Bandy X. Lee's Blog, page 9

Family Courts as Centers of Industrial Genocide, Part 2

An Industrial Complex Lies behind Family Court Genocide

Industrial Element

A common experience upon entering the genocidal machine of Family Court as an innocent victim is one of disbelief: that judicial authorities could really be aiming for one’s complete destruction; that they would knowingly cause such needless calamity; and that there would not be a way out. There is a frantic attempt to regain control: “What if I responded more ‘reasonably’ [to the destruction of my children]?” “What if I produced more proof of the abuser?” and “What if only behaved with better compliance [to their impossible demands]?” As we know from countless examples of genocides, there is almost nothing one can “do”, once one is identified as a target. The illogical methods of Family Courts make little sense until we recognize that we are dealing with an industrial complex that has its goal set on one outcome: the theft of children for their trafficking and destruction of evidence, including potential witnesses and whistleblowers. The Family Courts have this down as a blueprint: removal of children from the loving parent, isolation of them with the abuser, and decimation of the loving parent through plundering her financial assets, destroying her reputation, and putting her in prison or making her a ward of the state. An industrial genocide thus arises from two components: autocratic methods and pecuniary opportunity. Family Courts offer both.

Financial and business interests are no strangers to genocides: for example, they have played major roles in the Jewish, Kurdish, and Darfurian progroms. Family Court genocide is heavily tied to financial incentives. Family Courts not only effectuate the “sale” of children to their abusers but also the transfer of funds along with them, through child support, seizure of assets, and a variety of back-channel, money-laundered, illegitimately-procured sources of funding. There is also the transfer of federal funds to state coffers via the manipulation of Social Security Act Title IV-D, which allows the Department of Revenue and Child Support to penalize a targeted parent for “withholding” financial support the Family Court’s designated sole custodian of a child. These actions can involve seizure of bank accounts, revocation of driver’s licenses, removal of business licenses, and incarceration, which Family Courts employ with the goal of total destruction of a life.

The industrial element, therefore, is a continuation of the mental element of Family Court genocide that deals with opportunity. According to the United Nations (UN):

Importantly, the victims of genocide are deliberately targeted — not randomly — because of their real or perceived membership of [a group]. This means that the target of destruction must be the group, as such, and not its members as individuals. Genocide can also be committed against only a part of the group, as long as that part is identifiable … and “substantial”.

That the victims of Family Court are deliberately, not randomly, targeted is the basis for my argument of genocide based on social group. Once they are identified not only as “mothers and children who allege abuse in Family Court,” but as “loving family members who are emotionally bonded in ways that the abusive father is not,” Family Courts exploit the abuser’s psychological yearning for “revenge”. Hence, the more the proof there is of the abuse, and the more the loving mother tries to protect her children, the more they will be retaliated against — or imputed to be an “alienator” — and acquire targets on their backs for pursuit until their virtual annihilation. The “loving” quality makes them hated objects for violent perpetrators, for they expose the qualities that they lack. It also identifies them as vulnerable, “easy” prey: their empathy not only keeps them from viciously attacking back, but also may prevent them from suspecting the other side’s predatory motives, thus giving the abuser a strategic advantage. Additionally, they are likely to have been traumatized, intimidated, and psychologically manipulated by their narcissistic and psychopathic partners into defending their abuser or faulting themselves for the problems.

(To be continued.)

[image error]

Family Courts as Centers of Industrial Genocide

An Industrial Genocide against Protective Parents and Their Children Begins with Physical and Mental Elements

It will at first no doubt seem excessive to claim that the killing fields of Family Courts warrant a designation of genocide, but the mere assumption that “It can’t happen here!” should not deter accurate observation. This is an elaboration of an earlier article, and I will argue later that what is occurring through the Family Courts is not just genocide but the specific type of industrial genocide.

There are many barriers to seeing the stark reality of the Family Courts, and the first is the name: “Family Court” is self-exonerating. It defies public imagination that an entity called a “Court” would be breaking the law, much less be a criminal enterprise acting in fact as an “alternative court” for “reversing victim and offender,” by essentially eliminating the innocent party (and therefore the evidence). Most would find it inconceivable that an institution bestowed with public trust to protect families would abuse that trust to carry out the most hideous crimes against those it is charged with protecting.

Yet, the inconceivable levels of brutality in the Family Courts actually protect their ability to commit even more brutal acts — since, if anyone were to describe what is actually happening, no one would believe it. And, like most genocides, entire structures exist simply to hide the systematic human rights violations.

However, to define genocide, one need only examine the criteria in greater detail. Here, I will review the physical element and the mental element, as required for the designation, according to the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Then, in Part 2, I will explain how Family Court genocide is a special instance of industrial genocide.

Physical Element

For guilt to be established, there must first be a physical element, which needs to fulfill only one of the following: (a) killing members of the group; (b) causing members of the group serious bodily or mental harm; (c) deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life “calculated to bring about its … destruction”; (d) preventing births within the group; and (e) forcibly transferring children from one group to another.

In relation to Family Courts:

a) Killing members of the group. This action applies, since deaths are certain under given conditions, such as in the removal of a permanent restraining order intended to protect against a violent ex-spouse, or in sending children to their known abusers, while totally negating abuse as a matter that needs investigation. Almost three American women die per day by the hands of their intimate partners, most frequently following separation, and at least one child is killed every six days in relation to Family Court. By refusing to protect women and children from abuse, often stripping their own means of resistance through court orders that send back runaways and incarcerate adults who try to protect, Family Courts are powerful participants in the killings.

b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group. This criterion applies, as above, with an estimate of 58,000 to 361,000 children being sent to their abusers per year in the U.S. For every child murder, there is an even greater number of suicides and hundreds of serious injuries, a large portion of which will be lifelong. The same principle holds for protective mothers, whose often serious, if not lethal, Family Court-caused health harms are increasingly being documented.

c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part. This action applies, since, in addition to seizing children from innocent mothers (and occasionally innocent fathers), physical assets are expropriated, child support extorted, alimony withheld, and legal fees demanded, while “debtors’ prisons” are reinstituted, exceptions to bankruptcy protections made, and professional careers ruined. Protective parents are devastated financially, physically, and emotionally, so that they cannot fight back against unjust rulings, which also ruins their reputation and societal standing. Reports of children thriving with protective parents but deteriorating with abusive ones are aggressively suppressed, as Family Court-sanctioned abuse irreparably harms children, whose lives are beset by psychological and physical debilitation and a life expectancy that is reduced by decades.

d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group. This result may be an unintended consequence. Preventing births entirely is not within the interest of Family Courts, which rely on having children to send to their destruction for their profit. However, new births may fall dramatically, as the trauma of Family Court-exacerbated abuse may render victims incapable of forming families again, or considering having more children.

e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. This action is the foremost goal of this well-organized genocide. From “alienation” accusations to “reunification” camps, and from judge to “expert” custody evaluator, are all in alignment for the forcible transfer of children from protective parents to abusive ones, or from nurturance to exploitation, for a very lucrative (death) industry, estimated at 50 to 175 billion dollars a year in the U.S. alone.

In this manner, not just one but all criteria of the physical element of genocide are fulfilled.

Mental Element

To satisfy the mental element, there needs to be an “intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a [targeted] group, as such.” According to the United Nations (UN):

The intent is the most difficult element to determine. To constitute genocide, there must be a proven intent on the part of perpetrators to physically destroy a … group. Cultural destruction does not suffice, nor does an intention to simply disperse a group. It is this special intent, or dolus specialis, that makes the crime of genocide so unique. In addition, case law has associated intent with the existence of a State or organizational plan or policy, even if the definition of genocide in international law does not include that element.

First, intent is difficult to establish through direct evidence in genocide, since few perpetrators would be willing to admit in explicit statements, either written or spoken, their intentions to destroy especially innocent women and children. Family Courts, especially, have the unique authority to generate their own narrative, to cover up their violence through extreme secrecy and control, and to hide behind “the law.” Within the courtroom, intent may be inferred from actions that belie the “official” narrative: severe shunning of high-quality evidence; aggressive fabrication of false “evidence”; strict control of investigations; engagement of “experts” only from their pool of known imposters; denial of due process; outright felony crimes; and extreme indifference to the suffering, mental and physical decline, and even death of the targeted groups.

