Jane Lindskold's Blog, page 91
June 16, 2017
FF: Read Me a Story
I’m writing more than ever, but now that the garden is in, I’m finding little more time to read, or at least to listen to audiobooks.
[image error]
Wonder Kel!
For those of you just discovering this feature, the Friday Fragments lists what I’ve read over the past week. Most of the time I don’t include details of either short fiction (unless part of a book-length collection) or magazines.
The Fragments are not meant to be a recommendation list. If you’re interested in a not-at-all-inclusive recommendation list, you can look on my website under Neat Stuff.
Once again, this is not a book review column. It’s just a list with, maybe, a bit of description or a few opinions tossed in.
Recently Completed:
Murder on the Links by Agatha Christie. Audiobook. Re-read.
The Return of the Twelves by Pauline Clarke. A middle grade story about some magical wooden soldiers twisted up with the juvenilia of the famous Brontes.
The Big Four by Agatha Christie. Audiobook. Re-read.
Fleetwood Mac: The Ultimate Guide to Their Music and Legend. Rollingstone special issue. For all their money and fame, I ended up feeling this was a sad story.
In Progress:
The Secret History of Wonder Woman by Jill Lepore. A gloriously footnoted look at the people and events who shaped the development the iconic comic book character. No. I haven’t seen the movie yet! This book was actually a Christmas present I’m finally getting to read.
Black Coffee by Agatha Christie, audiobook. This audio is an adaptation by Charles Osborne of her first stage play. Mr. Osbourne is so faithful to the text that one can almost hear the stage directions in his descriptions.
Also:
Finished the current Smithsonian and am now reading the one before. Interesting article on the placebo effect.
June 15, 2017
TT: Is He In There?
JANE: Okay, Alan. We’ve expanded our agreeing to disagree about whether readers should “see” a character as “being” the author. I can’t say I’m persuaded to your point of view, but I will agree that sometimes authors deliberately put themselves in their books.
[image error]
Did He Sell the Moon?
You said you had a Famous SF Author in mind who regularly put himself into his stories. Who would that be?
ALAN: That would be Robert Heinlein, without whom there would be no such thing as science fiction as we know it today. He put a lot of his own personality, experience and beliefs into his fiction. I’m quite sure that time after time you can catch glimpses of Heinlein himself peering out at you from the pages of his stories.
JANE: Ah… But is this the readers’ opinion or the author’s opinion?
ALAN: It’s certainly not the author’s opinion. Heinlein was a very private individual who refused to engage in that kind of public speculation. I think he preferred to let the story speak for itself – and I certainly can’t criticise him for that. As far as I can tell, the most he ever said about his own work was in an introduction he wrote to Revolt in 2100: “They are just stories, meant to amuse, and written to buy groceries.”
JANE: Well, if he said that, then why do you feel so strongly otherwise?
Are there obvious clues? A name and description, like Roger Zelazny provided in The Hand of Oberon or an “in-joke” such as Kingsley Amis’s provided with One Fat Englishman?
ALAN: Yes, there are a lot of clues. In 1968 Alexei Panshin published Heinlein in Dimension, a very detailed critical analysis of all Heinlein’s stories. In it he identifies someone he calls “the Heinlein Individual” who he defines as: “…a single personality that appears in three different stages and is repeated in every Heinlein book in one form or another.”
Here is how Panshin describes the Heinlein Individual:
The earliest stage is that of the competent but naïve youngster. The hero of almost any Heinlein juvenile will serve as an example … The second stage is the competent man in full glory, the man who knows how things work. Examples of this are Zeb Jones of If This Goes On–, the secret agent narrator of The Puppet Masters, and Sergei Greenberg of The Star Beast. The last stage is the wise old man who not only know how things work, but why they work too. Jubal Harshaw of Stranger in a Strange Land is an example, and Baslim of Citizen of the Galaxy and Colonel Dubois of Starship Troopers. However these three stages as I have given them are simply the equivalents of frames cut from a movie film to serve as illustrations – the Heinlein Individual forms a continuum covering all points between youngster and wise old man.
Panshin goes on to defend this thesis in great and convincing detail.
JANE: So? Actually, these are pretty classic tropes. Even boring ones, to be honest. Nancy Drew or the Hardy Boys fit the first just as easily as any Heinlein youngster. Just about every spy thriller, Western – heck, just about any action adventure tale – has the second. And the Wise Old Man has been around since the first myth where the hero seeks guidance.
