Error Pop-Up - Close Button Must be a group member before inviting friends

Elizabeth Spann Craig's Blog, page 216

January 27, 2011

Why I Won't Take the Bait

Port--Jean-Julien Lemordant-1882-1968There is definitely a personality type out there that I'm running into more and more frequently (especially now that my following has increased on Twitter and Facebook.) This type of person is usually very bright and enjoys bringing up valid, if provocative, points on something that I've written or a link that I've tweeted.

From the way they've worded their response to the topic, it's more in the form of a challenge. It's occasionally a little on the rude side. It's clear they're looking for me to debate the topic.

And I'll write back and just agree that I can see where someone would share their point of view and leave it at that.

When I agree that a person has a valid viewpoint, an argument is usually diffused.

So, recently, a gentleman disagreed with something that I'd tweeted (regarding a post I hadn't written, but that I'd shared.)

As usual, I wrote back and mildly said that I could see where someone might share his opinion (being, as I always do, careful not to state my own opinion.)

He wrote me back: "It's not as much fun when you won't argue the point!"

Do any of us benefit from getting into arguments or debates on Twitter, Facebook, or any other forum?

Here's why I won't take the bait:

I know there is more than one way to look at an issue.

I don't like confrontation.

Something that starts out on the friendly side can deteriorate.

I have more to lose than I have to gain.

I don't have time to argue.

I don't care enough to argue.

It doesn't matter to me if I'm right or not.

There is no way I will come out looking good from an argument.

I don't gain anything from being argumentative.

Words live forever online.

I've heard several stories from authors that they had an email from their publisher over a political position the writer took on their blog or an ill-advised argument they had online. I have no desire to get in hot water with my publishers. In some ways I represent them, too.

Do I really want, ten or twenty years from now, my kids to be able to access a pointless argument I had online when I was having a bad day? Or my grandchildren even? This stuff stays out there.

One of the reasons I'm blogging and active in the online community is because I'm interested in hearing a variety of different approaches and ideas from different writers. In fact, I really want to be saturated with these ideas, because that's how I grow.

So I won't take the bait—I'm more interested in hearing your argument than in being right.

Have you ever gotten baited online? (I'll admit to hoping for a 'yes' answer because I'm starting to think it's just me!)

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 27, 2011 21:01

January 26, 2011

Knowing What Trips Us Up

La Méditation by Domenico Feti -1589 - 1624Tuesday, I was going through my daughter's weekly folder of graded school papers--parents are supposed to review the papers, help the kids with any problem areas, and sign that the folder has been checked.

Everything looked great until I saw a writing project paper that stopped my quick flipping through the pages. There were red marks all over it, which was unusual. And my daughter's writing looked different.

She ordinarily has a fun, and breezy writing voice. This writing was stilted and forced.

Even her handwriting looked different. It was very formal and stiff. There were perfectly-formed letters as if she'd tried to do calligraphy instead of the messier writing I see when she's in the flow and is trying to put her ideas down on paper.

What on earth had happened?

I really didn't want to approach her in a critical way (especially with this particular subject and coming from me), so I was just clearing my throat and figuring out what to say when she saw me holding her paper and burst into tears. Which was the last thing I wanted, of course.

They'd started a new creative writing program and the grading was going to be very strict, she said. She pointed out the rubric grid that was stapled to the back of the paper. The rubric was detailed, with four sections detailing what the paper would be graded on… from mechanics, to content, to neatness.

And she'd totally freaked out.

Honestly, it really had little to do with the assignment and a lot to do with her. I'm just completely delighted to see creative writing taught in public school at all, honestly. And it is time to really focus on getting the mechanics perfected….she's nine years old.

For her, though, it messed her up to look at this rubric while she was writing. When I suggested that , in future, she make a rough draft first and then make corrections in the second draft, she was all smiles.

Apparently, she's her mother's child. :) It makes me freeze when I think too much about the mechanics of my writing while I'm being creative.

For other writers, it's completely the opposite. Seeing all the typos and other mistakes in the first draft distracts some writers so much that they can't move forward until the mistakes are corrected first.

There's really so much advice out there on writing. Much of it is contradictory because it's what works for that particular writer—and each writer is different.

I wish there was a faster way to know what works as a writer, but I know it took me ages to figure out if I was an outliner or a pantster, if I could research as I wrote or if I needed to wait, or if I should edit as I wrote or at the end.

I tried each method and just paid attention if it was a struggle or not. I noted if I stalled when it was time to write or if my writing was really unnatural and stilted—and then I tried something else.