Culpable acts are systematically directed against targeted individuals — singled out as “alienators” — who live through a personal holocaust that does not end with mere character assassination, cultural effacement, or simple dismissal; commonly, the means of all meaningful survival are removed through seizure of assets, financial penalties, imprisonment, and deliberate obliteration of social or professional standing. Isolated from others like them because of “court seals” and “gag orders,” their experience is one of the greatest calamities conceivable, involving the loss of one’s children to often slow, calculated, malevolent torture and “soul murder” — which rather make immediate murder seem merciful. These repetitive experiences stand in stark contrast to the experience of other litigants who are not so targeted.

The unique quality of genocide is the special intent, or dolus specialis, of total eradication. This intent develops in stages, as delineated in detail through close examination across many dozens of cases of cynical corruption, reflected in the unconstitutional procedures of Jane Gallina-Mecca, and of sadistic depravity, indicated in the illicit practices of Evelyn Nissirios, who are unfortunately prototypical examples. These unlawful acts condoned in the Family Courts nurture brutality in individual violent abusers by bestowing on them impunity — and a perpetrator’s pathology is such that it continues to escalate until one achieves total annihilation. Many bring a “scorched earth” approach to begin with, but being encouraged and enabled as never before elsewhere, especially by a “court of law,” tempts them to go to the maximum: the obliteration of the lives, or at the very least the personhood, of their victims. This does not only happen with violent perpetrators who have already entered Family Court. Family Court, by offering “alternative justice,” where violent perpetrators become “victims” and can turn victims into “perpetrators”, serve as a compelling recruitment device for the most violent individuals society produces, who discover that they need only to apply for custody to access an easy path to exoneration and perpetuation of their plan to destroy all those they have a vendetta against, which for abusive personalities are those who have come in closest contact with them. Motives are increased especially when there is not just avoidance of prosecution but financial, reputational, and cultural rewards for doing so. Three out of four of women who are murdered by violent partners are killed after they leave them. These are the very pool of men from which Family Courts “harness” their lethality.

The presence of a State or organizational plan or policy can be seen in the Family Court “playbook”. A consistent, repetitious pattern can establish intent, which other organizations have identified as: “​Tactics Used to Switch Custody to Fathers and Conceal Abuse.” Among the noted patterns are: isolation of children from their mother, causing traumatic bonding with the father; “reunification” of children with fathers who have been convicted of violence; keeping protective mothers from their children for lengthy periods without contact or on costly supervised visits; the appointment of “therapists” to brainwash children into accepting the abuse; the facilitation of abusive fathers’ alienation or estrangement of children from their protective mothers; the use of gag orders and sealing of records to cover up paternal abuse and judicial bias; and threats against protective mothers with jail or loss of custody to extort silence and compliance, to mention just a few. For those who frequent the Family Courts, the extreme divergence in expectations from ordinary civil society; the immediate degradation, dehumanization, and persecution of the targeted group; and the remarkable consistency and efficiency across jurisdictions and even regions of the world make immediately clear that this is highly-organized crime, not coincidence.

In this manner, the detailed and general aspects of the mental element of genocide are fulfilled.

(In Part 2, we will discuss how Family Courts meet the criterion for industrial genocide.)

[image error]

A Loving Father’s Cry for Help

Family Courts Not Only Destroy Loving Mothers; They Also Destroy Loving Fathers

I have not independently verified the following story, but it is remarkably consistent with many others I have verified. The Family Court “playbook” is so repetitive, there is very little individual variation: one can almost predict and postdict the entire course of a case, without knowing many details. What Family Courts do is clear: they are a predatory organization that destroys families for its private plunder (judges, Court-appointed actors, and Court-connected “experts” from “the bottom of the barrel” who are all interconnected). They are an affront to the values of humanity, to the children and future society we are trying to protect, and to human decency. Their ugliness and brutality rival the maximum-security prisons where I have worked, where gladiator fights, gang rapes, and murder with impunity flourish — only they are worse, as they force innocent children who cannot fight back into situations of violence, sexual slavery, and death. I reproduce a father’s communication here, with permission, since fathers being caught up in the Family Court carnage are rare but significant — revealing that the powerful and well-funded “Fathers’ Rights groups” do not help loving fathers but should be renamed “Abusers’ Rights groups” — as what they actually foster is a culture of abuse, regardless of gender.

Hi,

I read about you online and am desperate looking for help and at least awareness. I was married to an extreme covert narcissistic woman who destroyed my whole life, also financially. We have 2 children together and I have 1 child from a previous marriage. All of these children have been and are still being abused, sexually, physically, and they have been brainwashed and conditioned. My oldest came forward recently that he had been molested by an older son of my ex. We realized that that same person had also molested my younger son who is 10 now, since he was a baby. My younger son doesn’t speak up, though, and my older son is afraid to do anything legally necessary.

I had almost full custody of the 2 minor children after a courageous and not corrupt GAL (guardian ad litem) did a 2 to 3 year investigation and it was very clear that the mother’s environment was completely inappropriate. Within a year she had that turned around, though, with help of a corrupt parenting coordinator who she most likely paid off and has an extremely bad name here. It is impossible to put in a few words how corrupt and biased that lady is — it is like she enjoys destroying lives.

There is a whole clique of corrupt “mental health” professionals that all know each other and the family court people like judges. My ex had way better finances than I and had a very unethical lawyer who is openly being unethical without any repercussions. He knows the judges, these “mental health” professionals, everybody knows each other.

My now 10 year old has severe trauma and is on a path to suicide, but I can not even get him treatment, because each time a counselor suspects anything, they are bullied out of the door. The counselor he is seeing now is completely controlled by mother and her lawyer. I could not even hold onto a restraining order to the molester, resulting that he can now openly, and with the help of mental health and family court mafia, molest my 10 year old. Mother is openly and clearly alienating the children without any repercussions.

I am a pro se litigant and am not getting anywhere in the Courts, the judge has been playing games, he is buddy-buddy with the parenting coordinator (PC) and her lawyer, and he is openly making sure that nothing goes my way, despite overwhelming evidence of abuse, physical [and] sexual. He is openly punishing me for filing a complaint against his PC, which went nowhere, because everybody is connected.

I have a now 22-year-old who is completely traumatized due to sexual and other abuse, a 10-year-old who is traumatized had been proven to be physically abused by my ex’s boyfriend and is sexually abused by her older son since he was a baby, sent back to these same abusers right after a lot of the abuse was proven due to the corrupt PC and corrupt and unethical counselors. I also have a 9-year-old who is permanently anxious. Both of the young kids are having physical problems, but it’s like the courts and counselors are able to put out and sustain a completely different story, labeling me as some kind of crazy parent on behalf of my ex. It is almost like the judge is enjoying it, and in all his actions he is covering himself. It is like dealing with the mafia who is completely siding with my ex, and hand-in-hand they are destroying children. It is just waiting for something to happen with my 10-year-old now, either to himself or to somebody else.

I am trying to obtain services of a lawyer again, because not having one did get me killed in court, but my business was intentionally destroyed, and I am still in deep debt due to actions of my ex, which in fact the courts seemed to find funny. The PC and judge have continuously made all kind of negative remarks about my financial situation and used that against me. Even after I lost everything I had left in a hurricane, they used that against me. I feel like in this county I stand no chance, because I am permanently labeled and everybody knows everybody. This means in reality that my children have no chance.

My 10-year-old is on his way to become just another statistic, and it will probably be blamed on me. My kids have so much potential, but mom is allowed to completely condition them as loyal followers subject to continuous abuse but so conditioned that they do not speak up. Mom works in the school system and has this clan of flying monkeys, she uses school system resources like lawyers to help her, for instance. It is hard to find a more abusive person than her. Her older son, the pedophile, is who he is because the way she raised him. It’s a whole family of completely disgusting people helping each other and attacking me, and my children are being pulled into that environment.

This was made very clear to the court by the GAL but overturned really quickly, with the judge lecturing me and ridiculing me, stating that everything had changed. It was really only because I dared filing a complaint against his PC that turned him into acting completely against me while covering himself, and it hasn’t stopped since. The coward even had another judge decide over a restraining order I had, because he knows all the evidence and it would have been hard for him to deny that order, but now they were able to throw most of the evidence out due to it being “hearsay”, sending a 10-year-old straight back to his molester, who has been molesting him since he was a baby and further making the road for me impossible, because I was labeled as filing a fake complaint. It’s like being permanently gaslighted by a whole clan of people.