By the way, before readers think I don’t like Heinlein’s work, I do. We’ve discussed it in detail here and here. I’d certainly consider myself a fan, rather than otherwise.
ALAN: Leaving aside, for the moment, the question of whether or not the Heinlein Individual is actually Robert Heinlein himself, we can at least be certain that the characteristics of the Heinlein Individual are very important to Heinlein the writer. Why else would he use the character in story after story after story? It’s also worth saying that the Heinlein Individual is often the only character who is completely defined and well-rounded in the story. Other characters tend to be thinly drawn, barely (if at all) described and sometimes little more than set piece caricatures.
JANE: How his using them because these sort of standard characters do exactly what Heinlein claimed he was doing: Buy the groceries. They don’t challenge expectations. They provide comfort reads. Someone is In Charge and will Save the Day, no matter how complicated the problem.
I’m going to need more convincing to see these as Heinlein. In fact, right now, what I’m seeing are readers who need to identify Heinlein with his characters as a sort of security blanket that carries the fictional “comfort food” into reality.
ALAN: If that’s all there was to it, I’d be inclined to agree with you. But let’s swim out into deeper waters…
The Heinlein Individual is always very competent. Heinlein himself was supremely competent and egotistically convinced of his own competence. When he first sold a story to John Campbell at Astounding he told Campell that he would continue to submit stories to him but that, if Campbell ever rejected one of them, that would be the end of the relationship. Clearly Heinlein was firmly convinced that he was more than capable of writing stories that Campbell would want to publish.
JANE: This sounds cocky, not competent.
ALAN: It worked though…
When Heinlein decided that he wanted a rockery and water feature for his garden, he designed and built it himself with no outside help – and he claimed that carrying rocks around was a great way to lose weight!
JANE: Uh… I’ve done that, up to and including carrying rocks. Does that make me Heinlein?
ALAN: No – but it shows that you share some degree of competence with him in at least one area.
In his novel Space Cadet, the hero is given a problem in orbital mechanics to solve. One day, just for fun, I decided to tackle that problem. It turned out to be a lot harder than I’d anticipated (if I’d known how hard it would be, I probably wouldn’t have started it in the first place) but I got there in the end and discovered to my delight that the solution Heinlein presented in the book was correct. Clearly he had done the same calculation himself.
There’s no question about it – Heinlein was very competent in a lot of fields.
JANE: Or he had a friend who was… You’d be amazed at the number of hard SF writers who use outside resources. There’s no shame in that. In fact, it’s good science – and great science fiction. Honestly, any writer who doesn’t make sure something like that orbital mechanics problem is correct would be an idiot.
ALAN: It honestly hadn’t occurred to me that he might use a friend. Maybe that makes me naïve, but I just assumed that Heinlein did everything himself because his self-reliance seemed such a fundamental part of his personality.
JANE: I actually have personal experience of having an error in one of my published works – but let’s talk about that next time…
June 14, 2017
The Revenge of Mega Radish!
Yep. That’s a radish. And the thing Jim put in the photo for scale is about the size of a standard baseball – that is, about nine inches in circumference. It doesn’t look real, does it? We should have used a ruler.
[image error]
Mega Radish!
That’s not the only radish that size we’ve gotten, although it is the most pleasingly symmetrical. For those of you who take interest in such things, no, these weren’t seeds intended to grow giant radishes. They were standard Easter Egg radishes.
So, what else (besides giant radishes) is going on here?
There’s the mystery of the missing cucumber and chard seedlings. (Solution: probably snails.)
Or maybe not… We haven’t seen any snails lately. I wonder why?
Join me now and we shall delve more deeply into the mystery.
Darkness has fallen. One by one, the lights in the surrounding houses go out. In the tiny ornamental pond, toads gather among the stems of the blue pickerel weed and aquatic plantain, soaking up moisture before going on the prowl. They are the great night hunters of this urban garden, confident in their supremacy.