I'm always looking for ways to be a better writer. And I think I'm still looking for ways to have a better writing process. I probably just need to stick with what works and leave it alone. :)

Have you learned what trips you up as a writer? And what works for you?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 26, 2011 21:01

January 25, 2011

Encouraging Reading

Where the Sidewalk EndsFirst up, thanks so much to everyone for their reception of the Writer's Knowledge Database yesterday. I really appreciate it and am so glad you found it helpful! Please continue sending in any suggestions you've got for the resource.

My post today goes a little off my usual topics, although I think it's still very important to writers…it's about encouraging children to read.

It's hard for many of us to imagine, because we were probably all avid readers when we were kids. But I have parents emailing me every month asking me for book recommendations or general recommendations for getting their children to read.

I'm lucky that both of my children enjoy reading. But I work hard talking to classrooms and other parents to try to encourage kids to read. There are so many other distractions these days and I want to ensure that there's a next generation of readers and writers.

Again, this is an area where I'm not an expert, but something that I feel strongly about. While I was a traditional reader as a kid, I'm happy to think more outside the box in order to loop in new readers. If I'm talking to a school or a Scout group, I'm going to think of as many ways to tempt readers as I can. These are my tips and thoughts for encouraging kids to read:

Put books everywhere. I've even been known to stick Popular Science on the coffee table in front of the Xbox when my son's friends are over. They will definitely leaf through it.

Scan book blogs to find YA releases and what's hot for juvenile literature. Sometimes if their peers are reading the newest, coolest book it might pique their interest. And then maybe they'll move on to other things.

Shel Silverstein for the kid who won't read a book straight through.

Try non-fiction for the reader who can't seem to get into a novel.

Challenged readers? Give them a book above their reading level…maybe a Harry Potter. And download the book onto your Ipod or MP3 player..and let them follow along in the book and gain confidence (and an increased vocabulary.)

Look for 'Best of 2010 (and other years) lists. You'll find an amazing list of recommendations for different types of books for children (and adults, too) at this site: Largehearted Boy.

Graphic novels have come a long way. You can now find beautiful graphic novel versions of major classical works, even. And there are series like the Bone series that create whole worlds for kids to explore.

Not getting anywhere with books? See if a download on a Kindle makes reading more interesting.

Pick up some picture books. I bring picture books home from the library every time I go and just leave them on the kitchen table. The kids (who would definitely say they're too old for picture books) will still read them with a lot of enjoyment, savoring the pictures and words.

Sometimes reading aloud to children every night is the best or only solution to get them interested in a book. I've gotten my kids started several times on books that initially didn't appeal to them by reading the story to them, then handing the book over when I got to an exciting part.

Magazines for children and teens are another way to sneak in some more reading for reluctant readers.

Know what your child most likes to read. And for the most reluctant of readers, know what they will read. Is there just one particular book that they really enjoyed? Look up that book on Amazon and books similar to that one will crop up in their "Customers Who Bought This Item Also Bought" section.

Any other ideas or tips for encouraging our future readers to read?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 25, 2011 21:02

January 24, 2011

A Search Engine for Writers

Writer's Knowledge Base graphicGoogle doesn't always deliver.

If you want to search for information on POV, try plugging the term into Google.

The top sites returned for POV are a video that PBS made (which isn't on writing POV), a couple of definitions by Wikipedia (several of which have to do with automobiles), a racy YouTube video, and some freeware.

That's right—nothing to do with the craft of writing.

When I started subscribing to writing blogs, I did it to access in-depth information on the writing craft—written by working writers and industry professionals.

After amassing a huge (1587 and growing) number of writing blog subscriptions, it occurred to me that other writers might be interested in the same type of information….and that maybe they didn't know where to look.

That's when I started tweeting the info I found.

Realizing that not everyone was on Twitter, I started sharing the links, weekly, on my blog.

Still, the fact that the links weren't easily searched bothered me. What if there was a writer who didn't need that great link on book marketing now. Maybe they needed an agent post on penning the perfect query. Would they just miss out on the marketing link since they wouldn't need it for a while? Would they bookmark it for later and end up with a ton of bookmarks?

I put a couple of pages up on my blog to try to archive the links and make them, to some degree, searchable. Still, the searching wasn't particularly efficient.

I mentioned on my blog one day, "I'm sure there's got to be a better way to do this, but I can't think of it."

Enter Mike Fleming, software engineer.

Mike knew exactly how to make the links searchable—create a specific search engine for writing links. He emailed me to bat the idea back and forth with me (actually, it was more of a one-sided tennis game, since he's way over my head in terms of technology.)

