Nimue Brown's Blog, page 187

February 4, 2020

The Consolation of History

I have read a fair few books about history and pre-history. There’s not much logic to it, my knowledge is patchy and random. My main interests are in radical history, and the lives of ordinary people. There is consolation to be found in reading history, and I’m feeling that keenly at the moment.


When you read about the lives of ordinary people – in any place or time, things are invariably a bit shit. Sometimes things are devastatingly shit. I read, and I wonder how anyone kept going in face of that. How people kept pushing for rights in face of tyranny. But they did, and when you look at grander sweeps of time, even as individual movements have often failed, there is a bit of a progress narrative and on the whole ordinary people have slowly gained more rights.


When I feel daunted and overwhelmed, I remind myself about my ancestors. All those ancestors of radical thinking who tried, and failed, and tried again. I remind myself that many, many people in history and pre-history have faced the end of their culture, their civilization, their people, their world. When I feel really grim about the state of things, I remind myself that many others have been here before me and I am not facing anything new. This helps me keep a sense of perspective.


The timescales of pre-history are good for perspective, too. We are a tiny, toxic blip in the history of humanoid life. Other humanoid species have fallen away in the past, it may be our turn now. Nothing is forever, including us.


We repeat history, whether we’ve studied it or not. We are not so very new. We are no cleverer or wiser than the people who went before us. As a species we seem able to learn some things very quickly, but the important lessons elude us – how to live well, how to live sustainably, and what purpose to make of our lives.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 04, 2020 02:30

February 3, 2020

Imbolc in nature

Round here, the snowdrops and catkins come out typically a week or two before the calendar date for Imbolc. So, if you go with the date, these seasonal markers aren’t the ones to focus on. If there are pregnant or lactating sheep in area, I don’t get to see them.


What does appear reliably at this time of year, are elf caps. These are a small, red fungi (see the video below for examples!). They have a much longer season over all, but where I live, they are absolutely something that shows up for the start of February.


The relationship between what the rest of nature is doing, and the calendar date varies according to where you live. Druidry can be a bit generic about seasonal celebration, which I think is a real weakness. We need to dig in with whatever we’ve got where we live, and make that the focus, or shift our dates so they match what the season means to us.



 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 03, 2020 02:30

February 2, 2020

The Conscientious Objector – a review

I admit I wasn’t sure how I would do with this book. I absolutely loved The Factory Girl Trilogy – review here – https://druidlife.wordpress.com/2018/05/13/the-factory-girl-trilogy-review/. Moving into a book that follows on from that but clearly wasn’t going to have my favourite character in, gave me a fair few feelings. As a younger reader I had bailed from series at times like these. Older and wiser me is more willing to have a go, and I regret nothing!


My other area of uncertainty was that this is an alternate history novel set around the First World War. It’s a period I know a fair bit about and find highly emotive. Would I be ok with WW1 re-imagined to include automata and other devices? For me, Stephen said everything that needed to be said about the grim realities of this awful war. He didn’t downplay the horrors, or sanitise anything and the bringing in of Steampunk elements did not feel disrespectful. As with The Factory Girl Trilogy, the fantastical elements were used to highlight and explore the period issues, not to write over them. And so I was as miserable in the trenches section as I needed to be.


I will freely admit that I wasn’t in the best headspace for reading anything when I read this. Normally I adore books where I have no idea what the story shape is or what’s going on. I love to be surprised. For the first three quarters of the book I had no idea where it was going, what kind of story it was, what it meant, and I flailed a bit. I think this is a book that will greatly benefit from being read in the right headspace, don’t pick it up if you want to be comforted by familiarity. However, at the three quarters mark, give or take, there is a revelation that blew me away. Suddenly the narrative crystallised, everything made sense, and I read the last quarter pretty much flat out in a state of utter delight, being frequently surprised. Read this book when you want to go on an adventure.


The underlying themes in this story are highly pertinent. This is a story about how we see ourselves, and whether we are willing to find out how others see us. This is a tale that questions the wisdom of living in an echo chamber and champions the need for different perspectives. It’s also a protest against all forms of absolutism. There are always exceptions. There should always be room for nuance and difference. When people insist there is only one truth, only one way to live, or love, or think about things, nothing good can come of it.


With war in Europe as the backdrop, this is without a doubt a book that has a lot to say about Brexit and the state of our culture, letting us view the present day from the perspective of more than a century ago.


Heartily recommended!


(And yes, that is a Tom Brown cover)

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 02, 2020 02:30

February 1, 2020

The New Clothes – a poem

We nod and agree that the Emperor


Is wearing exquisite clothes.


The best clothes.


