does, on trespass, peaceful disruption of work and historical squatting rights. Our first encounter was unpromising. They came spilling out of one of the squats, blinking into the light like some mutant horde. One of them launched himself straight at me and began fingering my waistcoat. “Nice waistcoat. What’s it like on the back?” He was trying to pull the coat off my shoulders to see what the material was like. I lit a cigarette to cover my irritation.
“Two’s up on yer fag, mate?”
Just then the cameraman appeared in his Barbour jacket, battery-pack drawn about his waist like a gun-belt, camera, armed and dangerous, slung across his shoulder like a bazooka.
“Nice coat, mate. Ten’s up on yer salary.”
The quips came thick and fast.
“Used to be a hippie. Now he’s all tan…” referring to my costume. He was right, and not just about the colour of my coat. This character turned out to be Lee Tree. I mentioned alienation.
“Don’t talk to me about alienation. My Dad was a miner. I was brought up on the strike. I know all about alienation.”
We were making our way up the hill when – magically – another of the company squatted on her haunches on a small knoll and began to expound. There was something very precise about this, as if this particular spot on the Earth had something to say for itself. She was addressing me directly. This was Sam, who I later discovered to be the Queen of the Donga tribe. She was talking about the trackways of Twyford Down – the famous dongas from which the tribe got its name – and I was particularly drawn to the quality of unaffected sincerity in her voice. She seemed to be speaking to me from some very ancient, sacred space. Meanwhile Lee mentioned a walk they were proposing, along the length of the Ridgeway, dragging handcarts. He was wearing a multicoloured hat like a fairy hood. I had a clear image of this raggle-taggle band of pagan revellers, with their penny-whistles and their bright patchwork clothes, strutting the hills like something out of a fairy-story, and was momentarily drawn into their world-view: “We are the old people, we are the new people, we are the same people, stronger than before,” as Lee was later to say to me.
I asked Lee what the tribe represented in the modern world. “We’re its conscience,” he said. I asked whether they thought they could win this battle. “We’ve already won,” he said. “Every time we get up in the morning and do what’s right, we’ve won.”
As we scrambled to the top of the hill along trails that stretched through trodden down fences, it seemed to me that these were not the only barriers coming down. I’d had this feeling before. It was like an elusive taste in my mouth: the merest hint of Revolution, maybe. It had the same quality you sense during a strike, when the management in in disarray, and the clockwork routine of the day-to-day is momentarily sprung. It is like a breath of fresh, clean air.
At the top the wind blew fiercely and, looking out over the settlements below, it did indeed seem as if we’d come to some ancient place. The old 20th century life seemed not only miles away, but centuries away. From this distance you couldn’t make out a single car.
I WENT back to the hill a week or so later. My second visit was more relaxed. I’d been through the baptism of blagging and the next few days would cost no more than the odd packet of tobacco and a few pints. I arrived at virtually the same time as a band of French students over in Bath on an EFL course. Their teacher was an old radical. We went to view the action as a digger gouged huge bites out of the blood-red earth. The workmen were taken aback at the sight of all these well-dressed students. No one knew what to make of it all. Some of the students, full of youthful ardour, wanted to overrun the machine themselves.
I counted 20 workmen. Most of them seemed to be standing around doing nothing. I asked how many were actually working and was told by the foreman, with an amused smile, “one”. There are four kinds of worker there. You can tell the difference by the colour of their hats. In order of importance: white = supervisor/engineer, green = foreman, yellow = worker, blue = security. There were many more blue hats than any of the others. I asked how much the security men were paid. One of the protesters told me £3.50 an hour, even for the night shift. During the night, I was told, they had to stand on the machinery in all weathers. I asked a workman if it was true they were only paid £3.50 an hour. “£3.43,” I was told, shamefacedly.