But, as the toads are about to heave themselves from their refreshing bath, a peculiar vibration ripples through the sandy soil. The toads sink below the water so only their tiny eyes protrude above the surface. Doubtless this saves them. For, at that moment, from the garden bed west of the pond it comes, moving with astonishing lightness on tiny rootlets, leafy greenery towering above, sensing the least motion in its surroundings: Mega-Radish has arisen…
Forth it stalks, seeking what? The toads do not know. They only bubble sighs of relief as the gargantuan vegetable passes by the pond, and vanishes from sight. But the hawk moths, large as hummingbirds, deep drinkers of the nectar of the sacred datura, are awake, dreaming on the wing, believing at first that what they see is a result of imbibing too much potent pollen.
Moving on many minute rippling rootlets Mega Radish races around the shed, down the path, to a small plot where infant seedlings of Swiss Chard and Armenian cucumbers tremble, rooted in fear, unable to move as the slime trailing terrors, the horrid garden snails, emerge from their daytime sanctuary within the tangle of Virginia Creeper, prepared to engulf the tender leaves of the infant plants.
Night after night this horrid slaughter has been repeated. Night after night the seedlings have been helpless, but tonight the cry for help has been heard. Mega Radish, hero of the garden, has ripped itself from its vegetative torpor and come to save the day.
Red and round, it launches! It rolls! Beneath its incarnadined rind it smashes the snails. They are demolished so completely that their shells become naught but flakes of calcium to feed the soil, their slimy bodies return moisture to the ground. The seedling cucumbers and chard wave their thanks. The arugula – too spicy for the snails, but nonetheless terrified – joins the chorus.
Mega Radish takes a bow and then, on twinkling rootlets, vanishes into the darkness…
Well, maybe not. But it’s a fun idea.
Have a lovely day. May Mega Radish watch over you!
June 9, 2017
FF: Secret Histories
Secrets, especially those long-hidden, are perennially fascinating. They play a major role in all the books I’m reading this week.
For those of you just discovering this feature, the Friday Fragments lists what I’ve read over the past week. Most of the time I don’t include details of either short fiction (unless part of a book-length collection) or magazines.
The Fragments are not meant to be a recommendation list. If you’re interested in a not-at-all-inclusive recommendation list, you can look on my website under Neat Stuff.
Once again, this is not a book review column. It’s just a list with, maybe, a bit of description or a few opinions tossed in.
Recently Completed:
Gardens of New Spain: How Mediterranean Plants and Foods Changed America by William W. Dunmire. This is really excellent because in addition to the subject in the title, it talks about how plants spread, why, and their cultural impact. Additional bonus: histories – going back to earliest cultivation – of various key plants. I seriously loved this book.
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline. Audiobook. Re-listen. Enjoyed again.
In Progress:
The Secret History of Wonder Woman by Jill Lepore. A gloriously footnoted look at the people and events who shaped the development the iconic comic book character. No. I haven’t seen the movie yet! This book was actually a Christmas present I’m finally getting to read.
Murder on the Links by Agatha Christie. Audiobook. Re-read.
The Return of the Twelves by Pauline Clarke. A middle grade story about some magical wooden soldiers twisted up with the juvenilia of the famous Brontes.
Also:
Still working on Smithsonian. Actually reading the current, hi-tech issue while waiting for Jim to finish the one before.
June 8, 2017
TT: A Question of Identity
JANE: Last time you said you had an obvious question for me.
ALAN: Yes – I have three, actually.
JANE: Three? I begin to feel as if we’re entering a fairytale – or at least a Monty Python sketch.
[image error]
A Character in Amber
Prithee, sir knight, what is your first question?
ALAN: The first concerns Roger Zelazny. I hope I’m not betraying a confidence, but you told me once that Roger had put himself into one of the Amber books. Can you tell me about that?
JANE: Oh… Roger’s cameo is hardly a secret. It happens in The Hand of Oberon, the fourth Amber novel. In it, Corwin, one of the Nine Princes of Amber whose tale is told in these novels, ventures into the dungeons and has a short chat with one of the guards.
Is this ringing a bell for you?
ALAN: No, not at all. It’s many years since I last read the book and my memories of it are very hazy.
JANE: The scene is short, so let me quote it in full:
“Good evening, Lord Corwin,” said the lean, cadaverous figure who rested against a storage rack, smoking his pipe, grinning around it.
“Good evening, Roger. How are things in the nether world?”
“A rat, a bat, a spider. Nothing much else astir. Peaceful.”
“You enjoy this duty?”
He nodded.