He’s the most fashionable Emperor


We’ve ever been blessed with.


We love him.


We nod, and agree that if we are poor


It is our fault for not trying harder.


The Emperor says we would all be wealthy


If we weren’t so lazy.


When we die on waiting lists


Die on trolleys outside A&E


Die because the drugs are too expensive


For the likes of us, we nod, and agree


That the Emperor is not to blame.


We should have chosen healthier lifestyles.


When our children are driven to suicide


By the Emperor’s new exam strategy


And those who survive can’t find work enough


To live on and will never own homes


We nod, and agree when the Emperor says


It is because of foreign people.


The Emperor’s new Brexit is going well


These are the sunny uplands and if


We aren’t living the dream, we have


Only ourselves to blame – that and the Remoaners


Who ruin it all with their negativity.


We nod, and agree that it is their fault, and our fault.


The Emperor cannot be blamed if we refuse


To fulfil our true potential.


Where is our heroic urge to die trying?


Why do we not sacrifice ourselves


For the greater good? It is such a small thing to ask.


The Emperor stands before us in his


Staggeringly expensive and truly impressive new clothes


And tells us to try harder. We nod and agree.


What do we know?


No one wants to admit they can’t see his remarkable suit


Can see his sagging Y fronts while everyone else


Sees what they are told to see.


We dare not, must not say we have wondered


If the Emperor knows full well he stands before us


In just his pants while his propaganda squad


Fawn over the elegant cut of his fictional suit.


We’ve all seen him smiling.


What if the Emperor knows full well


He has no clothes on


But if we nod and agree with this


We’ll nod and agree with anything


We don’t want to look like fools or failures.


Nod and agree, suffer willingly


Work harder for our most beloved Emperor


In his oh so beautiful new clothes.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on February 01, 2020 02:30

January 31, 2020

Are we good?

One of the key underlying concepts in religion is the question of whether we are inherently good or not. There are of course various takes. Some religions or subsects of religions treat this world as inherently bad, with transcendence the only thing to aspire to. We have to overcome our sinful bodies and lives, chained to karma, or however else it’s framed, and transcend into pure spirit. We have to work at being good in order to do this.


Paganism tends not to judge us so harshly and is much more in favour of this world.


In Taoism I’ve run into the idea that humans are basically good, but that can be distorted. The aim is to get back to our natural state so that what we do is good without having it work hard at it. The person who is in tune with the Tao can just get on with things and it will all flow and work out. Effort can be the enemy of this process.


Whether we are innately good, or innately vile is a question that underpins our politics. Are we more interested in helping the needy, or stopping people abusing the system? Are we more afraid of corruption, or suffering?


It’s an interesting question to ask of yourself, as well. Do I think my nature is fundamentally good? Do I think the expression of my true nature would be the best that I could be? Do I feel tainted, fallen, sinful, loaded with karmic debt, and otherwise in need of redemption? And if I feel that way, why do I feel that way?


So often, taking pleasure in life is treated as sinful. How do we construct our ideas of good and evil in the first place? Why would joy be sinful? Why would pleasure be sinful? Why would relishing this one precious existence be some kind of moral failing? Who benefits from those ideas? What happens to us when we work very hard at denying ourselves the things our mammal bodies yearn for?


For me, being Pagan means a starting place that says we might be good. We’re probably ok. We may have the capacity for terrible things, but it’s not inevitable. There is no atonement required. We do not need saving. Wine and sex and laughter and dancing and all those things are good and to be relished, not feared. We may in fact do more good by seeking simple pleasures and joys that don’t diminish anyone or anything else, than by tying ourselves in knots trying to fight our fundamentally animal selves.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 31, 2020 02:30

January 30, 2020

Dealing with night terrors

Anxiety when it comes in the night can be particularly hard to deal with. It may be less troubling than anxiety at times when we’re more visible, but it is also harder to manage. The tired mind isn’t as easy to control. When you’re awake, it is easier to try and reason with your own panicking mind. When awake, strategies can be deployed – be that breathing techniques, or visualisations, or just leaving the building.


In the middle of the night, in your bed attire, with everyone else asleep, or perhaps alone, it is difficult to fight your way out of panic. Waking into panic is especially hard because you get no conscious warning and there is no time to deploy tools or even brace yourself.


If it happens rarely, it’s a hard thing to prepare for as well. If it comes round more often, it pays to develop a plan when you can think about it properly. Decide what you might be going to do – because when you’re sweating with night terrors and barely awake, you’ll have trouble coming up with anything useful.


I find it helps to move. If you just lie there with nothing to distract you, it is easier for the terrors to keep chewing on you. Moving your body can help ground you and if the terror is vague, just the action of getting up and drinking some water can help push it away.