Later, I’m led past the ruins of one of the houses that have already been demolished. A gothic gateway leads to a winding drive. There is the bosom of the hill lay a sad tangle of broken bricks and splintered beams where someone once had their home. Now the area is occupied by protesters. They offer me a cup of tea. Someone passes by on the road above and lets out a piercing “Yip! Yip!” The sound is echoed from around the blackened kettle on the fire: “Yip! Yip!” After tea I’m guided to the security men’s HQ, where one of the protesters is perched on the roof. I’m told that the security men won’t let him have food or water up there. It’s against the European Commission on Human Rights, I’m told. Someone is ringing Liberty to complain.
Night-time on the hill. The tribe is gathered round the campfire, kettle boiling on the embers. Tea, cigarettes, and the odd can of beer are the only drugs in evidence. There’s a few incongruous didgeridoos about, but the main instruments are drums and penny-whistles. The music is jigs and reels with a heavy laden beat. Yips, whoops and war-cries pierce the night air. Someone is dancing in the shadows of a nearby tree. The fire-glow flickers around the circle of laughing faces. The thudding of the drums is like an excited heartbeat pulsing to the rhythm of life.
A young woman breaks into the circle, chattering wildly about herself. She tells us that she uses her “Feminine charms” to disarm the security guards. She’s gambolling from subject to subject excitedly. She’s seen the worst of life, been pregnant and on the street at the same time. Maybe she still is pregnant, she’s not sure. She has a shaved head and plenty of piercings. Her parents have disowned her. She’s a philosopher, she tells us. “All life goes in circles. The Earth goes round the sun, the Moon goes round the Earth.” Someone points out that they’re not circles but ellipses. “Oh all right, but they still go round, don’t they?” It becomes clear that no one actually knows her.
All in the garden is not rosy, it seems. The tribe attracts its share of nutters. But, you wonder, where else would they go? There’s also one distinct drawback to tribal consciousness: tribal paranoia. Rumours fly about like sparks from the fire. Conspiracy theory abounds. The strongest and most often repeated on is that there are narks in their midst. Everyone who speaks on matters of strategy makes a general remark aimed at the infiltrators. “Tell your bosses there’s a demonstration planned on such-and-such a date.”
I ASK where I can sleep and am led up the hill by the light of a storm-lamp to the gloomy exterior of a large bender. I’m too tired by now to worry what might be inside (it’s all that fresh air and the fact that my fags have been blagged away twice over by now), but once the tarpaulin is lifted, I’m led into a perfect little home-from-home. There’s a huge, raised futon with a line of teddy-bears propped against the pillow, carpets over the pallet floor, clothes hang neatly from the interlaced branches that constitute the main structure of the building, and against the far wall there’s a neat little wood-burning stove.
Everything is carefully stored away in boxes. The shape finally dismantles the shaven-headed girl’s theories: definitely an ellipse. I fall asleep to the sound of heart-beat drumming.
I’m woken by the sound of the skylark ripping the sky with its exuberant cry. Now I know where that Yip! Yip! sound comes from. Someone arrives to guide me to a current action. There’s a guy perched on the arm of one of the diggers, his body squeezed under the pneumatic piston that controls it: were the digger to be used it would cut him in half at the waist. Consequently the machine is immobilised and now stands blocking the entrance to the raw gash of earth they’ve already gouged out.
There’s a lot of standing about doing nothing. The workmen and the protesters share the odd jibe. “How did you get here then? See, you can’t say you don’t need roads…” Generally the atmosphere is good-humoured. It only begins to tense when a lorry arrives carrying hardcore. One young woman tries to throw herself in its path. The action comes in fits and starts. One minute it’s peaceful, the next all hell is breaking loose, people running this way and that, security men chasing them along the banks of earth deposited by the cutting. It’s a game really. I think even the security men are pleased to have the monotony of their day broken. There’s one guy, middle-aged, with darkened features and untidy dreads, who’s main contribution seems to be running around wildly, saying, “keep it fluffy, keep it fluffy!” “Fluffy” is the buzzword around here. It seems to mean “peaceful” or, in old-fashioned hip parlance, “cool”. There’s Fluffy Pete who wanders around in orange overalls carrying a staff with a white flag who negotiates between the authorities and the protesters. He’s the self-proclaimed negotiator. There’s a Fluffy-bus. A fluffy-this or a fluffy-that. I’m told that I should be fluffy and I’m afraid I bridle at the suggestion.