I don’t know how to get out of this mess anymore and how I am able to rescue my children that, with the mental health and family court mafia here, are being systematically destroyed. So I desperately need help, and it is hard because my financial resources are bad. My whole life was destroyed intentionally, and then when I was in the process of trying to get back on my feet, I lost everything in a hurricane.

I see my children being destroyed before my eyes, and I feel helpless and hopeless.

Thanks,

[Name Redacted]

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — Needs to be Prosecuted and Disbarred

Evelyn Nissirios — Needs to be Prosecuted and Disbarred

Criminal Charges are being Brought against Her, but a Civilized Society Needs Law Enforcement

It has been rewarding for me to learn that my articles are helping many to navigate the confusing “Twilight Zone” or “Alice in Wonderland” world that loving parents say Evelyn Nissirios has created for them — where down is up, white is black, and abuse is the best thing that ever happened to their child. However, to truly protect our children, we need to do more. As abolitionist of slavery Frederick Douglass has said: “It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men.”

There is a double-entendre here: a civilized society should stop serial child predators like Nissirios from destroying its budding members in her attempt to benefit “broken men.” This means that Boards of Education, Ethics Committees, and Family Courts should not serve as hiding places for habitual child predators like she. Child Protective Services, already scandalous in New Jersey for missing too many deaths — and hence in 2012 but changing little of its practices — must do better than simply serve to “rubber stamp” wrong (but lucrative) decisions.

Children should not be sent to their rape, battery, murder, and suicide for the financial profit of child predators.

The case that started me following Nissirios is truly one of the most benign among the two dozen or so I have since received of Nissirios’ stomach-churning crimes against innocent children and their loving parents. However, I have witnessed this case firsthand, without needing the mother to break any “gag order” or court “seal” — the chief means by which Family Courts cover up their organized crime — while it illustrates well Nissirios’ modus operandi.

Every person who is told that this mother has not seen or heard from her children, for even one minute in two and a half years, usually gasps — what could she have done that would cause her such a fate? Even murderers get more parenting time!

What if you were told that her only “crime” was to be a model mother, under whom her prodigy children thrived for the first ten years of their lives, in perfect physical and psychological health? Not only that, her lunches were “the talk of the town” for the care they showed, and her parenting skills were famous throughout the neighborhood. Discerning parents trusted her with their children like themselves, and teachers and counselors sought advice for her “way” with children.

However, loving, nurturing, and capable parents are precisely the ones from whom Nissirios finds it necessary to tear children away — not just forcefully and brutally, but using the most barbaric and violent methods possible. Few will believe what happened — except for those living through almost identical experiences under her.

The absentee father of this case, who was nicknamed “photo op dad” for appearing only for five minutes on special occasions, suddenly wanted a divorce: he was smitten with a new, younger mistress. He could not wait to leave the house and even reserved a single’s room for rent. However, Family Court enticed him to take the children, for then he would not only avoid alimony and child support payments but potentially seize the house, demand his legal fees, and even put his ex-spouse in jail (if she cannot pay the exorbitant penalties). This corrupt proposition is often one that abusive, “broken men” find too tempting to pass up.

But this father, having occupied all his time with singles parties, singing lessons, alcohol abuse, violent “indie” films, and his pornography addiction, did not know how to handle children. From the first day of imposing his “parenting time” on them, cries and screams reverberated through the house. Every additional hour with him turned into more cuts, bruises, bloody shirts, and the biggest injuries they had in their entire lives. Yet, Nissirios, as guardian ad litem, kept increasing his “parenting time.”

Finally, the father almost killed his seven-year-old son, when he slammed his head against a window — the way he previously almost killed his daughter as an infant by head injury — which caused him to be on a temporary restraining order. Nissirios was increasing his custody from zero to half-time when she co-conspired with him to kidnap the children altogether.

On his first full weekend with them, the father stole the children’s passports and fled across state lines with them — in overt violation of Court directives — but was discovered because the terrified children called their maternal grandfather. Nissirios said nothing about this, in the same way she said nothing when she learned of the father’s threatening the children with police, arrests, and jail if they did not do as he said — especially frightening after they had been police-escorted to him for refusing his “parenting time.” Nissirios could not let facts interfere with her agenda: she also buried the children’s suicide notes, attempts to set the house on fire in protest, emergency room visits for suicide attempts, emergency follow-up visits after suicide attempts, and letters to the Court asking to fire her for acting as their “enemy”.

Yet, when the mother, on her legitimate weekend with the children — which Nissirios herself assigned — tried to access a pool at a nearby hotel, which was well within Court directives, Nissirios and the father descended on her with a raid by five police officers and ripped her screaming and clinging children from her arms. They had maliciously accused the mother of “absconding”, but the charges were immediately dropped when their obvious lies were exposed. Nevertheless, having seized the children, the father used the opportunity to conceal them entirely, and Nissirios has ensured that the mother could not get a single message to them, while telling them that their mother abandoned them, no longer loved them, and wished nothing more to do with them.

Nine psychiatric professionals, some of them with world renown, have declared the mother not only fit but with “exceptional talent” in parenting. Six forensic professionals, four of whom diagnosed him with a serious personality disorder, have warned that the father is a danger to his children. Yet, through abuse of authority and almost 350 counts of perjury and lies to the Court, Nissirios suppressed them all. There are objective signs of deterioration: despite every effort to block the mother from accessing school and pediatric records, it was revealed that the daughter missed almost half of school since the abduction (she had perfect attendance before); both children are failing to thrive, as they became the smallest in their classes (they were average height and weight before); an orthopedist noted a bone injury in the daughter that was “neglected for months”; the son had more emergency room visits; and both of them have such serious tooth decay from neglect as to need surgery. Now, these poor children may even have contracted hepatitis B! In the meantime, the emboldened father is indeed demanding six figures in “child support,” his legal fees, the house, and offering no alimony (however much he is paying Nissirios, it is obviously worth it!). In addition, he has attempted five times — and succeeded in four — to co-conspire with Nissirios to get the mother and her affiliates arrested on further false charges.

When criminals are not held accountable, they do not stop but “DARVO” (“Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender”), in order to cover up their own crimes. They are, very simply, terrified of the truth getting out. This is why each and every one of Nissirios’ numerous victims should similarly press criminal charges and not be fooled by her “official” appointments, when she is in truth a vicious gangster who violently preys on the children she is supposed to protect.

*This is the thirteenth of weekly articles, as reports of Evelyn Nissirios’ abhorrent acts against children have grown overwhelming. Now, just days after the filing of criminal charges, Emily Kaufman of the Saddle River Board of Education finally answered my communication from over five weeks ago on March 20, 2024, stating, “none of the board members have been charged with nor convicted of any disqualifying crime,” to which I responded, “your refusal to investigate credible charges does not absolve you from responsibility” — which is especially alarming, given the severity of the charges. Saddle River, above all, has endured Nissirios’ brazenly remaining on the Board of Education, after the community explicitly held an election to remove her and indeed voted her out . If a Board of Education is too busy sheltering “broken women” to protect children, then perhaps it, too — like Child Protective Services and the Family Courts  — needs to be abolished.

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — ‘You Had Better Watch Out for Her!’

Evelyn Nissirios — ‘You Had Better Watch Out for Her!’

‘The Amount of Harm that this Woman has Brought to Children is Despicable’

I am not the only one issuing warnings, I have learned. The above is being said by a grandparent, who has seen what Evelyn Nissirios has done to his grandchildren. As an inspector of schools, he meets with principals and superintendents continuously, and he tells them: “Do you know Evelyn Nissirios on the Saddle River Board of Education? You had better watch out for her! Whenever you have to deal with her, be on guard — she is not who she seems to be!” He is alerting, I am told, anyone and everyone who will listen.

Apparently, Nissirios’ victims are now so numerous, the above grandparent has in the process encountered other grandparents whose children Nissirios has victimized. “She is such a psychotic woman,” the health professional informing me of the above commented, based on her own observations. Again, she posed to me the perennial question: “What is wrong with her?”