If that’s not enough, I go for distraction. The internet is a great blessing to me at these times, and there’s often a friend or two from some other part of the world online in the wee small hours. Random chats have rescued me on many occasions. I find things to read. If I’m more awake, I might go for a book. There’s no point trying to reason with my brain if I’m tired, but distraction often works.


I give myself an hour. If I can’t get it under control in that time frame, I wake my chap up. I don’t like waking people up, but if the panic is too intense for me to cope with on my own, this is the better call. Sometimes a calm, sane person who can talk you down makes all the difference. In the night, my fears can be incredibly irrational, and I can know they are irrational and still not be able to challenge them. I latch onto small problems and wake up convinced that they are perilous and disastrous and it’s hard getting out of that by myself.


That said, anxiety isn’t utterly irrational even when the focus of it is ridiculous. It troubles me how CBT and other ‘cures’ start from the assumption that you have nothing to fear and need to stop being silly. Anxiety exists either because of something historical that still haunts you, or something contemporary that threatens you, or both. Taking it seriously and trying to put it into perspective is more productive than dismissing it. If the superficial anxiety seems ridiculous, it could be because something else is underlying it. It can also be hormonal, and I know much of what I’m experiencing relates to the menopause. This too is an entirely real experience that needs taking seriously, even if it is manifesting as irrational panic. It seems to come from excess stress in my waking life, even if the rest of the time I feel like I’m on top of it.


If we lived in a kinder culture, with gentler working practices, this would all be so much easier to deal with. The sleepless night would not lead to the terrible day, and that in turn would give us less to fear.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 30, 2020 02:30

January 29, 2020

Druidry and service

I first started studying Druidry about 18 years ago. Back then, I was hungry for knowledge, and hopeful about developing wisdom. I wanted something that gave my life coherence, and Druidry brought together all the things I was interested in, giving shape to my life in a way I was excited about. I joined a Grove, went to open rituals, studied with OBOD. When I started, this is something I was doing for me.


Not very far in, the idea of service as the heart of Druidry happened to me, and I volunteered for The Druid Network. For some years, it was all about how much I could give and as a person who already wasn’t good at self-care, this didn’t entirely work for me. Most of my Druidry came to be about what I did for other people – in ritual, in teaching (I’d grown up Pagan, so when I got to Druidry I actually knew quite a lot already).


I don’t really know how to do ritual for myself. It was always something I did as an act of service. I only dress the part if I’m working for someone who I think needs me to dress the part. I don’t go to events unless someone wants me to do a talk. It struck me this week that my whole approach to Druidry has been shaped, if not distorted by this sense that service is what matters most.


Most people who take up a spiritual path do so because they want to grow. They want to enrich themselves, and for Pagans, opening the door to wonder and the numinous is usually part of the mix. When I started out, that was what I wanted. I have a lot of underlying issues around not feeling like I deserve nice things, and this has no doubt played its part. So, I’m looking at my assumptions.


I don’t really ‘do’ deity and that’s in no small part because I can’t see why any deity would want to bother with me so there’s not much point asking. For years now, I’ve only held sacred space and time for other people’s benefit. I don’t dress up, because I’m not glamorous and I don’t really feel entitled to present that way – I intend to challenge this. I don’t do much pagan bling, or interior decoration because I’ve persuaded myself it’s superficial. But it’s also joyful, and I’ve not made much space for personal joy in my path, and I think I need to.


What if my Druidry was fun?


What if the study and embodying of Druidic philosophy was something I consciously did for my own benefit first and foremost?


What if I made more deliberate space for beauty and joy? What if I allowed myself to play with this and take more delight in it?


What if I stopped trying to justify my use of time in terms of how I benefit other people?


 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 29, 2020 02:30

January 28, 2020

The Art of Arguing

Online arguing is a terrible thing, miserable to be part of and is unlikely to change anyone’s mind. On the whole I’m no fan off arguments offline, either. I find debate for the sake of it exhausting. I’m blessed with a husband who negotiates, we don’t really argue at all, but that’s not much help when trying to figure out how to engage with people who disagree.


This a story about the one person I enjoy arguing with. He doesn’t argue to win, to score points or to put me down. He’s never in it to force his opinion on to me, and he never seems to think less of me for disagreeing with him. I come into these exchanges from much the same place. What we end up doing is demonstrating our individual evidence and reasoning, and questioning each other’s beliefs, assumptions and interpretations. It can be intense, but it’s underpinned by care and respect, and I have never taken damage wading in to one of these.


One dramatic round of this last summer resulted in both of us changing our minds, and coming to think in ways that were more closely aligned around an issue. Good arguing can change things.