But I loved the idea of a free resource for writers. A way for writers to access information that would help them write better books or articles.

After a lot of work on Mike's part, the Writer's Knowledge Base was created.

As Mike stated on his blog:

The search is done instantly over thousands of writing-related articles ranging from character development to author promotion on social media. Unlike Google, all of the results are relevant to you as a writer. They may not all interest you, of course, but at least searching for "plot" will bring back articles on how to plot your story and not news articles on terrorist plots.

Mike has also included a fun feature where a writer can browse the links and find random writing-related articles.

Who are the authors of these blog posts? Writers, agents, editors, book marketing experts. Some of your blog posts may be included, too. Writers won't only be accessing the information they need, but they'll also be finding new and helpful blogs to follow. And Mike will continue adding the links that I uncover each week.

When you have a minute, we'd love for you to give it a try. What do you think? Please tell us what you like, what you'd like to see added, and any ideas or thoughts you have. You can comment on either of our blogs, email me at elizabethspanncraig (at) gmail.com or Mike at mike.fleming (at) hiveword.com.

And feel free to spread the news. I'd love for this to be a real resource for writers.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 24, 2011 21:01

January 23, 2011

The Little Things

IMS00173I wrote a post on this last year, but it's a topic that has cropped up again for me.

I tweet a ton of different writing blogs on many different topics. I've subscribed to blogs that have nothing to do with my particular area of interest (graphic novels, scriptwriting, etc.), but which I think other writers might find interesting or helpful.

A couple of times in the last couple of weeks, I've gotten direct messages on Twitter from users about typos in different writing blogs that I've tweeted.

One tweeter said that they just couldn't finish reading the writer's article at all because they were so distracted by the typos. It made me pull that blog post up again on my computer and look at it with a more critical eye.

The post's content was very helpful, I thought. The writer had a refreshing take on the writing craft and sound tips to follow that could prove useful to someone facing the same issue with their writing.

I did see typos. And there was even a pretty flagrant typo in the post's title. Was it distracting? English Major Me would have said yes. And it still distracted me a little…but not enough to keep me from tweeting the post because I found it useful. That's because I was searching for content.

The second time was a couple of days ago and I got a direct message from a tweeter. She said sadly that she wished typos didn't bother her…but she couldn't seem to stop being bothered by them. I pulled up the blog post for the writing blog she'd referred to. I skimmed the author's blog, then skimmed it quickly again. Finally I saw it…due instead of do. Homonym issue.

Again, that person's blog post was worthy of tweeting…this tweeter was being especially picky. The post was a list of archetypes found in a particular genre. I hadn't seen a post like that and knew that people who wrote that genre would find it interesting.

Typos happen. I think some writers don't have an especially wonderful grasp of spelling, either. And some could use a grammar brush-up. I was an English major and am the daughter of an English teacher, but-- I still have typos, especially in blog posts, which I tend to write quickly. I do put more time into my manuscripts, as do other writers, I'm sure.

So…the question is, how picky are agents and editors? If just random writers on Twitter can get badly tripped up by spelling, grammar, and carelessness, how badly do the gatekeepers get tripped up by reading it?

I think, if the mistakes are flagrant, they can be distracting, no matter how good the content is. It would be like a person arriving at a job interview in a really inappropriate outfit—maybe they're an excellent candidate for the position, but the fact they showed up in torn jeans and a rock band tee shirt makes the interviewer think twice.

Former Writer's Digest publisher and editorial director, Jane Friedman, wrote in a post last summer entitled "Why I Don't Care About Grammar (and Why You Should Stop Worrying") Jane's main point was that perfect grammar didn't necessarily mean good writing.

I agree with her and I think, in my small way, proved that we can become immune to typos, etc., in the search for good content when I became temporarily oblivious to the mechanics of the interesting posts that I tweeted.

But still, I think about all the competition out there. I wonder what goes through an editor's mind when she sees two equally good manuscripts—but one needs a heck of a lot more editing (which equals more time and money) than the other. And I think about the poor impression someone makes when they show up at a job interview in torn jeans and a rock band tee shirt.

Janice Hardy had a nice post about areas every writer should be familiar with—great summary.

With spelling and typos, I think you just have to be super careful to check your work. And not just with the spell-check program on your computer, either—it won't catch a homonym problem.

Here are some other resources that might be helpful:

Grammar, Punctuation, Mechanics, etc.:

Online guide to grammar and writing
Daily Writing Tips
Grammar Girl
The Grammarphobia Blog
Mighty Red Pen
Crystal Clear Proofing

Usage:
Common Errors in English Usage

Style:
The Chicago Manual of Style Online
The Elements of Style

Some writers might benefit from the help of independent editors. I know there are several who frequently comment here, including Helen Ginger, Marvin Wilson, Crystal from Crystal Clear, and Victoria Mixon.