In the Middle Ages, individuals with schizophrenia were employed for special tasks, as they were perceived as sensing the spirit world more keenly than ordinary people (there is indeed neuroscientific evidence to support this). In our day, we have the more cynical situation of individuals with psychopathy being employed for the Family Courts, as they are seen as being more efficient than normal individuals in horrific deeds such as sending children to their torture and death for monetary gain (there is ample research on their absence of compassion and conscience). Individuals with psychopathy also wear a “mask of sanity” that makes covering up criminality almost seamless (serial rapists and murderers often have this diagnosis).

Nissirios may or may not be psychotic, but there is considerable evidence that she may be psychopathic. I have begun evaluating her at the request of a litigant who is planning to sue her for fraud. Of note, forensic evaluations can take many forms. Objective data are more reliable in assessing dangerousness and criminal personality patterns than a personal interview, in which affected individuals motivated to mislead through pathological lying. Dangerousness, furthermore, may sometimes invoke a societal duty to warn potential victims, including the public. This duty becomes even more binding when children are involved.

In addition, I have the advantage of receiving information from almost two dozen sources. Therefore, I can speak more generally about the most common descriptor I receive in relation to Nissirios: “sadistic”. What does it mean to be sadistic?

The term sadism derives from the eighteenth-century French novelist Marquis de Sade, whose stories of degradation and graphic sexual acts, along with his own sexual crimes, landed him in prison. It does not always have to be sexual, but always involves enjoyment and pleasure from deliberately inflicting pain to others — be it physically, verbally, or emotionally, and frequently through manipulation and humiliation.

A sadist can have devastating consequences on children, adults, communities, or society. Sadism is thought to derive from adverse childhood experiences, such as physical or sexual abuse, that push an individual toward sadism. Societal endorsement may also encourage recurrent cruel behavior that focuses purely on their own pleasure at the expense of other people.

When sadistic personality disorder appeared as a separately diagnosable psychopathology in 1987, in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-III-R), the core feature was a pervasive pattern of “cruel, demeaning, and aggressive behavior, for the purpose of amusement or obtaining pleasure from the suffering of others.” Currently, it is conceived not as a separate disorder but as a trait of a personality disorder, psychopathy, the Dark Triad, or social deviance with impulsivity and rule-breaking.

Current research shows that sadism is most strongly related to increased psychopathic features. Psychopathy is characterized by deficits in emotional functioning, irresponsibility, pathological lying and deception, conning behavior and lack of sincerity, superficial charm, manipulation, and lack of empathy. Convicted male prisoner studies confirmed that all psychopathic components — interpersonal exploitation, emotional impoverishment, parasitic lifestyle, and antisocial tendencies — are associated with sadism.

Sadism has also shown to be connected to narcissistic personality disorder, and sexual sadism in male sexual homicide offenders associated with obsessive-compulsive personality disorder.

Sadism is heavily linked to the Dark Triad, which is composed of three socially maladaptive personality traits: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy. All three concepts are underpinned by callousness, self-promotion, and social deviance. Narcissism implies attention-seeking and fantasizing about unlimited success or power while possessing a grandiose, over-exaggerated sense of self-importance and entitlement. Machiavellianism refers to deception, flattery, and manipulation to promote one’s own interests.

Sadism also has a connection to the basic personality factors in the Big Five and HEXACO models: these are dimensional ways of conceiving personality, through the dimensions of Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness; HEXACO adds Honesty-Humility. Sadistic individuals lack integrity, emotionality, discipline, kindness, and social activity.

American Psychologist Theodore Millon divided sadism into four subtypes in his 2011 book, Disorders of Personality:

1. Enforcing sadism: “bossy” supervisors or deans believing that they have the “right” to be pitiless, merciless, coarse, and barbarous tyrants

2. Explosive sadism: unpredictably precipitous outbursts and fury, uncontrollable rage and fearsome attacks, and feelings of shame that are pent-up and discharged

3. Spineless sadism: venomous dominance and cruelty that are insecure and cowardly, publicly swaggering but selective of powerless scapegoats

4. Tyrannical sadism: relishing of menacing and brutalizing others, forcing them to cower and submit, verbally scathing, destructive, inhumane, and unmerciful

What does all this tell you about Evelyn Nissirios? You decide!

*This is the twelfth of weekly articles, now writing themselves as the horrendous, egregious, loathsome, and lurid actions of Evelyn Nissirios keep coming to light (what can be more monstrous than the torture, maiming, and setting up for murders of countless innocent children?). As long as the child endangerment continues, there is a duty for all onlookers not to remain silent. These pieces are also intended to educate, as reducing today’s victims prevents tomorrow’s perpetrators. More on Nissirios will be revealed in the upcoming book, Judicial Violence: Anatomy of a Family Court Case (the first of two related volumes). Those who have additional information to share can reach me here . Thank you!

[image error]

The Hidden ‘Genocide’ of the Family Courts

The Magnitude, Agency, and Actors Must be Correctly Assessed

My twenty-five years of practicing psychiatry and working with violent offenders have taught me that, when dealing with perpetrators of violence, nothing must be taken for their word and everything should be gauged by their actions. About a year into my researching the Family Courts, I came to gauge the activity occurring inside them as a form of genocide: literally, “killing of a kind” — regardless of what they claim with words alone. I will leave it to lawyers to engage in the legal nitpicking, the bizarre vagaries, and the communication blackout that characterize Family Courts, creating the conditions under which the public can be kept in the dark.

As a physician concerned with life and death and as a scholar of violence who has studied genocides, however — not to mention the sheer body count — my task is to describe, as accurately as possible, what I see. Polish lawyer Raphäel Lemkin coined the term through a combination of the Ancient Greek génos, “sort, category,” and the Latin caedere, “to kill,” to “signify a coordinated plan of different actions aimed at the destruction [of groups], with the aim of annihilating the groups.” Which group? We will define it for now, to be refined later, as: “mothers and children who allege abuse in Family Court.”

I diverge slightly from the 1948 United Nations (UN) Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, which omitted the category of targeted social or political groups, in a compromise that was necessary in the negotiating process with the member state Soviet Union, which objected to the inclusion in order to protect its own actions against political dissidents. I am insisting on the inclusion of social or political group here — for the social group of concern is a distinct group of dissidents in Family Court, and the ideological opinion of concern is that children should be protected from abuse. In this manner, the target for elimination is an idea, regardless of race, religion, ethnicity, or nationality. This accords better with more contemporary scholarship and with my own experience of teaching asylum law at Yale Law School for seventeen years. Asylees in need of protection from government persecution are defined not only by race, religion, or nationality but by membership of a particular social group or political opinion, whether actual or imputed, consistent with the 1951 UN Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees.

Lemkin’s initial conceptualizations, furthermore, bring up a poignant aspect of genocide that repeats in Family Courts:

I was startled by the description of the destruction of the Christians by Nero. They were thrown to the lions while the emperor sat laughing on the Roman arena…. I realized, vividly, that if a Christian could have called a policeman to help he would not have received any protection. Here was a group of people collectively sentenced to death for no reason except that they believed in Christ. And nobody could help them…. I was fascinated … by the great suffering inflicted on the victims and the hopelessness of their fate, and by the impossibility of repairing the damage.

In the U.S. Family Courts, the most heinous human crimes imaginable — the torture, maiming, and murder of innocent children — are occurring at industrial scale, with hundreds of new cases of children per day, day after day, year after year, over decades, in all fifty U.S. states. Yet, these children are not the primary targets, but their mothers (and occasionally fathers) — who, as they witness the destruction of their children — who are murdered at a rate of one every six days — die from grief, suicide, cancer, heart attack, or “broken heart syndrome.” As happens with systematic genocide, the organizers of these massacres are not punished according to the law with death penalties and life imprisonments but rewarded with promotions and multiple billions of dollars a year.