“I am writing a philosophical romance shot through with elements of horror and morbidity. I work on those parts down here.”
“Fitting, fitting,” I said. “I’ll be needing a lantern.”
He took one from the rack, brought it to flame from his candle.
“Will it have a happy ending?” I inquired.
He shrugged.
“I’ll be happy.”
“I mean, does good triumph and hero bed heroine? Or do you kill everybody off?”
“That’s hardly fair,” he said.
“Never mind. Maybe I’ll read it one day.”
“Maybe,” he said.
ALAN: Oh, that’s nice. As you know, I’ve met Roger and I had several conversations with him. The dialogue in that piece is pure Roger. I can so easily imagine him saying those things. He captured his own wry, sardonic humour perfectly.
Alfred Hitchcock and Peter Jackson always have a cameo in their own films. How good to see a writer following that tradition in prose.
JANE: Yes. But it really doesn’t capture Roger… He wasn’t only wry and sardonic. He could also be ridiculously silly. When we lived together, he used to sing nonsense songs to the cats. He could be sweetly sentimental. When our guinea pig had babies, he was the one who wanted to keep all of them. (We did.)
You don’t need to take my word for these aspects of his personality. The forthcoming anthology Shadows and Reflections includes a final, non-fiction piece by his daughter, Shannon, who was a high school student when she lost her dad. It’s very moving and, of the many tributes to Roger that I’ve read, it comes closest to capturing the man I knew and loved.
ALAN: I’ll definitely have to buy that when it comes out. I only saw Roger’s public face, of course, but I can easily imagine him being all those things.
JANE: What gets me is how many people want Roger not to be Roger but to be one of his characters. The most common are Sam (from Lord of Light) or Corwin (from the Amber novels); a runner-up seems to be Conrad from This Immortal. These people support the contention that these characters “were” him by showing similarities in skills or life experiences, creating the false syllogism that “if this is true, then so must the rest be.”
It’s a long-standing issue, going back to some of the earliest literary criticism written about Roger’s works (interestingly enough, his childhood friend, and literary biographer Carl Yoke is the least likely to make the equation), but one that persists to the diminishment of the multi-dimensional human he was. I’ll stop there lest I begin to rant…
ALAN: That’s actually a very good rant. It generally makes no sense to go that far. You might just as well say that David Copperfield (the hero of the novel, not the stage magician) is Charles Dickens – after all, they are both novelists!
Have any other writers of your acquaintance put themselves into their books?
JANE: Well, yes and no. I can’t think of examples off the cuff, but I certainly know writers who perpetually return to the same themes because they are working out their personal issues. I don’t want to go further than that.
ALAN: Perhaps that’s wise.
I know you quite well, and I’ve read most of your published fiction, but there is nobody in any of your novels that I could point to and say “That’s Jane.” How much of that is deliberate?
JANE: Probably quite a lot. I was very influenced as a Lit student by how some of my professors seemed to want to dwell less on the literary work of an author and more on his or her life. Yeats’s obsession with Maud Gonne. T.S. Eliot’s nervous breakdown. D.H. Lawrence’s various entanglements. On and on… Sure, some of that was in the work, but there was always more, a whole lot more, but much of that was treated as if it had only been created as a disguise for the author “really” writing autobiography.
At the same time, I read T.S. Eliot’s essay “Tradition and the Individual Talent” and was very hit by his discussion of how the artist transmutes life experiences into art. It’s in the second section, if you want to read all of it, but the final sentence captures some of his argument.
“…but the more perfect the artist, the more completely separate in him will be the man who suffers and the mind which creates; the more perfectly will the mind digest and transmute the passions which are its material.”
ALAN: I think natural human curiosity makes a reader want to know more about a writer that they admire, if only to try and understand what makes the writer approach their art in the way that they do.
I think I told you that I used to live in Eastwood, the Nottinghamshire village where Lawrence was brought up. There were still people in the village who remembered him and I’m sure that if he’d ever come back to the village they’d have hanged, drawn and quartered him. Even forty years after Lawrence’s death, there was still a lot of residual anger about the way he’d portrayed them. I’m sure that says something about the literary choices he made, though I confess I’m not sure exactly what.
Cases as blatant as Kingsley Amis, who we discussed last time, are actually quite rare. But nevertheless there’s a very famous SF writer who some people think put a lot of himself into his books. Shall we talk about him next time?