How easy is it for you to ignore others' typos? And, are there resources that you've come across that you'd like to share?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 23, 2011 21:01

January 22, 2011

Twitterific

Terry3_thumb[1]Here are writing links that I've posted to Twitter for the past week.

If you're looking for a particular topic, just plug in your keyword into the search box at the top left-hand corner of the blog (on the black header right above my blog name…next to the Blogger symbol…the small search window is next to the magnifying glass) and the roundup with your subject will come up. To narrow your search down on the page, do a CTRL+F, type your subject, and hit enter.

I'm also archiving these posts in what I hope is an easily searchable format—if you look at the Twitterific tabs under the blog's heading, I'm posting the links there, too.

Steampunk Archetypes: http://dld.bz/GVR2

When Is a Story Worth Writing? – Part One: http://dld.bz/Hbg7 @JamiGold

The Process of Creation – Here's a Concept: http://dld.bz/GV5j @JustusRStone

Getting a new idea: http://dld.bz/GV4g

Editing by instinct and some tips to distance yourself from your manuscript: http://dld.bz/HbfT

Don't Show Up In Overalls: http://dld.bz/GV3Q

Failed at Installation: http://dld.bz/GV3J

6 Steps to Fight Content Theft: http://dld.bz/GV3B

The app I use to schedule my tweets ahead of time is down for scheduled maintenance. Tweeting will resume after SocialOomph is back up. :)

Myst. Lov. Kitchen: Cream Scones: A Theme and Variations http://bit.ly/eK2beJ @CleoCoyle

Intern Tips: Query Edition: http://dld.bz/GSFg

Love's labour's located: how one writer plotted Shakespeare's London with an iPhone app (Guardian): http://dld.bz/GSEX

The 4 stages of writing--in comic form via @inkygirl: http://dld.bz/GSDE

Mystery writers guide to forensics--forensic linguistics: http://dld.bz/GSxP @clarissadraper

Quick editing tip for rewriting weak scenes: http://dld.bz/GSwg

Character building tips from King's "On Writing": http://dld.bz/GSve

Resistance is futile: 10 ways you can find NOT to write that novel: http://dld.bz/GV5E @ziggykinsella

Thoughts on realistic sexual tension for your book: http://dld.bz/GSuM

A tip for adding realistic tension to your book: http://dld.bz/GSut

Best Articles This Week for Writers 1/21/11: http://dld.bz/GV4r @4kidlit

Taming Time—Practical Tips to Increase Writing Productivity: http://dld.bz/GSsV

Barnes & Noble makes small -- or big? -- exec changes: http://dld.bz/GV3s

Insufficiently challenged heroes: http://dld.bz/GSs6

How to Find a Direct Line to Your Readers: http://dld.bz/GSsn

How to Feature Your Book on Your LinkedIn Profile: http://dld.bz/GSsc

When Social Media Becomes a Time-Suck: http://dld.bz/GSrG

Making your super characters extraordinary: http://dld.bz/GSqT @cvaldezmiller

10 ways to be awkward at a writers' conference: http://dld.bz/GSqe

The part that a lack of perspective and perception plays in creating crime fiction victims: http://dld.bz/GSzx @mkinberg

How Do You Know if Your Writing is Getting Better? http://dld.bz/GMPA

Why You're Only 1/4 of A Writer And How to Make You Whole Again: http://dld.bz/GMPu

Rediscovering the fun in our fiction: http://dld.bz/GMNN

Reading like a Writer: http://dld.bz/GMNe

Myst. Lov. Kitchen: Vegetarian Split Pea soup http://bit.ly/f64jeW @CleoCoyle

Advice From An Editor: The Three-Word Non-Magic Formula: http://dld.bz/GMFW

B&N lending features are disappearing: http://dld.bz/GMA6

Is It Just Too Much to Ask of an Author? (Huff Post): http://dld.bz/GJm9

Writer's Platform Vs. Writer's Foundation: http://dld.bz/GJmv @HeatherMcCorkle

8 Tips To Launch Successful Challenges at Your Blog: http://dld.bz/GJfU

How original do you have to be? Writing for a market: http://dld.bz/GJfJ

Links addressing whether our manuscript is ready for querying: http://dld.bz/GJdW @bluemaven