Several litigants under my sister’s Family Court judge, Jane Gallina-Mecca, have expressed the exact same sentiments as Lemkin’s of Christians being thrown to the lions: “I was crying [as she was handing my children to their abuser], and the judge was laughing.” They are part of a group of people collectively sentenced to metaphorical or literal “death”, for no reason other than that they broached the subject of child abuse in Family Court (or were imputed to broach the subject, in the case of the children reporting or resisting to go to the abusive parent, or actual evidence being found of child abuse). Once branded with broaching the subject of child abuse — or “parental alienation” — like being found to be a Christian in Nero’s time, the victim not only loses her children but all her Constitutional rights, her assets, her home(s), her profession(s), her reputation, her dignity, and her freedom (through incarceration, hospitalization, or guardianship), if not her life. The obvious goal is to render the victim litigant incapable of fighting back or becoming an effective whistleblower.

If any of these terrified mothers called the police for help, they would not have received any protection — not by Child Protective Services, not by school officials or medical professionals, and not by the county prosecutor or sheriff. The usual mechanisms of federal court, most of the time appellate court, and most likely judicial review board are nonexistent, because the “discretion” Family Courts are allowed is almost unlimited, unlike other courts. Even the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) takes a “hands off” approach and joins everyone else who falls in line under the implicit understanding that they are not to interfere. This is how there came to be “No Way Out but One” in the 1990’s, but now even the “One” way out has all but disappeared.

Indeed, six murders have surfaced in connection to Gallina-Mecca at this time, as a result of refusing to issue protective orders, arbitrarily removing permanent protective orders, or otherwise provoking situations to make them more dangerous. In my sister’s case, Gallina-Mecca issued a court order explicitly permitting her violent husband to break into her house against the security alarm — an alarm whose very purpose was to guard against him alone — just weeks after he attempted to murder her for a third time. Previously, when there was a protective order against him for causing head injuries to his children, Gallina-Mecca rendered it useless by ordering the children to visit with him over the protective order, placing them in greater danger than if the protective order did not exist! Reports of Gallina-Mecca laughing at victims of domestic violence, her aggressively shunning evidence — going as far as to order one critical piece destroyed — and her insisting once that my sister place herself in a dangerous situation, despite four medical professionals submitting reports that she could die, showed that these actions were deliberate and sadistic. She would come directly to place my sister’s life at risk three times, not to mention place her children under sole, unsupervised custody of the father who almost killed each of them. However, Gallina-Mecca’s actions are not unusual for Family Court culture, which rewards such behavior — and her promotion to being chief judge of the county’s Family Court is unsurprising.

The recent deaths of Catherine Kassenoff — a former special counsel to the New York State governor — and of Sinéad O’Connor — a highly-successful Irish singer — illustrate that legal competence and talented capabilities make matters worse, not better, for mothers in Family Courts. Indeed, among the more than one thousand cases I have witnessed or heard about, there seems to be a correlation between a woman’s abilities, including parenting abilities, and the draconian measures that rain down on them. This would make sense only if the Courts were functioning as instruments of the violent perpetrators who, enabled and emboldened in Family Court, become far more dangerous and brazen in their drive to bring down the capable women and excellent mothers whom they experienced, in their own personal lives, that they could not match. I believe that this has become the case, and Family Courts become the locus of collusion and cooperation with their extreme violence, as a result of the following characteristics:

1. Family Courts are said to be the bottom rung of all courts (“the sewer” of the judicial system, according to one legal scholar).

2. Incompetence and poor quality, coupled with absolute control by a single judge under total secrecy, has encouraged a lucrative abuse industry.

3. The abusers, upon entering “courts” that reward incompetence and enable abuse, grow maximally dangerous and deadly.

4. The abusers’ primary targets are the ex-spouses who have threatened to leave them, to whom they feel inferior, and whose annihilation would “vindicate” them.

5. The abusers’ secondary targets are the children, whose torture and death are compelling paths to causing the torture and slow death of ex-spouses.

Because Family Courts, by enabling or at best not holding accountable abusive personalities, have the effect of ballooning their entitlement, expectations, delusions of grandeur, and unlimited violence with impunity. These individuals, able to weaponize the legal system to enslave, torture, disfigure, and decimate their victims under “legal protection,” become actors in the larger Family Court carnage for profit that has become an industrial organization of genocide.

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — ‘The Most Horrible, Horrible F*ing GAL!’

Evelyn Nissirios — ‘The Most Horrible, Horrible F*ing GAL!’

‘She is the Worst Person I Have Ever Read About or Met!’

Reports on Evelyn Nissirios are accelerating, not slowing down. The latest is by someone in the mental health field. “I didn’t mean to curse,” the person apologized, “but she just put a child rape victim in a pedophile’s arms — she needs a full psychiatric evaluation!” This is again a variation of the recurrent question I have been receiving about her as a psychiatrist: “What is wrong with Evelyn Nissirios?”

“I am in the caring field, and I get very angry when it comes to abuse of children,” the person kept trying to explain. I responded: “Of course it makes you angry, as it should everybody! This is why I try to publicize what the Family Courts are doing as much as possible — it is so unthinkable and so inhumane, it actually helps them to get away with what they do, because people simply cannot believe that something like this could be happening.”

No one could fathom such a thing for one child, let alone a minimum of one hundred sixty children a day, every day of the year, year after year, in every U.S. state — playing a role in one child murder every six days, and the death of innumerable loving parents from grief, suicide, cancer and other stress-related illnesses, or heart attacks and “broken heart syndrome.” Nevertheless, amid this hidden holocaust, kept secret through “court seals,” “gag orders,” terrorism, coercion, and intimidation of the press, Nissirios is the Adolf Eichmann of the Family Courts.

“You cannot even say it is an iron fist and a velvet glove,” said another observer of her and her protector, Judge Jane Gallina-Mecca. “They are an iron fist and an iron fist!” The venomous hatred that comes out of Nissirios, when she coldly and calculatingly as guardian ad litem (GAL) does everything she can to annihilate the life of each child who comes under her charge, is something to analyze. Why is she so eagerly intent on severing healthy child-parent bonds? The stronger it is, the more she seems to attack it with a vengeance. And what drives her to punish excellent — even superb — mothers so viciously from the very beginning, when they have done nothing to her? What happened in her own childhood that has caused this twisted, aberrant vindictiveness toward total strangers? Family Courts derive obscene profits from corrupt practices, but this alone cannot explain her apparently voracious appetite for sadism.

There is still no report of Nissirios’ appearance before the Judicial Review Board, the New Jersey Supreme Court, or any other disciplinary body. How large, then, is her circle of complicity? First, there is the entire Saddle River Board of Education, including past president Jon Peros, current president Emily Kaufman, superintendent Gina Cinotti, Yasmin Elshami, Kaitlyn Lawler, and Elizabeth Salazer, in addition to Nissirios herself. We know from their absolute stonewalling of any communication that they probably conjecture that what I told them is true (and therefore, “hear no evil, speak no evil”). There are also her firm employers, Lawrence Meyerson, Anne Fox, and John Conte Jr., who themselves are mandated reporters who cannot not know about her “professional” activities.

Then there is the Bergen County North Ethics Committee, which has appointed her, likely without opposition, since they are always in need of volunteers — but do they do no screening? Then there is the Office of Attorney Ethics, which has refused to investigate her, based on her “being under the supervision” of Judge Gallina-Mecca. And then there is the Court of Gallina-Mecca herself, who, far from conducting “ethical supervision,” is a criminal co-conspirator with her in multiple cases.

Here is what one brilliant lawyer has said, in his essay about the need to abolish GAL’s in the Family Courts:

Tedious exploration [of an entire body of legal literature on why GAL’s exist] has finally revealed that the answer is not found in the law of the land, but in the law of the jungle. The truth lies in the symbiotic relationship between the tickbird and the rhinoceros. For those not conversant with life in the wild, the rhino roams about with an ever-present tickbird perched just behind his neck feasting upon the living smorgasbord found there. The rhino (family court judge) is relieved of the annoying and award task of disposing of the irritating insects (child custody cases) by delegating it to an eager member of another species (the GAL). In return, the bird is well fed (fees, collected with the help of the court’s contempt power) and enjoys a free ride (immunity from screw-ups).

In other words, they serve no function other than to scratch each other’s back, while preying off the backs of hapless litigants and their children (as of today, the total estimated casualties of Nissirios’ that I alone know about have exceeded one hundred fifty persons). Symbiosis is the mutual relationship between judge and GAL; the relationship they have with litigants who come before them is parasitism.