JANE: Absolutely!
June 7, 2017
When the Gods Are Silent E-book Now Available!
Back in January, I promised you there would be lots going on in 2017. The release of When the Gods Are Silent as an e-book – following on March’s e-book release of Smoke and Mirrors – is only part of my keeping that promise. Let me start with When the Gods Are Silent. Then I’ll drop a few hints about other projects I’m working on.
[image error]
When the Gods Are Silent
When the Gods Are Silent is my 1997 mythic sword and sorcery novel. It was my first attempt at writing what is often termed “imaginary world fiction” at novel length – that is, fiction where I created the entire world, as well as the characters and story. My earlier novels: Brother to Dragons, Companion to Owls; Marks of Our Brothers; The Pipes of Orpheus, and Smoke and Mirrors had all used some variation on our world or at least the mythic history of our world or a futuristic extrapolation.
So, in a way, When the Gods Are Silent is an older cousin of the Firekeeper novels which are set in a very complex imaginary world.
For those of you who already have When the Gods Are Silent, I will add that the e-book contains a bonus afterpiece talking about some of the things that influenced me when I was writing the book.
When the Gods Are Silent is available DRM free from Kindle, Nook, Google Play, iTunes, and Kobo.
Want to know more about When the Gods Are Silent? Here’s the cover blurb.
Sharp-tempered, dangerous, yet fiercely loyal, Rabble is a skilled warrior who knows both too much and too little of her past.
Discovered unconscious at the side of the road by the Travelling Spectacular, Rabble willingly becomes a member of this eclectic band of wandering entertainers. But her life and theirs are about to be disrupted by Hulhc, a prosperous farmer who is obsessed with finding the magic that vanished without warning over fifty years before.
Will any of them survive their search for the answer to a question about which the gods themselves are silent?
If you prefer print books, a limited number of the original mass market paperback are still available on my website bookstore.
Prices include shipping and handling. As always, signing and personalization are free!
Now… How about what’s coming?
The other day, someone asked me if all I’m doing is working with getting my older material out. The answer is “Absolutely not!” I’m currently writing a new novel, which takes place in an entirely new setting. The story will stand on its own but, already, the characters are hinting they have other stories to tell.
Moreover, I’m planning to bring out Asphodel, an extremely strange novel I wrote last year. I’m reading the manuscript of Asphodel to a group of friends. When I’m done with that, I’ll give it a final polish and start getting it ready for the press.
Finally, I’m beginning to lay the groundwork for some projects that will take me back to some familiar settings and audience-favorite characters. Since I want to finish a rough draft of my current novel first, you won’t see what I’m working on for a while. So, let’s just leave it at “You asked and I’m listening.”
Consider going to my website and signing up for my mailing list, so you don’t miss any of the new releases, updates, contests, and promotions I have planned for the year to come!
June 2, 2017
FF: Gardens and Games
The long weekend didn’t give me quite as much reading time as I’d hoped, but I managed some.
[image error]
Reading Among the Flowers
For those of you just discovering this feature, the Friday Fragments lists what I’ve read over the past week. Most of the time I don’t include details of either short fiction (unless part of a book-length collection) or magazines.
The Fragments are not meant to be a recommendation list. If you’re interested in a not-at-all-inclusive recommendation list, you can look on my website under Neat Stuff.
Once again, this is not a book review column. It’s just a list with, maybe, a bit of description or a few opinions tossed in.
Recently Completed:
Quartered Safe Out Here by George MacDonald Fraser. Audiobook. A look at the campaign in Burma during WWII, from the infantry, non-officer level – very intimate. I think it could be subtitled: George MacDonald Fraser is not Flashman and wants you to know it.
In Progress:
Gardens of New Spain: How Mediterranean Plants and Foods Changed America by William W. Dunmire. This is really excellent because in addition to the subject in the title, it talks about how plants spread, why, and their cultural impact. Additional bonus: histories – going back to earliest cultivation – of various key plants.
Ready Player One by Ernest Cline. Audiobook. Re-listen.
Also:
Reading back issues of Smithsonian. I’d gotten amazingly behind. Now reading about the Liberty Bell’s coast-to-coast tour.
June 1, 2017
TT: Is That the Author?