The difference between "pitch" and "query": http://dld.bz/GJd9

6 Mistakes That Make Your Website Look Like a 1970s Kitchen: http://dld.bz/GJd6

RT @KMWeiland Need to brush up your grammar? Useful site for a crash course: http://tinyurl.com/94rou

Formatting Your Manuscript – 25 Lines Per Page: http://dld.bz/GHtM @jhansenwrites

SFF and the Classical Past, Part 1: Atlantis: http://dld.bz/GHtb

Writers' group etiquette: http://bit.ly/grDtrM

Self-Editing for Writers: Part 1, Mechanics: http://dld.bz/GHqD

Steps toward establishing a writing habit: http://dld.bz/G7Ne

5 Tips for Freelance Mentor Relationships: http://dld.bz/G7MD

Authors, don't take offense at changes your editor & production team make to your book: http://dld.bz/G7Mp

How to Optimize Your Blog for Google: http://dld.bz/G7Fw

An agents says--Be Careful Over-working Your Story. You Will Never Finish: http://dld.bz/G7Fp

Blog design counts-- tips on what to avoid: http://dld.bz/G7Fb

Steampunk thoughts: the novels of Felix Gilman: http://dld.bz/GxKD

Myst. Lov. Kitchen: Leftovers and Editing http://bit.ly/fV6s3V @CleoCoyle

Do-Overs: 10 speculative fiction books that got major rewrites after they were published: http://dld.bz/GxKe

How to be a Writer and Have a Life: or, Livin' the Dream: http://dld.bz/GxMk

Trying to Explain Characterization: http://dld.bz/GxKS

Writing The Next Book: http://dld.bz/GxJ3

How blogging helped one writer find an agent: http://dld.bz/G7Aa

The Increasing Importance of the First Chapter: http://dld.bz/G7AR

Need inspiration? A coffee break for writers: http://dld.bz/GBqK @elspethwrites

Developing a Unique Voice - Links, Tips, and a Useful Tool: http://dld.bz/G7AC

Interesting post on narrative distance: http://dld.bz/G6cD

What your writers block may be telling you: http://dld.bz/G6b7 @flawritersconf

Unknown and unpublished: enjoy it while it lasts: http://dld.bz/G6aK

Finding--and Leading With--Theme: http://dld.bz/Gy7R

Free Books Aren't Free: http://dld.bz/GxGH

Setting the Right Tone for Your Story: http://dld.bz/GxGn

Branding: The Secret to Selling More Books (Huff Post): http://dld.bz/GxFY

Wikipedia is the non-fiction writer's best friend (Guardian): http://dld.bz/Gxb7

Foreign Rights: Not for the Faint of Heart: http://dld.bz/Gxbc

Edgar Nominees 2011: Mystery Writers of America: http://dld.bz/G6jk @janetrudolph

5 Reasons to Tackle Freelance Projects You Don't Love: http://dld.bz/GxaY

Is the Print-and-Pray Model of Book Publishing Dead? http://dld.bz/GxaV

Each scene in our book needs to earn its keep: http://dld.bz/G5Cz @authorterryo

Should I Mention My Blog in My Query? http://dld.bz/GwZP

With All the Hype, Is Self-Publishing Really for You?: 5 Questions to Ask Yourself (Huff Post): http://dld.bz/GtBN

Beat Procrastination With a Stopwatch: http://dld.bz/GtB3

Myst. Lov. Kitchen: Combatting the Weather With a Southern Favorite—Goulash! http://bit.ly/gFl4no @CleoCoyle

Critiquing with grace and a little panache: http://dld.bz/GsP9

Reject the "New Rules For Writers" (Huff Post): http://dld.bz/GsPm

The 2 Guaranteed Ways to Ruin Your Novel: http://dld.bz/GsNY

An agent with conference tips: http://dld.bz/GsN4

One writer's experience with Amazon's Breakthrough Novel Award process: http://dld.bz/GsE3 @hartjohnson

A Writer's Quick-fix Toolkit: http://dld.bz/GsNb @jammer0501

More Cuts at Borders (Publishers Weekly): http://dld.bz/GxHw

Showing your characters' emotions through dialogue: http://dld.bz/GsFr @Paize_Fiddler