Entomologist E.O. Wilson characterized parasites as “predators that eat prey in units of less than one.” And, unlike predators, parasites typically live off of their hosts for an extended period — such as child custody cases that can drag on for a decade or more. And so if you find yourself getting angry about the oppression and exploitation of Nissirios or the Nissirios/Gallina-Mecca duo, it is only natural that you do!

*This is the eleventh of weekly articles, initially intended to be a short series, but now writing themselves as the horrendous, egregious, loathsome, and lurid actions of Evelyn Nissirios keep coming to light (what can be more monstrous than the torture, maiming, and setting up for murders of innocent children?). As long as the child endangerment continues, there is a duty on all respective parties not to remain silent. Already, there are indications that victims are better arming themselves, and I, as an expert on violence, also have a duty to prevent future violence, since a large proportion of today’s victims will be tomorrow’s perpetrators. More on Nissirios will be revealed in the upcoming book, Judicial Violence: Anatomy of a Family Court Case (the first of two related books). Those who have additional information to share can reach me here . Thank you!

[image error]

Beware Family Court Doublethink and Newspeak

“Alienation” — “Reunification” — “Best Interests of the Child”

Consider the most unthinkable, heinous human crime: to torture, maim, and murder innocent children. Then consider this happening day after day, year after year, for decades, all across the country. Not in a single state, or a few states, but all fifty U.S. states. This is, without exaggeration, what is happening through the Family Courts, and it is a big, multi-billion-dollar business.

They get away with it through a perversion of legal mechanisms; the abuse of judicial authority; a public that believes, “It can’t happen here!”; and a cottage industry that has sprawled around the Courts to help claim that up is down, black is white, good is bad, and abuse is the best thing for the child. It is a well-oiled, racketeer-influenced corrupt organizational machine, and everyone is in on it: Child Protective Services, law enforcement, lawyers, schools, and hospitals — because if you are not, there is an entire system in place to shut you up and break you down.

Hence, beware when entering the gates of Family Court, noting that this is not a “court” in the usual sense of the word. If you are the innocent party in a domestic abuse situation, you are about to lose all your Constitutional rights, your children, your assets, your home(s), your profession(s), your reputation, and your dignity — no level of exemplary past behavior, successfuly parenting, or prestigious degrees matters. You will come to experience what life is like in a totalitarian state.

George Orwell’s 1984 is Here — and It Actually Arrived around that Year!

Richard Gardner, a proponent of pedophilia and misogyny who killed himself in 2003 by overdosing on multiple medications, slitting his throat, and stabbing himself twenty-three times with a steak knife, was a child psychiatrist “expert” in great demand in Family Court. Since the 1980’s, he provided a useful strategy against sexual abuse awareness campaigns, which he called a “national hysteria,” and claimed that sexual abuse was exceedingly rare, occurring at a rate of one in two million (the actual rate is closer to one in five, according to the most comprehensive epidemiologic study to date by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]). Unable to publish with reputable peer-reviewed journals or companies, he self-published more than two hundred articles and more than forty books over four decades, while serving as an expert witness in over four hundred cases on child custody and sexual abuse.

His recommendation was almost always to award custody to the parent accused of the abuse, even in cases where the child vehemently resisted seeing that parent — in fact, all the more so in such cases. None of his theories went through any standard scientific method of research, and by his own admission, his work was all based on personal experience and personal bias. Yet, because of his strategic usefulness, ideas and characteristics that would be denounced as despicable in all other sectors, including other courts, were almost deified in Family Court. Through his ideas, Gardner was singlehandedly able to transform Family Courts into a sanctuary for some of the most violent offenders, who can carry out their fantasy denials of culpability and their toxic pseudo-masculine agendas with full support of “the law.”

But even as Family Courts “fix” the evidence and eliminate whistleblowers, the statistics bear witness to the atrocities: one hundred sixty children per day are sent to their abusers by Family Court; one child is murdered every six days under the watch of Family Court; and countless loving mothers (and fathers) die from grief, suicide, cancer, heart attack, or “broken heart syndrome,” who might still be alive if not for Family Court. Probe into any (ex-)spousal murder, child murder by parent, or murder-suicide, and the likelihood of Family Court involvement is high — since they overwhelmingly create the conditions. Below is how they do it.

Call Any Report of Abuse ‘Alienation’

Child abuse, as we now know, is extremely common but vastly underreported and largely societally denied. For Family Courts, this constitutes an “opportunity”. Once a mother receives the Scarlet Letter of “alienation” (there are actually many variations: since “parental alienation syndrome” failed to enter any diagnostic system, modifications have included “parental alienation,” “alienating behavior,” or any equivalent description — but the purpose is the same), she becomes the lynchpin for decimation.

This pseudo-medical labeling is in truth the front of an abuse industry that switches custody from the nonabusive, custodial parent to the abusive, noncustodial parent, by claiming that a child’s fear or rejection of an abusive parent is from the preferred parent’s “malevolent” influence, rather than from abuse. It is, in truth, nothing more than naked perpetrator psychology of “DARVO” (“Deny, Attack, and Reverse Victim and Offender”).

Then, Force the Children Go through ‘Reunification’ with Their Abuser

Recent investigations into “reunification” camps such as Family Bridges or Turning Points for Families exposed that, since 2000, Family Court judges sent at least six hundred children to reunification programs that enforced temporary exile from trusted (mostly protective) parents, in order to “reunify” them with rejected (mostly abusive) parents. Thug-like transport agents may seize children by force, without an opportunity to say goodbye to loved ones. While the programs suggested a “no-contact period” of ninety days with the trusted parent, this term was routinely extended to years, according to their extensive investigation. As is well-established in the field of child psychiatry, such abrupt separation from the primary caregiving parent, and extraction from their stable home, is inevitably traumatic. Indeed, it is perhaps one of the most traumatic experiences a child could endure — for even when there is abuse, the presence of trusted primary supports can be mitigating. In the context of the trusted parent being removed, the next most essential component for healing is the ability to tell the truth about what happened, and this is taken away, also. Like the rest of the “alienation” industry, “reunification” programs dubiously assert a “scientific” basis for effectiveness, but a critical review did not show that their evaluations met the scientific standards for admission in the courtroom.

Nevertheless, “reunification” camps persist as the latter stage of Family Courts’ judicial strategy for trafficking children from their safe, nurturing, and protective parent to their dangerous, distrusted, and abusive parent.

According to purpose, “reunification” camps are seldom run by qualified professionals. Randy Rand, who founded Family Bridges, had to abandon his psychology license in 2009 after the California licensing board found several ethical violations. Others exploit loopholes by dubbing themselves “educational” institutions under no licensing board. While court-ordered charges are exorbitant — Family Bridges charges a minimum of 25,000 dollars for the first four days — actual settings are often makeshift hotels or motels in rural areas. An Insider investigation interviewed seventeen youths who had been ordered into these camps, which revealed thoroughly antitherapeutic, “crazy-making” methods: youth likely suffering from abuse were torn from their protective, nurturing parent and taught that their memories were false; that their nurturing parent was harmful; and that the parent they feared and rejected was loving and safe. Many were forced to reconcile with the unsafe parent — who is precisely the reason for which courts were granted the authority to separate children from parents in the first place — not the essential, protective parent necessary for normal growth! Using classic “brainwashing” techniques as described in Robert Jay Lifton’s Thought Reform and the Psychology of Totalism, participants are typically given no choice or voice, are verbally abused and physically deprived, and are threatened with further punishment if they resisted. Unsurprisingly, participants deteriorate acutely, becoming depressed and suicidal, as several former child participants disclosed. One thirteen-year-old girl got so distressed, that she banged on a hotel wall and screamed for help; others calling the police got her to a psychiatric hospital, but the one thing she cried out for — to see her mother — a court order prohibited. Many others were similarly psychiatrically hospitalized, according to Insider investigations.

Declare that All is for the ‘Best Interests of the Child’

The final, most Orwellian step is to declare all this destruction to be in the “best interests of the child.” That Family Courts are largely doing this deliberately is seen from the aggression with which they shun evidence or due process; the proliferation of “alienation” and “reunification” industries, despite proof of harm; the fact that children must “age out” to escape a system that seldom corrects its errors; and the unwillingness to undertake reform, no matter how much “education” is afforded them.