But – well – fluffy it is. I wonder what the workmen think of all this?
The foreman is Welsh, a real-life Celt for a change. He’s also a poet. He’s just doing his job, doesn’t like all the aggravation. Spend his time gossiping with the protesters whenever the work is flagging and testing them on the logic of their arguments. And one of the security guards is a spirited Irishman who prefers chatting up the women to working. This is just a job for most of them, though one or two seem to get added job-satisfaction whenever there’s trouble.
But this is the moment that sums up all the ironies of this occasion for me. The official poet for the National Trust, “Boots” Bantock, arrives to congratulate the fluffy-posse on their work. He makes a speech. At the sound of his plummy, posh accent you can see the workmen visibly stiffen, their lips curling into well-conditioned sneers. This is a voice that says only one thing to them – privilege. When did he last have to go grubbing about down the job centre looking for work? What does he know of the humiliation of unemployment, the strain of keeping a family together on the dole, or the dreary regularity of a life conditioned by the clock? And for me the confusion sets in as I see how conservative the working class have become.
Everyone is too afraid to challenge anything anymore. The Revolution’s not on overtime. But nor are the workers.
Later I wander down by the watermeadows to see what’s going on. One of the Fluffies is sitting on a low wall gazing abstractly at those huge, heavy-gauge vehicles gnawing at the land and turning it to dust. He’d spoken to one of the blue-hats earlier, he told me. Do you believe that trees have spirits, he asked? Answer: “No.” Do you believe that animals have spirits? “No.” Do you believe that the Earth has a spirit? “No.” And you: do you believe that you have a spirit? Slight pause, then: “No.”
I went to interview some of the neighbours to find out what they thought of the goings-on around here. The first person I spoke to was Josephine Slater, next-door-but-one to the squat where the protesters office was at the time. She was frightened at first, she told me. But after speaking to them, she found them to be lovely people. She said: “It’s not just ravers, it’s not just travellers, it’s actually ordinary middle-class people who have realised that they’re right, who are beginning to see through the duplicity of the government.” She understood the need for some sort of direct action, she said. “The Government rules with only 43% of the vote, how else can we challenge the power of corruption?”
Mrs Slater’s neighbour was less sympathetic with the protester’s cause. He’d conducted a poll locally and found that 73% were for the road. “Local people want relief,” he told me. The present road (the A46) had tormented them since 1936. The prospective route did not really encroach upon the hill; there was less than 100m difference between the two roads, and anything it will destroy will be replaced. “We have a lot of sympathy with the principle of finding a balanced transport system,” he said, “but due regard must be given to the interests of those residents directly effected by the pollution and safety of the present A46.” As for the protesters: “people find them bizarre. Some of them appear to be less than wholesome.” Old people were scared to come out of their homes at night. “Let’s face it, there’s some there that would frighten the horses, let alone the old people.”
The guy behind the counter in the chip-shop in Lower Swainswick was completely indifferent to the whole affair. He’d heard there was going to be a supermarket, that’s all.
THERE was one person I particularly wanted to talk to, and on my last day I managed to secure an interview with Sam of the Donga tribe. She’s a lithe, powerful woman, very dark-skinned, fearsome and brave, as I saw in her actions against the machines. Whether she is really a Queen or not, there is definitely something regal in her bearing.
We sat by the fire and drank tea, while she told me about her theories. The tribe’s name is taken from the deep ruts or trackways that used to cross Twyford Down. They were worn by the tread of human feet heading for St. Catherine’s Hill, which was the principle meeting place for all the tribes of ancient Europe. In chalk downland especially, she told me, there are deep underground streams, “like the veins in my hand.” This is what people and animals are in tune with. “They’re like energy lines, and people follow them to places on the Earth where people are welcome to gather.”