What’s key here I think is that this process of arguing is one of seeking understanding. It comes from a desire to be understood, coupled with a desire to understand. And of course when two people start from very different places, experiences and insights, it’s easy to also start at cross-purposes. The intention to learn turns what might be a fight, into an act of collectively wrestling with ideas. That can be exciting, and takes me places I would not have gone on my own.


In normal arguments, it’s all about winning; to be heard without having to listen. When two people are determined to be heard and not interested in listening, there’s very little good can come of it. The loudest, angriest, most aggressive person will likely force the other person to give up. Truth is not served by this. Nothing useful is learned.


I’ve learned how to argue in a different sort of way. I’ve learned how to be more open and less spiky and defensive. Much more is possible if I don’t feel I have to fight my corner to avoid being crushed. I’ve learned how to co-examine ideas without fearing the consequences. When getting to the right answer is the important thing, who was initially right or wrong doesn’t have to matter at all. No one has to be made smaller if the point is a chance to learn. And if you aren’t going to be knocked down, and it is safe to admit to being wrong and to change tack, all kinds of possibilities open up.


At the same time, anyone who wants to argue for the sake of it, or to score points or play devil’s advocate, I can do without. It’s one thing if there’s an aim to provide real help by exploring different perspectives. It’s quite another to take an opposing stance just for the ‘fun’ of arguing with someone. When a person is dealing with real issues, playing devil’s advocate for the sake of arguing can be immensely cruel. With so many real things I need to figure out, I find I don’t have the time or energy for fights with people who just want to prove they are cleverer than me.


 

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 28, 2020 02:30

January 27, 2020

Druidry and Life

What does it mean to live a Druid life? For some people it’s all about the magical side, the ritual, the deities. For some years now, my main areas of focus have been eco-activism, living in harmony with the planet, and how we think about being human, and interacting with each other. I’m interested in relationships with the land, and I blog about the bard path a bit. Often, I’m not making explicit how I see what I write about as being connected to Druidry.


Part of the ‘problem’ is that if you internalise something, it becomes less a conscious choice and more the water you swim in. Making the space to explore whether the water you swim in is the water you intended to swim in is always time well spent. Making things deliberate can be a good learning process. So, I shall try and take a step back and look more deliberately at how the Druidry is manifesting in my life and what I want to do with that.


I feel at the moment that I’m paused before a time of change. I’ve been making forays with my intuition and making space to invite magic into my life. My relationship with magic, deity and ritual is a bit messy, and for many years I’ve tended towards the pragmatic and had a complicated relationship with enchantment. I crave feelings of enchantment and wonder. I know how I got here, and perhaps I do know at this point how to change things. So there may be notes on the journey as I go along.


I’m going to make a point of writing with more explicit connections between life and Druidry. I think it will give me a good way to review what I’m doing, and I think other people may find it useful. Where, exactly, is the Druidry in my life? How do I reclaim magical possibility? How do I re-enchant myself? I’m curious to see if how I feel changes if I start making the Druid side of life a bit more explicit – even if it is only in my head.

1 like ·   •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 27, 2020 02:30

January 26, 2020

The Hidden Goddess – a review

[image error]The Hidden Goddess, by Laurie Martin-Gardner explores feminine divinity in Jewish and Christian tradition. It’s a book that looks at texts, historic practice and modern interpretations and in a small space covers considerable ground.


The book is written in a narrative style, and while there are enough references that you can get in and check things if you want to, this is not an academic text. It is immensely readable and ideal for someone who just wants to get in and explore the ideas. It’s not a book claiming to have exclusive insights or unique knowledge, but it is a bringing together of sacred femininity evidence from traditions that, superficially at least, seem to lack for that sort of thing.


For me there was a mix of the familiar and the wholly unknown here. One of the consequences of reading this book is that I feel inspired to try and read the Bible and look at this for myself. I have tried to read the whole Bible before (and failed) but to go in looking for these details might make a lot of odds.


I think this is the ideal read for anyone who has moved to Paganism from a Christian or Jewish background and who wants to find ways of balancing their old path and their new one. It will also be valuable for anyone whose ancestor work has felt difficult – seeing how the Goddess has always been present in these traditions may help bridge the divide between modern Pagans and our immediate ancestors. For Christian Druids I think it’s a must have (unless you’ve already covered this ground somewhere else!).


I found it an enjoyable read that expanded my knowledge and that may have set me on a reading adventure.


Read the first chapter here – https://www.johnhuntpublishing.com/blogs/moon-books/the-hidden-goddess-chapter-one-the-quest-begins/

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 26, 2020 02:30