In this manner, while most of the world had been enjoying newfound freedoms over the decades, such as women’s liberation, greater protection for children, and the triumph of science and reason, a dark world of total control, total destruction of parent-child bonds, total asset liquidation, and total destruction of career and reputation have been effectuated, all in the name of Family Court profit. Of course, the violent predators in the name of which all this is done, only grows more emboldened in violence, becomes more destructive, and hence the increase in child murders, murder-suicides, and — when the children are old enough — patricides.

Even a single such case should have been the scandal of the decade, especially committed by court actors under the direction of a judge, but “court seals” and “gag orders” that extend to threatening the press, allow for the atrocities to continue. Even the one judge I have been writing about has at least a half-dozen murders connected to her that I have heard about, hundreds of sacrificed children, and many hundreds more of lives she has ruined forever. Many of these could be capital crimes in some states, but she, instead, is awarded with being chief judge of Family Court! No more needs to be said about this criminal enterprise.

Family Courts are plague upon the land that urgently needs to be exposed and eliminated if we are to safeguard our future.

[image error]

Evelyn Nissirios — She Cannot Hide Forever from the Law….

Evelyn Nissirios — She Cannot Hide Forever from the Law….

A Required Reckoning for Society

Yet another report has come in that Evelyn Nissirios, true to her form, sided with the perverted, child predator. There has been no exception: with her help, the predator can imprison his victim under his sole custody, so that loving adults cannot have access but he has complete control over his sexual slave until she turns eighteen. In most cases, these children are too damaged to recover themselves when they “escape” — and turn to suicide, extreme rage, lifelong depression, and pedophilia themselves.

In some states, aggravated rape of a minor under twelve carries the death penalty. Under Nissirios, the rapist wins custody of the child, and Nissirios is handsomely rewarded financially, makes herself a favorite of corrupt Family Court judges, and hides within “ethics committees” and a “board of education.” She even gets to whet her appetite for the pleasure she derives from maximizing the torture of innocent children — a characteristic those who have witnessed her in Family Court uniformly report. Rewards reinforce her practices, and impunity emboldens her without limit. The failure to contain her at every level is as much an indictment of society as it is of Nissirios.

As a forensic psychiatrist, I worked in many maximum-security prisons, and it is often striking how prisoners themselves have a hierarchical distinction of crimes. No matter how heinous your murders, and how gory your acts of mutilation, nothing is as depraved as being a pedophile. Indeed, we often have to separate individuals convicted of child sexual assault from other inmates for their own safety, since they could be killed instantly.

My perception is that these prisoners are responding to their own experiences of helplessness. Predatory pedophiles are clever, calculating criminals who enjoy near-immunity in society, because of the widespread unwillingness to recognize the sharks in our midst. They take great care to cover their tracks, working themselves into positions of trust, and then stalk their prey under near-perfect camouflage — such as that which Nissirios provides. Yet, the consequences of their violence are witnessed in our psychiatric wards, our prisons, and our graveyards.

My reason for agreeing to write this column is to become a voice for these victims, and for all the good — often excellent — parents who had their children stripped from them, to be sold to their torture, rape, and battery.

We cannot turn away from these most vulnerable victims of society.

For every child who has been sacrificed, there may be a half-dozen loving adults whose lives are also completely destroyed, or at least remain only as a shell of their former selves. This means, from just the cases I received of Nissirios’ alone, there are approximately one hundred forty lives she needlessly destroyed — and I am sure this is just the tip of the iceberg.

We cannot allow predators to continue to go unprosecuted.

All of the above lives are destroyed to advantage the one predator Nissirios is protecting for each case, who often misuses this “opportunity” for further self-harm, anyway, such as in murder-suicides. These are individuals who are not well to start, and as is the principle when treating violent offenders — my area of specialty — the last thing you wish to do is to give them what they want.

Ignorance, incompetence, and evil manifest in other ways.

Ignorance and incompetence are already a dangerous combination, but a lack of conscience makes things exponentially worse. With the hidden undercurrent that Nissirios brings, it is of no wonder that the Saddle River community is languishing. Indeed, this column began also for them, at the request of a local official.

Members of the community are not only unhappy from being under Nissirios’ unwanted coercion, for her refusal to leave the Board of Education, despite the community voting her out. They are dismayed at the ignorance, incompetence, and corruption she has allowed to prevail, by keeping out truly competent, well-educated, and caring individuals who have been eager to join the Board — in some cases, so that they can stop the destruction.

This is very similar to what Nissirios does to the children placed in her charge in Family Court: even though the parents are more often than not far superior to her in education, professional achievement, and parenting ability, she pretends to know more when enforcing a path that ensures maximal injury and cruelty to the children. We know her ignorance is willful from the number of highly-credentialed medical reports and professional warnings she rejects, in favor of her uneducated, biased (and probably pathological) opinion. “If you picked anyone blindfolded off the street, they would be a better guardian ad litem!” one parent lamented to me.

“The school has suffered terribly,” according to several members of the community who are grieving the descent of their beloved institution. The Board of Education is occupied through illegitimate appointments (like Nissirios) or through family and other connections — by those who “do not do any work.” According to these sources, it has gone through six Board administrators and four assistant bureaus in three years, because “nobody can work with” the current superintendent. “We have lost good teachers…. Terrible!”

A Board of Education that harbors a serial child predator is likely to have problems to start. A lot is revealed in its refusal to hear about a member’s transgressions — regardless of the evidence or the credentials of those bringing charges — its seeming lack of educational or ethical background to understand these charges, and most disturbingly the characteristics it shares with Nissirios.

*This is the tenth of weekly articles, initially intended to be a short series, but now growing more serious as the Saddle River Board of Education willfully ignores the demands of its community. As long as child abuse is continuing, I have a legally-mandated duty to report. More on Evelyn Nissirios will be revealed and corroborated through evidence in the upcoming book, Judicial Violence: Anatomy of a Family Court Case. Those who have additional information to share can reach me here. Thank you!

[image error]

A Child Theft Operation: Will Jane Gallina-Mecca Proceed?

What is Unknown about Family Courts is that They Steal Healthy Children and Sell Them to Their Abuse and Death

Family Courts are given the legal auspices to remove children from parents, because society assumes that they are using this authority for good. When we hear of child murders by parent, or murder-suicides, we understandably assume that these cases “fell through the cracks” amid Family Courts and Child Protective Services (CPS) doing their best. This is the how Family Courts and CPS can keep asking for “more judges” and “more resources” for their failures. What we are not considering is the possibility that Family Courts are actually creating these conditions and knowingly causing many of these deaths — and for every murder, a suicide; for every death, hundreds of serious injuries; and for every visible injury, thousands of inwardly shattered lives.

We as a society are unwilling to consider that Family Courts are overwhelmingly abusing their function to remove healthy children from good parents — often excellent ones — to force them into “slavery” with violent abusers. The excuse is that these violent abusers have rights as “parents” (although the hypocrisy is immediately clear — for what about the rights of the good parents they so abruptly, casually, and brutally violate?).

The majority of children who are killed by murder are killed by a parent. Most of the children who are sexually abused are sexually abused by a parent. The vast majority of child pornography is produced and sold by parents of their own children. And the child sex rings in the United States are supplied by the very abusive parents that Family Courts have trafficked children to, away from their loving parents who might have protected them.

Most of the public does not know that we are sending our most precious resources — our children — to what is referred to as “the sewer” of the judicial system. Not all Family Courts are cesspools, and not all Family Court judges are miscreant, but it bears noting that within the court system exists a “Court” that does not follow the law, that harbors organized crime cartels, and that hides its own heinous crimes against humanity.

Children overwhelmingly describe a “life of hell” after Family Courts have trafficked them to their torture, rape, and battery — sometimes after being forced into “reunification camps,” which employ the old, Chinese Communist brainwashing techniques that not even the Chinese use anymore. And this is what these Orwellian Courts claim is in “the best interests of the child.”

It is a system where would-be whistleblowers are persecuted, discredited, and disbarred, where honest judges quit, and where an entrenched culture ousts those who do not “go along to get along.” One can tell who “the worst” judges are by their promotion to chief judge of Family Court — as has happened with Jane Gallina-Mecca. It is no secret who has “sold” the most children, who brings in the biggest revenue, and who is the most corrupt.

