Josh Lesnick's Blog, page 453

June 12, 2011

it is just that easy!



it is just that easy!

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 12, 2011 16:16

Hello

There've been a lot of new followers the past couple days, either because of or in spite of all the porn. I feel like I should mention that there usually isn't this much porn. In fact, I think this is the first time there's been this much porn.


Just thought I'd say that, also more on the way!

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 12, 2011 15:46

June 11, 2011

good night :x



good night :x

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 11, 2011 22:37

I meant to get back to work on the books (by the way I have more...



I meant to get back to work on the books (by the way I have more work to do on the books… The first prepress review came in yesterday and I made a million mistakes), but I learned another thing about the reboot and so I drew this lame thing.


Honestly I don't care one way or the other regarding DC. Mainstream comics are mostly pretty bad. The only one I bought in the past 20 years was the Power Girl series. So of course, it turns out this is probably not one of the characters coming back for the reboot. Unless they go through with the sex bandits idea, I don't think I'll be buying any DC comics for the next 20 years either.


So here a quick picture of Peeg and, uh, Atlee. Before anyone says anything, this takes place two years in the future, so Atlee's 18 or whatever. I guess since these two have no official future that means we can start making up our own, right?


OK OK, back to beer, I mean work.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 11, 2011 17:02

(sshh!) little froggies!: thoughts on the new harley design

(sshh!) little froggies!: thoughts on the new harley design:

littlefroggies:



NOTE: I moved this to its own post because I didn't want it to attached to an otherwise awesome drawing, I don't want my post to get reblogged on the coat tails of that.


Thoughts on the subject since I missed that boat:


What bugs me about the new Harley design, and many others, is the fact that all these artists and writers FLIRT with ideas of sexiness and sexuality without any commitment to it. They draw ladies in sexual manners and scantily clad by default, regardless of personality or job requirements as a hero/villain.


In the end that sexiness is without any rhyme or reason and it's meaningless, soulless, and how can soulless sex really be sex anyone is interested in?


This also creates a problem when you want to introduce a character incorporating a lot of sexual overtones in their personality and work, only to blend in because that's the default anyway. How can you have a vixen versus a cute "everyday" kinda girl when all of your "everyday" girls are cookie-cutter vixens.


Either go all the way, and have the character's overt sexual theme in costume and demeaner ACTUALLY MEAN SOMETHING (Think about someone like Poison Ivy, who does use that to her advantage — and HEY, look at the OP, why couldn't you rob a bank with sex!!) or drop it all together and dress these ladies (and dudes) appropriately for their personalities and skills.


We get it, ladies have boobies. It's not a fact I'm going to forget if I can't see them — I'd like to think most of us have a grasp on object permanence



It can be hard to put into words why even a porn comic site owner like me has problems with DC doing this stuff, but Amanda puts all very nicely.

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 11, 2011 16:34

littlefroggies:

… wait doodling Daisy isn't a part of the...



littlefroggies:



… wait doodling Daisy isn't a part of the scripting process for other comic artists? Don't believe you.



uehe the axe!

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 11, 2011 15:46

special service by the masseuse
i don't draw porn for the...



special service by the masseuse


i don't draw porn for the fun of it as much as i should… :|

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 11, 2011 15:43

seriously



seriously

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 11, 2011 10:55

GOOD MORNING



GOOD MORNING

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 11, 2011 06:27

June 10, 2011

cheezyweapon:

penanggalan:

sirose:

Simply put, what helped me...



cheezyweapon:



penanggalan:



sirose:



Simply put, what helped me cement my affection for all things geeky was the fact that Harley Quinn was one of my first female action characters that was not flashing her breasts or buttocks. As a kid, seeing scantily clad ladies in comic book pages made me feel uncomfortable and I avoided superhero genres all together. I am older now, not as intimidated by the flesh as I once have been, but the portrayal of women through a man's eyes still disagrees with me.