In these places there’s a special kind of magic. They are sacred. In England these are the Hill Forts, many of them now under threat from the DoT’s road building programme. She has an image of the ancient world as entirely on the move: thousands of tribes treading the trackways or following the trade-routes, ships and carts and the incessant tread of human feet. But something (the ubiquitous they) wants to stop this natural urge to travel and to gather. They buried plague victims in the sacred spots. They put the sewerage works on St. Catherine’s Hill, and then they built the road.
Who are we talking about exactly? The Freemasons. They are attuned to a negative form of the same energy that the tribes worship. They are actively trying to cut off the Earth’s nervous systems. Why else are they selecting the most beautiful sites for their road programme?
Sam has many theories that are obviously part of the on-going myth-structure of the movement. She talks of astrological patterns in the landscape, crystal energy, of vast, all-embracing conspiracies; of the circular dance. I’m disinclined to believe most of it, though I support her right to believe anything she likes. But there’s one thing she says which strikes me to the very heart. “There was a time when, world-wide, everything was in total harmony, when all the stone-energy was producing euphoric ecstasy of the Earth. She loves all the lovely things that we like – you know: dancing, laughing, sex, music, the whole lot. You know that brilliant feeling when you’re in love with someone special? Well imagine being in love with the whole of the Earth, and every lovely thing in it…”
A philosophy like that doesn’t have to be true in the strict scientific sense. It’s true enough in the feelings of longing that we all share.
THE question I asked was, Does the Earth have a spirit? My answer is: I don’t know. I still think the question is worth asking though.
I had a small revelation the other day. I was looking into the high-arching branches of two particularly tall trees reaching out across a country lane to each other – a complex network of interlacing leaves and twigs like some infinitely variable mathematical formula. I saw their branches criss-crossing across the night-sky, and I had this sudden feeling that they were communicating with each other. And then it struck me: it is the arrogance of human beings to suppose that language is the only form of intelligence. It took the immense calculating speeds of today’s microprocessors to create fractal images. Look into the subtle complexity of any foliage and you’ll see that fractals have always been there.
I rang Andrew Silverman, spokesman for the DoT, and asked him if the thought the Earth had a spirit? “It is not something my responsibilities make me qualified to answer,” he said. “What does that mean?” Did he think the question was worth asking though? “I don’t understand the terms of your question. I’m not here to judge whether the Earth has a spirit or not. I’m here to answer questions on the DoT’s road-building programme.”
Halfway up Little Solsbury Hill there’s a shrine built by local ramblers as a tribute to the place. It has become a meeting place for the protesters, and people have strewn flowers all around it. There’s a carved stone buried within it. Genius Loci, it says: Spirit of Place. The man whose land this was died of a broken heart, they tell me, soon after being forced to move out. Maybe there are places on the Earth that are also places of the heart. Do we dare think otherwise?
Pictures of the Solsbury Hill protest as published in the Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2009/feb/09/solsbury-hill-protest-anniversary
Crimanal Justice Bill Film, June 15th 1994:October 14, 2022
Agnostic Imagination
I’m an agnostic. I don’t believe in anything. I don’t believe in science. I don’t believe in art. I don’t believe in religion. I particularly don’t believe in newspapers or TV or anything that’s reported on the news.
Robert Anton Wilson famously said that belief is the death of intelligence. Once you believe something you stop asking questions. You think you already know. Questions are quests for the mind. When you stop questing, you are no longer truly alive.
That goes whether you believe in something, or militantly disbelieve. Both are aspects of belief. If you say, “there is no God” you have closed the door on the possibility of ever knowing if there is one or not. You’ve already made up your mind. You’ve stopped asking questions.
As an agnostic, on the other hand, you don’t know, and you don’t pretend to know. Nothing is certain, therefore you can play. You can pretend. You can play with belief. You can use your imagination as an experimental tool.