ALAN: When we were talking about Cordwainer Smith, I remarked in passing that one of his characters was possibly a representation of Smith himself. That seemed to strike a chord with you and you disagreed strongly. So how about we take a closer look at the idea of writers appearing in their own stories? And perhaps as we examine the idea, we might pin down the reasons why you believe that it is less common than some people think.
[image error]
Kel Untangles the Issue
JANE: I’m all for that. However, I’d like to clarify what it is that makes me uncomfortable: That’s when readers assume that a character is “really” the author. Certainly some authors deliberately fictionalize themselves, but even the specifics of how that is handled are worthy of discussion.
Do you have any examples to start us off?
ALAN: As it happens, I do. Kingsley Amis is a writer I admire enormously. Amis was, shall we say, rather plump and he was also well known to enjoy extramarital affairs. Lots of them. Once when he and he wife were on holiday Amis fell asleep on the beach. His wife took her lipstick and wrote “One Fat Englishman – I fuck anything” on his back. Then she took a photo of what she’d done and sent it to everybody she knew. Amis was apparently much amused (and a little appalled).
His next novel was called One Fat Englishman and the viewpoint character was a serial fornicator. I find it really hard to avoid seeing the author as the protagonist of that novel!
JANE: Since I haven’t read One Fat Englishman, I’m a little crippled in my ability to respond. However, I have read (and really loved) Amis’s Lucky Jim, so I’m with you on admiring his writing.
But let’s look at your contention that “the author” is the protagonist. I’d be inclined to say that Amis used his own experiences and even tried to turn his wife’s indignation to his own advantage, but that’s as far as I’d go.
Why? Because there’s a big difference between autobiography – which itself is fraught with issues as I’ve noted in one of my Wanderings – and fiction. In fiction, the author is free to change events to fit the fictional model. Therefore, before I’d say a character “is” the author, I’d want to read something (essay, comment in interview) saying “Yep. That’s me.”
ALAN: You are correct when you say that “…Amis used his own experiences and even tried to turn his wife’s indignation to his own advantage” and in the absence of any further evidence that’s probably as far as anyone can legitimately go.
But I have information that you don’t have. I’ve read Amis’ delightfully gossipy autobiography Memoirs and I’ve read several reminiscences of him by other writers – notably Colin Wilson’s The Angry Years – and while I don’t think Amis ever specifically said that he was the protagonist of One Fat Englishman, the character and the man himself are so alike in thought, word and deed that trying to tell them apart becomes something of a futile exercise.
JANE: Ah… But then autobiography itself can be an exercise in fictionalizing the self. That’s why reading an autobiography is not always preferable to a well-researched biography if you want to learn about someone. However, I do find it interesting that the person recalled in other people’s reminiscences and Amis’s portrayal of himself seem to be in sync.
ALAN: I won’t ask you to take what I say completely on trust, so let me give you another opinion.
Ever since the Great Library Purge of 2014 I’ve slowly been re-buying old favourites as ebooks. My recently purchased ebook of One Fat Englishman has an introduction by David Lodge, himself a respected novelist and academic. If I may quote:
[The protagonist] is rude, arrogant, snobbish, lecherous, treacherous, greedy and totally selfish… His thoughts, and often his speech, are crammed with offensive observations about Jews, Negroes, women, homosexuals and Americans in general. He eats like a pig and drinks like a fish. He is quite conscious of these traits and habits, and perversely proud of them…
In 1963, knowing little about Kingsley Amis except through his writings, I was puzzled to know why he had taken such pains to create this vividly unpleasant character. In my memory, many other fans of his work were equally baffled and disappointed. But in the light of Amis’s subsequent literary development, and all the biographical information that has emerged since his death, One Fat Englishman seems a much more comprehensible and interesting novel – also funnier, in its black way – than I remembered. It now seems obvious that [the protagonist] was, in many respects, a devastating and prophetic self-portrait.
JANE: Ouch! Talk about using one’s own writing as catharsis. That’s amazing, and really very sad.
ALAN: There’s a very delicate, and hard to pin down, line in the sand here. I think we need to distinguish carefully between characters who are presented as experiencing aspects of the author’s life (because those aspects are important to the novel) and characters who are so close to the author that separating the two turns into rather pointless hairsplitting.