Society’s inability and unwillingness to consider that this could be possible within an entity called “Family Court” is the reason it goes on. It is estimated that up to 20 percent of child murders by parent might be eliminated if we abolished Family Courts. A comparable number of child suicides may also be prevented. With one to 1.5 million children experiencing the divorce of their parents each year, and a conservative estimate of 58,000 children being sent to their abusers, we might eradicate a scourge that is almost three times the rate of childhood cancers.

That this was no accident but a well-oiled profiteering machine was evident to me as soon as my brother-in-law filed for divorce. He, the substance-abusing, pornography-addicted, and womanizing absentee father, suddenly became the “fit” parent, and the mother, who once had top security clearance for a government job, suddenly became “mentally ill” — in true Soviet style — and unable to have even one minute with her children. None of this would make any sense, unless it were part of a child theft operation — and it is.

Psychologically “breaking” the good parent is a commonly-pursued goal of the Family Courts, so as to retroactively justify their taking the children. Bringing in gangster-style human rights violations to middle- and upper-class families that never even imagined such violence helps ensure severe enough trauma to incapacitate them from speaking about what happened.

Yet, Gallina-Mecca misjudged my sister to be an easy target. Though mild-mannered and tight-lipped, having served as the New York State governor’s Ground Zero coordinator in the aftermath of the greatest terrorist attack on U.S. soil — 9/11 — she has steely determination. She was giving speeches, after all, before thousands of First Responders on the importance of safeguarding their mental health, when she was just in her twenties.

An alternative is to psychologically “break” the children. Isolating children with their violent abuser, while separating them from all loving adults, is a surefire formula for “Stockholm syndrome” — wherein victims ally themselves with their aggressor, so that they can psychically survive. With vulnerable children, this is only a matter of time, and thus many divorces drag on for more than a decade. This seems to be why Gallina-Mecca periodically interviews her child victims — all at once, assembly-line style — in stark contrast to her extreme suppression of their voices at all other times. She can test if they have been “broken” enough for their words to be used against them — since their saying they “prefer” their abuser is also useful as retroactive justification for having taken them.

The third psychological factor Family Courts evidently rely on and exploit is perpetrator psychology. Abusers are too myopic to notice that they are being “fleeced”, and having eagerly allied themselves with their likeminded, criminal operatives in Family Court, they cannot pull out, either, for then they will face proper prosecution. My brother-in-law is in this position — having sold his soul to Family Court, he is beholden to paying hundreds of thousands of dollars with no end in sight, getting nothing in return but the destruction of his family.

Yet, without a semblance of justification, Gallina-Mecca cannot make a ruling in my sister’s case. To call her “mentally ill” would be ludicrous by any objective standard. A default was entered in August 2022 for my sister’s imputed refusal of a “psychiatric evaluation” (the truth is, Evelyn Nissirios, charged with finding a compromised psychiatrist, in the end could not find one). Yet, ten highly-credentialed psychiatrists and doctorate psychologists submitted their reports, some up to 100 pages long, that the mother did not need another psychiatric evaluation.

A trial date was set for July 2023, already extremely delayed, and then postponed to August, September, October, and November 2023, and then January 2024. It still did not happen — and now the latest schedule is May 2024. The judge seems to be scrambling for some justification — she tried, for example, to accuse my sister of “absconding” with the children after assigning that weekend for her to be with them. She tried to incarcerate my sister for breaking a gag order, but all the information I have on her case is not from her (I even know more than she through independent investigations, not to mention comparison with multiple other, cookie-cutter Gallina-Mecca cases). She tried to incriminate my sister for articles I wrote, but my sister has nothing to do with my articles. Instead, I have direct witness of each of the following players who are involved:

‘Child Therapist’ Barbara Maurer

When Family Court mandated her to be the children’s “therapist”, Maurer knew she could charge exorbitantly without any accountability. Her only task was to make the abusive parent “good” and the good parent “bad”, and to cover up any signs of abuse. Despite not performing anything resembling therapy, which the mother recognized, she would baldly refuse to answer the mother, whereas every message from the father she answered within minutes. The children, who became more suicidal after each visit, finally refused her “therapy”. In response, she locked them in her office and traumatized them, which caused her licensing board to force her to recuse herself — only for Family Court to mandate another children’s “therapist”, this time while concealing the identity of the new “therapist”.

‘Guardian ad litem’ Evelyn Nissirios

As the “children’s” guardian ad litem in Family Court, Nissirios’ one task is to work for “the best interests” of the child predator. In order to do so, she has had to perjure herself 300 documented times. A few months after the father was on a restraining order for almost crushing the skull of his seven-year-old and almost having killed his daughter as an infant, he tried to abscond with the children, having stolen their passports and secretly crossing state lines to take them to a resort hours away from home. This was in direct violation of court directives, and he was caught only because the terrified children called their maternal grandfather. None of this bothered Nissirios, but when the mother picked up her children slightly early on her own assigned weekend — partly because they were distressed and suicidal from the prior, terrifying weekend with their unstable father — she descended on the mother like a hawk, lest she miss a critical “opportunity”. She immediately coordinated with the father to make a false police report, scheduled an emergency ex-parte hearing while keeping both the mother and her attorney in the dark, and orchestrated an ambush raid by five police officers, who would then forcibly tear the crying and clinging children from their mother for her trying to “abscond” with them — when the mother never dreamed of such a thing, was in complete compliance with court directives, on her legitimate weekend with her children, which Nissirios herself scheduled. Nissirios’ plans to arrest the mother foiled when the police immediately dropped the charges upon learning of her lies — but this “error” had always been the plan, proven by the fact that, for two and a half years since, Nissirios has not permitted the mother even one minute with her children.

‘Judge’ Jane Gallina-Mecca

That a Family Court “judge” is the mastermind of this child theft operation is seen from Gallina-Mecca’s extreme control of the narrative. How she has aggressively taken down articles and falsely arrested medical professionals based on secret orders she cannot show anyone has been written about elsewhere. Herself an archetypal sadist, she “mentors” Nissirios on heaping one human rights violation after another to hide their own, staggering criminality. She also endlessly appoints needless court actors to muddy the picture and to parrot her made-up story, while remaining on the payroll. This includes a guardian ad litem for the mother, Linda Schofel — since the psychopathic father’s fantasy fulfillment includes that his wife be “mentally ill.” While throwing out reports from nine psychiatric experts of national and international renown, stating that the mother has “excellent mental health,” Gallina-Mecca incessantly elevated an unlicensed and unqualified “associate counselor,” Tara Devine, because of her willingness to say otherwise. Pediatrician Karen Wu is another player Gallina-Mecca recruited for her willingness to retract her statement about the children’s abuse and to falsify her medical records to match.

The Father

A corporate lawyer and student of Alan Dershowitz, this father has dragged down a healthy, happy, and highly-respected family of multiple generations of successful doctorate professionals to his level of darkness, criminality, and violence through the Family Courts. In the absence of Family Court, he was reasonably contained, despite twelve years of domestic violence, and the children were protected. But the happiness and love everyone shared was incomprehensible to a duly-diagnosed psychopath, and jealousy and revenge (for the childhood he never had) overcame him. Instead of setting limits on such a sick individual, Family Court promised him unlimited power. But holding his children hostage and forcing them to say he is a “good” parent has not made them love him. Attempting to murder his wife six times, twice with the help of Gallina-Mecca and Nissirios (several murders are already connected to Gallina-Mecca), does not erase what makes a “good” parent. By raising unrealistic expectations, Family Courts only worsen the dynamic that can lead to family massacres where a man, because his wife threatened to leave him, kills his children, kills his wife, and then kills himself, thinking: “That’ll show them I am somebody!” In my brother-in-law’s case, it was not even his wife’s threatening to leave him but “stopping to praise” him that unleashed his vengeance against his family.

*The father will be named in my upcoming book, The Dangerous Case of Family Courts, where several other accomplices in child endangerment, such as a school principal and a police officer, will also be named. Additionally, there will be a documentary and a television series to expose the bad actors that Family Court buttressed for its own profit.

[image error]