Einstein famously came up with his theory of relativity by imaginative means. He imagined a train travelling at the speed of light and saw, from this perspective, that everything else was relative, even time.
Einstein began his experiment, firstly, by not believing. He didn’t believe in the standard Newtonian model. He was an agnostic. Had he believed he would never have bothered to question or find out.
He said, “Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we now know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand.”
Earlier, in the 15th Century, Copernicus came up with the idea that the earth went round the sun rather than the other was round.
In those days the model of the Universe was based upon the belief that the earth was at the centre of everything. By refusing to accept that belief, by taking an agnostic view, Copernicus was able to come up with a much more intellectually satisfying model of how the solar system works. We’ve been imagining that ever since.
Even more startling, not long after, in the mid 16th Century, an Italian Dominican Friar by the name of Giordano Bruno lay on his back one starry night and imagined that the stars were distant suns surrounded by their own planets.
Imagine that. What an extraordinary leap of the imagination. People hadn’t even begun to accept the Copernican model, let alone imagine the Universe as this vast, infinite space.
Giordano Bruno was burned at the stake for his agnosticism. He refused to accept the prevalent belief system at the time. He questioned the belief in eternal damnation, in the divinity of Christ, in the virginity of Mary, and in the transubstantiation of the host in the Eucharist.
At the same time he suggested that the Universe itself might be alive, and the soul might be reborn in another body by reincarnation.
Both Giordana Bruno and Kepler had read the newly discovered works of Hermes Trisemegestus dating from around the 1st century AD, which some say helped to kick start the Renaissance.
So it took something ancient, something outside the accepted view of the world, to start making people curious again.
The word “renaissance” means rebirth. It’s a new renaissance we need now as our dangerously out-of-control political and economic system is driving the world off a cliff edge into ecological disaster.
Just as Church dogma in the 15th and 16th centuries restricted imagination, so our new TV dogma does the same.
We need to start questioning again. We need to become agnostics.
Read more here.
DonateLike what you read? Please consider donating. As little as £1 would help. Details on my donations page here: https://whitstableviews.com/donate/
__ATA.cmd.push(function() { __ATA.initDynamicSlot({ id: 'atatags-26942-63492d074cf7f', location: 120, formFactor: '001', label: { text: 'Advertisements', }, creative: { reportAd: { text: 'Report this ad', }, privacySettings: { text: 'Privacy', onClick: function() { window.__tcfapi && window.__tcfapi( 'showUi' ); }, } } }); });September 18, 2022
The Blessing of the Beasts (long version)
(As delivered at the Blessing of the Beasts ceremony, September 10th 2022 on Whitstable Beach, organised by Sadie Hennessy. This is a longer version, not the version that was used, which you can find here.)
We are gathered here together, dear ones, to remember and give thanks to our fellow creatures on this earth.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
The furry ones, the finned ones, the feathered ones, the four-legged ones.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
The small ones. The large ones. The scaly ones. The warm ones.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
The clever ones. The foolish ones. The playful ones. The crazy ones.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
To all the creatures who share this planet with us, whose journey through life is as certain as our own.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
Who know love and loss just as we do. Who know savagery and kindness. Who know fear and hope and grief. Whose dreams are as real as ours. Who know peace better than we do. Who know life better than we do. For the beasts are here to heal us. The beasts are here to teach us. The beasts are here to guide us. The beasts are here to be our friends.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
For the beasts are everywhere that we are. In our parks and gardens. In our living rooms and parlours. In our walks and in our reveries. In our collective dreaming.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
For we are only beasts ourselves. Beasts with words, nothing more. Our nature is their nature. Our world is their world. Our future is their future. Our life is their life. Without them we cannot live.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
In the winter they will warm us. In the spring they will give us adventure. In the summer they will exercise us. In the autumn they will walk us home.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
In our isolation they give us friendship. In loneliness they give us companionship. In sadness they give us solace. In grief they give us love.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
For they are creatures of love just like ourselves. They know us and love us. They care for us as we care for them. They give us their love as we give them ours.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
With eyes that see and tongues that taste. With hearts that beat and blood that stirs. With senses that delight and appetites that crave. With electricity in the brain and motivation in the limbs. With all the needs that we have: in caring for them we care for ourselves.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
Bodies that grow cold and hearts that grow warm. This strange miracle we call life. This unknown unknowable. This breath that breathes us. This air that fills our lungs. This boundless sky. This earth that feeds us. This water of life. This planet that bears us, rich in its diversity. This moment in time. This appreciation of who we are, of what we are, and where we live, let us share it with our companion animals, with our familiars, with our family of friends, who cannot speak but who communicate in their different ways, who remind us of the fundamentals of our existence, and give us back what we sometimes forget, our own humanity.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
For as we give so we will receive. As we lose, so we will find. As we go so we will return. As we labour so we will rest. As we journey, so we will arrive.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
Give thanks to all our beastly friends.