JANE: Elegantly put! Last week, you commented that you felt that Lord Jestacost was, to some extent, Cordwainer Smith putting himself into his own book. Maybe you could examine that contention within the parameters you’ve established in the statement above.
ALAN: I’ll try – Jestacost appears in several of Smith’s stories. As I recall he is generally benevolent (something that is not typical of the Lords of the Instrumentality). Jestacost is politically aware, not afraid to take sides, and very adept at maneuvering his political opponents. Paul Linebarger (aka Smith) was himself all of these things. He was a political and military advisor in China, Malaya and Korea and he (literally!) wrote the book on brainwashing: Psychological Warfare. Jestacost’s role in the Rediscovery of Man has many correspondences with Linebarger’s real life preoccupations.
I’m not completely sure on which side of the line that I drew in the sand Jestacost/Linebarger stands. Perhaps he straddles it. Smith didn’t write enough fiction for us to have any degree of certainty about the question. But there are parallels…
JANE: I see why you would want to say Jestacost “is” Linebarger. I would place the line in the sand by saying that Linebarger used his own experiences to make Jestacost a believable and complex character.
“Write what you know,” after all, is something that would-be writers are often told.
One thing just came to me… In a sense, Paul Linebarger always wrote at one remove from himself. I believe all his work was published under pseudonyms. So, even Cordwainer Smith can be considered a character…
ALAN: Good point! I hadn’t thought of that. Meanwhile it occurs to me that you are a writer and you know many other writers, so I have an obvious question to ask you. Perhaps we can investigate that next time?
May 31, 2017
Pretty Nonsense
Recently, I mentioned to a friend that, as an interruption in a busy weekend that was too full of Things To Do and too little with fun, Jim and I had dropped into an antiques and collectibles mall. My friend asked, “Out of curiosity, what interests you most? Furniture? Jewelry….?”
[image error]
Junk?
My answer probably didn’t surprise her. “Neither. Weird stuff. Oddities. Sometimes flat-out junk. Occasionally, I’ll buy one of those jars full of odds and ends of costume jewelry or buttons. My short story ‘The Button Witch’ came directly from making such a purchase.”
Often I don’t buy anything at all. I just wander around, soaking in all the things that people have decided are important enough to keep, that other people have decided are important enough to buy. I’m not looking for inspiration as such but, without such fueling stops, after a while the only things I would end up writing about would be cats, gardens, and guinea pigs.
Sometimes, though, we do buy something. Old books, especially ones long out of print, are favorites. No surprise there.
Last year Jim bought me a magnificent Chinese brocade shawl lined in velvet. When I protested I had nowhere to where such an elaborate thing, he said, “You can wear it to the Bubonicon Afternoon Tea.” So I did.
Another time I bought a battered wooden lap desk. I took it home, sanded it (with a little help from Jim) and then sealed it with “pecan” Minwax. It still looks a bit battered, but shiny. I’m considering covering the lid with a collage of cancelled postage stamps, and then using it to keep my stationery. However, I need a lot more stamps before I can do that…
Such trips, where what we’ll see is completely unpredictable, are like mini-holiday for the brain. I’m curious. What do you do when you’re feeling a need for stimulation?
May 26, 2017
FF: Immersed
I’m still immersed in my non-fiction reads, but even more immersed in writing and researching, so I’m not reading as much as I’d like. Maybe over the forthcoming long weekend I’ll manage a couple of good hours.
[image error]
A Garden in New Spain
For those of you just discovering this feature, the Friday Fragments lists what I’ve read over the past week. Most of the time I don’t include details of either short fiction (unless part of a book-length collection) or magazines.
The Fragments are not meant to be a recommendation list. If you’re interested in a not-at-all-inclusive recommendation list, you can look on my website under Neat Stuff.
Once again, this is not a book review column. It’s just a list with, maybe, a bit of description or a few opinions tossed in.
In Progress:
Quartered Safe Out Here by George MacDonald Fraser. Audiobook. A look at the campaign in Burma during WWII, from the infantry, non-officer level – very intimate. I think it could be subtitled: George MacDonald Fraser is not Flashman and wants you to know it.
Gardens of New Spain: How Mediterranean Plants and Foods Changed America by William W. Dunmire. Jim gave me this for a gift. Just started.
Also:
Finished my proofing of When the Gods Are Silent, and am moving on to other, mysterious projects!