There have been discussions about the time and place for the need of sex appeal in a story. If a man cannot be taken seriously in a teeny tiny costume, chances are, their female counterparts are not going to be taken seriously either. Megan Rosalarian Gedris wrote about it and Jess Fink perfectly assembled the thought into a compact sentence: "Women aren't asking for sexuality to be stripped from comics, we are just asking for characters that make sense to the story they are in."


And wouldn't you know it, DC just happens to release the first promo shot of Harley Quinn in her new design for the universe reboot. Perfect timing to discuss this.


I've had my fair share of complaints concerning Harley's wardrobe over the past couple of years, what with the Arkham Asylum games and the stage arena show. But little did I know that this would happen. It doesn't work on many levels. I get that DC is trying to go for a anime/manga influenced design with the over all dripping-sex-in-an-itty-bitty costume but come on! We all know her breasts are going to topple out even by a little hop and her labia will be exposed if she does a split kick. Harley is an acrobat and you wouldn't expect someone with such technique to perform in these garments. There's the issue of chaffing for one thing and doing fast actions with a pair of breasts is actually bothersome! Not to mention, the whole shrunken corset and booty short combo is overplayed and that cape is bound to get caught while she's doing crime. And let's not even try to figure out the footwear because it's probably some sort of stiletto heel.


Another design issue is while the original costume may be 'too conservative' (not) for modern tastes, the classic outfit described Harley perfectly in a simple and effective manner. I personally know many people who aren't familiar with her character but they immediately recognize her as the 'clown girl' and automatically assume she uses gags to commit a felony. If I took the above image and asked these same people who this woman was, chances are I will get something along the lines of Hot Topic, The Crow and Insane Clown Posse. That and she probably sacrifices black cats because she is so dark and demented. She is near impossible to recognize other than the diamond motif and even that isn't very prevalent.


The wonderful thing about Harley's original design is that it's inviting, welcoming even. If you saw her on the street, you wouldn't expect her to suddenly draw out a gun and steal all your money. The general public would be won over with her megawatt grin until her mallet knocked them unconscious. If you put the new Harley in a city, people would start asking if Marilyn Manson was shooting a new music video, pedestrians would avoid her all together and the police would be called. She's more intimidating and easily more suspicious than the original.


Take it from someone who has dressed up as her and I'm sure that other Harley Quinn cosplayers can testify for this as well: one of the greatest things about wearing the jester suit is that people automatically gravitate toward you. It doesn't even matter if they know you're the Joker's girlfriend or not, because there's almost always a smile on someone's face when you walk by. I'm sure it's the same for Harley-the-character which makes it even more easier for her to distract people while helping Mr. J and his goons carry explosives in a bank. That's her charm! She may look sweet but if only you knew what her real motives were.


I'm particularly wary of how the female audience will react to this new reboot. Not just from Harley's radical change but also for the other women characters in DC as well. Granted, there are more ladies partaking in the fandom these days but will this drastic turn still attract the same audience that have long fought for a better and fairer treatment on women characters? Or has DC, even mainstream comics, finally reached the point where female fans will turn their backs and walk away? And what of the new generations of little girls who, like me, don't want their favorite women characters to be just another object on the front cover?


Don't get me wrong. I love a little cheesecake now and then but when it's excessive, it makes my stomach churn. And this is one of those cases.



This, this, everything this. :I It took me a long time staring at this to realize it wasn't just some fanart from someone on deviantart who never even read a classic comic in their life. :(




(I couldn't tell either. What were they even aiming for?) :<



To be honest, I rather like this design. In general, I mean. Not as a Harley Quinn design.


Make this girl some kind of other sexy crimefighter type, and give her a male sidekick who wears nothing but a split miniskirt, and it would be completely awesome.


Anyone with me?

 •  0 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on June 10, 2011 20:21

Josh Lesnick's Blog

Josh Lesnick
Josh Lesnick isn't a Goodreads Author (yet), but they do have a blog, so here are some recent posts imported from their feed.
Follow Josh Lesnick's blog with rss.