And remember: we are only really beasts ourselves.
Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts. Blessed are the beasts.
In the name of the Father Sun, Mother Earth and the Breath of Life.
Forever and ever.
Ah-beast.
Donate:As little as £1 would help. Details here: https://whitstableviews.com/donate/
March 21, 2022
Review: The Sun of gOd by Gregory Sams
“Do not believe in anything simply because you have heard it. Do not believe in anything simply because it is spoken and rumoured by many. Do not believe in anything simply because it is found written in your religious books. Do not believe in anything merely on the authority of your teachers and elders. Do not believe in traditions because they have been handed down for many generations. But after observation and analysis, when you find that anything agrees with reason and is conducive to the good and benefit of one and all, then accept it and live up to it.”
Buddha
One of the many delights of Gregory Sams’ book, The Sun of gOd, are the quotes, of which the above is just one sample.
I would suggest you keep it in mind while reading this review. The fact that Greg quotes it at the beginning shows that he intends that you keep it in mind while reading his book too.
Greg has assembled a large variety of sayings and quotes and references from all over the globe, from literature and mythology and gospel and scripture, either about the Sun, in praise of the Sun, or resonant with the idea that the Sun is a conscious being.
One in particular struck me early on.
It was this, from Sitting Bull, Sioux chief. He said: “Behold my friends, the spring is come; the Earth has gladly received the embraces of the Sun, and we shall soon see the results of their love!”
This is indeed a truth. A poetic truth, but a truth nonetheless. Isn’t the relationship between Sun and Earth much like that of lovers? The Earth does indeed seem to delight in the warm embrace of the Sun. The Sun does, indeed, seem to impregnate her with his fire. The Earth does, indeed, give birth in the springtime, when the blossoms come to life and all the creatures are born onto the Earth. It is, indeed, to all intents and purposes, a relationship of love.
The problem with modern scientific language is that, while it can be said to be “accurate” it does not always tell the truth. In particular it does not come anywhere near understanding or explaining the meaning of relationship. If I were to describe the act of love-making in scientific terms I would be describing a physical act – as Sigmund Freud did copiously and with an almost pornographic relish in his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality – but I would get nowhere near describing the essence, the meaning of the act, still less the feeling that accompanies it.
In the case of human love we take it for granted that there is more to it than the mere physical act. This is because, as human beings, conscious of ourselves, we ascribe and allow consciousness to other human beings. So we allow that love-making is more than a mere physical act. This is clear from the terminology we use. We call it “love-making” rather than “baby-making” because we are aware that love is a major component in the act.
When we talk about the rest of the Universe, however, we do not ascribe consciousness to it on any level. Our modern philosophical standpoint is that the Universe is a great big, accidental dead thing that just happens to have thrown up this anomalous spark of consciousness that is the human race.
How vain!
What struck me about Sitting Bull’s description of the relationship between the Sun and the Earth at springtime is that it is no less true to the facts than any scientific explanation, but a great deal more true to the meaning.