Editing made easier: http://dld.bz/GsPK

How Authors Move Their Own Merchandise (Wall St. Journal): http://dld.bz/GxF3

The Writing Process: From Idea To Print: http://dld.bz/GnHR

The Snowball Effect of Social Media: http://dld.bz/GnHM

Finding Book Endorsements: http://dld.bz/GnHn

Non-Fiction–The Road to Becoming an "Expert": http://dld.bz/GnGT

What Makes a Hero: http://dld.bz/GnGC

Me or You? Choosing Between First and Third POV: http://dld.bz/GnFR

A litmus test for your opening scene: http://dld.bz/GkGx

6 Common Dialogue Mistakes to Avoid: http://dld.bz/GkuZ

The Problem - and Reality - of Adding -LY: http://dld.bz/GkuV

Why one tweeter says 'no' to RTs: http://dld.bz/Gkut

Combining characters: http://dld.bz/Gkud

Looking back on past writing goals and tweaking them for the future: http://dld.bz/GktF

Myst. Lov. Kitchen: The Particular Happiness of Orange Cake by Cleo Coyle http://bit.ly/f1n2xY @CleoCoyle

4 business moves you'll never regret, as a writer: http://dld.bz/Gh2V @wendypmiller

Writing children's fantasy--what sets it apart from other fantasy: http://dld.bz/GksS

An interesting journey--one writer goes from self-published success to agented author: http://dld.bz/GkkD

Authors weigh in on being published by small presses (and thoughts on distribution): http://dld.bz/GkgT @LadyGlamis

Keeping characters real by allowing them to be moody: http://dld.bz/GnMc @elspethwrites

Know thy hub: http://dld.bz/Gkg5

NPR's new short fiction contest is on (LA Times): http://dld.bz/GnJS

The best practices list--for writers: http://dld.bz/Gjfz

How to write a press release for your book--8 tips: http://dld.bz/Gjfj @alexisgrant

The Neil Gaiman master class for writing--headhopping vs. POV shifts: http://dld.bz/Ghyk @SimonCLarter

The Cons of a Freelance Career: http://dld.bz/GaAH

How to Write a Synopsis When You Have Lots of Characters in Your Story: http://dld.bz/Ga9J @chucksambuchino

New Rules For Writers: Ignore Publicity, Shun Crowds, Refuse Recognition And More (Huff Post): http://dld.bz/Ga9r

An additional post on openings--defining our characters at the start of our book: http://dld.bz/GkjM @p2p_editor

Openings: In the Beginning . . .: http://dld.bz/Ga8Y

Lessons from the Slushpile: Good vs. Great: http://dld.bz/Ga8N

Be Focused, Be Prepared, Be Committed – Steps to Take Before Hiring a Publicist: http://dld.bz/Ga7g

40 tips to become more productive: http://dld.bz/Ga6Y

Edits vs. Revisions: One on One Death Match: http://dld.bz/Ga3f

How to Make Powerful Connections Through Social Media: http://dld.bz/Ga2G

Jospeh Conrad – A Writer Must Believe: http://dld.bz/Ga25

5 desk exercises for writers (or others who are attached to their desk): http://dld.bz/Ga2z

Myst. Lov. Kitchen: Winter Salad with Black-Eye Peas and Spinach http://bit.ly/f26GZg @CleoCoyle

Avoid this "writing contest": http://dld.bz/Ga2h

Trade magazines for writers: http://dld.bz/Ga2b

3 fixes to make your first novel fly: 1 – hook your reader by the head AND the heart: http://dld.bz/GazX @dirtywhitecandy

Why ebooks cost so much: http://dld.bz/GazT

10 Steps for Working Past the "This Stinks" Blues: http://dld.bz/GazM

What the powers-that-be think about DRM, and an explanation of the cloud: http://dld.bz/GazA

One reader's top 10 paranormal picks for 2011: http://dld.bz/FSfq

Creating empathy for your characters: http://dld.bz/FSfe

How to create a podcast: http://dld.bz/FSeU @thecreativepenn

Tension vs. Just Plain Old Annoying: http://dld.bz/FSeE

Using Setting to Help Build Your World: http://dld.bz/FSe7

How novels came to terms with the internet (Guardian): http://dld.bz/FSem

America's most literate cities: http://dld.bz/FSdG

Myst. Lov. Kitchen: Welcome Our Guest Blogger Terry Odell: What's in a name? + Honey and Orange Glaze... http://bit.ly/fUvLGJ @CleoCoyle

When the Bookshelves Spilleth Over: Ideas and Links for Book Donations: http://dld.bz/FSdv

Creating unforgettable settings--world building: http://dld.bz/FSdn

An illustrator's process in the spotlight: http://dld.bz/FSdh

An agent believes that writers who don't read their reviews limit their potential for growth: http://dld.bz/FNpD

Let's call the whole thing off: http://dld.bz/FNpr @sarahlapolla

This post rates a rare 2nd tweet from me...just b/c I think it's an easy, clever method for deep POV: http://dld.bz/F8j7