It does, indeed, describe exactly how the Sun and the Earth behave in relation to each other, but it adds another component too: the notion of the Sun and the Earth as conscious beings. Beings who might know love.
This is the odd and startling basis of Greg Sams’ book, The Sun of gOd.
Well I say “odd” and “startling”, but for the vast majority of our time on this planet, this concept has not been in the slightest bit strange. In fact, the idea to which we now subscribe – that the Earth and the Sun and the Universe and everything within it are just accidental lumps of matter bumping around like Dodgems Cars without drivers, which have somehow “accidentally” given rise to the one and only beings, us, who do carry consciousness – this is the new idea on this planet. And if we look at this new idea, and see where it has got us in relationship to our planet and to the living things around us in the last couple of hundred years, I think we can see that it wasn’t such a good idea after all.
Look at our world now. Look at the pollution, the destruction, the devaluation of all life – including human life – and the elevation of an abstract concept – money – into something that controls every aspect of our lives.
So what is “odd”? What is “strange”?
Certainly not Greg’s book.
Whenever I mention it to anyone, or attempt to describe it, the reaction is the same. At best it is considered eccentric. At worst, completely insane. It takes reading the book to discover that it is anything but eccentric; and, from the perspective of this book and the ideas which it puts forward, it is our modern philosophical standpoint which is insane.
I have to admit that I was already half-open to this idea before I heard about Greg’s book. I guess anyone who has ever taken part in the psychedelic experiment must be open to such thoughts. At the very least you are aware that something is going on; something for which the normal explanations seem inadequate.
This vague feeling became crystallised for me during the transit of Venus on June 8th 2004. I don’t know what it was like on the rest of the planet, but in the South Eastern corner of England. where I live, it was burningly hot that day. Fearsomely hot. I could feel the heat on the back of my neck as I went out of the door. It was as if the transit was acting as a lens and focussing the Sun’s rays onto the Earth with more intensity than usual.
I wanted to look up at the Sun to see the transit, but knew that it would blind me.
Later my upstairs neighbour set up a binocular lens and a white card through our hall window so we could observe the transit more closely. That’s when I saw it: that tiny little black dot passing before the face of the Sun.
How insignificant it appeared in the face of the Solar disc; and how huge, how magnificent, how awe-inspiringly vast seemed the Great Sun in comparison.
Venus is not much smaller than the Earth, and yet, here it was, a mere speck, a mere mote in the eye of the Sun.
How much smaller are we then, who scuttle about on our own, insignificant little planet, all six billion or more of us, all thinking we amount to something?
And yet, paradoxically, we do. We do amount to something, being, as we are, carriers of intelligence, of consciousness. The question then is: where does this consciousness come from?
It has always struck me as slightly absurd to think that these magnificent brains of ours, so unbelievably complex, so deeply layered and unfathomable, these quantum computers, are mere accidental generators of consciousness. What for, exactly? Is the Universe really so irrational that is would create consciousness as a by-product of matter and then leave it isolated inside our skulls, never to escape; to die and to disappear with the death of the body? That seems to me to be a fairy tale with as much basis in reality as Hansel and Gretel or the Book of Genesis.
Which is to say that, like Hansel and Gretel and the Book of Genesis (both of which I admire greatly) it contains part of a truth, is a searching for the truth, but there is much, much more.
Why do we always seem to want to look at things from one direction? If these brains of ours are consciousness generators, who is to say that they are not also consciousness receivers?
And if they are consciousness-receivers, where do they receive their consciousness from?
For me the answer to that question came beaming down to me from heaven above on the day of the first transit of Venus. It came down in the form of fierce heat and life-giving radiation. It came to me in the form of light. I was “enlightened” as it were. I could feel the Sun’s rays quickening me into life, embracing my body through the atmosphere, sending chemical surges through my brain. I could hear my thoughts stirring in some far-off, hidden womb. Thoughts that arose in my brain, and which I then listened to. Some of them were definitely not my thoughts. They were too interesting to be my thoughts. If I listened carefully enough I could almost hear something new.