Ways to go from Plod to Plot: http://dld.bz/FNnA

Writing like it's a game of chess: http://dld.bz/FUbY @JustusRStone

Literary tattoos (Guardian): http://dld.bz/FNnx

Tips for making your writing sparkle: http://dld.bz/FRMR

The use of artistically-arranged crime scenes in mysteries: http://dld.bz/FT4k @mkinberg

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 22, 2011 21:01

January 21, 2011

Gut Editing

img-013A couple of days ago I was at a friend's house, dropping off some craft supplies for the Girl Scout meeting. I was in a hurry, as always, made my goodbyes, jumped in the car, turned the key in the ignition…and nothing happened. And I mean nothing. It wasn't like the car even tried to turn over…and I'd just been driving the darned thing minutes earlier.

I can do a few things with a car—I can change a tire, add some oil…but I'd probably just call AAA auto club to come and do those things, since we have a membership. I had a feeling this problem was battery related so I popped open the hood.

My friend and I looked at the engine dubiously. Finally, I noticed that there was a cable that was kind of flopping around. I frowned at it. "That couldn't be right, could it? Some cable not connected to anything?"

My friend said, "You know, I think that's supposed to clamp onto the battery. See? It's got a red cover on it and there's the green one."

Ahh. I hooked it onto the battery terminal, or whatever it was. I jumped into the car and it started right away.

I know very little about cars, but I do know when something doesn't look right.

I've focused a lot on editing this week, probably because I just finished a slew of it recently. Now I'm back in the creative part again, but the editing still lingers in my mind. So my mind jumped right back to editing as I hurried back home.

I think that sometimes we can overthink the editing process. It seems so daunting (or boring) sometimes, but really…all it boils down to is that we're searching for something that doesn't look right.

Now the car engine was completely unfamiliar to me, so my eye went right to the thing that didn't look right. But with a manuscript, we've been working so closely with our words that it can be hard to get that distance.

Ways that we can distance ourselves enough from a manuscript to find the things that don't look right?

Time: You can put your manuscript down for as much time as possible, then return to it.

Reading aloud: This is a method that I use and it does help quite a bit.

Change of scenery: I really don't know why this works, but it does. If I've written the majority of the book at home, then I'll go to the coffeehouse to edit it, or vice versa.

Different font: I've heard this trick before, but haven't used it. Some swear by putting your manuscript in a completely different font for editing.

What gives you the distance to see when something doesn't look right?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 21, 2011 21:02

January 20, 2011

Quick Editing Tip

Pierre de Nolhac , conservateur du musée de Versailles by Henri Girault de Nolhac--1884 - 1948Microsoft Word 2010 and I have not been getting along, unfortunately. I've been very good to back up, as well as to save work as I go…but I've still experienced data loss.

Yesterday I was writing, carefully hitting 'save' at the end of each paragraph—and Word froze right before the end of a long paragraph. So I lost the sentences.

It wasn't a lot of text lost, but it was enough to make me take a 30 minute break in irritation. :)

When I sat down again to rewrite the paragraph, I tried to capture the feeling and gist of the previous paragraph. I'd written quickly and I couldn't remember my exact word choice.

I used different phrasing and I think the order of the sentences was different—and I know it reads a lot better than what I'd originally written.

I'd kept only my vague impression of the old paragraph. I had the gist of the scene but rewrote it in a fresh way.

This was accidental editing (that I sure wasn't planning on doing yesterday), but I've used the technique on purpose when editing manuscripts before.

Each draft of every manuscript I've worked on has had a mixture of strong and weak scenes.

When reading the first draft, I'll mark scenes that stand out as weak with a comment to myself in the margin, using Word's commenting feature.

After I've finished my read-through, I'll rewrite the weak scenes without looking at them. Well, I'll do a really fast read-through, to get the gist of the weak scene, but not a close-enough reading to be able to remember specific word choice.

The end product is nearly always much better than the old version.

I've found that if I'm looking right at the sentences that need to be edited, I tend to use the same phrasing…phrasing which obviously didn't work and which resulted in the weak scene to begin with.

Have you tried doing blind rewrites of a scene, page, or paragraph? How did it work for you?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 20, 2011 21:01

January 19, 2011

How Original? How Edgy? Writing for a Market

One exhilarating thing about writing is that there are so many choices for our story.

When I'm working on the Memphis Barbeque series, the plot possibilities are endless. There are dozens of possibilities for story direction, new characters, and character development.

What I do know when I start writing, is that the book will be set in Memphis. There will be at least one murder (and probably two.) Much of the story's activity will be centered around a barbeque restaurant.

There will not be a lot of profanity, excessive gore, or over-the-top violence.

The lack of profanity, gore and violence is because I know my genre and my readers—and I respect them. I'm writing for a particular market...and readers who might not buy my next book if they're disappointed by a radical departure from cozy norms. Check out these posts from Margot Kinberg (she explains that these subgenre categories help readers find the kinds of books they want) and Alan Orloff (writers should know their audience and the conventions that audience expects.)

The story's setting, the murders, and the centering around a restaurant is due to the series' branding and the expectations of my publisher. This is how we're marketing the series—it's set in Memphis, Tennessee which is a vibrant city known for its barbeque. The series is a culinary mystery series.

When I signed the contract for the series, I agreed to certain conditions. My publisher paid me an advance on the books that I hadn't written yet, and in return I promised to produce something that they could market and put on the shelf—that fit the parameters of the genre.

I was on Twitter the other day and someone sent me a message. They were interested in my agent's name because they had written something that "had never been done before."

I know that many unpublished writers say that they want to write a book that is unique and really stands out from the crowd…or the slush pile.

Of course you should write the book you want to write. The one with the characters that talk to you all hours of the day and night, begging for more lines.

But, if you're looking for publication, I don't think you have to go wildly original. And you don't have to push the boundaries or be really edgy to stand out.

In most genres, there's an audience for what's considered standbys for the genre. And what you see on the shelves in those genres represent, for the most part, what works. What people want to read, what they're talking about and sharing with each other.

It's great to have the breakout novel that defies definition. I think many of us have a book like that in us.

But I think there's a lot to be said for following industry guidelines for a genre and delivering something that can easily be marketed and sold. The type of book that readers of that genre genuinely love to read.

What makes your book unique and not the same as every other fantasy or YA book or mystery out there? Your characters and your voice.

So, if it's the edgy, breakout novel that resists labeling is the one that's asking you to be written, definitely write it.

But don't feel like that's the novel you have to write. There's plenty of room for the old standards. For the kinds of stories that people go back to. For comfortable reads. For what works.

I think it's great to wow an agent or editor with your unique voice and your amazing characters. I don't think you necessarily have to forge new territory with a radically different or edgy plot.

And maybe…once you've established yourself in the industry with with reliable sales, you can more easily find a home for something really unusual or unique or edgy.

I know there are folks who feel otherwise, though, like the man who contacted me on Twitter. What do you think? New territory? Old standards? Which do you see making its way through the slush pile easier?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 19, 2011 15:15

January 18, 2011

Keeping Busy While You Wait

Astronomical Clock detailPatience is the trait that I admire most.

Unfortunately, it's one of the traits I'm lacking. :)

Actually, I think if I had to name my biggest fault, it would be my lack of patience. I'm always moving, restless. I have trouble sitting still…even when I write. I'll frequently "write" in my head while I'm doing housework or errands.

And publishing? It moves veryyyyy slowwwwly.

There's actually not a single area of the publishing industry that I can think of that moves quickly. Querying? Very, very slow. Contract agreements? Slow. (Usually back and forth between agent to editor a couple of times before getting to us to sign.) Edits? Pretty slow, again mostly due to the back-and-forth nature of it and the need for thought in regards to changes. Book production…oh Lord. That's the slowest of all.

Of course, it takes time to write a book, too. :) Some of the time, they're all waiting on me.

Actually, for most published authors that I know, the process is wait, wait some more, waaaait, then…hurry! Hurry! Make the deadline! Then waaaait. Then there's an insane rush around release time that lingers.

But I never think about the waiting. I'm never anxiously wondering what stage of production my book is in.

I'd ordinarily be the worst person in the world with all the waiting…except that I'm so very busy writing books and working on promoting them.

My mother sometimes will ask me, "Now when is your book coming out? Everyone is asking me!" I'll tell her it's June and she'll exclaim over the wait. And…each time I'm surprised by her reaction. It hasn't felt that long on my end. For one, I think I'm just getting used to it.

But really, it's just my busyness. Who has time to think?

Unfortunately, publishing wasn't designed with impatient types in mind.

I think, if we spend too much time thinking about the wait—particularly if we're waiting to hear back from queries—then it just makes things worse. I can't think of a single productive internal monologue that I've had when I've felt impatient and anxious. They always end up making me feel worse.

If you're waiting on something to do with publishing (queries, contracts, your release)…have you tried writing another book? What else do you do to keep yourself busy while you wait?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 18, 2011 21:02