So that was my answer: we receive our consciousness from the Sun.
The Sun is God, I thought.
How could we ever have imagined anything else?
Greg Sams’ book is a fascinating, deeply-informed, convincing exploration of this idea: that the Sun has consciousness. It is a magnificent romp through a Universe of ideas accompanied by a wise, witty, intelligent companion. Greg manages to make more than sense of this stupendous thought. He makes it believable.
He weaves the concept into a magic-carpet of thoughts and ideas and history and science on which we then travel, across the Universe and back again. From the Big Bang to the Creation of Life. From the stars through all the interstellar vastness of space, on a beam of light. From the Sun, our Father (which art in heaven), to the Earth, our Mother, to us, their children. And it is always a joyous ride, full of interest, full of variety, well-written, easy to understand, a book that – like all great books – should help us to change our view of the world.
I can’t recommend this book highly enough.
Reviews of Sun of gOd“If you ever asked, ‘What’s life all about?’ I would recommend this… A charming and mind altering book.”
Kindred Spirit 5-star review by Gavin Whyte
“Sun of gOd is wise, persuasively reasoned, and thoughtfully written – not light reading, but rich, provocative, and worth savoring, like a fine meal. By the time we finish, Sams has served up a feast… making great contributions to the global shift in consciousness.”
New Consciousness Review
“Wonderful, clear-headed, thought-provoking material….Gregory Sams’ new book, and new way of seeing, will have a part to play in the global change of consciousness that is now, as never before, so desperately needed.”
Graham Hancock, author of Fingerprints of the Gods, Supernatural, Meetings with the Ancient Teachers of Mankind
“As one who had always been convinced that nature is both intelligent and purposeful, I was both excited and moved by this remarkable book.”
Colin Wilson, The Outsider
“Gregory Sams asserts that the Sun is endowed with intelligence and consciousness. In the brilliantly articulated chapters of this remarkable book, he also provides a provocative paradigm for understanding the self-organizing capacities of the entire Universe.”
Stanley Krippner, Ph.D., co-editor, Varieties of Anomalous Experience
“A thousand snorkelstonkers for illuminating my existence with this turbo blasting whizz into the infinite and back. What a monumental rip tide of thought – truly a marvellous book. A page turner…a life enhancing, mind provoking brain tickler…..always entertaining and enlightening. Thank you Greg“
Raja Ram, TIP, Shpongle, 1200 MICS
“An unusually insightful and well-integrated exploration of the origins of religion and the evolution of consciousness, that radically refreshes our view of the world. Simply one of the wisest, most lucid, and thoughtfully written books that I’ve ever read on spirituality.”
David Jay Brown, Mavericks of the Mind, and Conversations at the Edge of the Apocalypse
“Someday, when scientists are able to directly connect with non-human consciousnesses, they may discover that the sun is indeed a conscious being and that Gregory Sams (and numerous cultures of sun worshippers) anticipated this discovery by purely philosophical means.”
Nick Herbert, author of Quantum Reality, Faster than Light, and Elemental Mind
“Gregory Sams’ Sun of gOd is one of those most rare books, an unpretentious book of wisdom. Acute, apt quotations from sages and philosophers alone justify the book. But best of all, Gregory Sams allows us to experience his pellucid perceptions and exhilarating joie de vivre. Be careful! They might be catching.”
John Allen, Chairman, Global Ecotechnics, Originator of the Biosphere 2 Project
“Sun of gOd presents a perfectly outrageous hypothesis: The sun is a conscious, living organism residing in a thriving galactic community, thinking stellar thoughts that span the entire universe. Surely this is nonsense. Except that the more you read the more a conscious universe begins to make sense. Gregory Sams’ book is a clearly written and persuasively reasoned argument to think about the sun in a radically new and refreshing way.”
Dean Radin, PhD, Senior Scientist, Institute of Noetic Sciences
